Technology Get the latest on technology, electronics and software…

OpenDNS, anyone use it?

Thread Tools
 
Old Dec 10, 2009 | 01:09 PM
  #1  
#1 STUNNA's Avatar
Thread Starter
Sanest Florida Man
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Community Influencer
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 45,975
Likes: 11,763
From: Florida
OpenDNS, anyone use it?

I'm thinking about trying it out. looks like a good way of stopping nuddie sites or malware, botnets, phishing, etc. The restaurant I work at wanted to setup a way to block porn sites so people wouldn't be surfing porn while there. I did tell him that no one would do that but he still wants to do it.
Reply
Old Dec 10, 2009 | 01:15 PM
  #2  
#1 STUNNA's Avatar
Thread Starter
Sanest Florida Man
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Community Influencer
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 45,975
Likes: 11,763
From: Florida
well malware protection starts at $2,000 a year so cross that off the list.
Reply
Old Dec 10, 2009 | 01:16 PM
  #3  
stogie1020's Avatar
Needs more Lemon Pledge
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 52,768
Likes: 2,000
From: Phoenix, AZ
If they block AZine, burn them with fire.
Reply
Old Dec 10, 2009 | 01:33 PM
  #4  
thunder04's Avatar
Sweet!
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 4,106
Likes: 82
From: Northern VA
I use it at home and at work (have our DNS servers forward to OpenDNS). I have no complaints. It benefitted us greatly when conflickter was released. They did a lot of proactive DNS blocking with it.

I don't use much of their DNS filtering stuff (other than what they filter, which is minimal and usually really really bad stuff...ex conflickter), but at work we use their statistics. It's pretty cool to see what's popular among network users. Also, they have DNS entries for common domain typos. So...working for a school district...it cut down the amount of "why can't I get to x website?" typo requests lol.

I mainly switched over to them because, at the time, they were the fastest DNS resolvers.

Last edited by thunder04; Dec 10, 2009 at 01:36 PM.
Reply
Old Dec 10, 2009 | 01:38 PM
  #5  
Vector02's Avatar
Drifting
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 3,023
Likes: 2
From: Kyle, TX
I've set up lots of clients with with free version. It's a great way to filter content for an entire network without any hardware/major work.
Reply
Old Dec 10, 2009 | 02:01 PM
  #6  
doopstr's Avatar
Team Owner
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 25,967
Likes: 2,685
From: Jersey
I use the free version of it to block the porn sites. Works well. Plus the porn blocker can be turned off in 3 minutes

I'm happy with it.
Reply
Old Dec 10, 2009 | 02:16 PM
  #7  
#1 STUNNA's Avatar
Thread Starter
Sanest Florida Man
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Community Influencer
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 45,975
Likes: 11,763
From: Florida
Sweet! I'll use it then!
Reply
Old Dec 10, 2009 | 02:21 PM
  #8  
rza49311's Avatar
Drifting
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 3,072
Likes: 8
From: Southern VA
A little OT....something I didn't know until recently was google has free DNS. Doesn't filter anything but still free DNS.

http://code.google.com/speed/public-dns/
Reply
Old Dec 10, 2009 | 04:18 PM
  #9  
DoubleSh0t's Avatar
Three Wheelin'
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,954
Likes: 1
I use it at home and with a few clients who wanted to block porn sites without paying for software. Works great.
Reply
Old Dec 10, 2009 | 04:25 PM
  #10  
astro's Avatar
Community Architect
robb m.
25 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 72,841
Likes: 660
From: ON
use this to find the fastest DNS available.
http://code.google.com/p/namebench/
Reply
Old Dec 10, 2009 | 05:51 PM
  #11  
#1 STUNNA's Avatar
Thread Starter
Sanest Florida Man
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Community Influencer
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 45,975
Likes: 11,763
From: Florida
^someone's an avid reader of my software/tip of the week thread!

