Technology Get the latest on technology, electronics and software…

Technology Discussion: Text Messaging

Thread Tools
 
Old 09-10-2008 | 12:33 PM
  #1  
Sly Raskal's Avatar
Thread Starter
Team Owner
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 30,991
Likes: 582
From: Fontana, California
Question Technology Discussion: Text Messaging

So I read an article on Engadget about text messaging and it's rising costs. You can find the article here -> http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/10/s...ssaging-rates/

I know Engadget may not be the most credible source of news journalism, nonetheless it got me thinking about text messaging.

With technology innovation as rampant as it is why is it that text messaging issues still plague us? The issues I'm referring to in specific are unsolicited text messages which is slowly becoming more and more of a problem.

1) Most, if not all carriers allow you to send a text message to one of their subscribers phones by using a form on their website and enter the users phone number with a message. I think this is one of the stupidest services that could be offered, because there is no validation on who is sending the message so anyone could spam another person with text messages.
2) I have yet to see ANY carrier implement a blacklist/whitelist feature for text messaging where the user chooses who can text them so as to avoid unnecessary text message charges. Hell it could even help parents protect their kids now that more and more of them are getting cell phones at younger and younger ages.

It's no wonder why these technology innovations haven't been applied or fixed. It's because they make money of fthe problems and until someone tells them to fix it, why should they.

/discuss (if you want)
Old 09-10-2008 | 12:40 PM
  #2  
Scottman111's Avatar
1919
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 21,467
Likes: 162
I never thought about spamming from the internet....thanks for the idea!

But yeah, this sentence pretty much sums it nicely.

It's because they make money of fthe problems and until someone tells them to fix it, why should they
Old 09-10-2008 | 01:01 PM
  #3  
jupitersolo's Avatar
nnInn
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 37,670
Likes: 1,084
I think since it is their site that allows the text to be sent, they have some kind of safe guard against major spam. Plus they have the IP address of who sent the message.
Old 09-10-2008 | 01:06 PM
  #4  
Sly Raskal's Avatar
Thread Starter
Team Owner
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 30,991
Likes: 582
From: Fontana, California
Originally Posted by jupitersolo
I think since it is their site that allows the text to be sent, they have some kind of safe guard against major spam. Plus they have the IP address of who sent the message.
We have or can get IP addresses of known machines that spam, but that hasn't stopped spam. Dynamic IP Addressing FTL.

As long as something can be done with any chance of not being held accountable or caught, the action will continue. Like SSN, DL# that stay with you for life, it's almost as if IP addresses should stay with you for life and if you need more, you request more. Sure they can be spoofed, but Dynamic addresses only makes it easier.
Old 09-10-2008 | 01:10 PM
  #5  
spdy0001's Avatar
I now drive an accord....
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 4,800
Likes: 2
From: Etters, PA
ive said for years that txt msgs are the biggest scam ever

As cell phones and plans get cheaper, txt msgs get more expensive
Old 09-10-2008 | 01:10 PM
  #6  
Billiam's Avatar
Big Block go VROOOM!
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 8,578
Likes: 1
From: Chicago Burbs
In my opinion, there are only two reasons text messaging is as popular as it is today:

A) Where the masses are concerned, it's been around longer than email enabled phones and has become ubiquitous.

B) Usability: even on phones that are email-enabled, it's usually easier to send a quick text message than it is to send a quick email.

As your average phone gets more and more sophisticated and powerful, email on the phone will also become ubiquitous and the horsepower of under the hood will allow for more sophisticated email client apps which address much of the usability concerns. You can also take this same line of thought and apply it to IM clients on phones.

