Blu-Ray vs. HD DVD?

Thread Tools
 
Old 01-14-2008, 10:59 PM
  #281  
The Third Ball
 
Sarlacc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Los Angeles, Ca
Age: 45
Posts: 49,250
Received 4,922 Likes on 2,618 Posts
Thankfully my samsung BR player is firmware upgradable over ethernet.
Old 01-14-2008, 11:28 PM
  #282  
Kang Ho
 
SupaRookie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: SJ, CA
Age: 41
Posts: 2,872
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Dirty lil secret!

FYI:

http://gizmodo.com/344680/the-real-r...r-went-blu+ray

All you need is a pen to sign some zeroes! Nine to be exact I'll let you guys speculate.
Old 01-15-2008, 12:09 AM
  #283  
Got a Job!
iTrader: (1)
 
Dem1K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: NYC (NoLita)
Age: 38
Posts: 4,343
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ok...I JUST saw this thread and I have some questions.

My dad bought me a 360 for xmas (the new model w/ the falcon, 175w, quieter drive). I wanted it so that I could add the HD-DVD drive to it because it was so cheap. Now I come across this thread, and apparently HD-DVD isn't going to be around anymore? So, the production of HD-DVD's will cease? Basically, should I get rid of my 360 and try to pick up a PS3? I really just want a HD/Blu-Ray DVD player, and for the price, you might as well get a game console, or so I figure. I was just about to purchase the HD-DVD player for the 360 until I came across this thread. Please lead me in the right direction. Thanks!

`John
Old 01-15-2008, 12:18 AM
  #284  
The Third Ball
 
Sarlacc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Los Angeles, Ca
Age: 45
Posts: 49,250
Received 4,922 Likes on 2,618 Posts
Dem, as of RIGHT NOW.

Warner will make HD-DVD unitl the end of May. Paramount is HD-DVD exclusive, and Universal still makes both.

This can change at any moment, but as of right now, HD-DVD is still around.
Old 01-15-2008, 12:29 AM
  #285  
Got a Job!
iTrader: (1)
 
Dem1K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: NYC (NoLita)
Age: 38
Posts: 4,343
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So if you were in my shoes, what would you do Sarlacc? Should I hang on to the 360 & get the HD-DVD drive? Or switch to the PS3? Basically I don't want to invest in HD-DVDs when it will just die out sooner or later. This sucks

OH btw, thanks for that.
Old 01-15-2008, 12:32 AM
  #286  
The Third Ball
 
Sarlacc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Los Angeles, Ca
Age: 45
Posts: 49,250
Received 4,922 Likes on 2,618 Posts
Originally Posted by Dem1K
So if you were in my shoes, what would you do Sarlacc? Should I hang on to the 360 & get the HD-DVD drive? Or switch to the PS3? This sucks

OH btw, thanks for that.
Well, do you play the xbox? if you play games on it, then yes keep it.

You can get the HD-DVD drive for sub-200 now, so with netflix to watch to rent the movies....why the hell not.

Plus, if you are running the setup using HDMI, its a GREAT upresing DVD player.
Old 01-15-2008, 12:36 AM
  #287  
Got a Job!
iTrader: (1)
 
Dem1K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: NYC (NoLita)
Age: 38
Posts: 4,343
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm not sure. I would like to, but to be honest I don't see myself playing it that much. Some games have caught my eye, such as BioShock, Halo3, Assassin's Creed, Call of Duty 4, etc. I also have a Wii which I like a lot. I really just want to watch dvd's in 1080p. As mentioned, I figured for another $100 more or so, you could get a console that could play HD movies as well, which is why I asked for it.

Last edited by Dem1K; 01-15-2008 at 12:38 AM.
Old 01-15-2008, 12:41 AM
  #288  
The Third Ball
 
Sarlacc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Los Angeles, Ca
Age: 45
Posts: 49,250
Received 4,922 Likes on 2,618 Posts
hmm, touch call. I have an xbox and a wii. But I also never like playstation games enough to even want to own the systems.

