Opinions from you people who know your engine stuff
#1
Opinions from you people who know your engine stuff
How do you feel about me getting a stage 2 bisimoto cam with valvesprings & lifters?
There is also a stage 1.2 turbo cam available... would it be best to just wait and get the 1.2 turbo cam after i turbo, or get the stage 2 now and run that with the turbo later?
In other words, seeing as its called a "1.2 turbo cam" is that better for turbo than the "stage 2 cam" or what? They both cost the same for the grind.
Also, if I were to get the cam, what do you guys think about running an h22 trans for higher revving? And about tuning, I know the h series trans can bolt up to the F, but how much tuning would be necessary, would I be best off just getting a new ecu?
Anyways, I plan on getting headwork and all that shit as well.
Thanks, I gotta go to work.
There is also a stage 1.2 turbo cam available... would it be best to just wait and get the 1.2 turbo cam after i turbo, or get the stage 2 now and run that with the turbo later?
In other words, seeing as its called a "1.2 turbo cam" is that better for turbo than the "stage 2 cam" or what? They both cost the same for the grind.
Also, if I were to get the cam, what do you guys think about running an h22 trans for higher revving? And about tuning, I know the h series trans can bolt up to the F, but how much tuning would be necessary, would I be best off just getting a new ecu?
Anyways, I plan on getting headwork and all that shit as well.
Thanks, I gotta go to work.
Last edited by Gnate; 05-10-2009 at 04:52 PM.
#2
One custom CL
all depends on what type of power ur planning on
i say go for it and if you want a H22 tranny im willing to trade
tunning i say S300 but thats me...
i say go for it and if you want a H22 tranny im willing to trade
tunning i say S300 but thats me...
#3
2600lb CL
iTrader: (2)
What is the lift and duration for both cams so we can compare?
Depending on the size of your turbo, I would reconsider keeping your f series trans. Short gear ratios and turbos dont go hand in hand. AGAIN, that depends though on the size of the turbo whether or not it becomes an issue.
Depending on the size of your turbo, I would reconsider keeping your f series trans. Short gear ratios and turbos dont go hand in hand. AGAIN, that depends though on the size of the turbo whether or not it becomes an issue.
#5
Senior Moderator
Regional Coordinator
(Mid-Atlantic)
Regional Coordinator
(Mid-Atlantic)
iTrader: (6)
nate, i'd worry about saving for a turbo more than dumping money on a cam that won't give you much benefit
#6
stage 1.2 turbo cam grind
0.396" valve lift on the intake and 0.410" exh; 220 deg duration on intake and 227 deg exhaust at 0.040"
Stage 2 cam:
0.410" valve lift on the intake and 0.370 exh; 230 deg duration on intake and exhaust at 0.040"
please clean this thread up from noobs other than myself, I actually want a serious thread with people who know stuff.![Sorry](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/sorry.gif)
EDIT BY BLACKACK: Cleaned
0.396" valve lift on the intake and 0.410" exh; 220 deg duration on intake and 227 deg exhaust at 0.040"
Stage 2 cam:
0.410" valve lift on the intake and 0.370 exh; 230 deg duration on intake and exhaust at 0.040"
please clean this thread up from noobs other than myself, I actually want a serious thread with people who know stuff.
![Sorry](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/sorry.gif)
EDIT BY BLACKACK: Cleaned
#7
What is the lift and duration for both cams so we can compare?
Depending on the size of your turbo, I would reconsider keeping your f series trans. Short gear ratios and turbos dont go hand in hand. AGAIN, that depends though on the size of the turbo whether or not it becomes an issue.
Depending on the size of your turbo, I would reconsider keeping your f series trans. Short gear ratios and turbos dont go hand in hand. AGAIN, that depends though on the size of the turbo whether or not it becomes an issue.
