Nissan: GT-R News

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 16, 2005 | 07:58 AM
  #201  
F23A4's Avatar
Senior Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 18,020
Likes: 1,740
Originally Posted by 03TL-S
heres a better pic of the 05 interior for the G just for comparisons sake. Now back to topic.



Now how does that look cheap?
.....probably cause it's not made by Honda/Acura. (just playing Devil's advocate on behalf of lessiswhateva)

Nice pic though. Looks like the 05 G took some styling cues from BMW's 3-series IMHO.
Reply
Old Mar 16, 2005 | 09:16 AM
  #202  
titan's Avatar
Safety Car
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 4,411
Likes: 0
From: New Orleans
Originally Posted by gavriil
Actually Nissan has an opportunity here. Why?

If the Z06 will truly be in the mid 60s or even low 70s then there is a huge gap between it and the base C6 model.

So if I am Nissan, I'd make sure the Skyline makes 500HP and pricing it right smack in the middle of the C6 and the Z06. There is your dilema now as a potential Z06 owner: "WHy not save $10K and go with the Skyline which is super exclusive anyway for similar performance?"

Otherwise, as I said above, if the SKyline will perform like a C6 then it has got to be priced in the low 40Ks if it's going to be remotely successful sales-wise.
I agree with everything you said. I've been pretty much thinking the same thing. The GTR will already have the exclusive edge over either the C6 or Z06. It's on Infiniti to get it's product placement right. If I'm a potential Z06 owner, looking at $70K, and then I test the GTR (making 500HP and handling as well as the Z06) at $60K, guess where I'm going? The Infiniti badge and awesome customer service is just icing on the cake at this point.
Reply
Old Mar 16, 2005 | 09:25 AM
  #203  
gavriil's Avatar
Moderator Alumnus
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 16,399
Likes: 8
From: Washington DC (NOVA)
The infiniti service is more than icing on the cake. I totally agree. Whenever I think of any non-luxury car as a potential buyer, I am immediately turned off when I think of the crappy service I will get when I need it. Luxury service is a huge factor currently, combined with the extended warranty that comes with it. Three vs. four years is a big difference.
Reply
Old Mar 16, 2005 | 09:28 AM
  #204  
titan's Avatar
Safety Car
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 4,411
Likes: 0
From: New Orleans
^ Yeap. Nothing like sipping lattes, playing put-put in the dealership, and driving in an Infiniti loaner car to build that customer loyalty.
Reply
Old Mar 16, 2005 | 09:47 AM
  #205  
gavriil's Avatar
Moderator Alumnus
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 16,399
Likes: 8
From: Washington DC (NOVA)
Originally Posted by titan
^ Yeap. Nothing like sipping lattes, playing put-put in the dealership, and driving in an Infiniti loaner car to build that customer loyalty.

And surfing and phoning from free from a disclosed cube
Reply
Old Mar 16, 2005 | 10:23 AM
  #206  
cob3683's Avatar
Burn some dust here
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 5,709
Likes: 13
From: Atlanta
Enough bitching

Nissan/Infiniti needs to go ahead and get the damn thing out......NOW
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2005 | 11:05 AM
  #207  
gavriil's Avatar
Moderator Alumnus
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 16,399
Likes: 8
From: Washington DC (NOVA)

b) Porsche 911 Turbo is going down... in fact, it seems Nissan are already claiming victory (???)... such is their confidence after the Nurburgring tests. Apparently, the first test failed because some driveline hardware was faulty, but the subsequent 2 tests were successful enough for Nissan to make final decisions on the driveline: 3.2L V6 Twin electric-assisted Turbo, FR-L platform (Primary Front engine/Rear wheel drive transaxle, motor-assisted front wheel drive or "e-4WD") with Getrag 7-speed sequential gearbox.

After much deliberation about 3.0, 3.5 and even 4.1L capacities for the VQ engine, they've decided on 3.2. The thing to bear in mind here is the Porsche 911 Turbo... it seems Nissan may want to defeat Porsche with less capacity...

