Sales Numbers
I must say obviously your Legend statement has some stance.. 500,000 miles later..
The 2.4 is definitely thirstier though. I drive pretty conservatively to get the kind of mileage I do (i'll need to fill up in about 60 miles, but my current tank is at 32.1 according to the MID, which seems pretty accurate when i do fill up) since I do a fair bit of around town driving. The traffic in the philly/south jersey area stinks, but it probably does in most reasonably populated areas!
http://www.autonews.com/article/2012...-quick-changes
2.4L automatic is on its way...
"The car was planned for a 2.4 automatic, and we're working to fulfill that"
2.4L automatic is on its way...
"The car was planned for a 2.4 automatic, and we're working to fulfill that"
Faced with the difficult choice of whether to push the release of all Earth Dreams cars back by 12 months (creating a "ripple effect" where all cars are a year late), or release what should have been the second vehicle with the technology first, I think Honda chose to release the Accord on schedule, and update the ILX and Civic early.

I bet the ILX, if fitment is possible, w/ 5AT and the K24 would net a 21/30 MPG.. even though my 09 TSX had the same rating as my ILX (22/31) I am getting a higher average (same driving routes) in the ILX than my TSX. I'd say the ILX 6-Speed is more like 24/33 for me..
My TSX w/ 5AT averaged 25/26 mpg with a 50/50 drive.
My ILX w/ 6MT averages 27-29 mpg with same 50/50 drive.. AND I drive more spirited in my ILX!!!!!!
The best think logistically for Acura to do is put the ED 2.4 in regardless of CVT or not.. because it will net a noticeable power increase AND not lose but 2mpg (5AT) at most over the 2.0 w/ 5AT.. Now add the CVT and you're getting MORE miles per gallon than the current 2.0 w/ 5AT...That would sell like crazy, people would be silly not to buy it. And, judging by what y'all are saying with the fitment issues it seems that's where they'd go with it.
But wouldn't that drive the price up? I hope the best for you guys with the 2.0!
Whoa ladies lets not get our panties in a bunch...
http://wot.motortrend.com/sagging-sa...#axzz2EgsHzNOK
Acura spokesman Chuck Schifsky tells us a different story, however. “The ILX is slowly getting up to where we want it to be, and it’s taking quite a while to get the awareness built up, but the 2.0-liter isn’t going anywhere.” As for a 2.4 automatic, Schifsky says there’s no plan for that, either.
Conflicting reports...
http://wot.motortrend.com/sagging-sa...#axzz2EgsHzNOK
Acura spokesman Chuck Schifsky tells us a different story, however. “The ILX is slowly getting up to where we want it to be, and it’s taking quite a while to get the awareness built up, but the 2.0-liter isn’t going anywhere.” As for a 2.4 automatic, Schifsky says there’s no plan for that, either.
Conflicting reports...
Errr, that makes more sense.. My bad. 
I bet the ILX, if fitment is possible, w/ 5AT and the K24 would net a 21/30 MPG.. even though my 09 TSX had the same rating as my ILX (22/31) I am getting a higher average (same driving routes) in the ILX than my TSX. I'd say the ILX 6-Speed is more like 24/33 for me..
My TSX w/ 5AT averaged 25/26 mpg with a 50/50 drive.
My ILX w/ 6MT averages 27-29 mpg with same 50/50 drive.. AND I drive more spirited in my ILX!!!!!!
The best think logistically for Acura to do is put the ED 2.4 in regardless of CVT or not.. because it will net a noticeable power increase AND not lose but 2mpg (5AT) at most over the 2.0 w/ 5AT.. Now add the CVT and you're getting MORE miles per gallon than the current 2.0 w/ 5AT...That would sell like crazy, people would be silly not to buy it. And, judging by what y'all are saying with the fitment issues it seems that's where they'd go with it.
But wouldn't that drive the price up? I hope the best for you guys with the 2.0!