also for a more version there's DNS benchmark from grc.com

www.grc.com/dns/benchmark

Primary Benchmark Features:
For each of up to 200 DNS nameservers, using the Internet's most popular top-50 domain names, independently measures, charts, statistically analyzes, reports (and optionally exports):
Cached lookups – the time to return a domain name that is already in the resolver's name cache.
Uncached lookups – the time to return a sub-domain name that is not already in the resolver's name cache.
Dotcom lookups – the time to consult the nameserver's chosen dotcom resolver(s) for a dotcom name.
Reliability – the number of queries not replied to during the benchmark.
Optionally verifies whether nameservers provide DNS security (DNSSEC) record authentication.
When using a list of (provided) DNSSEC-signed domains, benchmarks DNSSEC authentication performance.
Graphs and compares all four benchmark parameters with easy-to-read bar chart.
On-the-fly hierarchical sorting of performance results by cached (default) or uncached performance.
(Sorting is “hierarchical” because cached is sorted first, followed by uncached, then dotcom.)
Auto-scaled bar chart that can be manually overridden for chart-to-chart comparison.
Pop-up value “inspector” (left click in nameserver list) displays precise values on bar chart.
Detailed tabular result report for non-graphical detailed reporting.
Full detailed, locale-aware (internationalized), CSV results export.
Automatic logging to CSV file for long-term background results monitoring and collection.
Simultaneously compares the performance and reliability of up to 200 DNS nameservers.
Determines nameserver network name (reverse DNS), ownership, operational status.
Determines whether nameservers intercept and redirect bad domain names.
Comprehensive, heuristic “Conclusions” generation summarizes all results and suggests useful system changes, if any, in easily readable English.
All results are analyzed for statistical significance with a 95% confidence threshold.
Bottom of tabular data page contains built-in quick-reference “reminder” help.

Additional Power-User & Convenience Features:
The built-in top-50 domains list is user-replaceable to allow more or less accurate (and statistically significant) operation, and for support of DNSSEC record authentication. (More domains takes longer to run.)
.INI files containing sets and subsets of nameservers to benchmark can be added, removed, and saved.
Special “dnsbench.ini” is auto-loaded, if present, to always override built-in nameserver list.
(This supports the use of customizable personal nameserver lists for special applications.)
At startup, tests for the presence of, and deliberately “triggers”, any outbound-blocking personal firewalls to allow Internet access exceptions to be provided before testing begins.
Internet connectivity aware – verifies unimpeded Internet connectivity before testing and gracefully handles possible loss of Internet connectivity during testing.
Bar chart results can be copied to the system clipboard or saved in BMP or compressed PNG format for storage or sharing.
Built-in self-screen capture to BMP or compressed PNG file.
All benchmark pages and tabs can be copied to the system clipboard or saved to files as text, rich-text, or images as appropriate.

Last edited by #1 STUNNA; Dec 10, 2009 at 05:55 PM.
Reply
Old Dec 10, 2009 | 06:31 PM
  #12  
Whiskers's Avatar
Go Giants
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 70,003
Likes: 1,260
From: PA
Why would you want to block porn
Reply
Old Dec 10, 2009 | 08:47 PM
  #13  
doopstr's Avatar
Team Owner
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 25,967
Likes: 2,685
From: Jersey
Originally Posted by Whiskers
Why would you want to block porn
I feel a little dirty when I goto opendns to turn off the porn block and see that little hottie Allison Rhodes looking at me right before I do it. I like that
Reply
Old Dec 10, 2009 | 10:55 PM
  #14  
#1 STUNNA's Avatar
Thread Starter
Sanest Florida Man
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Community Influencer
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 45,975
Likes: 11,763
From: Florida
OK I'm confused.




