2.3CL vs. 3.0CL??!?!?!
)?
contrarian in fashion
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 9,861
Likes: 19
From: Los Angeles / Highland Park
Originally Posted by subbuzz
don't get them started.......
Thread Starter
Pics coming soon...
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
From: THE 619 BITCHES! (San Diego)
Originally Posted by Palayah8ta
99cl will rape u, hes like 211 to the wheels..
2.3 vs 3.0.. cant we all just get a long..
2.3 vs 3.0.. cant we all just get a long..
211 to the wheels? i doubt it. stock, it comes with 200 to the crank.
2.4 L iVtec
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,327
Likes: 4
Originally Posted by PimpCL23
me and jumpman can go at this shit all day till this thread is closed! so when we say shit to you in the beginning... just take it as a joke and leave it alone... or we r gonna force ur ass to take a whole glass of SHUT UP JUICE
how handsome I am
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 12,983
Likes: 1
From: Miami, FL
Originally Posted by skeeeeet
My 2.2l is by the far the slowest car I have ever owned. The ONLY reason I bought it was for good gas mileage and the nice interior. Oh, it has good looks too. All these posts about "what would I beat" just makes me laugh. Stupid ricers.........
07 tl-s in
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 6,946
Likes: 12
From: NORTH NJ
Originally Posted by agranado
okay drift king lol... It is pretty damn slow compared to a 3.0. No need to start bashing though..
but we all knew this already 
Originally Posted by 5-speed
Its slow, kind of like... you know, a short yellow cheese bus.
4x4- fat chicks cant jump
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,192
Likes: 0
From: NC
Originally Posted by agranado
okay drift king lol... It is pretty damn slow, but atleast our trannies arent made of glass and then they fall out on the road then we try to fix them and we cant cause we suck and people throw round things at us *example-percy* . No need to start bashing though, unless ofcourse its bashing on subbuzz.
Fixed
I have nothing to say to you percy
my cl
Safety Car
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 4,317
Likes: 1
From: TAMPA
Originally Posted by PimpCL23
yup... h22 would pull nasty on the 3.0
i dont know man.. i did my homeboys 98 lude in with my 3.0 i had i/h/e, and he had i/e and i got him by atleast 3 cars at the end and i was still slowly pullin. now my tl-s ate my cl up. bottom top and everything. i miss my cl
Safety Car
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 4,317
Likes: 1
From: TAMPA
besides this has been argued so many times.. if you do a search theres avid of a 2.x vs 3.0 and the 3.0 lost in both races. and the 2.x had i/h/e, and the 3.0 was stock.. ooh yea and the 3.0 couldnt drive for shit. who was that....... 
percy?
Thread Starter
Pics coming soon...
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
From: THE 619 BITCHES! (San Diego)
Originally Posted by 99CL
Sorry it's not 211 its only 206
You said that was stock but there was a previous run on the graph. It stated that there was an 5.1hp increase.... what changed between the two runs?
By the way everybody, I love my CL. Its the finest luxury/performance you can buy for the money. If people want a V6 with an automatic then thats fine too, its just that I LOVE driving a manual. To each his own....
blah blah blah
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 2,260
Likes: 8
From: SoCal
Hamtr3: Those aren't stock dyno runs. Stock you're only looking at 150 or so to the wheel. The increase in the 5 hp was from retuning my VAFC controller. My ride has the basic bolt-ons alot with CL-S Cam
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
DiamondJoeQuimby
Car Parts for Sale
1
Sep 10, 2015 11:40 AM