I bet the ILX, if fitment is possible, w/ 5AT and the K24 would net a 21/30 MPG.. even though my 09 TSX had the same rating as my ILX (22/31) I am getting a higher average (same driving routes) in the ILX than my TSX. I'd say the ILX 6-Speed is more like 24/33 for me..
My TSX w/ 5AT averaged 25/26 mpg with a 50/50 drive.
My ILX w/ 6MT averages 27-29 mpg with same 50/50 drive.. AND I drive more spirited in my ILX!!!!!!
The best think logistically for Acura to do is put the ED 2.4 in regardless of CVT or not.. because it will net a noticeable power increase AND not lose but 2mpg (5AT) at most over the 2.0 w/ 5AT.. Now add the CVT and you're getting MORE miles per gallon than the current 2.0 w/ 5AT...That would sell like crazy, people would be silly not to buy it. And, judging by what y'all are saying with the fitment issues it seems that's where they'd go with it.
But wouldn't that drive the price up? I hope the best for you guys with the 2.0!
The sad part about all this hoopla is that in the end it will further hurt sales. John Mendel has started a self fulfilling prophecy: give people the expectation of a 2.4L and people will now stop buying the 2.0L in anticipation... In essence, his statement pretty much ensures the death of the 2.0L... Another shrewd business move by Acura...
The sad part about all this hoopla is that in the end it will further hurt sales. John Mendel has started a self fulfilling prophecy: give people the expectation of a 2.4L and people will now stop buying the 2.0L in anticipation... In essence, his statement pretty much ensures the death of the 2.0L... Another shrewd business move by Acura...
It's the same if they offered the 2.4L with a 6-Speed then hinted that there could be a Type-S in the future.. I would of waited at least.
Why is it sad news? It is what some of us asked for and most of us in the know knew about the potential changes down the road with ED coming. Most people won't even care about the change. Maybe they will continue with the 2.0 as well as the gas mileage may still be better and probably a cheaper option.
Is it woe is me when Audi, BMW, Lexus, Ford, Hyundai etc. make improvements from one year to the next or two. It is they are keeping up with the market. If Acura didn't make a change we would be complaining about that too.
The sales aren't as high as they would like them to be but that is nothing unusual for Acura, they have really never been a huge seller in the market especially as the industry continues to change so quickly.
If they hadn't delayed so long making changes to the RL they may have actually had some sales in the last few years but even in its hay day it wasn't a major seller in the market.
Is it woe is me when Audi, BMW, Lexus, Ford, Hyundai etc. make improvements from one year to the next or two. It is they are keeping up with the market. If Acura didn't make a change we would be complaining about that too.
The sales aren't as high as they would like them to be but that is nothing unusual for Acura, they have really never been a huge seller in the market especially as the industry continues to change so quickly.
If they hadn't delayed so long making changes to the RL they may have actually had some sales in the last few years but even in its hay day it wasn't a major seller in the market.
Why is it sad news? It is what some of us asked for and most of us in the know knew about the potential changes down the road with ED coming. Most people won't even care about the change. Maybe they will continue with the 2.0 as well as the gas mileage may still be better and probably a cheaper option.
Is it woe is me when Audi, BMW, Lexus, Ford, Hyundai etc. make improvements from one year to the next or two. It is they are keeping up with the market. If Acura didn't make a change we would be complaining about that too.
The sales aren't as high as they would like them to be but that is nothing unusual for Acura, they have really never been a huge seller in the market especially as the industry continues to change so quickly.
If they hadn't delayed so long making changes to the RL they may have actually had some sales in the last few years but even in its hay day it wasn't a major seller in the market.
Is it woe is me when Audi, BMW, Lexus, Ford, Hyundai etc. make improvements from one year to the next or two. It is they are keeping up with the market. If Acura didn't make a change we would be complaining about that too.
The sales aren't as high as they would like them to be but that is nothing unusual for Acura, they have really never been a huge seller in the market especially as the industry continues to change so quickly.