If I go with the middle option how does it limit it's usage to 5 users? Is it 5 IPs in the dashboard? My plan is to put it in the router so would that limit me to 5 routers with an unlimited number of users behind that router or just 5 users?
Reply
Old Dec 10, 2009 | 11:09 PM
  #15  
v6cord2k5's Avatar
seizure force field!
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 8,971
Likes: 115
From: Monkeytown
Originally Posted by Whiskers
Why would you want to block porn
I pictured this post as I was going down the thread, then I see it and I
Reply
Old Dec 11, 2009 | 07:09 AM
  #16  
DoubleSh0t's Avatar
Three Wheelin'
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,954
Likes: 1
I'm not 100% sure, but if you put it on the router you can have unlimited users, but you won't be able to track individual user's activity. 5 IPs = 5 unique users.
Reply
Old Dec 11, 2009 | 07:31 AM
  #17  
pimpin-tl's Avatar
Safety Car
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 3,995
Likes: 148
From: San Antonio, TX
Originally Posted by #1 STUNNA
I'm thinking about trying it out. looks like a good way of stopping nuddie sites or malware, botnets, phishing, etc. The restaurant I work at wanted to setup a way to block porn sites so people wouldn't be surfing porn while there. I did tell him that no one would do that but he still wants to do it.
It works very good for being free. We have been using it for my work (school) for the last year and it has done it's job. I highly recommend it for work or personal if you want something free.
Reply
Old Dec 11, 2009 | 09:01 AM
  #18  
einsatz's Avatar
I miss my 03 CL-S :(
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 7,140
Likes: 445
From: Washington, DC
I've been using the free opendns for well over a year. No problems. Fast, and less annoying than Verizon's.
Reply
Old Dec 11, 2009 | 10:09 AM
  #19  
#1 STUNNA's Avatar
Thread Starter
Sanest Florida Man
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Community Influencer
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 45,975
Likes: 11,763
From: Florida
That's interesting, cause for both the DNS speed benchmarks I've run OpenDNS comes in butt naked last. It was 61 out of 65 DNS servers. But I saw a video of someone else running the same benchmark and OpenDNS was in the top 10. It really does depend on your location. But even if it's last it's still worth it and it shouldn't slow down the page loading drastically.
Reply
Old Dec 11, 2009 | 12:52 PM
  #20  
thunder04's Avatar
Sweet!
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 4,106
Likes: 82
From: Northern VA
I just ran namebench and it reported that UltraDNS was the fastest with OpenDNS being second. I assume this is because OpenDNS is based in San Francisco, I'm in Menlo Park, and we have a direct link to the Palo Alto Internet Exchange in Redwood City.




Last edited by thunder04; Dec 11, 2009 at 12:54 PM.
Reply
Old Dec 11, 2009 | 01:50 PM
  #21  
#1 STUNNA's Avatar
Thread Starter
Sanest Florida Man
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Community Influencer
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 45,975
Likes: 11,763
From: Florida
Yeah the person I saw use it was also in San Fransisco (Leo Laporte). This is what OpenDNS is for me, butt naked last.

Reply
Old Dec 11, 2009 | 11:14 PM
  #22  
Gfaze's Avatar
S E L L
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 12,768
Likes: 51
From: Modesto, CA
I just used namebench and configured my computer as per the recommendations and noticed a considerable increase in speed. Thanks Stunna and also Astro for posting it.
Reply
Old Dec 12, 2009 | 12:45 PM
  #23  
litesout's Avatar
Oliver!!!
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 3,962
Likes: 38
From: Orlando, FL
Wait a minute. If I go with UltraDNS or OpenDNS (or whichever is quickest and free) I can get my porn to load faster? Why didn't anybody tell me this before?!?!?!?!?!
Reply
Old Dec 12, 2009 | 01:18 PM
  #24  
doopstr's Avatar
Team Owner
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 25,967
Likes: 2,685
From: Jersey
With today's porn all you really need is one of the following.

1. Teen (over 18 of course)
2. MILF
3. Anal
4. Creampie
5. Granny (optional)

Porn is so unoriginal these days so you don't really need a lot of speed for porn anymore.
Reply
Old Dec 12, 2009 | 02:13 PM
  #25  
stogie1020's Avatar
Needs more Lemon Pledge
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 52,768
Likes: 2,000
From: Phoenix, AZ
Sooo.... I should leave it alone?

Reply
Old Dec 12, 2009 | 08:46 PM
  #26  
thunder04's Avatar
Sweet!
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 4,106
Likes: 82
From: Northern VA
^ I'd say yes.

Weirdly enough...I ran namebench at home last night multiple times and every time it said OpenDNS was the fastest...but then tonight after one run it says Comodo Secure DNS is the fastest and OpenDNS is nowhere to be found!
Reply
Old Dec 12, 2009 | 08:50 PM
  #27  
thunder04's Avatar
Sweet!
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 4,106
Likes: 82
From: Northern VA
I need to research optimizing BIND as a caching DNS server. My internal DNS server (debian box running bind9) is always second fastest. Hmm...
Reply
Old Dec 12, 2009 | 09:09 PM
  #28  
#1 STUNNA's Avatar
Thread Starter
Sanest Florida Man
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Community Influencer
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 45,975
Likes: 11,763
From: Florida
Stogie they say it's faster to set up the DNS server settings in Windows than in the router cause the router adds an extra step.
Reply
Old Dec 12, 2009 | 09:38 PM
  #29  
stogie1020's Avatar
Needs more Lemon Pledge
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 52,768
Likes: 2,000
From: Phoenix, AZ
Hmmm... I will give it a try sometime. Thanks.
Reply




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:13 AM.