3G vs. 3G: Whose mobile data network is best?
#1
3G vs. 3G: Whose mobile data network is best?
As Verizon Wireless (NYSE:VZ, NYSE:VOD) and AT&T (NYSE:T) argue on TV whose network is fastest and most ubiquitous, independent performance testing firm Root Wireless has put their claims to the test, mapping out the performance metrics of all of the big four’s 3G networks in seven major metro markets. The findings were surprising. Though AT&T has taken a huge public relations hit for poor coverage and capacity on its high-speed packet access (HSPA) network, Root found that it’s network performed best in almost every single category from average download speed to level of connection failure (See TelephonyOnline’s related analysis of AT&T and Verizon’s networks). Root’s complete market data can be seen after the break.
All four operators, however, had their strengths and weaknesses. Sprint (NYSE:S) has the highest coverage networks on the books: typically 90% of its footprint receives receives signals of 50% or greater of full strength. But Root found that Sprint also had the highest data connection failure rate, as high as 15% in Seattle, while the rest of the operators kept their failure rates well below 5%. So while Sprint 3G customers are getting more bars consistently, they’re much less likely to actually complete a data session.
Though T-Mobile (NYSE: DT) was the last to deploy its 3G network, it has managed to build up coverage quite quickly. In five of the seven markets Root tested, T-Mobile’s 3G build out is comparable to its three competitors’. Only in Seattle and San Francisco does it significantly lag the others–surprising considering T-Mobile USA is headquartered in Seattle. Also, though T-Mobile’s HSPA network is much newer than AT&T’s–Cingular was the first operator in the world to deploy HSPA–it’s still much slower than AT&T’s. In several markets AT&T’s average download speeds were as much as double that of T-Mobile’s.
While AT&T seemed to run away with the prize in most of the performance categories, there was one area where weaknesses in its network design were evident. While AT&T had high signal strength in much of its metro footprint, that signal strength tended to fall off rather rapidly outside of those hotzones. In most markets, 30% to 50% of AT&T’s footprint received half-strength signals or worse, which in part explains many of the lack of coverage and capacity complaints AT&T has received from many of its iPhone customers. And that’s that’s to say nothing of Verizon’s most damaging argument: AT&T doesn’t offer 3G service to 25% of population.
Here are Root’s market-by-market results:
CHICAGO
Network Technology: 3G vs 2.5G
Verizon: 98% runs 3G infrastructure
AT&T: 98%
Sprint: 97%
T-Mobile: 96%
Signal Strength
Verizon:
Percentage of network operating at 75% of full strength or better: 22% of network mapped
50 - 75%: 36%
25 - 50%: 37%
25% or less: 5%
AT&T:
75% or better: 34%
50 - 75%: 16%
25 - 50%: 44%
25% or less: 5%
Sprint:
75% or better: 69%
50 - 75%: 24%
25 - 50%: 5%
25% or less: 2%
T-Mobile:
75% or better: 51%
50 - 75%: 18%
25 - 50%: 27%
25% or less: 4%
Data Speeds: Average Download/Upload speeds
Verizon: 259k/138k
AT&T: 359k/94k
Sprint: 236k/72k
T-Mobile: 167k/106k
Connectivity: Chance of data connection failure
Verizon: 2%
AT&T: 2%
Sprint: 11%
T-Mobile: 4%
DALLAS
Network Technology: 3G vs 2.5G
Verizon: 97% runs 3G infrastructure
AT&T: 99%
Sprint: 98%
T-Mobile: 96%
Signal Strength
