Any sports handicappers on Acurazine???
#361
Burning Brakes
Originally Posted by peacefrog
I'll be pretty busy until Sunday, Ill get on there during the games Sun afternoon.
Get on it ASAP!!! SAS is a great site for capping, those guys on there have tones of info,facts, and everything else you can think of.
#362
Drifting
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Chicago
Age: 44
Posts: 2,567
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The question of the night. Who has Uconn played besides GT? NOBODY! Cuse has faced some pretty good D and offenses. Should feel like a cake walk for them after playing FSU, VIR, and WVU.
My local is hanging a +8.5 this is another reason why I hate posting my units cuz my lines are un real at times, but if any of you deal with locals their lines can be WAY off.
You know who I'm on tonight.
GL to all
My local is hanging a +8.5 this is another reason why I hate posting my units cuz my lines are un real at times, but if any of you deal with locals their lines can be WAY off.
You know who I'm on tonight.
GL to all
#363
Burning Brakes
Can any of you guys confirm that Micheal Vick isn't playing? NUGS?
The spread went from ATL -2.5 to ATL +2.0 in a matter of a couple hours. I am sure it is because of Vick, i doubt the sharps or public can push the spread that hard.
To bad, i was gonna jump all over ATL on this, because of NE injured team....shit!
The spread went from ATL -2.5 to ATL +2.0 in a matter of a couple hours. I am sure it is because of Vick, i doubt the sharps or public can push the spread that hard.
To bad, i was gonna jump all over ATL on this, because of NE injured team....shit!
#364
Once more into the breach
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: MI
Posts: 4,879
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Rhlieu
Can any of you guys confirm that Micheal Vick isn't playing? NUGS?
The spread went from ATL -2.5 to ATL +2.0 in a matter of a couple hours. I am sure it is because of Vick, i doubt the sharps or public can push the spread that hard.
To bad, i was gonna jump all over ATL on this, because of NE injured team....shit!
The spread went from ATL -2.5 to ATL +2.0 in a matter of a couple hours. I am sure it is because of Vick, i doubt the sharps or public can push the spread that hard.
To bad, i was gonna jump all over ATL on this, because of NE injured team....shit!
I have been watching ESPN all morning. Everything points to Vick NOT playing and maybe not even dressing. Shaub is starting. I wouldnt touch this game
Side note - How many people lost their asses on the bullshit Buckeyes??
#366
Burning Brakes
With or with out VICK, ATL is still a very good team. Might even bee a better passing team today. NE is totally injuryed, starting CB's, SAFTY, DL, everyone. People are still jumping on NE because they never lose 2 in a roll, but never say never!hahaha
ATL +2.5 (3 units)
ATL ML +125 (1 unit)
ATL +2.5 (3 units)
ATL ML +125 (1 unit)
#368
Drifting
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Chicago
Age: 44
Posts: 2,567
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Didn't get raped on OSU since line was -3.5 if local would have given a 3 Yes I would have gotten raped.
I did get screwed on that CAL game.....anyone play Cal yesterday? Absolute BS!!!!!!! Had them at +1.5 Would have been up almost 8 units this week going into Sun if that game came through.
Today played
Buff
Hou
GB
BALT
Philly
AZ
DEN
not looking to hot.
I did get screwed on that CAL game.....anyone play Cal yesterday? Absolute BS!!!!!!! Had them at +1.5 Would have been up almost 8 units this week going into Sun if that game came through.
Today played
Buff
Hou
GB
BALT
Philly
AZ
DEN
not looking to hot.
#369
Burning Brakes
[QUOTE=Nugs3]
I did get screwed on that CAL game.....anyone play Cal yesterday? Absolute BS!!!!!!! Had them at +1.5 Would have been up almost 8 units this week going into Sun if that game came through.
QUOTE]
Thats so funny bro, i took UCLA +1.0 yesterday. I was all pissed when they went for two, and and score was 41-40. Then somehow there was a INT or a fumble or something, and they had it with 43sec at the 7 yard line of cal???
Man, that was my one lucky bounce for me yesterday! Penn ST rip me a new asshole!hahahahhaha
I did get screwed on that CAL game.....anyone play Cal yesterday? Absolute BS!!!!!!! Had them at +1.5 Would have been up almost 8 units this week going into Sun if that game came through.
