Sports Talk & Fantasy Leagues If you like men in tights, this is the spot to be!

NBA Discussion Thread

Thread Tools
 
Old 12-12-2005 | 04:23 PM
  #361  
jlukja's Avatar
Team Owner
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 20,558
Likes: 5
From: Long Beach, CA
Its obvious that it wasn't Shaq or Kobe that put LA over the top. It was Robert Horry. They didn't win without him, but he won without them.
Old 12-12-2005 | 04:25 PM
  #362  
dom's Avatar
dom
Senior Moderator
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 47,710
Likes: 801
From: Toronto, Canada
They'll have to get by Detroit first.
Old 12-12-2005 | 04:28 PM
  #363  
teg_to_bike's Avatar
I'm back, biatch.
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 5,752
Likes: 0
From: Sunnyvale, CA
whats with all the bball threads?

Send him to preschool where he can sit with the other crybabies.
Old 12-12-2005 | 04:49 PM
  #364  
jlukja's Avatar
Team Owner
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 20,558
Likes: 5
From: Long Beach, CA
Give Phil Jackson a crack at him. He handled Rodman.
Old 12-12-2005 | 05:20 PM
  #365  
slayer202's Avatar
Drifting
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,522
Likes: 0
From: Bergen County, NJ
he wants the knicks. pacers need a point guard. hmmmm
Old 12-12-2005 | 05:28 PM
  #366  
slayer202's Avatar
Drifting
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,522
Likes: 0
From: Bergen County, NJ
Originally Posted by Doom878
I think Lebron is already about as good as Kobe and he's freaking 20. How can it be said that Shaq is going down? His stats were better for points per game than his last year in LA and he had a career high in FG% ever.

And as far as Shaq not helping LA win??? Shaq goes to Orlando they make the Finals. Shaq goes to LA, dynasty. Shaq goes to Miami 4th to 1st seed and Eastern Conf. Finals. LA without Shaq, doesn't make playoffs. So explain to me again how Shaq is not the reason LA won?
you cant say shaq was what he used to be. and i didnt say shaq didnt help the lakers win, i said he wasnt THE reason. I think kobe helped the team more, but of course shaq was part of it.

shaq + penny was a Very good combo, couldnt get all the way
shaq + kobe = championships
shaq + DWade = Very good, but I dont think it will ever get a title. shaq doesnt have that much time left
Old 12-12-2005 | 05:39 PM
  #367  
CrockPot's Avatar
Suzuka Master
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 8,333
Likes: 0
From: SoCal
Originally Posted by jlukja
Its obvious that it wasn't Shaq or Kobe that put LA over the top. It was Robert Horry. They didn't win without him, but he won without them.
not sure why this is in red, since it is fact.
Old 12-12-2005 | 05:40 PM
  #368  
CrockPot's Avatar
Suzuka Master
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 8,333
Likes: 0
From: SoCal
stephon = death to any team
Old 12-12-2005 | 05:42 PM
  #369  
teg_to_bike's Avatar
I'm back, biatch.
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 5,752
Likes: 0
From: Sunnyvale, CA
Originally Posted by GTKrockeTT
stephon = death to any team
Old 12-12-2005 | 05:53 PM
  #370  
jlukja's Avatar
Team Owner
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 20,558
Likes: 5
From: Long Beach, CA
Originally Posted by GTKrockeTT
not sure why this is in red, since it is fact.
I put it in red because, although the results are fact, the reason I stated was false. All this Shaq & Kobe bickering. :shakehead The fact is that champions are made up of teams. Who knows if, with Shaq at his best and with Kobe, the Lakers would have won anything if Horry doesn't hit the big 3 pointer in Sacramento, or if Fisher doesn't hit 50% on his 3-pointers against San Antonio, or if just one play goes differently in the Laker's 17-point comeback in Portland. Same can be said of other champions. A key play here, a key play there. No one player is the reason a team wins a championship. There are only key players without whom a team will not have won. Shaq, Kobe, Horry, Duncan, Pippen, etc. All you can say is that without any one of them, the Larry O'Brien trophy would have gone elsewhere.
Old 12-12-2005 | 05:55 PM
  #371  
sipark's Avatar
Drifting
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 3,457
Likes: 0
From: D.C. area
Originally Posted by slayer202
you cant say shaq was what he used to be. and i didnt say shaq didnt help the lakers win, i said he wasnt THE reason. I think kobe helped the team more, but of course shaq was part of it.