If they hadn't delayed so long making changes to the RL they may have actually had some sales in the last few years but even in its hay day it wasn't a major seller in the market.
It's just the tone that Acura put forth...they have made it sound like the 2.0L is a failure. The vice president himself said that it was "underpowered, and consumers don’t see the value"!
I welcome improvements, why denigrate yourself in the process? Why not just say "we are excited about the 2.0L ILX as its continuing to gain in sales (which will continue to go up due to the decline of the TSX) and to further spur sales we will be offering more engine selections in the coming year".
Acura consumers are savvy and value oriented. I feel many more will care about this news than we realize, especially those initially interested in the 2.0L...
My only point is that Acura could have gone about this without shooting themselves in the foot...
I agree with your points, Terry.
It's just the tone that Acura put forth...they have made it sound like the 2.0L is a failure. The vice president himself said that it was "underpowered, and consumers don’t see the value"!
I welcome improvements, why denigrate yourself in the process? Why not just say "we are excited about the 2.0L ILX as its continuing to gain in sales (which will continue to go up due to the decline of the TSX) and to further spur sales we will be offering more engine selections in the coming year".
Acura consumers are savvy and value oriented. I feel many more will care about this news than we realize, especially those initially interested in the 2.0L...
My only point is that Acura could have gone about this without shooting themselves in the foot...
It's just the tone that Acura put forth...they have made it sound like the 2.0L is a failure. The vice president himself said that it was "underpowered, and consumers don’t see the value"!
I welcome improvements, why denigrate yourself in the process? Why not just say "we are excited about the 2.0L ILX as its continuing to gain in sales (which will continue to go up due to the decline of the TSX) and to further spur sales we will be offering more engine selections in the coming year".
Acura consumers are savvy and value oriented. I feel many more will care about this news than we realize, especially those initially interested in the 2.0L...
My only point is that Acura could have gone about this without shooting themselves in the foot...
It was actually pretty stupid thing to say if he was quoted correctly and or it was in context.
Errr, that makes more sense.. My bad. 
I bet the ILX, if fitment is possible, w/ 5AT and the K24 would net a 21/30 MPG.. even though my 09 TSX had the same rating as my ILX (22/31) I am getting a higher average (same driving routes) in the ILX than my TSX. I'd say the ILX 6-Speed is more like 24/33 for me..
My TSX w/ 5AT averaged 25/26 mpg with a 50/50 drive.
My ILX w/ 6MT averages 27-29 mpg with same 50/50 drive.. AND I drive more spirited in my ILX!!!!!!
The best think logistically for Acura to do is put the ED 2.4 in regardless of CVT or not.. because it will net a noticeable power increase AND not lose but 2mpg (5AT) at most over the 2.0 w/ 5AT.. Now add the CVT and you're getting MORE miles per gallon than the current 2.0 w/ 5AT...That would sell like crazy, people would be silly not to buy it. And, judging by what y'all are saying with the fitment issues it seems that's where they'd go with it.
But wouldn't that drive the price up? I hope the best for you guys with the 2.0!

I bet the ILX, if fitment is possible, w/ 5AT and the K24 would net a 21/30 MPG.. even though my 09 TSX had the same rating as my ILX (22/31) I am getting a higher average (same driving routes) in the ILX than my TSX. I'd say the ILX 6-Speed is more like 24/33 for me..
My TSX w/ 5AT averaged 25/26 mpg with a 50/50 drive.
My ILX w/ 6MT averages 27-29 mpg with same 50/50 drive.. AND I drive more spirited in my ILX!!!!!!
The best think logistically for Acura to do is put the ED 2.4 in regardless of CVT or not.. because it will net a noticeable power increase AND not lose but 2mpg (5AT) at most over the 2.0 w/ 5AT.. Now add the CVT and you're getting MORE miles per gallon than the current 2.0 w/ 5AT...That would sell like crazy, people would be silly not to buy it. And, judging by what y'all are saying with the fitment issues it seems that's where they'd go with it.
