Technology Discussion: Text Messaging
#1
Thread Starter
Team Owner
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 30,991
Likes: 582
From: Fontana, California
Technology Discussion: Text Messaging
So I read an article on Engadget about text messaging and it's rising costs. You can find the article here -> http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/10/s...ssaging-rates/
I know Engadget may not be the most credible source of news journalism, nonetheless it got me thinking about text messaging.
With technology innovation as rampant as it is why is it that text messaging issues still plague us? The issues I'm referring to in specific are unsolicited text messages which is slowly becoming more and more of a problem.
1) Most, if not all carriers allow you to send a text message to one of their subscribers phones by using a form on their website and enter the users phone number with a message. I think this is one of the stupidest services that could be offered, because there is no validation on who is sending the message so anyone could spam another person with text messages.
2) I have yet to see ANY carrier implement a blacklist/whitelist feature for text messaging where the user chooses who can text them so as to avoid unnecessary text message charges. Hell it could even help parents protect their kids now that more and more of them are getting cell phones at younger and younger ages.
It's no wonder why these technology innovations haven't been applied or fixed. It's because they make money of fthe problems and until someone tells them to fix it, why should they.
/discuss (if you want)
I know Engadget may not be the most credible source of news journalism, nonetheless it got me thinking about text messaging.
With technology innovation as rampant as it is why is it that text messaging issues still plague us? The issues I'm referring to in specific are unsolicited text messages which is slowly becoming more and more of a problem.
1) Most, if not all carriers allow you to send a text message to one of their subscribers phones by using a form on their website and enter the users phone number with a message. I think this is one of the stupidest services that could be offered, because there is no validation on who is sending the message so anyone could spam another person with text messages.
2) I have yet to see ANY carrier implement a blacklist/whitelist feature for text messaging where the user chooses who can text them so as to avoid unnecessary text message charges. Hell it could even help parents protect their kids now that more and more of them are getting cell phones at younger and younger ages.
It's no wonder why these technology innovations haven't been applied or fixed. It's because they make money of fthe problems and until someone tells them to fix it, why should they.
/discuss (if you want)
#2
I never thought about spamming from the internet....thanks for the idea!
But yeah, this sentence pretty much sums it nicely.
But yeah, this sentence pretty much sums it nicely.
It's because they make money of fthe problems and until someone tells them to fix it, why should they
#4
Thread Starter
Team Owner
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 30,991
Likes: 582
From: Fontana, California
As long as something can be done with any chance of not being held accountable or caught, the action will continue. Like SSN, DL# that stay with you for life, it's almost as if IP addresses should stay with you for life and if you need more, you request more. Sure they can be spoofed, but Dynamic addresses only makes it easier.
#6
In my opinion, there are only two reasons text messaging is as popular as it is today:
A) Where the masses are concerned, it's been around longer than email enabled phones and has become ubiquitous.
B) Usability: even on phones that are email-enabled, it's usually easier to send a quick text message than it is to send a quick email.
As your average phone gets more and more sophisticated and powerful, email on the phone will also become ubiquitous and the horsepower of under the hood will allow for more sophisticated email client apps which address much of the usability concerns. You can also take this same line of thought and apply it to IM clients on phones.
So on the one hand, carriers are making money by selling their text messaging services, but on the other hand, the writing may be on the wall for text messaging in general. That doesn't really give the carriers much incentive to invest $'s into their text messaging systems for things that only improve the end user experience.
A) Where the masses are concerned, it's been around longer than email enabled phones and has become ubiquitous.
B) Usability: even on phones that are email-enabled, it's usually easier to send a quick text message than it is to send a quick email.
As your average phone gets more and more sophisticated and powerful, email on the phone will also become ubiquitous and the horsepower of under the hood will allow for more sophisticated email client apps which address much of the usability concerns. You can also take this same line of thought and apply it to IM clients on phones.
So on the one hand, carriers are making money by selling their text messaging services, but on the other hand, the writing may be on the wall for text messaging in general. That doesn't really give the carriers much incentive to invest $'s into their text messaging systems for things that only improve the end user experience.
#7
OT, but only slightly - Congress is now asking the 4 major wireless companies to justify why they have all raised their prices on text messaging, to the same amount, all at around the same time. I smell collusion and price fixing.
Trending Topics
#8
I like the idea of blocking/allowing texts from other people. I am not one who texts but I don't want to block them totally neither, just in case someone has to send me information. However when someone texts me a forward that's bandwith I have to pay for since I don't have a text plan.
#10
Do the provider web sites have some type of "captcha" system required prior to sending the text? These are the graphic representations of words that must be typed correctly to allow the transaction to continue. This would certainly cut down on the high volume senders, although not the individual messages.
#11
We have or can get IP addresses of known machines that spam, but that hasn't stopped spam. Dynamic IP Addressing FTL.
As long as something can be done with any chance of not being held accountable or caught, the action will continue. Like SSN, DL# that stay with you for life, it's almost as if IP addresses should stay with you for life and if you need more, you request more. Sure they can be spoofed, but Dynamic addresses only makes it easier.