QUOTE]
Thats so funny bro, i took UCLA +1.0 yesterday. I was all pissed when they went for two, and and score was 41-40. Then somehow there was a INT or a fumble or something, and they had it with 43sec at the 7 yard line of cal???
Man, that was my one lucky bounce for me yesterday! Penn ST rip me a new asshole!hahahahhaha
#371
Drifting
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Chicago
Age: 44
Posts: 2,567
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
[QUOTE=Rhlieu]
Line open at Cal +2 and then moved to Cal- 1. my local gave me Cal +1.5 so I pounded it. Cal was look great the whole game, I bet the UCLA backers thought they were done by the 3rd Q.
Originally Posted by Nugs3
I did get screwed on that CAL game.....anyone play Cal yesterday? Absolute BS!!!!!!! Had them at +1.5 Would have been up almost 8 units this week going into Sun if that game came through.
QUOTE]
Thats so funny bro, i took UCLA +1.0 yesterday. I was all pissed when they went for two, and and score was 41-40. Then somehow there was a INT or a fumble or something, and they had it with 43sec at the 7 yard line of cal???
Man, that was my one lucky bounce for me yesterday! Penn ST rip me a new asshole!hahahahhaha
QUOTE]
Thats so funny bro, i took UCLA +1.0 yesterday. I was all pissed when they went for two, and and score was 41-40. Then somehow there was a INT or a fumble or something, and they had it with 43sec at the 7 yard line of cal???
Man, that was my one lucky bounce for me yesterday! Penn ST rip me a new asshole!hahahahhaha
#372
Burning Brakes
Anyone with any thoughts on MNF PIT/SD??? NUGS: i think most peeople on SAS on on board with PIT. any thoughts???? I don't recall when PIT was a underdog in any game, i hate rothersburg, but he is 8td/0int. Can't beat that, nor the defense only giving up 11 points per game??
I am leaning toward PIT +3/+110, and ML +160 to win outright!!!
GL GL GL
I am leaning toward PIT +3/+110, and ML +160 to win outright!!!
GL GL GL
#373
Love the bolts tonite if you can get -3...
Offensively Bolts have too much for steelers weak secondary to cover.. and I look for SD to stack 8 in the box.. and force Roth to throw the ball.. don't think Ward will be effective tonite with hammy slowing him down. Over might be the safer play... but I see final something like 34-23 Bolts.
Also playing Yankees tonite small.. had them earlier +105
see late money coming in on them...
Offensively Bolts have too much for steelers weak secondary to cover.. and I look for SD to stack 8 in the box.. and force Roth to throw the ball.. don't think Ward will be effective tonite with hammy slowing him down. Over might be the safer play... but I see final something like 34-23 Bolts.
Also playing Yankees tonite small.. had them earlier +105
see late money coming in on them...
#374
Drifting
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Chicago
Age: 44
Posts: 2,567
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Rhlieu
Anyone with any thoughts on MNF PIT/SD??? NUGS: i think most peeople on SAS on on board with PIT. any thoughts???? I don't recall when PIT was a underdog in any game, i hate rothersburg, but he is 8td/0int. Can't beat that, nor the defense only giving up 11 points per game??
I am leaning toward PIT +3/+110, and ML +160 to win outright!!!
GL GL GL
I am leaning toward PIT +3/+110, and ML +160 to win outright!!!
GL GL GL
#375
Burning Brakes
Woohooo!!! Finally reeling the fish in!hahahaha
Sweet! I got hella lucky today, played PIT +3 and ML PIT /LOW 47.5 and came back and got scared and played the 2nd half SD -3.5 / over 23. And some how, i got all 4 of the combo and the ML!!! first time ever, normally, you take 2nd half for insurances of the game. UP like 9.5 units
Hope there where PIT backers tonight, hey NUG3 what the hell does fantasy football have to do with money wagering?hahahaha
Sweet! I got hella lucky today, played PIT +3 and ML PIT /LOW 47.5 and came back and got scared and played the 2nd half SD -3.5 / over 23. And some how, i got all 4 of the combo and the ML!!! first time ever, normally, you take 2nd half for insurances of the game. UP like 9.5 units
Hope there where PIT backers tonight, hey NUG3 what the hell does fantasy football have to do with money wagering?hahahaha
#376
Drifting
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Chicago
Age: 44
Posts: 2,567
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Rhlieu
Woohooo!!!
