Buying an 2011 RDX...FWD or AWD?
#1
Cruisin'
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: NJ
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Buying an 2011 RDX...FWD or AWD?
I've decided to buy a 2011 RDX for my wife. Our dealer has the color she wants w/Tech pkg in both FWD and AWD. Neither one of us have ever had an AWD vehicle. We have both lived in NJ our entire lives (no jokes please!).
It's about $2500 more and 2 mph less for AWD.
Is it worth it? Will we really notice a difference in the performance?
Thanks
It's about $2500 more and 2 mph less for AWD.
Is it worth it? Will we really notice a difference in the performance?
Thanks
#2
I have never driven a front wheel drive RDX, but I can't imagine why anyone would buy one. I have driven many front wheel drive vehicles. With this much torque, they inevitably suffer from torque steer. AWD is made for this car. You If you want to save 1-2 mpg you should avoid the $38000 sporty small suv and look into a Prius. Of course this is only my opinion.
#4
Cruisin'
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: NJ
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Actually, I should be more worried about being brain dead and unable to proof read my replies. I should have said, "I agree that if I was worried about 1-2 mph I should buy something else"
#5
Awd - all the way!
Are you still in NJ; the AWD will come in very handy like the blizzard we just had about two weeks ago.
Also the AWD handles like a champ on dry and wet roads. (Almost like a go-kart IMO.)
I would suggest you to test drive both and see the differences.
Are you still in NJ; the AWD will come in very handy like the blizzard we just had about two weeks ago.
Also the AWD handles like a champ on dry and wet roads. (Almost like a go-kart IMO.)
I would suggest you to test drive both and see the differences.
#7
mrgold35
I have a FWD TSX and sh-awd RDX and the RDX is more fun to drive when the road has a few turns at high speeds. Both car go where they are pointed and I can get the wife car sick and the kid sliding in the back (TSX=A-spec suspension + Progress RSB, RDX=Eibach springs + Hondata). FWD is what I need 99% of the time in both cars. Depending on tires, a FWD car will get you from A to B just like an awd car in most conditions. We had 4 inches of snow in NM before X-mas and the wife drove the TSX with Conti DWS compared to the RDX with OEM tires because the TSX felt more secure on the road.
If you think about it, in normal driving conditions you only need the “awd” ability at most. You only use the “sh” in accelerating and cornering at the same time like taking a 35 mph curve at +50 mph. I’ve taken the same 35mph up to 45mph and didn’t see a change on the sh-awd indicator other than plain old regular awd lights. Most folks you see upside down in the median are usually not paying attention to the road conditions and sh-awd is not a substitute for poor driving skills.
If you wife drives the RDX like my wife, sh-awd will not be fully utilized until you get behind the wheel.
FWD RDX = 190 lbs less weight + faster acceleration + better gas mileage + same fun to drive factor + 2-3 less trip to the gas pump per year.
If you think about it, in normal driving conditions you only need the “awd” ability at most. You only use the “sh” in accelerating and cornering at the same time like taking a 35 mph curve at +50 mph. I’ve taken the same 35mph up to 45mph and didn’t see a change on the sh-awd indicator other than plain old regular awd lights. Most folks you see upside down in the median are usually not paying attention to the road conditions and sh-awd is not a substitute for poor driving skills.
If you wife drives the RDX like my wife, sh-awd will not be fully utilized until you get behind the wheel.
FWD RDX = 190 lbs less weight + faster acceleration + better gas mileage + same fun to drive factor + 2-3 less trip to the gas pump per year.
Trending Topics
#8
I have never driven a front wheel drive RDX, but I can't imagine why anyone would buy one. I have driven many front wheel drive vehicles. With this much torque, they inevitably suffer from torque steer. AWD is made for this car. You If you want to save 1-2 mpg you should avoid the $38000 sporty small suv and look into a Prius. Of course this is only my opinion.
#9
#10
Advanced
We just bought a 2011 FWD RDX that my wife will use.
The decision really boils down to use scenarios. If your driving scenario is primarily city driving and you are not an aggressive driver, the FWD is more than adequate. I grew up in Toronto and used FWD on vehicles there -- there was never a need for AWD for the type of driving I did.
Conversely, if you do a lot of country driving or like to push the driving regardless of conditions, then AWD is a big benefit.