But wouldn't that drive the price up? I hope the best for you guys with the 2.0!
I am comparing two cars I have owned with the same EPA rating. As stated I get 2 more MPG MINIMUM out of the ILX with a more spirited driving style. I am not saying that would be the same for every person ever or every car.. just my 2 car experiences. Thanks for the clarification though.
I am comparing two cars I have owned with the same EPA rating. As stated I get 2 more MPG MINIMUM out of the ILX with a more spirited driving style. I am not saying that would be the same for every person ever or every car.. just my 2 car experiences. Thanks for the clarification though.
ILX is 22/31 for 6MT. They dont have same rating.
He also said "The current RL has been a flop, ...." ouch. Hope the guys in the RL forum don't see this!
I was comparing the 21/30 to the 22/31 and saying it was a real world difference of 2 MPG. It having the same or even nearly the same is negligible. But, I see where my misprint lead to that part.
But, it's whatever I don't know the new facts on the new ILX of 2014. I assume if they make a change they go all the way.. i.e. Earth Dreams + CVT from the accord.
Whoa ladies lets not get our panties in a bunch...
http://wot.motortrend.com/sagging-sa...#axzz2EgsHzNOK
Acura spokesman Chuck Schifsky tells us a different story, however. “The ILX is slowly getting up to where we want it to be, and it’s taking quite a while to get the awareness built up, but the 2.0-liter isn’t going anywhere.” As for a 2.4 automatic, Schifsky says there’s no plan for that, either.
Conflicting reports...
http://wot.motortrend.com/sagging-sa...#axzz2EgsHzNOK
Acura spokesman Chuck Schifsky tells us a different story, however. “The ILX is slowly getting up to where we want it to be, and it’s taking quite a while to get the awareness built up, but the 2.0-liter isn’t going anywhere.” As for a 2.4 automatic, Schifsky says there’s no plan for that, either.
Conflicting reports...
Looks like the 2.0L's death was exaggerated...
According to the original report we had referenced from Automotive News (solely referenced by your article), Honda executive vice president John Mendel said the ILX with the base engine is”underpowered, and consumers don’t see the value.” Mendel added that an automatic transmission is on the way for the more powerful 2.4-liter version, as originally intended for the car.
Acura spokesman Carter Jung called the implication that 2.0-liter engine would be dropped “pure speculation.” He said the 2.0-liter base engine would continue to be in the ILX’s portfolio.
“We just introduced the ILX this year,” he said. “It’s not being taken from the lineup.”
Seems like one man simply misspoke?
Acura spokesman Carter Jung called the implication that 2.0-liter engine would be dropped “pure speculation.” He said the 2.0-liter base engine would continue to be in the ILX’s portfolio.
“We just introduced the ILX this year,” he said. “It’s not being taken from the lineup.”
Seems like one man simply misspoke?
According to the original report we had referenced from Automotive News (solely referenced by your article), Honda executive vice president John Mendel said the ILX with the base engine is”underpowered, and consumers don’t see the value.” Mendel added that an automatic transmission is on the way for the more powerful 2.4-liter version, as originally intended for the car.
Acura spokesman Carter Jung called the implication that 2.0-liter engine would be dropped “pure speculation.” He said the 2.0-liter base engine would continue to be in the ILX’s portfolio.
“We just introduced the ILX this year,” he said. “It’s not being taken from the lineup.”
Seems like one man simply misspoke?
Acura spokesman Carter Jung called the implication that 2.0-liter engine would be dropped “pure speculation.” He said the 2.0-liter base engine would continue to be in the ILX’s portfolio.
“We just introduced the ILX this year,” he said. “It’s not being taken from the lineup.”
Seems like one man simply misspoke?
I would've fired Mendel...that's what I call an inexcusable pr blunder on his part. He should know better than to denigrate his products/brand. I mean, come on, you work for one of the world's largest automakers, the margin of error is slim.