Hope there where PIT backers tonight, hey NUG3 what the hell does fantasy football have to do with money wagering?hahahaha
Hope there where PIT backers tonight, hey NUG3 what the hell does fantasy football have to do with money wagering?hahahaha
Cash league and there is a 3 way tie for 1st place. Plus how could I pass up pitt +3.5
I did end up losing 102-104 bettis really fucked me over last night.
#377
like CWS tonite.. -1.5 for + money
Angels travelling after playing game 5 last night... White Sox well rested... and despite my dislike for Contreras.. he's pitched well lately.. White Sox 7 Angels 2
Angels travelling after playing game 5 last night... White Sox well rested... and despite my dislike for Contreras.. he's pitched well lately.. White Sox 7 Angels 2
#378
Drifting
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Chicago
Age: 44
Posts: 2,567
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by chinoz
like CWS tonite.. -1.5 for + money
Angels travelling after playing game 5 last night... White Sox well rested... and despite my dislike for Contreras.. he's pitched well lately.. White Sox 7 Angels 2
Angels travelling after playing game 5 last night... White Sox well rested... and despite my dislike for Contreras.. he's pitched well lately.. White Sox 7 Angels 2
BOL everyones thinking SOX have a lock in game 1.
#379
Burning Brakes
Dang guys, you guys never rest!!!hahahaa I was glad to see no college action on TUE or WED. Gives me a little down time from the gambling world.
I think i am going to watch TWO for the MONEY this weekend, anyone watch it yet? Worth the $$$, or did hollywood fuck up another good screen write??
I think i am going to watch TWO for the MONEY this weekend, anyone watch it yet? Worth the $$$, or did hollywood fuck up another good screen write??
#380
Once more into the breach
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: MI
Posts: 4,879
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Damn I had to go 3 pages deep to find this thread and its Thursday, you mugs all broke or something
Here are a few games im intersted in this week.
TCU - 23 vs Army
Alabama -13 vs Miss
Uconn -7 vs Cinci
Louis. -4 vs W. VA
UCLA -7 vs Wash St.
USF + vs Pitt
NE +3 vs Denver
I like all teams on the left.
Here are a few games im intersted in this week.
TCU - 23 vs Army
Alabama -13 vs Miss
Uconn -7 vs Cinci
Louis. -4 vs W. VA
UCLA -7 vs Wash St.
USF + vs Pitt
NE +3 vs Denver
I like all teams on the left.
#382
Burning Brakes
I haven't post because there hasn't been a game until tonight. Maybe Nugs is just worry about geting jinx!hahaha J/K
I haven't really looked at college sat yet either, just a play for tonight. NC ST -3 (-135) 2 unit, and NC ST -4 1 unit. NC ST is a great team at home, hell they open the line at 7.5 now, it's droping to 4. Lots of people saw the lucky bounce NC ST got last week, but it didn't mean thy didn't play well. Clemson has played the better team, however, it chips at a team every time they are up or come close and end up losing by 3 or less. (all 5 games have been 6 points or less) NC ST is not going to lose at home, specially a ACC matchup. To cover a pocketpasser like whitehurst is going to be a walk in the park, compare to last weeks coverage vs Ball.
GL
Peacefrog: beware of NE/DEN game. NE is really banged up, i don't think dillion is going to play, but the public is still on NE 82% to DEN 18% so far. I could wrong again, since i live in Colorado!hahahaha
I haven't really looked at college sat yet either, just a play for tonight. NC ST -3 (-135) 2 unit, and NC ST -4 1 unit. NC ST is a great team at home, hell they open the line at 7.5 now, it's droping to 4. Lots of people saw the lucky bounce NC ST got last week, but it didn't mean thy didn't play well. Clemson has played the better team, however, it chips at a team every time they are up or come close and end up losing by 3 or less. (all 5 games have been 6 points or less) NC ST is not going to lose at home, specially a ACC matchup. To cover a pocketpasser like whitehurst is going to be a walk in the park, compare to last weeks coverage vs Ball.