So on the one hand, carriers are making money by selling their text messaging services, but on the other hand, the writing may be on the wall for text messaging in general. That doesn't really give the carriers much incentive to invest $'s into their text messaging systems for things that only improve the end user experience.
Old 09-10-2008 | 01:15 PM
  #7  
moeronn's Avatar
is learning to moonwalk i
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 15,520
Likes: 3
From: SoCal
OT, but only slightly - Congress is now asking the 4 major wireless companies to justify why they have all raised their prices on text messaging, to the same amount, all at around the same time. I smell collusion and price fixing.
Old 09-10-2008 | 01:15 PM
  #8  
Doom878's Avatar
Team Owner
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 27,997
Likes: 1,318
From: Miami, FL
I like the idea of blocking/allowing texts from other people. I am not one who texts but I don't want to block them totally neither, just in case someone has to send me information. However when someone texts me a forward that's bandwith I have to pay for since I don't have a text plan.
Old 09-10-2008 | 01:17 PM
  #9  
Moog-Type-S's Avatar
The sizzle in the Steak
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 71,436
Likes: 1,877
From: Southern California
Follow the $$
Old 09-10-2008 | 01:22 PM
  #10  
stogie1020's Avatar
Needs more Lemon Pledge
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 52,768
Likes: 2,000
From: Phoenix, AZ
Do the provider web sites have some type of "captcha" system required prior to sending the text? These are the graphic representations of words that must be typed correctly to allow the transaction to continue. This would certainly cut down on the high volume senders, although not the individual messages.
Old 09-10-2008 | 01:23 PM
  #11  
jupitersolo's Avatar
nnInn
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 37,670
Likes: 1,084
Originally Posted by Sly Raskal
We have or can get IP addresses of known machines that spam, but that hasn't stopped spam. Dynamic IP Addressing FTL.

As long as something can be done with any chance of not being held accountable or caught, the action will continue. Like SSN, DL# that stay with you for life, it's almost as if IP addresses should stay with you for life and if you need more, you request more. Sure they can be spoofed, but Dynamic addresses only makes it easier.
OK, but since they run the site that allows the message to be sent, if they see something out of the ordinary, they won't let it happen. One of the local news shows had a guy from Verizon on talk about spam in text, he said they have a system for blocking it just the same as they do for their internet.
Old 09-10-2008 | 01:24 PM
  #12  
Sly Raskal's Avatar
Thread Starter
Team Owner
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 30,991
Likes: 582
From: Fontana, California
Originally Posted by moeronn
OT, but only slightly - Congress is now asking the 4 major wireless companies to justify why they have all raised their prices on text messaging, to the same amount, all at around the same time. I smell collusion and price fixing.
That was the topic of the article I posted in the first post.
Old 09-10-2008 | 01:27 PM
  #13  
moeronn's Avatar
is learning to moonwalk i
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 15,520
Likes: 3
From: SoCal
Originally Posted by Sly Raskal
That was the topic of the article I posted in the first post.
I thought what you posted underneath was a summary of the article.

So, yeah - I say it's a big scam and the companies are making money where money can be made. We should me able to video message with our phones by now.
Old 09-10-2008 | 01:27 PM
  #14  
Sly Raskal's Avatar
Thread Starter
Team Owner
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 30,991
Likes: 582
From: Fontana, California
Originally Posted by Billiam
In my opinion, there are only two reasons text messaging is as popular as it is today:

A) Where the masses are concerned, it's been around longer than email enabled phones and has become ubiquitous.

B) Usability: even on phones that are email-enabled, it's usually easier to send a quick text message than it is to send a quick email.

As your average phone gets more and more sophisticated and powerful, email on the phone will also become ubiquitous and the horsepower of under the hood will allow for more sophisticated email client apps which address much of the usability concerns. You can also take this same line of thought and apply it to IM clients on phones.

So on the one hand, carriers are making money by selling their text messaging services, but on the other hand, the writing may be on the wall for text messaging in general. That doesn't really give the carriers much incentive to invest $'s into their text messaging systems for things that only improve the end user experience.
email is ubiqutous, but I don't see a majority of phone subscribers getting pda styled or phones with full keyboards to make sending emails easier so they stick to text messaging. These types of phones are becoming more readily avialable, but from what I've seen, more people own flip phones with a standard keypad than a keyboard.

And with the younger crowd, who seem to have more phones than working professionals, texting is bigger than having an email address.
Old 09-10-2008 | 01:28 PM
  #15  
Sly Raskal's Avatar
Thread Starter
Team Owner
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 30,991
Likes: 582
From: Fontana, California
Originally Posted by moeronn
I thought what you posted underneath was a summary of the article.