Trending Topics
#8
2600lb CL
iTrader: (2)
stage 1.2 turbo cam grind
0.396" valve lift on the intake and 0.410" exh; 220 deg duration on intake and 227 deg exhaust at 0.040"
Stage 2 cam:
0.410" valve lift on the intake and 0.370 exh; 230 deg duration on intake and exhaust at 0.040"
please clean this thread up from noobs other than myself, I actually want a serious thread with people who know stuff.![Sorry](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/sorry.gif)
0.396" valve lift on the intake and 0.410" exh; 220 deg duration on intake and 227 deg exhaust at 0.040"
Stage 2 cam:
0.410" valve lift on the intake and 0.370 exh; 230 deg duration on intake and exhaust at 0.040"
please clean this thread up from noobs other than myself, I actually want a serious thread with people who know stuff.
![Sorry](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/sorry.gif)
OMG was I scratching my head on this one. Really wish I reread your very first post more carefully.
Alright, well, do you know what valve lift and duration is?
Lift is nothing more then a term used for how much/wide your valve is opened.
Duration is a term for how long that particular valve stays open.
Those are not the only 2 things that have an impact when choosing/building the right cam. There is also Centerline and Seperation. To be honest with you, you'll never hear anyone talk about that unless you're talking to someone that knows their stuff. I can tell you right now, the majority of the aftermarket scene talks about Duration and Lift the most. Don't get too worked up over it as those terms are used for those that are building the cams or just really know their stuff.
Knowing just that, it would confuse you looking at the above specs ASSUMING they were both for turbo applications. This whole time I was trying to figure out whether one was meant for a ball bearing turbo and the other for a blade type, lol. I was wondering why on the 2nd cam they brought more air in, but reduced the amount of air coming out, while at the same time keeping it open longer. Man was I stumped till I reread your post and looked them up.
Anyways, the first one will definitely provide you more power with a turbo'd application.
The 2nd one would be interesting if you could ask them to match the valve lift of the exhaust of the first one, and increase the duration. But then we're looking at something that might not be streetable
![Smile](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
Well, after all this was said, I was preparing for your next question. I would assume your next question would be, "Wouldn't the 2nd cam put down more power if more air is coming into the engine".
My attempt to answer that was going to be how much more important that exhaust valve would have been compared to the intake on a turbo'd app, but then came across a lovely quote by your builder Bismoto himself.
The biggest mistake boosted enthusiasts make is place an N/A designed cam in their turbo'd engine: the increased duration, and lobe separation qualities cause lackluster performance due to boost blowing right through the exhaust during the overlap event.
A purposely designed cam for turbocharged applications, like our level 1.2 turbo cam, addresses the need for more exhaust lift and duration than our level 1 grinds, and wider lobe separation to allow you to build boost sooner, and retain it longer throughout the powerband.
Customers have reported excellent gains in DOHC and SOHC powerplants, with our level 1.2 cams. The single cam engines are a lot harder to master, since you have to grind in the lobe separation; it took us 13 different grinds to find the proper LS for the level 1.2...yes, I love to experiment, as my pain is your gain. I guess that is a key advantage of having my own dyno!"
This quote was found on a site I know won't show up (H-T). But I'll post the link anyways as you can always add (H-T) to it. Hope you know what site I'm referring to.
http://www..com/showthread.php?t=2217467
"
Hope this helped you out Nate.
#10
THE GRIM
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: DIRTY SOUTH CHARLOTTE N.C.
Age: 53
Posts: 113
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
How do you feel about me getting a stage 2 bisimoto cam with valvesprings & lifters?
There is also a stage 1.2 turbo cam available... would it be best to just wait and get the 1.2 turbo cam after i turbo, or get the stage 2 now and run that with the turbo later?
In other words, seeing as its called a "1.2 turbo cam" is that better for turbo than the "stage 2 cam" or what? They both cost the same for the grind.
Also, if I were to get the cam, what do you guys think about running an h22 trans for higher revving? And about tuning, I know the h series trans can bolt up to the F, but how much tuning would be necessary, would I be best off just getting a new ecu?
Anyways, I plan on getting headwork and all that shit as well.
Thanks, I gotta go to work.
There is also a stage 1.2 turbo cam available... would it be best to just wait and get the 1.2 turbo cam after i turbo, or get the stage 2 now and run that with the turbo later?
In other words, seeing as its called a "1.2 turbo cam" is that better for turbo than the "stage 2 cam" or what? They both cost the same for the grind.