GL
Peacefrog: beware of NE/DEN game. NE is really banged up, i don't think dillion is going to play, but the public is still on NE 82% to DEN 18% so far. I could wrong again, since i live in Colorado!hahahaha
#383
NCSt.. not a very good chalk team in ACC play.... got Tigers at +5...
Also playing ark st.. got them at -10.5 but would play to -12
not sure how many people follow sun belt football, but La-La is horrible.. Indians pretty good play at home..
Also playing ark st.. got them at -10.5 but would play to -12
not sure how many people follow sun belt football, but La-La is horrible.. Indians pretty good play at home..
#384
Burning Brakes
Dang, what happen to this thread????
I guess we all tanked these couple of days huh?hahahhaa
Alright here are my sunday bulleyes:
WASH +6.0
DEN -3.0
GL guys!
I guess we all tanked these couple of days huh?hahahhaa
Alright here are my sunday bulleyes:
WASH +6.0
DEN -3.0
GL guys!
#386
Burning Brakes
Nugs: any take on the IND/STL game??? Kinda funny that CLV comes in IND and they are 14.5 point dogs, and now a good team like STL comes to town and its 14 too??? hmmmm Something smells fishy if you ask me.
Leaning: IND/Under.
I think IND have really proven that they are a good defensive team. After 5 weeks of the NFL, it isn't a fluke.
Leaning: IND/Under.
I think IND have really proven that they are a good defensive team. After 5 weeks of the NFL, it isn't a fluke.
#387
Drifting
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Chicago
Age: 44
Posts: 2,567
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
This is tough. I like STL plus the points and the over. but without Martz will the Ram throw 50+ times tonight??? Who knows...... I have S. Jackson left for my fantasy team so I'll prob play STL small just for something to cheer about unless my guy give me Indy for a good price. Well see calling him now.
#388
Drifting
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Chicago
Age: 44
Posts: 2,567
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Rhlieu
Nugs: any take on the IND/STL game??? Kinda funny that CLV comes in IND and they are 14.5 point dogs, and now a good team like STL comes to town and its 14 too??? hmmmm Something smells fishy if you ask me.
Leaning: IND/Under.
I think IND have really proven that they are a good defensive team. After 5 weeks of the NFL, it isn't a fluke.
Leaning: IND/Under.
I think IND have really proven that they are a good defensive team. After 5 weeks of the NFL, it isn't a fluke.
Playing Rams +13.5
Also hitting the under at 52...think the Rams will run the ball tonight to keep indy off the field.
BOL
#389
Burning Brakes
Wow, what a comeback by IND. Major impact that Bulger got hurt, that Martin dude sux. I did decent tonight, lost the UNDER for the whole game, but came back and got OVER 24 on the 2nd half. Got IND to cover, so that was the bonus play.
#390
Once more into the breach
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: MI
Posts: 4,879
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Who do you like - Need 4 games.
Det +3 @ Cle
Ten +3 @ atl
Bal +1 @ Chi
Pit +2 @ Cin
KC +2 @ Mia
Den +2 @ Nyg
Buf +3 @ Oak
SD +4 @ Phi
Dal +3 @ Sea
SF +13 @ Was
Det +3 @ Cle
Ten +3 @ atl
Bal +1 @ Chi
Pit +2 @ Cin
KC +2 @ Mia
Den +2 @ Nyg
Buf +3 @ Oak
SD +4 @ Phi
Dal +3 @ Sea
SF +13 @ Was
#394
Drifting
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Chicago
Age: 44
Posts: 2,567
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Anyone look at tonights NCAA game? over 95% on VT tonight. I'm a huge VT fan, and do not see Maryland being able to hang. But the percentage on VT has me a little worried.
got this from SAS
Pinnacle Pulse
The inside line from PinnacleSports.com
by Simon Noble
10/19/2005 2:06PM EST
Welcome to the Pinnacle Pulse where the line managers at PinnacleSports.com look to give you an insider’s view of the point spread movement on key games each week and provide you with a little gambling theory to help you find a smarter way to bet courtesy of Pinnacle Sports.