The AWD on the RDX provides added traction control as it can shift drive power side to side as well as back and front. Folks who like to drive fast, corner quickly or face much wet/inclement roads find this a big plus for the AWD.
For us, FWD was more than adequate. My wife is not an aggressive driver and our occasional trips to the back roads are more than accommodated by the FWD vehicle. And besides, saving a few thousand upfront and a tank or two of gas over the year works for me! :-)
Whichever you choose, I believe you will love the RDX. We are thrilled with ours so far!
The decision really boils down to use scenarios. If your driving scenario is primarily city driving and you are not an aggressive driver, the FWD is more than adequate. I grew up in Toronto and used FWD on vehicles there -- there was never a need for AWD for the type of driving I did.
Conversely, if you do a lot of country driving or like to push the driving regardless of conditions, then AWD is a big benefit.
The AWD on the RDX provides added traction control as it can shift drive power side to side as well as back and front. Folks who like to drive fast, corner quickly or face much wet/inclement roads find this a big plus for the AWD.
For us, FWD was more than adequate. My wife is not an aggressive driver and our occasional trips to the back roads are more than accommodated by the FWD vehicle. And besides, saving a few thousand upfront and a tank or two of gas over the year works for me! :-)
Whichever you choose, I believe you will love the RDX. We are thrilled with ours so far!
#12
StayAtHomeDad
I've decided to buy a 2011 RDX for my wife. Our dealer has the color she wants w/Tech pkg in both FWD and AWD. Neither one of us have ever had an AWD vehicle. We have both lived in NJ our entire lives (no jokes please!).
It's about $2500 more and 2 mph less for AWD.
Is it worth it? Will we really notice a difference in the performance?
Thanks
It's about $2500 more and 2 mph less for AWD.
Is it worth it? Will we really notice a difference in the performance?
Thanks
#14
2010 TL AWD 6MT: New King
If you are still trying to decide, given your location it's not even worth buying the FWD. Being in the North East it's rare to find FWD or RWD SUVs, people like to know they have AWD for the snow. Also, if performance is what you want, the FWD is definitely NOT what you are looking for.
You may regret buying the FWD when you need it for snow. You won't regret getting the AWD at all.
1-2mpg difference is not a biggie. IMHO.
#16
We just bought a 2011 FWD RDX that my wife will use.
The decision really boils down to use scenarios. If your driving scenario is primarily city driving and you are not an aggressive driver, the FWD is more than adequate. I grew up in Toronto and used FWD on vehicles there -- there was never a need for AWD for the type of driving I did.
Conversely, if you do a lot of country driving or like to push the driving regardless of conditions, then AWD is a big benefit.
The AWD on the RDX provides added traction control as it can shift drive power side to side as well as back and front. Folks who like to drive fast, corner quickly or face much wet/inclement roads find this a big plus for the AWD.
For us, FWD was more than adequate. My wife is not an aggressive driver and our occasional trips to the back roads are more than accommodated by the FWD vehicle. And besides, saving a few thousand upfront and a tank or two of gas over the year works for me! :-)
Whichever you choose, I believe you will love the RDX. We are thrilled with ours so far!
The decision really boils down to use scenarios. If your driving scenario is primarily city driving and you are not an aggressive driver, the FWD is more than adequate. I grew up in Toronto and used FWD on vehicles there -- there was never a need for AWD for the type of driving I did.
Conversely, if you do a lot of country driving or like to push the driving regardless of conditions, then AWD is a big benefit.
The AWD on the RDX provides added traction control as it can shift drive power side to side as well as back and front. Folks who like to drive fast, corner quickly or face much wet/inclement roads find this a big plus for the AWD.
For us, FWD was more than adequate. My wife is not an aggressive driver and our occasional trips to the back roads are more than accommodated by the FWD vehicle. And besides, saving a few thousand upfront and a tank or two of gas over the year works for me! :-)
Whichever you choose, I believe you will love the RDX. We are thrilled with ours so far!
![Too Cool](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/toocool.gif)
Last edited by Mr Marco; 01-07-2011 at 01:34 PM.
#17
Advanced
![BEETROOT](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/lift.gif)
Also wrestrepo makes a good point re geographic availability of FWD and AWD. I know the dealers in Dallas area have FWD as default and AWD is special order... so makes sense that NE would have AWD as most plentiful.
#18
IMO the size alone warrants these vehicles being AWD.