Expected final power output: 480ps @ 7,200rpm, 58.0kg/m @ 5,200rpm.

c) Other specs of note are the "semi-wet sump" (as opposed to the dry sump originally quoted) and the aluminum space frame, steel cabin and bulk usage of carbon throughout.
Source: Autoweek Forums
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2005 | 12:27 PM
  #208  
F23A4's Avatar
Senior Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 18,020
Likes: 1,740
Sounds like about 472hp.... not bad. Let's just see what more turns up.
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2005 | 03:02 PM
  #209  
gavriil's Avatar
Moderator Alumnus
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 16,399
Likes: 8
From: Washington DC (NOVA)
480PS from 3.2 liters will make the high-tech-fashioninsts very happy.
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2005 | 04:09 PM
  #210  
03TL-S's Avatar
Pro
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 638
Likes: 0
From: California
WOW...if the new GT-R can beat a 911 turbo, then that should make a huge impact for infiniti in the car world.
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2005 | 04:14 PM
  #211  
DownUnder's Avatar
Drifting
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,054
Likes: 0
From: Sunshine State
I want the production GT-R to hit the magic number of 500HP!
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2005 | 04:28 PM
  #212  
Maximized's Avatar
Suzuka Master
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 5,579
Likes: 0
From: Chicago Suburbs
Not impressive when you consider that the new Z06 is around the corner.....Make mine black.
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2005 | 07:42 PM
  #213  
gocubsgo55's Avatar
101 years of heartache...
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 3,076
Likes: 0
From: Chicago's North Side/Champaign, IL
sounds very nice. they're going turbo after all i see. i wonder how Honda and Toyota (if they actually are going to) are going to compete with their cars.
Reply
Old Mar 31, 2005 | 12:37 AM
  #214  
chef chris's Avatar
Homeless
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 9,210
Likes: 0
From: Northern DEL-A-Where?
Originally Posted by gavriil
Man!

So many points I disagree with here...

First, what is wrong with the FM platform? You call it a can like it's a Yugo. The FM platform is one of the best platforms in its class right now from any point of view. Nissan/Infiniti have based so many cars on it, it's showed how flexible it can be. And all have been successful. Think if of the Z, the M, the Gs. I mean, it's a total success story.

Infiniti has some issues with interior quality of materials with the G. That's it though, so I dont see a point there either.

Another VQ car? That better have been meant as a compliment for the Skyline. The VQ engine is probably the best V6 ever produced! Read ward's auto on another thread abou the 10 best engines of 2005. The VQ is the only engine making the list for 11 years in a row. No other engine has managed that feat. So what's wrong with the VQ?

Finally, the reason the previous M did not sell is mostly due to its looks and handling characteristics. The case is pretty much the same for the Q also. But as you see they have fixed the M and mind you, it will sell way better than the previous M. So now they need to fix the next Q and the G's interior and they have a great lineup.

Infiniti deserves praise by all enthusiasts. They have corrected so many things in such short period of time, they need to be teaching their techniques to pretty much every other auto manufacturer.
Honestly Gav, I'm super glad you're on this board man...really!!!
Reply
Old Mar 31, 2005 | 12:44 AM
  #215  
gocubsgo55's Avatar
101 years of heartache...
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 3,076
Likes: 0
From: Chicago's North Side/Champaign, IL
Gav, you hit it right on the dot. HOWEVER, (sorry to hate so much), the QX has not been that big of a success. I blame it, however, on the "Big and Roomy" Large SUV "Fad" ending. Appart from that, however, I like what Nissan did to make the Armada into a luxury car. Despite the same exact interior layout, the QX's materials are noticeable better.
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2005 | 09:44 PM
  #216  
heyitsme's Avatar
Safety Car
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 4,426
Likes: 0
From: philly
Originally Posted by F23A4



Although they were compared to each other, the Z, Supra and 3000GT were never sports cars like the Corvette. Rather they were more like high-tech import versions of the Mustang GT, Z28 and T/A. To wit, that high tech aspect led to much higher MSRPs (as much as $62k for the 3000GT VR4 Spyder) that ultimately led to their demise. Admittedly, I dont know what'll come of the new GTR, in terms of the buying public.
I don't think the Supra or 300zx were ever near being compared to a mustang or z28 and instead think the cars themselves were ahead of the times/market where the corvette was able to maintain due to it being an icon.