Also, if I were to get the cam, what do you guys think about running an h22 trans for higher revving? And about tuning, I know the h series trans can bolt up to the F, but how much tuning would be necessary, would I be best off just getting a new ecu?
Anyways, I plan on getting headwork and all that shit as well.
Thanks, I gotta go to work.
as far as trans go you will be fine for now no need to tune unless you have something to fine tune on the dyno when you go i use s300 i love it and when your ready to boost you should get it.
but if your a 100% sure your going turbo dont waste your money on parts to go fast now just to take later this will only keep you from going turbo unless you press in the basement but good luck i hope this was usefull.
#11
Three Wheelin'
Good info Cocoa. I was going to post more about that, but I'm not familiar with Bisimoto cams.
The valve overlap is a big issue when going FI. N/A motors need high compression to compensate for the air that's lost through the exhaust ports. When someone says they have an all motor build with 13.5:1 compression, they're usually speaking of their calculated compression (if the cylinder were completely sealed when the piston is at the bottom of its stroke). Since big cams and high compression go hand in hand, the overlap causes the dynamic compression ration to be less. Pressurized air from a FI application would escape much faster when using N/A cams.
I forgot about HULK22, since you almost never post.
He probably knows a thing or two about turbo set-ups.
The valve overlap is a big issue when going FI. N/A motors need high compression to compensate for the air that's lost through the exhaust ports. When someone says they have an all motor build with 13.5:1 compression, they're usually speaking of their calculated compression (if the cylinder were completely sealed when the piston is at the bottom of its stroke). Since big cams and high compression go hand in hand, the overlap causes the dynamic compression ration to be less. Pressurized air from a FI application would escape much faster when using N/A cams.
I forgot about HULK22, since you almost never post.
![Tomato](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/tomato.gif)
#13
There was a member on here who said he had the hookup at cccylinder heads out in cali... any of you guys deal with them for headwork?
http://www.cccylinderheads.com/main.html
Something like the "hot street" package should be fine for me
I'm thinking of just buying an extra f engine now with lower miles, would make it easier to send parts off and not have driving down time. Should I stick withe the f22 or go f23?
http://www.cccylinderheads.com/main.html
Something like the "hot street" package should be fine for me
I'm thinking of just buying an extra f engine now with lower miles, would make it easier to send parts off and not have driving down time. Should I stick withe the f22 or go f23?
Last edited by Gnate; 05-11-2009 at 11:06 AM.
#15
Senior Moderator
Regional Coordinator
(Mid-Atlantic)
Regional Coordinator
(Mid-Atlantic)
iTrader: (6)
There was a member on here who said he had the hookup at cccylinder heads out in cali... any of you guys deal with them for headwork?
http://www.cccylinderheads.com/main.html
Something like the "hot street" package should be fine for me
I'm thinking of just buying an extra f engine now with lower miles, would make it easier to send parts off and not have driving down time. Should I stick withe the f22 or go f23?
http://www.cccylinderheads.com/main.html
Something like the "hot street" package should be fine for me
I'm thinking of just buying an extra f engine now with lower miles, would make it easier to send parts off and not have driving down time. Should I stick withe the f22 or go f23?
#19
One custom CL
300whp stay with the F. Def. If you go NA then go with the H22 tranny.
Believe me dont get too serious with your parts especialy your cams. You will be changing and feeling out parts by the time you get to where you wana be.
Believe me dont get too serious with your parts especialy your cams. You will be changing and feeling out parts by the time you get to where you wana be.
#20
Mom why is there two?
A cam should be the last thing you do.............................................. We use web cam they have done four cams for us and they did an awesome job, they did forget the grind sheet one time I was like WTF!!!!then they sent it to us in the mail.... Good luck
#21
THE GRIM
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: DIRTY SOUTH CHARLOTTE N.C.
Age: 53
Posts: 113
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
i would say yes and change the finial drive. but i started breaking gears shit in my f22 tran alil over 625hp at the track i just switch to the h22 there gears are alot thicker than the f we will see, but i will miss that long forth gear of the f but hey you got to give to get
![Thumbs Up](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/thumbsup.gif)
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
rockyboy
2G RDX (2013-2018)
170
12-06-2022 02:29 PM