Texas Tech (+15.5) at Texas
Both teams are 6-0 overall and 3-0 in the Big 12. Both teams' offenses appear statistically insane with Tech averaging 53.7 points per game and 573 yards of offense, while Texas averages 46.7 points and 494.5 yards per game. However, there are a couple of big differences between the in-state rivals.
First, Texas has the #1 pass defense in the Big 12, allowing under 148 passing yards per game. Second, Tech's schedule has been much easier thus far - games against Florida International, Sam Houston State, and Indiana State have inflated their statistics. By comparison, Sagarin rates Tech's schedule as the 138th most difficult in the nation compared to 46th for Texas.
This week, we opened this game at Texas -12 and got pounded by Texas backers. Within four minutes we were at -14. We are still seeing mostly Longhorn money, but the line is stabilizing near 15.5/16. Interestingly, we started taking action on this game in July when we opened it as one of our Marquee match-ups. At that time, we opened it at +10.5 and Tech backers pushed the line down to 9.5.
Auburn (+6.5) at LSU
The last five meetings between these two teams have been won by the home team and only one of those was decided by less than 13 points. Both teams have one loss, but LSU has played stronger teams, overcoming Florida and Arizona State (while losing to Tennessee). We opened the game on Sunday at +6.5 and have been taking heavy, balanced action ever since.
As another game that was featured as one of our College Football Marquee match-ups in July, we opened the line at -6 (-105) and took balanced action then as well. There has been little in way of line movement since then and it seems as though our opener was strong.
Baltimore at Chicago O/U 30.5
There has only been one NFL game in the last 20 years that closed with a total under 31. In 1994, Chicago defeated Arizona 19-16 when the game had a total of 30.5. As of Wednesday morning, the under is priced at 30.5 -111. Why is this game so low?
From a yards per play analysis, Baltimore and Chicago have the #1 and #2 defenses allowing approximately 4.3 yards per play each. Offensively, they rate #29 and #26 respectively with 4.1 and 4.7 yards per play. Both have rushed for more than 100 yards per game. Combine outstanding defenses with poor rush-based offenses and you get the lowest game total of all time. What is the lowest scoring NFL game in the last 20 years? In 2003, the Jets beat the Steelers 6-0 (with a total of 38.5).
We opened this game at 32 flat and immediately saw sharp action on the under. We had some smaller players taking the over at plus money selling points. Several professional scalpers played over 30.5 (+106), but up until now the sharps are neutral at the current number.
Indianapolis (-15) at Houston
Most sharps shudder at the thought of laying more than 7 points in the NFL in any match-up and would rather play large dogs. I know many pros who won't lay more than 7 points no matter how good it looks. On the other side are the "public" bettors who are unafraid to lay any number. For that group, Indy has been a covering machine and they are now 8-4 against the spread in the last two years when favored by more than 7 points.
Houston is the NFL's only winless team this year. Why are they so bad? They have averaged 3.8 yards per play compared to a league average of 5.3. In five games, Houston has allowed thirty QB sacks. This means that in a typical twelve possessions for the Texans, 42% of these face a long passing situation against a nickel or dime defense. These problems combine to limit Houston to less than 11 points per game.
We opened the game at -15 and received large hits from sharps at +15 and +14. We dealt briefly at +13 but were then flooded with Indy money. It looks like the sharps are on Houston at +14 or higher, while the public is favoring Indianapolis.
got this from SAS
Pinnacle Pulse
The inside line from PinnacleSports.com
by Simon Noble
10/19/2005 2:06PM EST
Welcome to the Pinnacle Pulse where the line managers at PinnacleSports.com look to give you an insider’s view of the point spread movement on key games each week and provide you with a little gambling theory to help you find a smarter way to bet courtesy of Pinnacle Sports.
Texas Tech (+15.5) at Texas
Both teams are 6-0 overall and 3-0 in the Big 12. Both teams' offenses appear statistically insane with Tech averaging 53.7 points per game and 573 yards of offense, while Texas averages 46.7 points and 494.5 yards per game. However, there are a couple of big differences between the in-state rivals.