And due to the Supras popularity I can find articles that brind the Supra into comparos with a ZR1 and 911 :





Originally Posted by gavriil
The Supra, 300Z TT, etc never went directly agains the Vette. They were a Vette alternative for "high tech lovers". Until they shot themselves in the foot and went extinct.

If the Skyline is priced for as much as a base C6, then it will sell fine. Otherwise it wont.

Finally, the STi and Evo are not selling "in large numbers" you wrote. That depends on what you compare them with. If you compare them with the Camry, certainly. But they are supposed to be exclusive cars appealing to a niche market. Same for the Skyline only the price will be higher than the Evo/Sti segment.

I remember an article where they were all compared, forget who won, but non the less I think the cars themselves were within a market.

I'm comparing them(evo&sti) in sorta the same sense I would a vette as a niche car. The vette sells great as a kick ass two door, the evo/sti are jdm hype that really don't sell that much at all. The 350z was able to walk in on those (vette)niche sales because of the value/looks, but beyond 40k a brand like Nissan doesn't hold any value. Its sorta like paying 35k for a hyundai that offers more, why when I have name brands?

Nissan developing a car at this point that would fall into that category of hardcore performance like a zo6 doesn't make sense to me considering everything they've ever done at this point has been to get sales and honestly I see no point in a nissan phaeton to go against the vette. Theres no reason for it. The vette is a one man team, its not a market(chevy has a vette following). All other cars at that price point are luxury cars.

My guess for the GTR at this point is an Infiniti g45, 370hp. Ghosn said the 911 was the benchmark, he even crashed the damn car(company?!! 911), and he's never been wrong yet. And relating to the article, if a zr1 didn't make it, which was way above a zo6 at the time compared to the normal vette, theres no way the base vette ever had tops in the category.
Reply
Old Apr 2, 2005 | 02:20 PM
  #217  
gavriil's Avatar
Moderator Alumnus
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 16,399
Likes: 8
From: Washington DC (NOVA)
Originally Posted by gocubsgo55
sounds very nice. they're going turbo after all i see. i wonder how Honda and Toyota (if they actually are going to) are going to compete with their cars.
It's not 100% clear yet if that turbo engine will actually be used for the USA market. There are rumors that Japan and Europe will get the turbo, but the USA will get a V8.
Reply
Old Apr 2, 2005 | 02:22 PM
  #218  
gavriil's Avatar
Moderator Alumnus
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 16,399
Likes: 8
From: Washington DC (NOVA)
Originally Posted by chef chris
Honestly Gav, I'm super glad you're on this board man...really!!!

Thanks.

Though, I'd say that...I am not just "on this board"
Reply
Old Apr 2, 2005 | 02:24 PM
  #219  
gavriil's Avatar
Moderator Alumnus
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 16,399
Likes: 8
From: Washington DC (NOVA)
Originally Posted by gocubsgo55
Gav, you hit it right on the dot. HOWEVER, (sorry to hate so much), the QX has not been that big of a success. I blame it, however, on the "Big and Roomy" Large SUV "Fad" ending. Appart from that, however, I like what Nissan did to make the Armada into a luxury car. Despite the same exact interior layout, the QX's materials are noticeable better.

Agreed about the QX but since it's not available currently, it's really a moot point for Infiniti's future.
Reply
Old Apr 3, 2005 | 02:03 PM
  #220  
caball88's Avatar
Safety Car
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 3,631
Likes: 0
From: NYC
is it just me or does the instrument cluster look like its floating in that pic? btw i think the G35 interior looks a little better than the previous interior, so its a good change. but the change is still pretty minor.
Reply
Old Apr 3, 2005 | 08:40 PM
  #221  
MaximaPower's Avatar
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,010
Likes: 0
From: H-town
the G's only been out for about 2 yrs...so any change would be "pretty minor"
Reply
Old Apr 3, 2005 | 10:14 PM
  #222  
chef chris's Avatar
Homeless
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 9,210
Likes: 0
From: Northern DEL-A-Where?
The 2005 Looks leaps and bounds ahead of the earlier years. It's easier to see once you have one as a daily driver.