So, yeah - I say it's a big scam and the companies are making money where money can be made. We should me able to video message with our phones by now.
Don't they have that already in Japan? or at least I've seen demos of it on phones available or will be available soon in Japan.
Old 09-10-2008 | 01:31 PM
  #16  
stogie1020's Avatar
Needs more Lemon Pledge
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 52,768
Likes: 2,000
From: Phoenix, AZ
I would assume that, based on bandwidth, texting is less expensive for the carrier to transmit than a 30 second - 1 minute phone call. Anyone in the biz conform or refute?
Old 09-10-2008 | 01:47 PM
  #17  
chill_dog's Avatar
Oderint dum metuant.
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 12,496
Likes: 534
From: Lake Wylie
Most stupid form of communication ever. One can only hope it goes away.
Old 09-10-2008 | 02:02 PM
  #18  
TeknoKing's Avatar
Race Director
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 10,497
Likes: 277
^ You never owned a blackberry egh?

I have unlimited plan on everything...let them text.
Old 09-10-2008 | 02:13 PM
  #19  
moeronn's Avatar
is learning to moonwalk i
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 15,520
Likes: 3
From: SoCal
We currently have all texts blocked on our phone because we were getting spammed and were getting charged for it. I recently just started looking into getting a texting plan only because people keep saying "How come you never responded to my text" even though we told them a couple of times we have them blocked. The only real use for them is when I want to tell my wife something, but it's not important enough to call and interrupt her class.
Old 09-10-2008 | 02:17 PM
  #20  
Trackruner228's Avatar
Race Director
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 11,395
Likes: 0
From: Charlotte(home) /Raleigh (school), NC
Its nice during class if you need to talk to someone.
Old 09-10-2008 | 02:41 PM
  #21  
Sly Raskal's Avatar
Thread Starter
Team Owner
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 30,991
Likes: 582
From: Fontana, California
Originally Posted by Trackruner228
Its nice during class if you need to talk to someone.
or during meetings or times when you don't want to call someone to tell them one small thing and have it turn into a huge converstation. i'd rather get a text any day of the week telling me to give someone a call when I have a chance then having to hear a stupid voice mail that I have to check telling me the same thing. I wish Voice mail would go away.
Old 09-10-2008 | 02:52 PM
  #22  
jupitersolo's Avatar
nnInn
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 37,670
Likes: 1,084
Originally Posted by Sly Raskal
or during meetings or times when you don't want to call someone to tell them one small thing and have it turn into a huge converstation. i'd rather get a text any day of the week telling me to give someone a call when I have a chance then having to hear a stupid voice mail that I have to check telling me the same thing. I wish Voice mail would go away.
I don't want it to go away, I'd just like for it to be marked like the iphone does with it. That's a big reason I want one, but AT&T keeps me away, so far.
Old 09-10-2008 | 02:55 PM
  #23  
GIBSON6594's Avatar
My Garage
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 13,386
Likes: 11
From: NY
Originally Posted by Sly Raskal
or during meetings or times when you don't want to call someone to tell them one small thing and have it turn into a huge converstation. i'd rather get a text any day of the week telling me to give someone a call when I have a chance then having to hear a stupid voice mail that I have to check telling me the same thing. I wish Voice mail would go away.
werd. Although I'd much rather explain something over the phone thna via text. But if it's just normal chatter, then text away.

And double werd to voicemail. it just bothers me.
Old 09-10-2008 | 07:11 PM
  #24  
Sly Raskal's Avatar
Thread Starter
Team Owner
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 30,991
Likes: 582
From: Fontana, California
Originally Posted by GIBSON6594
werd. Although I'd much rather explain something over the phone thna via text. But if it's just normal chatter, then text away.

And double werd to voicemail. it just bothers me.
There are definitely occasions where a voice mail is superior than a text message, I'll agree to that. But if you have a pda phone that has a full keyboard, text messaging can still trump voice mail in some of those occasions as well.

I remember when Voice mail used to cost money on cell phones, then it became a free option on every plan that came with your cell phone service.

So why is it that text messaging hasn't followed suit yet? Ahhh I remember, it's because they can charge you whatever the hell they want. And really, there's nothing we consumers can do about it. All the cell phone provider will say is, well then cancel the service or pay the fee.

Choosing a cell phone provider is no longer about choosing between the best, it's about choosing the lesser of two evils.
Old 09-10-2008 | 07:12 PM
  #25  
NiteQwill's Avatar
Adventurist.
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 6,661
Likes: 58
From: Orange County, CA
blackberry unlimited text FTW
Old 09-10-2008 | 07:14 PM
  #26  
NiteQwill's Avatar
Adventurist.
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 6,661
Likes: 58
From: Orange County, CA
Originally Posted by Sly Raskal
There are definitely occasions where a voice mail is superior than a text message, I'll agree to that. But if you have a pda phone that has a full keyboard, text messaging can still trump voice mail in some of those occasions as well.