shaq + penny was a Very good combo, couldnt get all the way
shaq + kobe = championships
shaq + DWade = Very good, but I dont think it will ever get a title. shaq doesnt have that much time left
Shaq + '05 Lakers would've beaten Kobe + '05 Lakers 9 out of 10 times.
Old 12-12-2005 | 05:57 PM
  #372  
Maximized's Avatar
Suzuka Master
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 5,579
Likes: 0
From: Chicago Suburbs
Originally Posted by slayer202
oh jeez, not you again.

Detroit is anything but over-hyped. they are underrated. look at them this year, they have been better than ever.

and LA did not win because of shaq. look what kobe did when shaq was out of the lineup, and then the reverse. look at shaq now, going down. kobe still rising. did you just call kobe good, but not exceptional? He is probably the most talented player in the league...and i did not say he is as good as michael jordan, i just said he is the bext best thing, and you can compare him better than anyone else. lebron certainly in nothing like MJ, nor tim duncan, and ESPECIALLY not shaq.
Detroit is over-hyped. The Eastern conference was "watered down" last year. You do remember what happened with the Pacers last year? If they remain healthy and avoid stupidness, they are a team to watch in the East.

Shaq is the main reason why LA won the championship. LA sure has a great record after he left. A good example is to bolster my point is the Bulls winning because of Jordan. Pippen was an exceptional player and benefited from playing with Jordan. Jordan was a leader and would make his teammates better. Kobe the most talented, man that's a joke. Even funnier is that you claim that he is "the next best thing" to MJ.
Old 12-12-2005 | 07:19 PM
  #373  
Amoeba's Avatar
Best D-Line in the NFL
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 4,415
Likes: 0
From: Gainesville, Fl for college, Palm Beach Gardens, Fl at Home
Wade>kobe
Old 12-12-2005 | 07:28 PM
  #374  
CrockPot's Avatar
Suzuka Master
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 8,333
Likes: 0
From: SoCal
Originally Posted by Renegade
kobe>wade>amoeba
Old 12-12-2005 | 07:29 PM
  #375  
teg_to_bike's Avatar
I'm back, biatch.
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 5,752
Likes: 0
From: Sunnyvale, CA
Originally Posted by Renegade
Wade>kobe
scottie > kobe > wade

Old 12-12-2005 | 07:38 PM
  #376  
slayer202's Avatar
Drifting
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,522
Likes: 0
From: Bergen County, NJ
id say artest is worse if he doesnt wanna be there
Old 12-12-2005 | 07:39 PM
  #377  
Maximized's Avatar
Suzuka Master
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 5,579
Likes: 0
From: Chicago Suburbs
Originally Posted by jlukja
I put it in red because, although the results are fact, the reason I stated was false. All this Shaq & Kobe bickering. :shakehead The fact is that champions are made up of teams. Who knows if, with Shaq at his best and with Kobe, the Lakers would have won anything if Horry doesn't hit the big 3 pointer in Sacramento, or if Fisher doesn't hit 50% on his 3-pointers against San Antonio, or if just one play goes differently in the Laker's 17-point comeback in Portland. Same can be said of other champions. A key play here, a key play there. No one player is the reason a team wins a championship. There are only key players without whom a team will not have won. Shaq, Kobe, Horry, Duncan, Pippen, etc. All you can say is that without any one of them, the Larry O'Brien trophy would have gone elsewhere.
I agree 100%. Every championship team has a player that steps up. Steve Kerr hit a few amazing 3's when he was playing for the Bulls during their reign. He wasn't a star, but contributed when needed. Superstars enpower the team. The Bulls had a lot of average players, but playing with Jordan and Pippen really made them shine. I personally don't see that in Kobe's actions.
Old 12-12-2005 | 07:43 PM
  #378  
Fibonacci's Avatar
I feel the need...
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 14,957
Likes: 515
From: Motown
Originally Posted by Black CL-S 4-Life
Van Gundy got screwed.

but, Coach Ron Jeremy did a lot of screwing...