Business wise they should of never said anything.. and when they did the update. "We had intended for this car to have the new Earth Dreams motor all along" then no one feels like Acura doesn't know what they're doing and there are no alienated customers...
I drove the 2.0 and didn't think it was bad at all... It really didn't give me a huge "feeling" difference between my TSX and it (I know it's there) would of done fine on a daily driver. I just wanted more fun so I opt'd for a manual.
Meh.. this situation is obviously not surprising to me but it's just how Acura is handling it. It's like the right hand doesn't know who the left hand is.. let alone what it's doing.
http://www.goodcarbadcar.net/2011/12...s-figures.html
Month
Acura ILX
U.S. Sales 2012
-----
February
-----
March
-----
April
-----
May
168
June
1081
July
1410
August
1733
September
1737
October
1529
November
2108
Month
Acura ILX
Canadian Sales 2012
January
-----
February
-----
March
-----
April
-----
May
14
June
147
July
285
August
318
September
323
October
400
November
December
Year
Acura ILX
U.S. Sales
9766
Canadian Sales
1487
Looking good!
Month
Acura ILX
U.S. Sales 2012
-----
February
-----
March
-----
April
-----
May
168
June
1081
July
1410
August
1733
September
1737
October
1529
November
2108
Month
Acura ILX
Canadian Sales 2012
January
-----
February
-----
March
-----
April
-----
May
14
June
147
July
285
August
318
September
323
October
400
November
December
Year
Acura ILX
U.S. Sales
9766
Canadian Sales
1487
Looking good!
November Canadian Sales
363
so actually a dip from September!
YTD numbers
Year Acura ILX U.S. Sales Acura ILX Canadian Sales
2012 9766 1850
December 2012 numbers are out. Really good momentum here!
ILX Sales Since Its Release:
TSX Sales Since ILX Release:
ILX Sales Since Its Release:
- June - 1081 units
- July - 1410 units
- August - 1733 units
- September - 1737 units
- October - 1529 units
- November - 2108 units
- December - 2485 units
TSX Sales Since ILX Release:
- June - 2602 units
- July - 1980 units
- August - 2103 units
- September - 1681 units
- October - 1577 units
- November - 1768 units
- December - 2142 units
December 2012 numbers are out. Really good momentum here!
ILX Sales Since Its Release:
TSX Sales Since ILX Release:
ILX Sales Since Its Release:
- June - 1081 units
- July - 1410 units
- August - 1733 units
- September - 1737 units
- October - 1529 units
- November - 2108 units
- December - 2485 units
TSX Sales Since ILX Release:
- June - 2602 units
- July - 1980 units
- August - 2103 units
- September - 1681 units
- October - 1577 units
- November - 1768 units
- December - 2142 units
Good to see an upward trend but I find the hybrid sales more interesting (alarming?). They had wanted 1/4 of the sales to be hybrids but thus far it stands at less than 10%. Hopefully if & when the new ED engines & hybrid system makes it to the ILX, the sales will pick up.
December's Fastest & Slowest Selling Cars
Automakers won't report December sales results until later today, but we have data on the month's fastest and slowest sellers. The redesigned Toyota Avalon hit dealerships in the first week of December, and it stormed the fastest-selling list, with regular and hybrid versions averaging just 8 days apiece on dealer lots. Shoppers moved toward the Ford F-Series Super Duty pickup truck, too. That’s likely a result of an improved construction market; November housing starts hit their 2nd highest rate since mid-2008.
The redesigned Mercedes-Benz GL-Class, which hit dealerships in September, spent its 3rd month among the fastest sellers; the new-for-2013 Subaru XV Crosstrek also marked its 3rd month on the list. Of the 18 fastest-selling cars, 10 were repeat performers, with such regulars as the redesigned Subaru Impreza and new Scion FR-S. The Kia Soul's severe mileage downgrade doesn't seem to have sapped demand, and neither has the popular hatchback's age. It debuted way back in early 2009, but in December it placed among the fastest sellers for the 3rd month in a row.