New knobs are 100 x more user friendly.
Reply
Old Apr 5, 2005 | 01:06 PM
  #223  
Motohip's Avatar
I'm a llama :(
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 4,243
Likes: 0
From: Washington
Someone here said it before, but I lost it in all these posts, that the GT-R will never be a competitor of the Corvette. These are two completely different cars with completely different images. A person in the market for a Corvette wouldn't even concider this car or any other. They are not the cross shoppers that look at cars with similar horsepower numbers in the same price range. They are looking for a Corvette. Who cares if this car has this much more power, or cost this much less...they will eventually soup it up and if they are spending that much money, what's another few grand. The typical Corvette owner is like 50 and retired.

I personaly wouldn't concider buying a Corvetter because I don't fit the image and it's not an image I want for myself. When you pay that much for a car it's more about image. Just look at the Bimmer drivers, or worse, ///M drivers . The "typical" BMW owner wouldn't buy a G35 or M45. I say "typical" because people believe all BMW drivers are this way, but they are not.

I don't mean to label and categorize people and their cars, but for the most part and from a marketing standpoint...it's true.
Reply
Old May 25, 2005 | 10:18 AM
  #224  
gavriil's Avatar
Moderator Alumnus
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 16,399
Likes: 8
From: Washington DC (NOVA)
Spied testing with G35 body

Japan’s Future Rockets - - Source: Autoweek




Meanwhile, the car Nissan chief Carlos Ghosn has promised in time for the 2007 Tokyo motor show—the Skyline GT-R—appears to be running through its paces in the form of a super-powered, special-bodied Infiniti G35 Coupe (below). The all-wheel-drive Skyline will be powered by a 450-hp, twin-turbocharged V6 engine, with suspension tuned by Lotus engineers.


Reply
Old May 25, 2005 | 10:21 AM
  #225  
gavriil's Avatar
Moderator Alumnus
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 16,399
Likes: 8
From: Washington DC (NOVA)
This car has taken way too long to finish. Not that it has. It better be good. Real good.
Reply
Old May 25, 2005 | 10:25 AM
  #226  
F23A4's Avatar
Senior Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 18,020
Likes: 1,740
Originally Posted by gavriil
I'm thinking (and I could be wrong) that these pics are of them testing the upcoming GTR powertrain and suspension in a current G35 Coupe.

I hope the R35 GTR great because the R34 GTR was just simply awesome!!
Reply
Old May 25, 2005 | 10:59 AM
  #227  
F23A4's Avatar
Senior Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 18,020
Likes: 1,740
...nearly 2 mos later....

Originally Posted by heyitsme
I don't think the Supra or 300zx were ever near being compared to a mustang or z28 and instead think the cars themselves were ahead of the times/market where the corvette was able to maintain due to it being an icon.

And due to the Supras popularity I can find articles that brind the Supra into comparos with a ZR1 and 911 :


...never said they were compared in the mags.

Incidentally, is this the same Motor Trend that conducted an in depth comparison between the MB CLK55 and Pontiac GTO?
Reply
Old May 25, 2005 | 11:32 AM
  #228  
titan's Avatar
Safety Car
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 4,411
Likes: 0
From: New Orleans
Originally Posted by gavriil
This car has taken way too long to finish. Not that it has. It better be good. Real good.
Damn right. This car is wwaayyy long. Just like the next Sentra. I know that they want to get it right, but damn. And at this point, 450HP just feels a little low. 500HP would make me smile more.
Reply
Old May 25, 2005 | 12:39 PM
  #229  
biker's Avatar
Race Director
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 14,437
Likes: 639
From: Orlando, Fl
Maybe the same focus group that rejected the looks on the Sentra, made Nissan go back to the drawing board with the GT-R.
How does anyone know (other than the engineers) what's under that G35 body?
Reply
Old May 25, 2005 | 01:34 PM
  #230  
MaximaPower's Avatar
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,010
Likes: 0
From: H-town
Originally Posted by titan
Damn right. This car is wwaayyy long. Just like the next Sentra. I know that they want to get it right, but damn. And at this point, 450HP just feels a little low. 500HP would make me smile more.
hmmm...i dont think they're taking long at all...the G35 and 350Z are still fairly new and still creating the "sportiness" of infiniti and nissan....kinda like establishing themselves in the sports car category in the US til godzilla comes
Reply
Old May 25, 2005 | 03:24 PM
  #231  
F23A4's Avatar
Senior Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 18,020
Likes: 1,740
Originally Posted by MaximaPower
hmmm...i dont think they're taking long at all...the G35 and 350Z are still fairly new and still creating the "sportiness" of infiniti and nissan....kinda like establishing themselves in the sports car category in the US til godzilla comes
At this point, the new GTR may be on a V36 platform as the V35 is already well into it's 3rd model year. With talk of the new GTR being a 2007MY or 2008MY, it'll more than likely be on a new platform (unless Nissan extends the V35 a year or two...a la B15 Sentra).
Reply
Old May 25, 2005 | 03:28 PM
  #232  
CGTSX2004's Avatar
Team Owner
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 24,299
Likes: 380
From: Beach Cities, CA
Wonder what the pricetag will be?
Reply
Old May 25, 2005 | 03:32 PM
  #233  
MaximaPower's Avatar
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,010
Likes: 0
From: H-town
Originally Posted by F23A4
At this point, the new GTR may be on a V36 platform as the V35 is already well into it's 3rd model year. With talk of the new GTR being a 2007MY or 2008MY, it'll more than likely be on a new platform (unless Nissan extends the V35 a year or two...a la B15 Sentra).
well dats a good reason right there for nissan to hold out on the GTR.....if nissan had released the GTR earlier, then there would b too many sports cars out for nissan at such a short amount of time.....the Z, G35, & GTR...