Pat Riley needs to head back to Lala Land, he won't take the Maimi Twinkies any further than the Eastern Conference Finals...if THAT even.
Old 12-12-2005 | 07:48 PM
  #379  
slayer202's Avatar
Drifting
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,522
Likes: 0
From: Bergen County, NJ
Originally Posted by Maximized
Detroit is over-hyped. The Eastern conference was "watered down" last year. You do remember what happened with the Pacers last year? If they remain healthy and avoid stupidness, they are a team to watch in the East.

Shaq is the main reason why LA won the championship. LA sure has a great record after he left. A good example is to bolster my point is the Bulls winning because of Jordan. Pippen was an exceptional player and benefited from playing with Jordan. Jordan was a leader and would make his teammates better. Kobe the most talented, man that's a joke. Even funnier is that you claim that he is "the next best thing" to MJ.
detroit is not overhyped. you are crazy. they were insanely close to winning the title. how is that overhyped? they were under rated because everyone was just talking about how bad the east was.

the pacers are crap this year, even though they were the most overhyped team in the league...

Heat are .5 game over the lakers. why? because shaq is old and is hurt all the time, and kobe can carry a team, but needs a little help to get over the hump, someone like a scottie pippen. not to mention the lakers are in the west, which is much tougher, aside from the central division with my bulls

I dont see what you are trying to say with the bulls comment? no one is arguing pippen was better...he did get the bulls to the playoffs without MJ though.

and Kobe is the closest thing to jordan. you are insane if you think otherwise. who else is more like jordan? I am not saying he is close, but the CLOSEST

you my friend, do not know a thing about anything
Old 12-12-2005 | 07:57 PM
  #380  
I'm Batman's Avatar
Boom goes the Dynamite
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,670
Likes: 0
From: Moore, SC
Can they trade him to one of those European teams?
Old 12-12-2005 | 07:58 PM
  #381  
I'm Batman's Avatar
Boom goes the Dynamite
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,670
Likes: 0
From: Moore, SC
Better yet trade him to Texas Tech and lets see him pull that shit with Bobby Knight...
Old 12-12-2005 | 08:02 PM
  #382  
Maximized's Avatar
Suzuka Master
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 5,579
Likes: 0
From: Chicago Suburbs
Originally Posted by slayer202
detroit is not overhyped. you are crazy. they were insanely close to winning the title. how is that overhyped? they were under rated because everyone was just talking about how bad the east was.

the pacers are crap this year, even though they were the most overhyped team in the league...

Heat are .5 game over the lakers. why? because shaq is old and is hurt all the time, and kobe can carry a team, but needs a little help to get over the hump, someone like a scottie pippen. not to mention the lakers are in the west, which is much tougher, aside from the central division with my bulls

I dont see what you are trying to say with the bulls comment? no one is arguing pippen was better...he did get the bulls to the playoffs without MJ though.

and Kobe is the closest thing to jordan. you are insane if you think otherwise. who else is more like jordan? I am not saying he is close, but the CLOSEST

you my friend, do not know a thing about anything
Kobe shouldn't even be mentioned in the same sentence as Jordan. He isn't close to Jordan in anything. Compare the stats, simple as that. Also, here is a good comparison http://www.usatoday.com/sports/colum...zillgitt_x.htm

Kobe isn't close to Jordan, simple as that. Jordan was the arguable the best in the game. Kobe isn't even the best in the league.
Old 12-12-2005 | 08:09 PM
  #383  
Maximized's Avatar
Suzuka Master
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 5,579
Likes: 0
From: Chicago Suburbs
Originally Posted by slayer202
detroit is not overhyped. you are crazy. they were insanely close to winning the title. how is that overhyped? they were under rated because everyone was just talking about how bad the east was.
Detroit BARELY made it to the finals last year. The Heat took them to 7. Wade had 4 points in game 7. He played injured. Indiana probably would have taken them to 7 if they had a full team. Detroit was very very lucky to make it to the Finals.