On the flip side, the Acura ILX spent its 2nd month on the Losers list (the ILX Hybrid made November's list). Have buyers snubbed it for the related and less expensive Civic from parent company Honda? The Civic's substantial updates narrow the quality gap between the 2, and buyers in December flocked toward the revised Honda, which averaged just 10 days on dealer lots. Stay tuned to see how both cars fare in today's sales results.
Cars in December 2012 averaged 33 days to turn. That's an uptick versus both November 2012's 28 days and December 2011's 29 days. As is custom this time of year, we looked only at 2013 inventory in December since dealers have cleared out the majority of 2012s. Here are the fastest and slowest sellers:
December Movers
2013 Mercedes-Benz GL350 Bluetec: 7 days
2013 Subaru XV Crosstrek: 7 days
2013 GMC Acadia: 8 days
2013 Toyota Avalon: 8 days
2013 Toyota Avalon Hybrid: 8 days
2013 Ford F-250 crew cab: 10 days
2013 Ford F-350 crew cab: 10 days
2013 Ford Fusion Hybrid: 10 days
2013 Honda Civic sedan: 10 days
2013 Nissan Pathfinder: 11 days
2013 Subaru Impreza hatchback: 12 days
2013 Audi Q5: 13 days
2013 Mercedes-Benz GL450: 13 days
2013 Scion FR-S: 14 days
2013 Toyota Prius v: 14 days
2013 BMW 328i xDrive sedan: 15 days
2013 Buick Enclave: 15 days
2013 Kia Soul: 15 days
December Losers
2013 Chevrolet Malibu Eco: 135 days
2013 Mazda6: 123 days
2013 Volvo XC90: 99 days
2013 Cadillac Escalade Hybrid: 99 days
2013 Acura ILX Hybrid: 96 days
2013 Smart ForTwo convertible: 91 days
2013 Volkswagen CC: 84 days
2013 Nissan GT-R: 82 days
2013 Kia Forte hatchback: 76 days
2013 Acura ILX: 76 days
Cars.com Picks
2013 Dodge Durango: 52 days
2013 Volkswagen Golf four-door: 54 days
2013 Infiniti EX37: 56 days
2013 Chevrolet Malibu: 57 days
2013 Lexus GS 350: 66 days
About the Lists
The Fastest- and Slowest-Selling Cars list reports the average number of days it takes to sell models from the day they arrive on the lot until the final paperwork is signed by a buyer. This is not a days-of-inventory list like you may find on other websites. We look exclusively at 2013s now, calling the fastest sellers Movers and the slowest ones Losers.
For Movers, we only list vehicles that pass a certain threshold of sales in order to weed out limited editions, ultra-high-performance cars and others that might skew the numbers or otherwise inaccurately portray popularity. To highlight all slow sellers, losers have no such threshold.
Our Picks highlight cars that take a significant time before they're sold and might be overlooked by shoppers. Dealers could be more motivated to sell these cars.
Automakers won't report December sales results until later today, but we have data on the month's fastest and slowest sellers. The redesigned Toyota Avalon hit dealerships in the first week of December, and it stormed the fastest-selling list, with regular and hybrid versions averaging just 8 days apiece on dealer lots. Shoppers moved toward the Ford F-Series Super Duty pickup truck, too. That’s likely a result of an improved construction market; November housing starts hit their 2nd highest rate since mid-2008.
The redesigned Mercedes-Benz GL-Class, which hit dealerships in September, spent its 3rd month among the fastest sellers; the new-for-2013 Subaru XV Crosstrek also marked its 3rd month on the list. Of the 18 fastest-selling cars, 10 were repeat performers, with such regulars as the redesigned Subaru Impreza and new Scion FR-S. The Kia Soul's severe mileage downgrade doesn't seem to have sapped demand, and neither has the popular hatchback's age. It debuted way back in early 2009, but in December it placed among the fastest sellers for the 3rd month in a row.