Verizon:
75% of full strength or better: 16% of network mapped
50 - 75%: 39%
25 - 50%: 41%
25% or less: 4%
AT&T:
75% or better: 54%
50 - 75%: 17%
25 - 50%: 27%
25% or less: 2%
Sprint:
75% or better: 61%
50 - 75%: 30%
25 - 50%: 7%
25% or less: 2%
T-Mobile:
75% or better: 44%
50 - 75%: 18%
25 - 50%: 35%
25% or less: 3%
Data Speeds
Verizon’s average download/upload speeds: 208k/121k
AT&T: 428k/97k
Sprint: 204k/69k
T-Mobile: 266k/161k
Connectivity
Chance of data connection failure:
Verizon: 2%
AT&T: 1%
Sprint: 11%
T-Mobile: 4%
LOS ANGELES/ORANGE COUNTY
Network Technology: 3G vs 2.5G
Verizon: 97% runs 3G infrastructure
AT&T: 99.99 %
Sprint: 89%
T-Mobile: 93%
Signal Strength
Verizon: Percentage of network operating at:
75% of full strength or better: 21% of network mapped
50 - 75%: 36%
25 - 50%: 33%
25% or less: 10%
AT&T:
75% or better: 33%
50 - 75%: 18%
25 - 50%: 42%
25% or less: 7%
Sprint:
75% or better: 66%
50 - 75%: 26%
25 - 50%: 5%
25% or less: 3%
T-Mobile:
75% or better: 42%
50 - 75%: 20%
25 - 50%: 35%
25% or less: 3%
Data Speeds
Verizon’s average download/upload speeds: 241k/115k
AT&T: 350k/93k
Sprint: 207k/67k
T-Mobile: 188k/119k
Connectivity
Chance of data connection failure:
Verizon: 3%
AT&T: 2%
Sprint: 12%
T-Mobile: 4%
NEW YORK CITY
Network Technology: 3G vs 2.5G
Verizon: 97% runs 3G infrastructure
AT&T: 99%
Sprint: 98%
T-Mobile: 96%
Signal Strength
Verizon: Percentage of network operating at:
75% of full strength or better: 37% of network mapped
50 - 75%: 38%
25 - 50%: 21%
25% or less: 4%
AT&T:
75% or better: 71%
50 - 75%: 16%
25 - 50%: 12%
25% or less: 1%
Sprint:
75% or better: 83%
50 - 75%: 12%
25 - 50%: 4%
25% or less: 1%
T-Mobile:
75% or better: 62%
50 - 75%: 17%
25 - 50%: 20%
25% or less: 1%
Data Speeds
Verizon’s average download/upload speeds: 201k/103k
AT&T: 246k/131k
Sprint: 176k/59k
T-Mobile: 198k/119k
Connectivity
Chance of data connection failure:
Verizon: 2%
AT&T: 1%
Sprint: 12%
T-Mobile: 5%
SEATTLE/TACOMA
Network Technology: 3G vs 2.5G
Verizon: 94% runs 3G infrastructure
AT&T: 98%
Sprint: 93%
T-Mobile: 65%
Signal Strength
Verizon: Percentage of network operating at:
75% of full strength or better: 22% of network mapped
50 - 75%: 33%
25 - 50%: 31%
25% or less: 14%
AT&T:
75% or better: 46%
50 – 75%: 19%
25 - 50%: 31%
25% or less: 4%
Sprint:
75% or better: 60%
50 - 75%: 30%
25 - 50%: 7%
25% or less: 3%
T-Mobile:
75% or better: 42%
50 - 75%: 20%
25 - 50%: 33%
25% or less: 5%
Data Speeds
Verizon’s average download/upload speeds: 195k/103k
AT&T: 350k/126k
Sprint: 205k/68k
T-Mobile: 251k/148k
Connectivity
Chance of data connection failure:
Verizon: 3%
AT&T: 3%
Sprint: 15%
T-Mobile: 3%
SAN FRANCISCO BAY REGION
Network Technology: 3G vs 2.5G
Verizon: 96% runs 3G infrastructure
AT&T: 93%
Sprint: 91%
T-Mobile: 68%
Signal Strength
Verizon: Percentage of network operating at:
75% of full strength or better: 30% of network mapped
50 - 75%: 32%
25 - 50%: 31%
25% or less: 6%
AT&T:
75% or better: 33%
50 - 75%: 18%
25 - 50%: 40%
25% or less: 9%
Sprint:
75% or better: 68%
50 - 75%: 23%
25 - 50%: 5%
25% or less: 3%
T-Mobile:
75% or better: 38%
50 - 75%: 18%
25 - 50%: 39%
25% or less: 5%
Data Speeds
Verizon’s average download/upload speeds: 259k/138k
AT&T: 359k/94k
Sprint: 236k/72k
T-Mobile: 167k/106k
Connectivity
Chance of data connection failure:
Verizon: 2%
AT&T: 2%
Sprint: 11%
T-Mobile: 4%
WASHINGTON, DC
Network Technology: 3G vs 2.5G
Verizon: 97% runs 3G infrastructure
AT&T: 99%
Sprint: 91%
T-Mobile: 82%