My wife has a 2010 RDX SH-AWD and we came from a 2004 BMX X3 (which was also AWD).
And yes, we're from NJ also and the way people drive during a snowstorm here I would never drive a FWD SUV.
My wife has a 2010 RDX SH-AWD and we came from a 2004 BMX X3 (which was also AWD).
And yes, we're from NJ also and the way people drive during a snowstorm here I would never drive a FWD SUV.
#19
Cruisin'
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: NJ
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hmmm, sounds like I should get the AWD. That's good because today I did, the AWD w/Tech pkg!!! Ironically, today it snowed in NJ!
We pick it up next week since our dealer had to locate the color combo (white/taupe) at another dealer.
My wife's 17 years of driving mini vans ends next week. Now there will be another Acura to keep my 06 TL company in the garage!
Thanks for all the help!
We pick it up next week since our dealer had to locate the color combo (white/taupe) at another dealer.
My wife's 17 years of driving mini vans ends next week. Now there will be another Acura to keep my 06 TL company in the garage!
Thanks for all the help!
#20
Carbon Bronze Pearl 2008
Exactly! Once you go SH-AWD you'll never want a two wheel drive vehicle ever again! It is that awesome. SH-AWD performs year-round whether dry, rain, snow, other. It makes the driving experience so much better in any condition.
#21
![Thumbs up](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/icons/icon14.gif)
Congrats on the new ride! You won't regard it! ~![Thumbs Up](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/thumbsup.gif)
![Thumbs Up](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/thumbsup.gif)
Hmmm, sounds like I should get the AWD. That's good because today I did, the AWD w/Tech pkg!!! Ironically, today it snowed in NJ!
We pick it up next week since our dealer had to locate the color combo (white/taupe) at another dealer.
My wife's 17 years of driving mini vans ends next week. Now there will be another Acura to keep my 06 TL company in the garage!
Thanks for all the help!
We pick it up next week since our dealer had to locate the color combo (white/taupe) at another dealer.
My wife's 17 years of driving mini vans ends next week. Now there will be another Acura to keep my 06 TL company in the garage!
Thanks for all the help!
#24
Cruisin'
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: NJ
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
No problem. I often said during the SUV search that if we can't afford the gas, an option, etc. we should look for something less expensive.
It was an interesting process. I originally had several "luxury" models picked out, but when we drove the RDX and saw all the amenities you get, it made the RDX the winner.
The Infiniti EX35 came in second. The major drawback was the lack of space in the back and in the back seat. It drove like a car, since I think it's a G35 with a hatch.
We are both excited and looking forward to picking it up on Weds.
It was an interesting process. I originally had several "luxury" models picked out, but when we drove the RDX and saw all the amenities you get, it made the RDX the winner.
The Infiniti EX35 came in second. The major drawback was the lack of space in the back and in the back seat. It drove like a car, since I think it's a G35 with a hatch.
We are both excited and looking forward to picking it up on Weds.
#25
B A N N E D
iTrader: (4)
No problem. I often said during the SUV search that if we can't afford the gas, an option, etc. we should look for something less expensive.
It was an interesting process. I originally had several "luxury" models picked out, but when we drove the RDX and saw all the amenities you get, it made the RDX the winner.
The Infiniti EX35 came in second. The major drawback was the lack of space in the back and in the back seat. It drove like a car, since I think it's a G35 with a hatch.
We are both excited and looking forward to picking it up on Weds.
It was an interesting process. I originally had several "luxury" models picked out, but when we drove the RDX and saw all the amenities you get, it made the RDX the winner.
The Infiniti EX35 came in second. The major drawback was the lack of space in the back and in the back seat. It drove like a car, since I think it's a G35 with a hatch.
We are both excited and looking forward to picking it up on Weds.
![Shrug](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/shrug.gif)
also i would recommend SHELL gas too, if readily available to you, most cars seem to the run the best on it personally
#26
Senior Moderator
#27
Safety Car
Glad you made the right choice. There's hardly anything more pathetic or embarrassing than an SUV that can't get around in the snow because it's FWD.
#30
StayAtHomeDad
Sorry, but that's not the reason a car can or not get around in the snow. Put winter tires or chains and anything will move in the snow. As a matter of fact, one of the magazines put that to the test.