As long as something can be done with any chance of not being held accountable or caught, the action will continue. Like SSN, DL# that stay with you for life, it's almost as if IP addresses should stay with you for life and if you need more, you request more. Sure they can be spoofed, but Dynamic addresses only makes it easier.
#13
I thought what you posted underneath was a summary of the article.
So, yeah - I say it's a big scam and the companies are making money where money can be made. We should me able to video message with our phones by now.
So, yeah - I say it's a big scam and the companies are making money where money can be made. We should me able to video message with our phones by now.
#14
Thread Starter
Team Owner
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 30,991
Likes: 582
From: Fontana, California
In my opinion, there are only two reasons text messaging is as popular as it is today:
A) Where the masses are concerned, it's been around longer than email enabled phones and has become ubiquitous.
B) Usability: even on phones that are email-enabled, it's usually easier to send a quick text message than it is to send a quick email.
As your average phone gets more and more sophisticated and powerful, email on the phone will also become ubiquitous and the horsepower of under the hood will allow for more sophisticated email client apps which address much of the usability concerns. You can also take this same line of thought and apply it to IM clients on phones.
So on the one hand, carriers are making money by selling their text messaging services, but on the other hand, the writing may be on the wall for text messaging in general. That doesn't really give the carriers much incentive to invest $'s into their text messaging systems for things that only improve the end user experience.
A) Where the masses are concerned, it's been around longer than email enabled phones and has become ubiquitous.
B) Usability: even on phones that are email-enabled, it's usually easier to send a quick text message than it is to send a quick email.
As your average phone gets more and more sophisticated and powerful, email on the phone will also become ubiquitous and the horsepower of under the hood will allow for more sophisticated email client apps which address much of the usability concerns. You can also take this same line of thought and apply it to IM clients on phones.
So on the one hand, carriers are making money by selling their text messaging services, but on the other hand, the writing may be on the wall for text messaging in general. That doesn't really give the carriers much incentive to invest $'s into their text messaging systems for things that only improve the end user experience.
And with the younger crowd, who seem to have more phones than working professionals, texting is bigger than having an email address.
#19
We currently have all texts blocked on our phone because we were getting spammed and were getting charged for it. I recently just started looking into getting a texting plan only because people keep saying "How come you never responded to my text" even though we told them a couple of times we have them blocked. The only real use for them is when I want to tell my wife something, but it's not important enough to call and interrupt her class.
#21
Thread Starter
Team Owner
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 30,991
Likes: 582
From: Fontana, California
or during meetings or times when you don't want to call someone to tell them one small thing and have it turn into a huge converstation. i'd rather get a text any day of the week telling me to give someone a call when I have a chance then having to hear a stupid voice mail that I have to check telling me the same thing. I wish Voice mail would go away.
#22
or during meetings or times when you don't want to call someone to tell them one small thing and have it turn into a huge converstation. i'd rather get a text any day of the week telling me to give someone a call when I have a chance then having to hear a stupid voice mail that I have to check telling me the same thing. I wish Voice mail would go away.
#23
or during meetings or times when you don't want to call someone to tell them one small thing and have it turn into a huge converstation. i'd rather get a text any day of the week telling me to give someone a call when I have a chance then having to hear a stupid voice mail that I have to check telling me the same thing. I wish Voice mail would go away.
And double werd to voicemail. it just bothers me.
#24
Thread Starter
Team Owner
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 30,991
Likes: 582
From: Fontana, California
I remember when Voice mail used to cost money on cell phones, then it became a free option on every plan that came with your cell phone service.
So why is it that text messaging hasn't followed suit yet? Ahhh I remember, it's because they can charge you whatever the hell they want. And really, there's nothing we consumers can do about it. All the cell phone provider will say is, well then cancel the service or pay the fee.
Choosing a cell phone provider is no longer about choosing between the best, it's about choosing the lesser of two evils.
#26
There are definitely occasions where a voice mail is superior than a text message, I'll agree to that. But if you have a pda phone that has a full keyboard, text messaging can still trump voice mail in some of those occasions as well.
I remember when Voice mail used to cost money on cell phones, then it became a free option on every plan that came with your cell phone service.
So why is it that text messaging hasn't followed suit yet? Ahhh I remember, it's because they can charge you whatever the hell they want. And really, there's nothing we consumers can do about it. All the cell phone provider will say is, well then cancel the service or pay the fee.
Choosing a cell phone provider is no longer about choosing between the best, it's about choosing the lesser of two evils.
I remember when Voice mail used to cost money on cell phones, then it became a free option on every plan that came with your cell phone service.
So why is it that text messaging hasn't followed suit yet? Ahhh I remember, it's because they can charge you whatever the hell they want. And really, there's nothing we consumers can do about it. All the cell phone provider will say is, well then cancel the service or pay the fee.
Choosing a cell phone provider is no longer about choosing between the best, it's about choosing the lesser of two evils.
#27
Race Director
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 11,395
Likes: 0
From: Charlotte(home) /Raleigh (school), NC
or during meetings or times when you don't want to call someone to tell them one small thing and have it turn into a huge converstation. i'd rather get a text any day of the week telling me to give someone a call when I have a chance then having to hear a stupid voice mail that I have to check telling me the same thing. I wish Voice mail would go away.