Signal Strength
Verizon: Percentage of network operating at:
75% of full strength or better: 17% of network mapped
50 - 75%: 30%
25 - 50%: 39%
25% or less: 14%
AT&T:
75% or better: 46%
50 - 75%: 17%
25 - 50%: 32%
25% or less: 5%
Sprint:
75% or better: 63%
50 - 75%: 26%
25 - 50%: 7%
25% or less: 3%
T-Mobile:
75% or better: 35%
50 - 75%: 19%
25 - 50%: 41%
25% or less: 5%
Data Speeds
Verizon’s average download/upload speeds: 204k/119k
AT&T: 308k/135k
Sprint: 192k/60k
T-Mobile: 201k/116k
Connectivity
Chance of data connection failure:
Verizon: 2%
AT&T: 2%
Sprint: 12%
T-Mobile: 2%
All four operators, however, had their strengths and weaknesses. Sprint (NYSE:S) has the highest coverage networks on the books: typically 90% of its footprint receives receives signals of 50% or greater of full strength. But Root found that Sprint also had the highest data connection failure rate, as high as 15% in Seattle, while the rest of the operators kept their failure rates well below 5%. So while Sprint 3G customers are getting more bars consistently, they’re much less likely to actually complete a data session.
Though T-Mobile (NYSE: DT) was the last to deploy its 3G network, it has managed to build up coverage quite quickly. In five of the seven markets Root tested, T-Mobile’s 3G build out is comparable to its three competitors’. Only in Seattle and San Francisco does it significantly lag the others–surprising considering T-Mobile USA is headquartered in Seattle. Also, though T-Mobile’s HSPA network is much newer than AT&T’s–Cingular was the first operator in the world to deploy HSPA–it’s still much slower than AT&T’s. In several markets AT&T’s average download speeds were as much as double that of T-Mobile’s.
While AT&T seemed to run away with the prize in most of the performance categories, there was one area where weaknesses in its network design were evident. While AT&T had high signal strength in much of its metro footprint, that signal strength tended to fall off rather rapidly outside of those hotzones. In most markets, 30% to 50% of AT&T’s footprint received half-strength signals or worse, which in part explains many of the lack of coverage and capacity complaints AT&T has received from many of its iPhone customers. And that’s that’s to say nothing of Verizon’s most damaging argument: AT&T doesn’t offer 3G service to 25% of population.
Here are Root’s market-by-market results:
CHICAGO
Network Technology: 3G vs 2.5G
Verizon: 98% runs 3G infrastructure
AT&T: 98%
Sprint: 97%
T-Mobile: 96%
Signal Strength
Verizon:
Percentage of network operating at 75% of full strength or better: 22% of network mapped
50 - 75%: 36%
25 - 50%: 37%
25% or less: 5%
AT&T:
75% or better: 34%
50 - 75%: 16%
25 - 50%: 44%
25% or less: 5%
Sprint:
75% or better: 69%
50 - 75%: 24%
25 - 50%: 5%
25% or less: 2%
T-Mobile:
75% or better: 51%
50 - 75%: 18%
25 - 50%: 27%
25% or less: 4%
Data Speeds: Average Download/Upload speeds
Verizon: 259k/138k
AT&T: 359k/94k
Sprint: 236k/72k
T-Mobile: 167k/106k
Connectivity: Chance of data connection failure
Verizon: 2%
AT&T: 2%
Sprint: 11%
T-Mobile: 4%
DALLAS
Network Technology: 3G vs 2.5G
Verizon: 97% runs 3G infrastructure
AT&T: 99%
Sprint: 98%
T-Mobile: 96%
Signal Strength
Verizon:
75% of full strength or better: 16% of network mapped
50 - 75%: 39%
25 - 50%: 41%
25% or less: 4%
AT&T:
75% or better: 54%
50 - 75%: 17%
25 - 50%: 27%
25% or less: 2%
Sprint:
75% or better: 61%
50 - 75%: 30%
25 - 50%: 7%
25% or less: 2%