I am a Bulls fan, but I don't think a team in the NBA will beat the Spurs in the playoffs. They play as a team, play smart in the playoffs, and know how to win.
Old 12-12-2005 | 08:11 PM
  #384  
slayer202's Avatar
Drifting
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,522
Likes: 0
From: Bergen County, NJ
OMG can you read? I AM NOT SAYING HE IS CLOSE, ONLY THE CLOSEST. no, hes not the best in the league, but he is VERY close. he is by far, the closest player to the kind of player jordan was. how can you argue that? give me an example
Old 12-12-2005 | 08:22 PM
  #385  
Maximized's Avatar
Suzuka Master
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 5,579
Likes: 0
From: Chicago Suburbs
Originally Posted by slayer202
OMG can you read? I AM NOT SAYING HE IS CLOSE, ONLY THE CLOSEST. no, hes not the best in the league, but he is VERY close. he is by far, the closest player to the kind of player jordan was. how can you argue that? give me an example
There are players that have some of Jordan like styles of play. The only person in the league that has some characteristics of Jordan is Lebron. Time will tell if he develops into a legend. Kobe has really nothing in common with Jordan. He has a similar style of play(as do many players because they grew up watching Jordan), but Kobe doesn't have Jordan's knowledge of the game, skill, or drive. Did you take time to look at Kobe's playoff stats???? It's a disgrace that you state that Kobe is the closest player to Jordan.
Old 12-12-2005 | 09:09 PM
  #386  
slayer202's Avatar
Drifting
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,522
Likes: 0
From: Bergen County, NJ
I am telling you there is no one closer to jordan than kobe. lebron is not even close.

last year kobe averaged 27.6 / 5.9 / 6.0

this year boards/asts down, but points up, TO down.

granted this isnt as good as jordan's numbers, but they are close, and very damn nice. he can take control of a game like jordan. tmac can also do this, although he is a little different

I should mention I hate lebron. he does not make anyone else better, regardless if kobe does. lebron is a one man show and thats all he will ever be IMO.
Old 12-12-2005 | 09:22 PM
  #387  
CrockPot's Avatar
Suzuka Master
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 8,333
Likes: 0
From: SoCal
stats...bunch a BS. the fact is, kobe is the ONLY legitimate superstar off guard that has won a recent championship. until lebron, tmac, or any other 2 guard has this on their resume...kobe is the closest to jordan because at the end of the day, it's about winning. stats come in a distant runner-up.
Old 12-12-2005 | 09:42 PM
  #388  
mjmuel0's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 181
Likes: 0
From: Louisville
he is a bad influence but you can't deny he is a strong force year in and out (except last year of course). lol
Old 12-12-2005 | 09:47 PM
  #389  
teg_to_bike's Avatar
I'm back, biatch.
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 5,752
Likes: 0
From: Sunnyvale, CA
Originally Posted by GTKrockeTT
stephon = death to any team
...along with Webber
Old 12-12-2005 | 10:07 PM
  #390  
Maximized's Avatar
Suzuka Master
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 5,579
Likes: 0
From: Chicago Suburbs
Originally Posted by GTKrockeTT
stats...bunch a BS. the fact is, kobe is the ONLY legitimate superstar off guard that has won a recent championship. until lebron, tmac, or any other 2 guard has this on their resume...kobe is the closest to jordan because at the end of the day, it's about winning. stats come in a distant runner-up.
Kobe is averaging 22.6 in the playoffs, hardly a stellar performance. Jordan averaged 33 points. Are you guys watching the NBA? Legends perform in pressure situations. Kobe hasn't performed in the playoffs, simple as that. Kobe isn't close to Jordan in anything. Also, why wasn't Kobe the Finals MVP. Shaq was the heart of that team.
Old 12-12-2005 | 10:12 PM
  #391  
CrockPot's Avatar
Suzuka Master
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 8,333
Likes: 0
From: SoCal
Originally Posted by Maximized
Kobe is averaging 22.6 in the playoffs, hardly a stellar performance. Jordan averaged 33 points. Are you guys watching the NBA? Legends perform in pressure situations. Kobe hasn't performed in the playoffs, simple as that. Kobe isn't close to Jordan in anything. Also, why wasn't Kobe the Finals MVP. Shaq was the heart of that team.
you're going off topic here. the debate is who is closest player to michael jordan in the game right now...it's not about who was more valuable to the lakers, shaq or kobe. i dare you to come up with another 2 guard that can compete with kobe's all around game and hardware in the NBA today.
Old 12-12-2005 | 10:34 PM
  #392  
Maximized's Avatar
Suzuka Master
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 5,579
Likes: 0
From: Chicago Suburbs
Originally Posted by GTKrockeTT
you're going off topic here. the debate is who is closest player to michael jordan in the game right now...it's not about who was more valuable to the lakers, shaq or kobe. i dare you to come up with another 2 guard that can compete with kobe's all around game and hardware in the NBA today.
Closest is a stupid arguement. No one in the NBA is close to the skill level of Jordan. You guys are obviously Kobe fans, so anyone I name won't get a fair shake. Dwayne Wade is right there. He needs to work on his 3 point shooting though.
Old 12-12-2005 | 11:00 PM
  #393  
teg_to_bike's Avatar
I'm back, biatch.
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 5,752
Likes: 0
From: Sunnyvale, CA
Anyone who says player x is the next Jordan is fucking retarded. No one has ever made a bigger impact on the NBA and basketball in geneal than Jordan did, and no one ever will.