If you think you would, then I guess go ps3.
Old 01-15-2008, 12:42 AM
  #289  
Got a Job!
iTrader: (1)
 
Dem1K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: NYC (NoLita)
Age: 38
Posts: 4,343
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yeah I feel you. I don't really know much about PS3 or what games it offers so I can't make an educated decision, and I don't want to stray from the topic into a ps3 vs. xbox thing. It's more about the HD movie capabilities that I'm concerned about.
Old 01-15-2008, 12:44 AM
  #290  
The Third Ball
 
Sarlacc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Los Angeles, Ca
Age: 45
Posts: 49,250
Received 4,922 Likes on 2,618 Posts
Then why not just buy a standalone player. At this point its cheaper.
Old 01-15-2008, 12:50 AM
  #291  
Got a Job!
iTrader: (1)
 
Dem1K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: NYC (NoLita)
Age: 38
Posts: 4,343
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
HD-DVD yes, but not a BluRay player. Also note that the 360 was paid for, so I only have to pay $160 for the HD-DVD player for the 360 (which plays 1080p), whereas the cheapest 1080p HD-DVD player is like $250-300, and BluRay is around $400.
Old 01-15-2008, 12:52 AM
  #292  
The Third Ball
 
Sarlacc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Los Angeles, Ca
Age: 45
Posts: 49,250
Received 4,922 Likes on 2,618 Posts
Originally Posted by Dem1K
HD-DVD yes, but not a BluRay player. Also note that the 360 was paid for, so I only have to pay $160 for the HD-DVD player for the 360 (which plays 1080p), whereas the cheapest 1080p HD-DVD player is like $250-300, and BluRay is around $400.
Actually Sony and Samsung both have good players for 299.
Old 01-15-2008, 12:58 AM
  #293  
Big White Chocolate
 
NetEditor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: San Francisco, CA
Age: 51
Posts: 6,487
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts
Originally Posted by Sarlacc
Warner will make HD-DVD unitl the end of May. Paramount is HD-DVD exclusive, and Universal still makes both.
Actually, Universal and Paramount (and DreamWorks) are exclusive.
Old 01-15-2008, 12:59 AM
  #294  
The Third Ball
 
Sarlacc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Los Angeles, Ca
Age: 45
Posts: 49,250
Received 4,922 Likes on 2,618 Posts
Originally Posted by NetEditor
Actually, Universal and Paramount (and DreamWorks) are exclusive.
Why the hell did I think they were neutral. oh well, bed time.
Old 01-15-2008, 01:06 AM
  #295  
Got a Job!
iTrader: (1)
 
Dem1K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: NYC (NoLita)
Age: 38
Posts: 4,343
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Sarlacc
Actually Sony and Samsung both have good players for 299.

Which?? I just browsed amazon and the cheapest bluray was about $340 or so.
Old 01-15-2008, 10:16 AM
  #296  
The sizzle in the Steak
 
Moog-Type-S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Southern California
Posts: 71,436
Received 1,877 Likes on 1,297 Posts
Originally Posted by SupaRookie
FYI:

http://gizmodo.com/344680/the-real-r...r-went-blu+ray

All you need is a pen to sign some zeroes! Nine to be exact I'll let you guys speculate.
Sony
Sure these tactics of being payed off happen all the time...but Sony having to pay studios to go Blu-Ray?!? Underhanded to say the least.
Old 01-15-2008, 10:45 AM
  #297  
Big Block go VROOOM!
 
Billiam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Chicago Burbs
Age: 53
Posts: 8,578
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Moog-Type-S
Sony
Sure these tactics of being payed off happen all the time...but Sony having to pay studios to go Blu-Ray?!? Underhanded to say the least.
And Toshiba's $150 million offering plate wasn't?
Old 01-15-2008, 11:17 AM
  #298  
teh Senior Instigator
 
CLpower's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Huntington Beach, CA -> Ashburn, VA -> Raleigh, NC -> Walnut Creek, CA
Age: 42
Posts: 44,090
Received 957 Likes on 328 Posts
Originally Posted by Moog-Type-S
Sony
Sure these tactics of being payed off happen all the time...but Sony having to pay studios to go Blu-Ray?!? Underhanded to say the least.