T-Mobile:
75% or better: 44%
50 - 75%: 18%
25 - 50%: 35%
25% or less: 3%
Data Speeds
Verizon’s average download/upload speeds: 208k/121k
AT&T: 428k/97k
Sprint: 204k/69k
T-Mobile: 266k/161k
Connectivity
Chance of data connection failure:
Verizon: 2%
AT&T: 1%
Sprint: 11%
T-Mobile: 4%
LOS ANGELES/ORANGE COUNTY
Network Technology: 3G vs 2.5G
Verizon: 97% runs 3G infrastructure
AT&T: 99.99 %
Sprint: 89%
T-Mobile: 93%
Signal Strength
Verizon: Percentage of network operating at:
75% of full strength or better: 21% of network mapped
50 - 75%: 36%
25 - 50%: 33%
25% or less: 10%
AT&T:
75% or better: 33%
50 - 75%: 18%
25 - 50%: 42%
25% or less: 7%
Sprint:
75% or better: 66%
50 - 75%: 26%
25 - 50%: 5%
25% or less: 3%
T-Mobile:
75% or better: 42%
50 - 75%: 20%
25 - 50%: 35%
25% or less: 3%
Data Speeds
Verizon’s average download/upload speeds: 241k/115k
AT&T: 350k/93k
Sprint: 207k/67k
T-Mobile: 188k/119k
Connectivity
Chance of data connection failure:
Verizon: 3%
AT&T: 2%
Sprint: 12%
T-Mobile: 4%
NEW YORK CITY
Network Technology: 3G vs 2.5G
Verizon: 97% runs 3G infrastructure
AT&T: 99%
Sprint: 98%
T-Mobile: 96%
Signal Strength
Verizon: Percentage of network operating at:
75% of full strength or better: 37% of network mapped
50 - 75%: 38%
25 - 50%: 21%
25% or less: 4%
AT&T:
75% or better: 71%
50 - 75%: 16%
25 - 50%: 12%
25% or less: 1%
Sprint:
75% or better: 83%
50 - 75%: 12%
25 - 50%: 4%
25% or less: 1%
T-Mobile:
75% or better: 62%
50 - 75%: 17%
25 - 50%: 20%
25% or less: 1%
Data Speeds
Verizon’s average download/upload speeds: 201k/103k
AT&T: 246k/131k
Sprint: 176k/59k
T-Mobile: 198k/119k
Connectivity
Chance of data connection failure:
Verizon: 2%
AT&T: 1%
Sprint: 12%
T-Mobile: 5%
SEATTLE/TACOMA
Network Technology: 3G vs 2.5G
Verizon: 94% runs 3G infrastructure
AT&T: 98%
Sprint: 93%
T-Mobile: 65%
Signal Strength
Verizon: Percentage of network operating at:
75% of full strength or better: 22% of network mapped
50 - 75%: 33%
25 - 50%: 31%
25% or less: 14%
AT&T:
75% or better: 46%
50 – 75%: 19%
25 - 50%: 31%
25% or less: 4%
Sprint:
75% or better: 60%
50 - 75%: 30%
25 - 50%: 7%
25% or less: 3%
T-Mobile:
75% or better: 42%
50 - 75%: 20%
25 - 50%: 33%
25% or less: 5%
Data Speeds
Verizon’s average download/upload speeds: 195k/103k
AT&T: 350k/126k
Sprint: 205k/68k
T-Mobile: 251k/148k
Connectivity
Chance of data connection failure:
Verizon: 3%
AT&T: 3%
Sprint: 15%
T-Mobile: 3%
SAN FRANCISCO BAY REGION
Network Technology: 3G vs 2.5G
Verizon: 96% runs 3G infrastructure
AT&T: 93%
Sprint: 91%
T-Mobile: 68%
Signal Strength
Verizon: Percentage of network operating at:
75% of full strength or better: 30% of network mapped
50 - 75%: 32%
25 - 50%: 31%
25% or less: 6%
AT&T:
75% or better: 33%
50 - 75%: 18%
25 - 50%: 40%
25% or less: 9%
Sprint:
75% or better: 68%
50 - 75%: 23%
25 - 50%: 5%
25% or less: 3%
T-Mobile:
75% or better: 38%
50 - 75%: 18%
25 - 50%: 39%
25% or less: 5%
Data Speeds
Verizon’s average download/upload speeds: 259k/138k
AT&T: 359k/94k
Sprint: 236k/72k
T-Mobile: 167k/106k
Connectivity
Chance of data connection failure:
Verizon: 2%
AT&T: 2%
Sprint: 11%
T-Mobile: 4%
WASHINGTON, DC
Network Technology: 3G vs 2.5G
Verizon: 97% runs 3G infrastructure
AT&T: 99%
Sprint: 91%
T-Mobile: 82%
Signal Strength
Verizon: Percentage of network operating at:
75% of full strength or better: 17% of network mapped
50 - 75%: 30%
25 - 50%: 39%
25% or less: 14%
AT&T:
75% or better: 46%
50 - 75%: 17%
25 - 50%: 32%
25% or less: 5%
Sprint:
75% or better: 63%
50 - 75%: 26%
25 - 50%: 7%
25% or less: 3%
T-Mobile:
75% or better: 35%
50 - 75%: 19%
25 - 50%: 41%
25% or less: 5%
Data Speeds
Verizon’s average download/upload speeds: 204k/119k
AT&T: 308k/135k
Sprint: 192k/60k
T-Mobile: 201k/116k
Connectivity
Chance of data connection failure:
Verizon: 2%
AT&T: 2%
Sprint: 12%
T-Mobile: 2%
Interesting results.
Last edited by sho_nuff1997; 12-08-2009 at 10:19 AM.
#3
Go back and read the paragraph in the bold print, pay attention to the last couple of sentences.
#7
Banned
I do find it interesting, however, what the drop off is from >75% to 51-75% for AT&T. Almost like it's all, half, or nothing with them. That would correlate what my experience with them has been.
Trending Topics
#9
Senior Moderator
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Better Neighborhood, Arizona
Posts: 45,641
Received 2,329 Likes
on
1,309 Posts
I pay just over a hundred a month for two phones with unlimited data with Sprint. No problems at all.
#10
Can't wait to drive
Go with the carrier with the coverage that you need. Depends on where you live, and where do most of your talking. I got zero reception at home one time with ATT, so i dumped it. I then went to Sprint. Sprint "roam" too much when i'm on the go sometimes and i had to pay roaming charges, so i chucked it. I then tried Verizon. Verizon has the fewest dropped calls for me, so I stuck with it for over 3 years. So for me, verizon>sprint>att
#11
Drifting
iTrader: (1)
While AT&T had high signal strength in much of its metro footprint, that signal strength tended to fall off rather rapidly outside of those hotzones.
I can't believe they didn't explain this better.
In a nutshell, its because the AT&T network is mainly in the 1900 Mhz band which doesn't not travel as far as the 850 Mhz band which Verizon uses. Lower frequence = better range/better building penetration/less towers needed, higher frequency = lower range/lower building penetration/more towers needed.
I have verizon and I'm excited about LTE because it will be operating in the 700 Mhz band
I can't believe they didn't explain this better.
In a nutshell, its because the AT&T network is mainly in the 1900 Mhz band which doesn't not travel as far as the 850 Mhz band which Verizon uses. Lower frequence = better range/better building penetration/less towers needed, higher frequency = lower range/lower building penetration/more towers needed.
I have verizon and I'm excited about LTE because it will be operating in the 700 Mhz band
#12
The sizzle in the Steak
AT&T works better than Verizon did for me.
#14
I live in a somewhat rural area. MD.
T-Mobile = Money Stealer
AT&T = Never Used
Sprint = Never Used
Verizon Wireless = Over 5 years.
Sometimes had issues with connecting calls (rarely), but taking few steps somewhere actually fixes the problem, or recalling as well.
Customer Service has always been excellent in my opinion.
Phone calls to cities (NY, LA, Seattle, Washington D.C, Ocean City) hasn't been a problem.
IMO, Verizon is "fair", although I wish it was a little bit cheaper for being with them for over 5 years.
Sprint, you can get 25% discount on your bill, which all customer is eligible for.
AT&T, from what I've seen, most people use it for the iPhone.
One problem I do not enjoy with the Verizon, if you want to upgrade your phone, you have to extend your contract with them for another +2 years. And your upgrade occurs only certain amount of time. (once a year?)
