How to avoid CEL with DP
#1
How to avoid CEL with DP
Hello,
Looking into the RV6 DP w\cat. I live in an area with emissions, as such can not have any CEL's or I don't get my plates.
Is the only way to avoid a CEL to get a fouler showed on their site?
Will the base reflash from Hondata + DP throw a CEL?
Thanks ya'll..
Looking into the RV6 DP w\cat. I live in an area with emissions, as such can not have any CEL's or I don't get my plates.
Is the only way to avoid a CEL to get a fouler showed on their site?
Will the base reflash from Hondata + DP throw a CEL?
Thanks ya'll..
#4
What about this?>
http://www.ebay.com/itm/2007-2012-Acura-RDX-2-3L-Front-Magnaflow-Direct-Fit-Catalytic-Converter-Exhaust-/271735998822?pt=Motors_Car_Truck_Parts_Accessories&hash=item3f44ba4966&vxp=mtr
http://www.ebay.com/itm/2007-2012-Acura-RDX-2-3L-Front-Magnaflow-Direct-Fit-Catalytic-Converter-Exhaust-/271735998822?pt=Motors_Car_Truck_Parts_Accessories&hash=item3f44ba4966&vxp=mtr
#6
#7
The following users liked this post:
justnspace (01-23-2015)
Trending Topics
#10
Drifting
#11
Drifting
#13
Thanks for the pics man.. that think looks sexy!
Its a shame you never see it.. but I guess better to feel it!
This is the one i was looking into!
RV6 Performance | RDX 07-12 Downpipe
#14
Drifting
Yea, I was referring to that ebay one. Which looks a lot like a stock DP; however, I think the member is trying to get a performance DP without trigging the CEL. Which to my knowledge is unpreventable at this time.
The following users liked this post:
justnspace (01-23-2015)
#15
Look at how restrictive the OEM one looks..
https://acurazine.com/forums/perform...totype-879252/
#16
Drifting
I see.. so all you do to avoid a CEL is turn off the sensor through Hondata Flashpro?
Thanks for the pics man.. that think looks sexy!
Its a shame you never see it.. but I guess better to feel it!
This is the one i was looking into!
RV6 Performance | RDX 07-12 Downpipe
Thanks for the pics man.. that think looks sexy!
Its a shame you never see it.. but I guess better to feel it!
This is the one i was looking into!
RV6 Performance | RDX 07-12 Downpipe
#17
Yes Ken this is EXACTLY what I am after.. I want the gains but NO CEL or fouler to "fake" it.
#18
Drifting
I see.. so all you do to avoid a CEL is turn off the sensor through Hondata Flashpro?
Thanks for the pics man.. that think looks sexy!
Its a shame you never see it.. but I guess better to feel it!
This is the one i was looking into!
RV6 Performance | RDX 07-12 Downpipe
Thanks for the pics man.. that think looks sexy!
Its a shame you never see it.. but I guess better to feel it!
This is the one i was looking into!
RV6 Performance | RDX 07-12 Downpipe
#22
Drifting
I would wait on the DP then, and would go with the flashpro and some injectors. Because I don't want you to get the downpipe and a CEL pop up. Currently we are waiting for Hondata to do something about our flashpro tuning capabilities.
The following users liked this post:
justnspace (01-23-2015)
The following users liked this post:
justnspace (01-23-2015)
#24
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
defoulers are there in order to "fake it"
or else the 02 sensors will be seeing lean/rich conditions....which triggers the code.
nothing wrong with extending the 02 sensor so that its outside of the oxygen stream
but what im gathering is that it might not work on the RDX...
as stated, i had to angle mine in different positions in order to get the CEL to go away
or else the 02 sensors will be seeing lean/rich conditions....which triggers the code.
nothing wrong with extending the 02 sensor so that its outside of the oxygen stream
but what im gathering is that it might not work on the RDX...
as stated, i had to angle mine in different positions in order to get the CEL to go away
#25
Drifting
Nope, we are still waiting for further notice from Hondata. I'm sure some cars and pull this off, but with all the sensors running in and out of our exhaust, turbo, and intercooler it's hard to trick.
#26
My DP didnt throw a CEL. No defouler used. This is not and RDX though.
Anything after the cat wont throw a code, so the 3in open exhaust wouldnt matter.
There is a sensor around most cats and another sensor before most cats. Meaning one around the DP and a second around the CAT. This is true in my ILX anyway. Hope that helps a little.
#27
Drifting
No cat will throw a code if there is a sensor in the cat that you deleted with the cat.
My DP didnt throw a CEL. No defouler used. This is not and RDX though.
Anything after the cat wont throw a code, so the 3in open exhaust wouldnt matter.
There is a sensor around most cats and another sensor before most cats. Meaning one around the DP and a second around the CAT. This is true in my ILX anyway. Hope that helps a little.
My DP didnt throw a CEL. No defouler used. This is not and RDX though.
Anything after the cat wont throw a code, so the 3in open exhaust wouldnt matter.
There is a sensor around most cats and another sensor before most cats. Meaning one around the DP and a second around the CAT. This is true in my ILX anyway. Hope that helps a little.