On the flip side, the Acura ILX spent its 2nd month on the Losers list (the ILX Hybrid made November's list). Have buyers snubbed it for the related and less expensive Civic from parent company Honda? The Civic's substantial updates narrow the quality gap between the 2, and buyers in December flocked toward the revised Honda, which averaged just 10 days on dealer lots. Stay tuned to see how both cars fare in today's sales results.
Cars in December 2012 averaged 33 days to turn. That's an uptick versus both November 2012's 28 days and December 2011's 29 days. As is custom this time of year, we looked only at 2013 inventory in December since dealers have cleared out the majority of 2012s. Here are the fastest and slowest sellers:
December Movers
2013 Mercedes-Benz GL350 Bluetec: 7 days
2013 Subaru XV Crosstrek: 7 days
2013 GMC Acadia: 8 days
2013 Toyota Avalon: 8 days
2013 Toyota Avalon Hybrid: 8 days
2013 Ford F-250 crew cab: 10 days
2013 Ford F-350 crew cab: 10 days
2013 Ford Fusion Hybrid: 10 days
2013 Honda Civic sedan: 10 days
2013 Nissan Pathfinder: 11 days
2013 Subaru Impreza hatchback: 12 days
2013 Audi Q5: 13 days
2013 Mercedes-Benz GL450: 13 days
2013 Scion FR-S: 14 days
2013 Toyota Prius v: 14 days
2013 BMW 328i xDrive sedan: 15 days
2013 Buick Enclave: 15 days
2013 Kia Soul: 15 days
December Losers
2013 Chevrolet Malibu Eco: 135 days
2013 Mazda6: 123 days
2013 Volvo XC90: 99 days
2013 Cadillac Escalade Hybrid: 99 days
2013 Acura ILX Hybrid: 96 days
2013 Smart ForTwo convertible: 91 days
2013 Volkswagen CC: 84 days
2013 Nissan GT-R: 82 days
2013 Kia Forte hatchback: 76 days
2013 Acura ILX: 76 days
Cars.com Picks
2013 Dodge Durango: 52 days
2013 Volkswagen Golf four-door: 54 days
2013 Infiniti EX37: 56 days
2013 Chevrolet Malibu: 57 days
2013 Lexus GS 350: 66 days
About the Lists
The Fastest- and Slowest-Selling Cars list reports the average number of days it takes to sell models from the day they arrive on the lot until the final paperwork is signed by a buyer. This is not a days-of-inventory list like you may find on other websites. We look exclusively at 2013s now, calling the fastest sellers Movers and the slowest ones Losers.
For Movers, we only list vehicles that pass a certain threshold of sales in order to weed out limited editions, ultra-high-performance cars and others that might skew the numbers or otherwise inaccurately portray popularity. To highlight all slow sellers, losers have no such threshold.
Our Picks highlight cars that take a significant time before they're sold and might be overlooked by shoppers. Dealers could be more motivated to sell these cars.
Good to see an upward trend but I find the hybrid sales more interesting (alarming?). They had wanted 1/4 of the sales to be hybrids but thus far it stands at less than 10%. Hopefully if & when the new ED engines & hybrid system makes it to the ILX, the sales will pick up.
On the flip side, the Acura ILX spent its 2nd month on the Losers list (the ILX Hybrid made November's list). Have buyers snubbed it for the related and less expensive Civic from parent company Honda? The Civic's substantial updates narrow the quality gap between the 2, and buyers in December flocked toward the revised Honda, which averaged just 10 days on dealer lots. Stay tuned to see how both cars fare in today's sales results.[/INDENT]
On the flip side, the Acura ILX spent its 2nd month on the Losers list (the ILX Hybrid made November's list). Have buyers snubbed it for the related and less expensive Civic from parent company Honda? The Civic's substantial updates narrow the quality gap between the 2, and buyers in December flocked toward the revised Honda, which averaged just 10 days on dealer lots. Stay tuned to see how both cars fare in today's sales results.[/INDENT]