look at all the kinks nissan had to work out for the Z and G35

the Z & G35 needed time to set the tone for the GTR, since i'm guessing it'll b priced much higher than the other two
Reply
Old May 25, 2005 | 08:32 PM
  #234  
stangg172004's Avatar
_____ like a rabbit
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 8,594
Likes: 12
From: Edgewater, Chicago, IL
this shit better be good, i mean come on, im sick of waiting to c how its going to look/perform/be priced/come here/ext
Reply
Old May 25, 2005 | 10:38 PM
  #235  
cusdaddy's Avatar
Suzuka Master
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 7,083
Likes: 0
From: Los Angeles, CA
I'm a big Nissan fan and I own a Z, but I agree that it's taken Nissan too long to get this Skyline released. I'm sick of the news and lost much of the excitement I previously had for the car. I'm sure it will be great if it's ever released.
Reply
Old May 26, 2005 | 09:34 AM
  #236  
titan's Avatar
Safety Car
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 4,411
Likes: 0
From: New Orleans
Originally Posted by stangg172004
this shit better be good, i mean come on, im sick of waiting to c how its going to look/perform/be priced/come here/ext
Yeah, that's what I was sayin'. I mean, I know you want to get it right, but damn. We've been talking about this car for more than a few years now...
Reply
Old May 26, 2005 | 09:58 AM
  #237  
gavriil's Avatar
Moderator Alumnus
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 16,399
Likes: 8
From: Washington DC (NOVA)
Originally Posted by CGTSX2004
Wonder what the pricetag will be?
That will depend a lot on the name assigned. Nissan or Infiniti. But overall I think that starting at the very high 40s or low 50s is probable. Well equipped $55K-$58K.
Reply
Old May 26, 2005 | 10:04 AM
  #238  
dom's Avatar
dom
Senior Moderator
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 47,710
Likes: 801
From: Toronto, Canada
Originally Posted by heyitsme


The good ole days when MT was a good mag
Reply
Old May 28, 2005 | 01:19 AM
  #239  
gocubsgo55's Avatar
101 years of heartache...
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 3,076
Likes: 0
From: Chicago's North Side/Champaign, IL
guys keep in mind, they had an R35 set in the plans, then Nissan almost went bankrupt. When Messiah Ghosn came, he turned them around and promised to restore the GT-R building program.
Reply
Old May 28, 2005 | 07:00 PM
  #240  
heyitsme's Avatar
Safety Car
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 4,426
Likes: 0
From: philly
The Gtr pre-USA is one thing, it will be interesting to see how they have to adapt the car in order to sell it here and around the world including Japan where buyers are used to turbo powerz. Think F/I would satisfy japanese tuners, luxury performance buyers and worldwide tuners at the same time.
Without F/I, large V8, 5.0+ with heavy nismo aftermarket support.
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:09 AM.