Its more than stats people.
Old 12-12-2005 | 11:08 PM
  #394  
Maximized's Avatar
Suzuka Master
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 5,579
Likes: 0
From: Chicago Suburbs
Originally Posted by teg_to_bike
Anyone who says player x is the next Jordan is fucking retarded. No one has ever made a bigger impact on the NBA and basketball in geneal than Jordan did, and no one ever will.

Its more than stats people.
Thank You! Jordan did put up some great numbers though. The difference is that Jordan had an outstanding knowledge of the game and knew how to play as a part of a team.
Old 12-12-2005 | 11:10 PM
  #395  
jlukja's Avatar
Team Owner
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 20,558
Likes: 5
From: Long Beach, CA
Lakers just beat Dallas, IN DALLAS. Kobe went for a Jordanlike 43.
Old 12-12-2005 | 11:12 PM
  #396  
slayer202's Avatar
Drifting
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,522
Likes: 0
From: Bergen County, NJ
maximized, you are not understanding. no one here has said kobe is the next jordan, or that he is close to as good as jordan. we are saying that he is the closest thing to jordan out of all the other players.

I am a HUGE jordan fan, more than anyone on this board, and in no way am I a kobe fan at all, but that doesnt change anything.

I believe there will never be another jordan, especially in that bitch lebron. but there HAS to be someone closest to MJ, no matter how far away, and that player is kobe
Old 12-12-2005 | 11:13 PM
  #397  
slayer202's Avatar
Drifting
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,522
Likes: 0
From: Bergen County, NJ
Originally Posted by jlukja
Lakers just beat Dallas, IN DALLAS. Kobe went for a Jordanlike 43.
what a coincidence
Old 12-12-2005 | 11:20 PM
  #398  
CrockPot's Avatar
Suzuka Master
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 8,333
Likes: 0
From: SoCal
Originally Posted by Maximized
Closest is a stupid arguement. No one in the NBA is close to the skill level of Jordan. You guys are obviously Kobe fans, so anyone I name won't get a fair shake. Dwayne Wade is right there. He needs to work on his 3 point shooting though.
stupid is saying the pistons are over-hyped. no one introduced that kobe is the "heir apparent" because no one is arguing that mj wasn't the greatest, or that kobe was a close 2nd. but, if you can't find someone that is better all around at the 2 than kobe today, then there is no argument...cause you've already lost. dwayne wade, while a great player with boundless potential, isn't anywhere until he wins a championship. same with lebron and tmac.
Old 12-12-2005 | 11:25 PM
  #399  
fuckleberry's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 3,716
Likes: 0
so what's the big deal ?
Old 12-12-2005 | 11:25 PM
  #400  
slayer202's Avatar
Drifting
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,522
Likes: 0
From: Bergen County, NJ
Originally Posted by GTKrockeTT
stupid is saying the pistons are over-hyped. no one introduced that kobe is the "heir apparent" because no one is arguing that mj wasn't the greatest, or that kobe was a close 2nd. but, if you can't find someone that is better all around at the 2 than kobe today, then there is no argument...cause you've already lost. dwayne wade, while a great player with boundless potential, isn't anywhere until he wins a championship. same with lebron and tmac.


also, the only reason the dwade / shaq heat are better than the final shaq / kobe years is because of the controversy they had with each other. if they stayed friendly through all the years, they might still be winning championships, until the spurs and detroit overtake them



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:24 PM.