First, Texas has the #1 pass defense in the Big 12, allowing under 148 passing yards per game. Second, Tech's schedule has been much easier thus far - games against Florida International, Sam Houston State, and Indiana State have inflated their statistics. By comparison, Sagarin rates Tech's schedule as the 138th most difficult in the nation compared to 46th for Texas.
This week, we opened this game at Texas -12 and got pounded by Texas backers. Within four minutes we were at -14. We are still seeing mostly Longhorn money, but the line is stabilizing near 15.5/16. Interestingly, we started taking action on this game in July when we opened it as one of our Marquee match-ups. At that time, we opened it at +10.5 and Tech backers pushed the line down to 9.5.
Auburn (+6.5) at LSU
The last five meetings between these two teams have been won by the home team and only one of those was decided by less than 13 points. Both teams have one loss, but LSU has played stronger teams, overcoming Florida and Arizona State (while losing to Tennessee). We opened the game on Sunday at +6.5 and have been taking heavy, balanced action ever since.
As another game that was featured as one of our College Football Marquee match-ups in July, we opened the line at -6 (-105) and took balanced action then as well. There has been little in way of line movement since then and it seems as though our opener was strong.
Baltimore at Chicago O/U 30.5
There has only been one NFL game in the last 20 years that closed with a total under 31. In 1994, Chicago defeated Arizona 19-16 when the game had a total of 30.5. As of Wednesday morning, the under is priced at 30.5 -111. Why is this game so low?
From a yards per play analysis, Baltimore and Chicago have the #1 and #2 defenses allowing approximately 4.3 yards per play each. Offensively, they rate #29 and #26 respectively with 4.1 and 4.7 yards per play. Both have rushed for more than 100 yards per game. Combine outstanding defenses with poor rush-based offenses and you get the lowest game total of all time. What is the lowest scoring NFL game in the last 20 years? In 2003, the Jets beat the Steelers 6-0 (with a total of 38.5).
We opened this game at 32 flat and immediately saw sharp action on the under. We had some smaller players taking the over at plus money selling points. Several professional scalpers played over 30.5 (+106), but up until now the sharps are neutral at the current number.
Indianapolis (-15) at Houston
Most sharps shudder at the thought of laying more than 7 points in the NFL in any match-up and would rather play large dogs. I know many pros who won't lay more than 7 points no matter how good it looks. On the other side are the "public" bettors who are unafraid to lay any number. For that group, Indy has been a covering machine and they are now 8-4 against the spread in the last two years when favored by more than 7 points.
Houston is the NFL's only winless team this year. Why are they so bad? They have averaged 3.8 yards per play compared to a league average of 5.3. In five games, Houston has allowed thirty QB sacks. This means that in a typical twelve possessions for the Texans, 42% of these face a long passing situation against a nickel or dime defense. These problems combine to limit Houston to less than 11 points per game.
We opened the game at -15 and received large hits from sharps at +15 and +14. We dealt briefly at +13 but were then flooded with Indy money. It looks like the sharps are on Houston at +14 or higher, while the public is favoring Indianapolis.
#396
Burning Brakes
Originally Posted by peacefrog
Who do you like - Need 4 games.
Det +3 @ Cle
Ten +3 @ atl
Bal +1 @ Chi
Pit +2 @ Cin
KC +2 @ Mia
Den +2 @ Nyg
Buf +3 @ Oak
SD +4 @ Phi
Dal +3 @ Sea
SF +13 @ Was
Det +3 @ Cle
Ten +3 @ atl
Bal +1 @ Chi
Pit +2 @ Cin
KC +2 @ Mia
Den +2 @ Nyg
Buf +3 @ Oak
SD +4 @ Phi
Dal +3 @ Sea
SF +13 @ Was
MAI -2
PHI -4
WASH -13
DEN +2
Great game for Denver, they finally get to win vs. a Manning!hahahha
#397
Burning Brakes
I thought this thread was DEAD!
I stop looking on rambling because none of you guys post anymore...
Glad to see everyone is still at it, NUGS! CHINOZ, PEACEFROG!
I stop looking on rambling because none of you guys post anymore...
Glad to see everyone is still at it, NUGS! CHINOZ, PEACEFROG!
#400
Go Giants
There are sports betting places all over London, actual places to go and bet. I walked into one yesterday and asked if you can bet on American Football and they said yes...