#32
weather aside, SHAWD is a performance-oriented mechanism for all of Acura's rides that implement it. Weather imo is of course a benefit but not meant to be the purpose of Acura's system. Its for cornering, grip, acceleration, etc. All of which you would not benefit from in the FWD. Imo, totally different machine and I would not have even considered it, regardless of the location of your residence. Glad to see you made the correct decision for the RDX.
The website comes right out: "Though it has the same all-weather attributes of conventional all-wheel drive, Acura developed its revolutionary Super Handling All-Wheel Drive™ (SH-AWD®) system to enhance high-performance dry-road handling."
The website comes right out: "Though it has the same all-weather attributes of conventional all-wheel drive, Acura developed its revolutionary Super Handling All-Wheel Drive™ (SH-AWD®) system to enhance high-performance dry-road handling."
#33
Safety Car
Originally Posted by wrestrepo
Being in the North East it's rare to find FWD or RWD SUVs, people like to know they have AWD for the snow.
Last edited by XLR8R; 01-09-2011 at 12:26 PM.
#34
StayAtHomeDad
About the NE comment, people think that AWD is the solution to all their problems and it is in fact rare to find a 4x2 or FWD or RWD SUV. Not only dealers don't have them in stock, when you go to sell it you will have a hard(er) time to unload it. What people need to realize is that AWD alone is not the solution, they need good rubber in the snow, whether it's paired up with AWD or single traction.
#35
B A N N E D
iTrader: (4)
Let me elaborate...First we are talking about snow, not off roading or utilitarian use of the vehicles. Given the same conditions AWD will have the upper hand in the snow, however if you were to fit a FWD with snow tires and compare it with an AWD with all seasons, the FWD will most likely perform better.....this is not some crazy theory that I invented, it was put to the test by one of the car magazines, I posted the link before but am too lazy to look for it again. Not only that, I can tell you from my personal experience that I prefer my FWD sedan with snow tires over the AWD RDX with all-seasons....that is until the accumulation is so tall that the front spoiler starts acting as a plow.
About the NE comment, people think that AWD is the solution to all their problems and it is in fact rare to find a 4x2 or FWD or RWD SUV. Not only dealers don't have them in stock, when you go to sell it you will have a hard(er) time to unload it. What people need to realize is that AWD alone is not the solution, they need good rubber in the snow, whether it's paired up with AWD or single traction.
About the NE comment, people think that AWD is the solution to all their problems and it is in fact rare to find a 4x2 or FWD or RWD SUV. Not only dealers don't have them in stock, when you go to sell it you will have a hard(er) time to unload it. What people need to realize is that AWD alone is not the solution, they need good rubber in the snow, whether it's paired up with AWD or single traction.
![Nod](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/nod.gif)
![what](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/what.gif)
#36
Senior Moderator
I got around ok in Jersey in my 1G TSX with snow tires. I am still on the OEMs with my RDX (SH-AWD) in NY and I'm curious to see how it will handle in the snow. With these storms, I still haven't ventured out to experiment. I don't feel like taking a chance unless I have to in my new car. I know I'll have to sometime, though. ![Tongue](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/tongue.gif)
I'm hearing more snow Tuesday into Wednesday....
![Tongue](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/tongue.gif)
I'm hearing more snow Tuesday into Wednesday....
#37
B A N N E D
iTrader: (4)
I got around ok in Jersey in my 1G TSX with snow tires. I am still on the OEMs with my RDX (SH-AWD) in NY and I'm curious to see how it will handle in the snow. With these storms, I still haven't ventured out to experiment. I don't feel like taking a chance unless I have to in my new car. I know I'll have to sometime, though. ![Tongue](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/tongue.gif)
I'm hearing more snow Tuesday into Wednesday....
![Tongue](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/tongue.gif)
I'm hearing more snow Tuesday into Wednesday....
![Annoyed](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/annoyed.gif)
#38
Senior Moderator
#39
B A N N E D
iTrader: (4)
![Tongue](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/tongue.gif)
and other then last week's storm, this is really the only other storm we have gotten here this winter (that has actually stuck to the ground)
#40
Cruisin'
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: NJ
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
We're expecting 6-12" Tues into Weds. Of course we are picking the RDX up on Wednesday. I'm not going to re-hash the AWD stuff, but it'd be nice to drive it home on a nice day. Something about picking up a new car in that stuff and by the time you get home it's full of sand, salt and snow. I guess that's why we have car washes!