Of course, there are other ways to get "new" phones, but that's not what I do.
T-Mobile = Money Stealer
AT&T = Never Used
Sprint = Never Used
Verizon Wireless = Over 5 years.
Sometimes had issues with connecting calls (rarely), but taking few steps somewhere actually fixes the problem, or recalling as well.
Customer Service has always been excellent in my opinion.
Phone calls to cities (NY, LA, Seattle, Washington D.C, Ocean City) hasn't been a problem.
IMO, Verizon is "fair", although I wish it was a little bit cheaper for being with them for over 5 years.
Sprint, you can get 25% discount on your bill, which all customer is eligible for.
AT&T, from what I've seen, most people use it for the iPhone.
One problem I do not enjoy with the Verizon, if you want to upgrade your phone, you have to extend your contract with them for another +2 years. And your upgrade occurs only certain amount of time. (once a year?)
Of course, there are other ways to get "new" phones, but that's not what I do.
#15
Chapter Leader
(Northeast Florida)
(Northeast Florida)
iTrader: (1)
I have had Verizon for well over seven years now. I love them. The customer service is what sets it apart from other carriers for me.
I have not had more than one mistake on our bill (ever). Their coverage is outstanding, and most of my family loves Verizon and is on Verizon.
I have not had more than one mistake on our bill (ever). Their coverage is outstanding, and most of my family loves Verizon and is on Verizon.
#16
Safety Car
I love it when I go around Texas with friends that have Verizon or Sprint and they can't get a signal but my AT&T phone works everywhere and never had issues.
In Texas AT&T ownz all of them.
In Texas AT&T ownz all of them.
#17
New tests arrived....
It's a pretty big article so I'm not going to post it all.
http://www.pcworld.com/article/18959...ance_test.html
AT&T says it has worked hard to improve its much-maligned 3G network over the last eight months--erecting hundreds of new cell towers, using better-performing wireless spectrum, and souping up its cell sites across the country--and the results of our latest 13-city 3G network performance tests suggest that the network has indeed undergone a drastic makeover.
After registering the lowest average download speeds in our 3G performance tests last spring, AT&T’s network turned in download speeds that were 84 percent better than the numbers from eight months ago; in our latest tests, AT&T's download speeds were 67 percent faster on average than those of the other three largest U.S. wireless providers--Sprint, T-Mobile, and Verizon.
In our tests last spring, AT&T posted an average download speed of 818 kbps (kilobits per second) across 13 cities. In our tests conducted in December 2009 and January 2010, AT&T’s average download speed increased to 1410 kbps.
AT&T's download speeds in New York City were three times faster in our latest tests than in our tests last spring; in San Francisco, the AT&T's download speeds were 40 percent faster.
The AT&T network’s reliability improved dramatically, too: Last spring, PCWorld testers obtained a usable broadband connection with AT&T only 68 percent of the time. In our latest tests, testers connected to AT&T successfully in 94 percent of their attempts.
After registering the lowest average download speeds in our 3G performance tests last spring, AT&T’s network turned in download speeds that were 84 percent better than the numbers from eight months ago; in our latest tests, AT&T's download speeds were 67 percent faster on average than those of the other three largest U.S. wireless providers--Sprint, T-Mobile, and Verizon.
In our tests last spring, AT&T posted an average download speed of 818 kbps (kilobits per second) across 13 cities. In our tests conducted in December 2009 and January 2010, AT&T’s average download speed increased to 1410 kbps.
AT&T's download speeds in New York City were three times faster in our latest tests than in our tests last spring; in San Francisco, the AT&T's download speeds were 40 percent faster.
The AT&T network’s reliability improved dramatically, too: Last spring, PCWorld testers obtained a usable broadband connection with AT&T only 68 percent of the time. In our latest tests, testers connected to AT&T successfully in 94 percent of their attempts.
It's a pretty big article so I'm not going to post it all.
http://www.pcworld.com/article/18959...ance_test.html
#23
lol @ all my friends championing Verizon when they all have smartphones.
#25
My Garage
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
IndycarFaster
2G TSX Audio, Bluetooth, Electronics & Navigation
0
09-11-2015 02:52 PM
DiamondJoeQuimby
Car Parts for Sale
1
09-10-2015 11:40 AM