I remember when Voice mail used to cost money on cell phones, then it became a free option on every plan that came with your cell phone service.

So why is it that text messaging hasn't followed suit yet? Ahhh I remember, it's because they can charge you whatever the hell they want. And really, there's nothing we consumers can do about it. All the cell phone provider will say is, well then cancel the service or pay the fee.

Choosing a cell phone provider is no longer about choosing between the best, it's about choosing the lesser of two evils.
I have a buddy who is contracted to put cell phone towers into use by the big cell companies (basically, he owns several [thousand] towers and leases them out) and he told me years ago that text messaging costs NOTHING on the maintenance side of things. Go figure, you know the cell companies are eating all the profit
Old 09-10-2008 | 07:15 PM
  #27  
Trackruner228's Avatar
Race Director
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 11,395
Likes: 0
From: Charlotte(home) /Raleigh (school), NC
Originally Posted by Sly Raskal
or during meetings or times when you don't want to call someone to tell them one small thing and have it turn into a huge converstation. i'd rather get a text any day of the week telling me to give someone a call when I have a chance then having to hear a stupid voice mail that I have to check telling me the same thing. I wish Voice mail would go away.
I hate voicemails. If I see you called me I will call you back so unless I am dying I dont need a voicemail.
Old 09-10-2008 | 07:31 PM
  #28  
Sly Raskal's Avatar
Thread Starter
Team Owner
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 30,991
Likes: 582
From: Fontana, California
Originally Posted by NiteQwill
I have a buddy who is contracted to put cell phone towers into use by the big cell companies (basically, he owns several [thousand] towers and leases them out) and he told me years ago that text messaging costs NOTHING on the maintenance side of things. Go figure, you know the cell companies are eating all the profit
Remember voice mail on paging? It was the same thing. I used to work at a paging company for about 5 years. We re-sold paging services provided by PageNet. PageNet gave us voice mail for free. We'd charge different prices based on what kind of plan you had. Over the years though, as competition increased, voice mail became a free service.

Now this isn't to say that PageNet didn't eat that cost in hopes of landing more subscribers, but we had that pricing structure for years and it worked fine. Cell phones are the only reason why paging has gone away.
Old 09-10-2008 | 07:38 PM
  #29  
Osamu's Avatar
Drifting
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 3,138
Likes: 4
From: 808
I don't mind voice mails if it is something important, or you actually leave information.

I just hate it when I check my voice mail, and it is just like "hey, call me back", which is what I would've done anyway. I usually never leave voicemail cause 1. I think it is kinda stupid, and 2. I never like leaving messages anyways.

I think my phone has the option to block advertisements or anonymous text messages. I think I can also have it ask before it downloads the message. I've never tried any of these features, as I've never gotten spammed. I just added the smallest text plan to my phone since I started texting more often, and the rates for individual text messages is kinda ridiculous.
Old 09-10-2008 | 07:40 PM
  #30  
Sly Raskal's Avatar
Thread Starter
Team Owner
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 30,991
Likes: 582
From: Fontana, California
Originally Posted by Osamu
I think my phone has the option to block advertisements or anonymous text messages. I think I can also have it ask before it downloads the message. I've never tried any of these features, as I've never gotten spammed. I just added the smallest text plan to my phone since I started texting more often, and the rates for individual text messages is kinda ridiculous.
What provider do you have? This is the first time I've ever heard of a company that put that amount of control on the user's end in regards to text messaging.
Old 09-10-2008 | 07:52 PM
  #31  
Osamu's Avatar
Drifting
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 3,138
Likes: 4
From: 808
maybe they don't work, I have never tried, i have at&t, and a sony ericsson phone.

just under message settings in my phone, I can set autodownload to 'off' or 'always ask', and turn off accept messages from 'advertisements' or 'anonymous'.

maybe I should turn them off and try and text myself from my computer to see if it works.
Old 09-10-2008 | 07:56 PM
  #32  
#1 STUNNA's Avatar
Sanest Florida Man
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 44,630
Likes: 10,913
From: Florida
I guess no one here has heard of this class action law suit?