#28
Thread Starter
Team Owner
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 30,991
Likes: 582
From: Fontana, California
I have a buddy who is contracted to put cell phone towers into use by the big cell companies (basically, he owns several [thousand] towers and leases them out) and he told me years ago that text messaging costs NOTHING on the maintenance side of things. Go figure, you know the cell companies are eating all the profit
Now this isn't to say that PageNet didn't eat that cost in hopes of landing more subscribers, but we had that pricing structure for years and it worked fine. Cell phones are the only reason why paging has gone away.
#29
I don't mind voice mails if it is something important, or you actually leave information.
I just hate it when I check my voice mail, and it is just like "hey, call me back", which is what I would've done anyway. I usually never leave voicemail cause 1. I think it is kinda stupid, and 2. I never like leaving messages anyways.
I think my phone has the option to block advertisements or anonymous text messages. I think I can also have it ask before it downloads the message. I've never tried any of these features, as I've never gotten spammed. I just added the smallest text plan to my phone since I started texting more often, and the rates for individual text messages is kinda ridiculous.
I just hate it when I check my voice mail, and it is just like "hey, call me back", which is what I would've done anyway. I usually never leave voicemail cause 1. I think it is kinda stupid, and 2. I never like leaving messages anyways.
I think my phone has the option to block advertisements or anonymous text messages. I think I can also have it ask before it downloads the message. I've never tried any of these features, as I've never gotten spammed. I just added the smallest text plan to my phone since I started texting more often, and the rates for individual text messages is kinda ridiculous.
#30
Thread Starter
Team Owner
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 30,991
Likes: 582
From: Fontana, California
I think my phone has the option to block advertisements or anonymous text messages. I think I can also have it ask before it downloads the message. I've never tried any of these features, as I've never gotten spammed. I just added the smallest text plan to my phone since I started texting more often, and the rates for individual text messages is kinda ridiculous.
#31
maybe they don't work, I have never tried, i have at&t, and a sony ericsson phone.
just under message settings in my phone, I can set autodownload to 'off' or 'always ask', and turn off accept messages from 'advertisements' or 'anonymous'.
maybe I should turn them off and try and text myself from my computer to see if it works.
just under message settings in my phone, I can set autodownload to 'off' or 'always ask', and turn off accept messages from 'advertisements' or 'anonymous'.
maybe I should turn them off and try and text myself from my computer to see if it works.
#32
I guess no one here has heard of this class action law suit?
http://gizmodo.com/391985/class-acti...-price-gouging
I very rarely get unsolicited texts but I did happen to get one at 6am this morning, I wasn't very happy about that!
Originally Posted by Gizmodo May 20th, 2008
When you do the math on it, sending a text message requires such a tiny amount of bandwidth that, based on data transfer rates, they should round down to free. Clearly, that's not the case, with every single carrier using text messaging as a fun excuse to gouge their customers with insane prices for such a popular feature. Well, people are getting a little sick of paying $0.20 to send 15 characters of text; a class action lawsuit has just been filed against all the major carriers for price gouging.
The suit, which targets AT&T, Sprint, Verizon, Alltel, U.S. Cellular, Cellular South and Virgin Mobile (T-Mobile was targeted in a similar suit last week), seeks "recovery for actual and compensatory damages sustained by plaintiffs and others similarly situated. At this time, plaintiffs are specifically seeking recovery against the defendants for unauthorized charges, wrongful collections and unjust enrichment." Its peg is based on charges that people receive from unsolicited texts even if they don't want to have a text message plan at all, but it could have ramifications that reach beyond that. Or not. Something tells me that the carriers won't be giving up their beloved ripoff text plans without a serious fight.
The suit, which targets AT&T, Sprint, Verizon, Alltel, U.S. Cellular, Cellular South and Virgin Mobile (T-Mobile was targeted in a similar suit last week), seeks "recovery for actual and compensatory damages sustained by plaintiffs and others similarly situated. At this time, plaintiffs are specifically seeking recovery against the defendants for unauthorized charges, wrongful collections and unjust enrichment." Its peg is based on charges that people receive from unsolicited texts even if they don't want to have a text message plan at all, but it could have ramifications that reach beyond that. Or not. Something tells me that the carriers won't be giving up their beloved ripoff text plans without a serious fight.
I very rarely get unsolicited texts but I did happen to get one at 6am this morning, I wasn't very happy about that!
#34
#37
But blackberry messenger is the shit. As long as the people you need to talk to have a BB.
#38
I usually don't even check my voice mails. They just pile up and eventually my mailbox gets full. If voice mail wasn't free, I sure as hell wouldn't have it.
#40
Thread Starter
Team Owner
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 30,991
Likes: 582
From: Fontana, California
My messages pile up as well because I hate checking messages since sending a text can let me know more immediately that you need to talk to me or inform me of something.
Last edited by Sly Raskal; 09-10-2008 at 11:17 PM.