#29
So the RDX, like many modern cars, has two O2 sensors. The primary (pre-cat) is a wideband which measures the actual air/fuel ratio in order to make minor adjustments to the fuel trims in real-time. The 2nd one is after the cat, and is a narrowband that exists solely to measure the performance (or presence) of the cat. Obviously you don't want to mess with the first one.
In my experience (albeit with other cars, not the RDX, but the OBDII set-up is pretty standard), it is fairly easy to have the engine not report the P0420 code (cat inefficiency). BUT, internal emissions code checks will always report it as a "NOT READY", and while this doesn't trigger a CEL, it does cause you to fail emissions if they read you via the OBI port.
Some cars (for sure many 90's / early 00's GM's) allow you to tell the ECU to always report P0420 as OK. So, you're not disabling the sensor, you're actually telling the computer that the sensor is always working fine (even if it's not there). Back in the day I got my old Cavalier through emissions this way when the cat failed. On my previous car this was impossible, and I used a defouler...with limited success.
In my experience (albeit with other cars, not the RDX, but the OBDII set-up is pretty standard), it is fairly easy to have the engine not report the P0420 code (cat inefficiency). BUT, internal emissions code checks will always report it as a "NOT READY", and while this doesn't trigger a CEL, it does cause you to fail emissions if they read you via the OBI port.
Some cars (for sure many 90's / early 00's GM's) allow you to tell the ECU to always report P0420 as OK. So, you're not disabling the sensor, you're actually telling the computer that the sensor is always working fine (even if it's not there). Back in the day I got my old Cavalier through emissions this way when the cat failed. On my previous car this was impossible, and I used a defouler...with limited success.
#30
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (1)
defoulers are there in order to "fake it"
or else the 02 sensors will be seeing lean/rich conditions....which triggers the code.
nothing wrong with extending the 02 sensor so that its outside of the oxygen stream
but what im gathering is that it might not work on the RDX...
as stated, i had to angle mine in different positions in order to get the CEL to go away
or else the 02 sensors will be seeing lean/rich conditions....which triggers the code.
nothing wrong with extending the 02 sensor so that its outside of the oxygen stream
but what im gathering is that it might not work on the RDX...
as stated, i had to angle mine in different positions in order to get the CEL to go away
Fastline Performance Spark Plug / O2 Sensor Defouler, Universal Honda/Acura - HeelToe Automotive
Also adding some material to block the opening helps as well. The TSXs need just 1/16" of a hole. Any larger and the light comes on.
#32
2008 Acura RDX
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Jamaica W.I.
Age: 61
Posts: 1,227
Likes: 0
Received 58 Likes
on
48 Posts
Ok....Guys this has been so called 'solved' a long time ago by a few people. But the trick is that the secondary O2 location has to be moved further down on the dp or even onto the next adjoining pipe. An extension harness had to be purchased in order to connect to the factory plug. As far as I can remember, guys that did this had no more check light issues. A fouler was also used in the new location.
#34
Let me clarify.. I want to know if you can plug in directly the 02 sensor Pre and Post Catalytic Converter with the RV6 DP and then TUNE it to work with the senors in an acceptable range not to cause a CEL.
NO fouler. NO disabling the sensors.
NO fouler. NO disabling the sensors.
#35
Drifting
Ok....Guys this has been so called 'solved' a long time ago by a few people. But the trick is that the secondary O2 location has to be moved further down on the dp or even onto the next adjoining pipe. An extension harness had to be purchased in order to connect to the factory plug. As far as I can remember, guys that did this had no more check light issues. A fouler was also used in the new location.
Not sure how true that is. Haven't heard from those guys in a while. Most people, like myself with flashpro turn off the secondary 02.
#37
If you get the DP, you will have to:
1. Install the de-fouler and hope it works (moving O2 further downstream can help, as noted above)
OR
2. Find a way to disable / deactivate the sensor in a way that still allows you to pass emissions (if your state checks via OBDII, simply deactivating the sensor may not be enough...if the car's emissions self-check never goes into ready state it's as much a fail as having an active CEL)
OR
3. Live with a constant CEL - and perhaps swap the DP out every 1-2 years with stock to pass emissions as needed.
On my old car I could swap it in 45 mins, so that's the route I took. This car...looks slightly more complicated. But then again I haven't tried it, so maybe it's easier than it seems.
#38
Just curious, have you checked the OBDII monitors to see if the catalyst efficiency monitor is reporting as ready or not ready? I'm very curious to see if by disabling the sensor you are truly eliminating the issue or just hiding it. In some places that doesn't matter, but for Phoenix emissions, if the monitor reads as "not ready", it'll still fail even if there is no CEL.
#39
So for conversation purposes if RV6 added a factory cat between the pre\post 02's then it would go to a "ready state" and perform as normal?
#40
Former Sponsor
Our test RDX had a Hondata reflash. No problems at all.
The defouler works just fine. We've sold 50+ downpipes in the last year.
That would defeat the whole purpose of getting a performance downpipe. The defouler will allow the ECU to reach a ready state.
The following 2 users liked this post by Richie v6:
josiahmgillespie (03-03-2021),
protoRDX (01-31-2015)