Originally Posted by Gizmodo May 20th, 2008
When you do the math on it, sending a text message requires such a tiny amount of bandwidth that, based on data transfer rates, they should round down to free. Clearly, that's not the case, with every single carrier using text messaging as a fun excuse to gouge their customers with insane prices for such a popular feature. Well, people are getting a little sick of paying $0.20 to send 15 characters of text; a class action lawsuit has just been filed against all the major carriers for price gouging.

The suit, which targets AT&T, Sprint, Verizon, Alltel, U.S. Cellular, Cellular South and Virgin Mobile (T-Mobile was targeted in a similar suit last week), seeks "recovery for actual and compensatory damages sustained by plaintiffs and others similarly situated. At this time, plaintiffs are specifically seeking recovery against the defendants for unauthorized charges, wrongful collections and unjust enrichment." Its peg is based on charges that people receive from unsolicited texts even if they don't want to have a text message plan at all, but it could have ramifications that reach beyond that. Or not. Something tells me that the carriers won't be giving up their beloved ripoff text plans without a serious fight.
http://gizmodo.com/391985/class-acti...-price-gouging

I very rarely get unsolicited texts but I did happen to get one at 6am this morning, I wasn't very happy about that!
Old 09-10-2008 | 08:07 PM
  #33  
Whiskers's Avatar
Go Giants
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 69,918
Likes: 1,236
From: PA
Originally Posted by NiteQwill
blackberry unlimited text FTW
Old 09-10-2008 | 08:22 PM
  #34  
stogie1020's Avatar
Needs more Lemon Pledge
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 52,768
Likes: 2,000
From: Phoenix, AZ
Originally Posted by NiteQwill
blackberry unlimited text FTW
Have a BB, never used the BB messaging. I just always use the VZW SMS messaging. Am I missing out on something cool?
Old 09-10-2008 | 08:41 PM
  #35  
Smalls's Avatar
Insert Sarcasm Here
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 3,552
Likes: 4
From: Gardner, KS
T-Mobile has a spam filter available. Just log-in to "My T-Mobile" and filter away!
Old 09-10-2008 | 11:06 PM
  #36  
sho_nuff1997's Avatar
I disagree with unanimity
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 14,035
Likes: 27
From: WI
Originally Posted by NiteQwill
blackberry unlimited text FTW
what provider do you use? are international texts included? AT&T charges .25 for each one. highway robbery.
Old 09-10-2008 | 11:09 PM
  #37  
Q1911's Avatar
Suzuka Master
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 5,993
Likes: 8
Originally Posted by stogie1020
Have a BB, never used the BB messaging. I just always use the VZW SMS messaging. Am I missing out on something cool?
I believe that was what Nite was referring too. Unlimited SMS.


But blackberry messenger is the shit. As long as the people you need to talk to have a BB.
Old 09-10-2008 | 11:11 PM
  #38  
Q1911's Avatar
Suzuka Master
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 5,993
Likes: 8
Originally Posted by Trackruner228
I hate voicemails. If I see you called me I will call you back so unless I am dying I dont need a voicemail.


I usually don't even check my voice mails. They just pile up and eventually my mailbox gets full. If voice mail wasn't free, I sure as hell wouldn't have it.
Old 09-10-2008 | 11:13 PM
  #39  
JediMindTricks's Avatar
What Would Don Draper Do?
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 22,223
Likes: 1
From: Houston
i hate voicemails too.

one of my favorite features of the iphone is the ability to just delete voicemails right away.
Old 09-10-2008 | 11:14 PM
  #40  
Sly Raskal's Avatar
Thread Starter
Team Owner
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 30,991
Likes: 582
From: Fontana, California
Originally Posted by quinto1025
I usually don't even check my voice mails. They just pile up and eventually my mailbox gets full. If voice mail wasn't free, I sure as hell wouldn't have it.
I've tried having voice mail removed even though it's free and haven't been able to so I just gave up on it.

My messages pile up as well because I hate checking messages since sending a text can let me know more immediately that you need to talk to me or inform me of something.

Last edited by Sly Raskal; 09-10-2008 at 11:17 PM.


Quick Reply: Technology Discussion: Text Messaging



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:27 AM.