Have you any clue what the HD side has done? Obviously not
Old 01-15-2008, 11:21 AM
  #299  
Senior Moderator
 
srika's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 58,268
Received 10,352 Likes on 5,259 Posts
Originally Posted by Moog-Type-S
Sony
Sure these tactics of being payed off happen all the time...but Sony having to pay studios to go Blu-Ray?!? Underhanded to say the least.
I thought this was speculation?
Old 01-15-2008, 11:33 AM
  #300  
nnInn
 
jupitersolo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 37,670
Received 1,084 Likes on 646 Posts
paid


P A I D
Old 01-15-2008, 11:35 AM
  #301  
Big White Chocolate
 
NetEditor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: San Francisco, CA
Age: 51
Posts: 6,487
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts
Originally Posted by srika
I thought this was speculation?
It is speculation. Both Warner and Fox have denied receiving any payoffs, while Paramount and DreamWorks both said that they did receive a total of $150 million in "marketing and promotional incentives." Now, I don't doubt that Warner received something, but it's not like it would be something new.
Old 01-15-2008, 11:37 AM
  #302  
Senior Moderator
 
srika's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 58,268
Received 10,352 Likes on 5,259 Posts
ok - thanks.

now, technically speaking, did I read somewhere that Blu-ray has a "better" quality picture?
Old 01-15-2008, 11:38 AM
  #303  
Punctuation Nazi
 
asujosh1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Austin, TX
Age: 46
Posts: 177
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by NetEditor
Actually, Universal and Paramount (and DreamWorks) are exclusive.
Uh, no they aren't...
Old 01-15-2008, 11:41 AM
  #304  
Big White Chocolate
 
NetEditor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: San Francisco, CA
Age: 51
Posts: 6,487
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts
Originally Posted by asujosh1
Pure speculation. There has been no official word from either company about abandoning HD DVD.
Old 01-15-2008, 11:44 AM
  #305  
Big White Chocolate
 
NetEditor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: San Francisco, CA
Age: 51
Posts: 6,487
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts
Originally Posted by srika
ok - thanks.

now, technically speaking, did I read somewhere that Blu-ray has a "better" quality picture?
Comparing movies that are released in both formats, the picture and audio quality is identical, usually because the same encode is used.

Although DVDFile.com did do an interesting "analysis" on that particular topic:

http://dvdfile.com/index.php?option=...6326&Itemid=11
Old 01-15-2008, 11:46 AM
  #306  
Senior Moderator
 
srika's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 58,268
Received 10,352 Likes on 5,259 Posts
ok well - if they are identical, there really does need to be some kind of "other" intervention, doesn't there. I mean as it stands, there really is no advantage to using either - so the companies needed an extra incentive to choose one over the other. The $$$ all of a sudden makes perfect sense.
Old 01-15-2008, 11:49 AM
  #307  
Got a Job!
iTrader: (1)
 
Dem1K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: NYC (NoLita)
Age: 38
Posts: 4,343
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Money usually tends to be the theme and deciding factor
Old 01-15-2008, 11:49 AM
  #308  
Big White Chocolate
 
NetEditor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: San Francisco, CA
Age: 51
Posts: 6,487
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts
Originally Posted by srika
ok well - if they are identical, there really does need to be some kind of "other" intervention, doesn't there. I mean as it stands, there really is no advantage to using either - so the companies needed an extra incentive to choose one over the other. The $$$ all of a sudden makes perfect sense.
Well, some people are saying that Shoot Em Up is showing bit rates above the theoretical limit for HD DVD. But this has been reported using the PS3 bit-rate meter, which is not that reliable. Theoretically, a movie COULD look better on Blu-ray since the specs on paper are better.
Old 01-15-2008, 01:22 PM
  #309  
The sizzle in the Steak
 
Moog-Type-S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Southern California
Posts: 71,436
Received 1,877 Likes on 1,297 Posts
Originally Posted by CLpower
Have you any clue what the HD side has done? Obviously not
HD DVD has paid studios to drop BLu-Ray?
Old 01-15-2008, 01:24 PM
  #310  
Senior Moderator
 
srika's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 58,268
Received 10,352 Likes on 5,259 Posts
Originally Posted by NetEditor
Well, some people are saying that Shoot Em Up is showing bit rates above the theoretical limit for HD DVD. But this has been reported using the PS3 bit-rate meter, which is not that reliable. Theoretically, a movie COULD look better on Blu-ray since the specs on paper are better.
do you mean the theoretical limit for Blu Ray?
Old 01-15-2008, 01:32 PM
  #311  
Big White Chocolate
 
NetEditor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: San Francisco, CA
Age: 51
Posts: 6,487
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts
Originally Posted by srika
do you mean the theoretical limit for Blu Ray?
No for HD DVD, meaning that IF Shoot Em Up were put on HD DVD, New Line would have to do something different since the bit rate is too high for HD DVD.

This assumes that the bit-rate numbers for the Blu-ray version are accurate.
Old 01-15-2008, 01:35 PM
  #312  
Big White Chocolate
 
NetEditor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: San Francisco, CA
Age: 51
Posts: 6,487
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts
Originally Posted by Moog-Type-S
HD DVD has paid studios to drop BLu-Ray?
DreamWorks got $100 million; Paramount, $50 million. These were called "marketing and promotional incentives."
Old 01-15-2008, 01:36 PM
  #313  
Senior Moderator
 
srika's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 58,268
Received 10,352 Likes on 5,259 Posts
Originally Posted by NetEditor
No for HD DVD, meaning that IF Shoot Em Up were put on HD DVD, New Line would have to do something different since the bit rate is too high for HD DVD.

This assumes that the bit-rate numbers for the Blu-ray version are accurate.
ahh ok I get it now
Old 01-15-2008, 01:45 PM
  #314  
Moderator Alumnus
 
Silver™'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: SoCal
Posts: 37,312
Received 337 Likes on 244 Posts


<object width="425" height="373"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/friS4OOcdgQ&rel=1&border=1"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/friS4OOcdgQ&rel=1&border=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="373"></embed></object>
Old 01-15-2008, 01:51 PM
  #315  
Big White Chocolate
 
NetEditor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: San Francisco, CA
Age: 51
Posts: 6,487
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts
^^^

Great movie, BTW.
Old 01-15-2008, 01:53 PM
  #316  
The sizzle in the Steak
 
Moog-Type-S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Southern California
Posts: 71,436
Received 1,877 Likes on 1,297 Posts
Originally Posted by NetEditor
DreamWorks got $100 million; Paramount, $50 million. These were called "marketing and promotional incentives."
I thought M$ paid them...not Toshiba (HD-DVD).
Old 01-15-2008, 01:58 PM
  #317  
Senior Moderator
 
srika's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 58,268
Received 10,352 Likes on 5,259 Posts
fun thread, folks.
Old 01-15-2008, 01:59 PM
  #318  
Chapter Leader
(Northeast Florida)
iTrader: (1)
 
gatrhumpy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Age: 44
Posts: 35,532
Received 1,652 Likes on 1,117 Posts
Old 01-15-2008, 02:05 PM
  #319  
Big White Chocolate
 
NetEditor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: San Francisco, CA
Age: 51
Posts: 6,487
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts
Originally Posted by Moog-Type-S
I thought M$ paid them...not Toshiba (HD-DVD).
The official word is Microsoft did NOT pay them. They probably contributed indirectly, but the money officially came from the HD DVD group.
Old 01-15-2008, 02:08 PM
  #320  
The sizzle in the Steak
 
Moog-Type-S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Southern California
Posts: 71,436
Received 1,877 Likes on 1,297 Posts
Originally Posted by NetEditor
The official word is Microsoft did NOT pay them. They probably contributed indirectly, but the money officially came from the HD DVD group.
So the money did not come from M$
Got it :wink:


Quick Reply: Blu-Ray vs. HD DVD?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:26 AM.