Blu-Ray vs. HD DVD?
#81
Big White Chocolate
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: San Francisco, CA
Age: 51
Posts: 6,487
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes
on
6 Posts
People on AVS are saying that "Shoot Em Up" has a bit transfer rate above what HD DVD is capable of. And the specs shown for either format shows Blu-ray has a higher transfer rate (as mention above in fsttyms1's post).
The triple-layer HD DVD, as far as I know, is not backward compatible. That's big deal, rendering triple-layer discs difficult and potentially impossible to implement among the installed user base.
Concerning combo discs, I'm just using my own experience (the few glitches I've experienced on either format involved combo discs) and what I've read on AVS. Most of the HD DVD guys seem to hate combos. And combos are more expensive.
Michael Bay has been very adamant about his support for Blu-ray. Spielberg specifically has said that the movies he has directed are not part of the DreamWorks deal, and numerous times has had to quash rumors that his movies will be released on HD DVD. His lone hi-def release is on Blu-ray, too.
But as I said before, I'm not so much happy for Blu-ray as I'm happy that there looks to be one format, which I think is needed for HD to gain mass adoption.
The triple-layer HD DVD, as far as I know, is not backward compatible. That's big deal, rendering triple-layer discs difficult and potentially impossible to implement among the installed user base.
Concerning combo discs, I'm just using my own experience (the few glitches I've experienced on either format involved combo discs) and what I've read on AVS. Most of the HD DVD guys seem to hate combos. And combos are more expensive.
Michael Bay has been very adamant about his support for Blu-ray. Spielberg specifically has said that the movies he has directed are not part of the DreamWorks deal, and numerous times has had to quash rumors that his movies will be released on HD DVD. His lone hi-def release is on Blu-ray, too.
But as I said before, I'm not so much happy for Blu-ray as I'm happy that there looks to be one format, which I think is needed for HD to gain mass adoption.
#82
Moderator Alumnus
Kind of bittersweet for me.
I am also glad to see the war end.
I was an early adopter, so HD-DVD was a no-brainer.
It was a finished spec. Didn't have to worry about new movies being incompatble.
I have definitely had some lockups, although I'm not sure if that was because I was a first gen player or not. My player is really bad with regards to error recovery. I got an early toshiba DVD player and never had this much trouble with it.
I wonder if MI3 will be re-released on Blu-ray to include the features that are on the HD-DVD. My guess is probably not....... *sigh*
I am also glad to see the war end.
I was an early adopter, so HD-DVD was a no-brainer.
It was a finished spec. Didn't have to worry about new movies being incompatble.
I have definitely had some lockups, although I'm not sure if that was because I was a first gen player or not. My player is really bad with regards to error recovery. I got an early toshiba DVD player and never had this much trouble with it.
I wonder if MI3 will be re-released on Blu-ray to include the features that are on the HD-DVD. My guess is probably not....... *sigh*
#83
Looks like I'll be sending back my HDDVD player and movies I got last week. Time to buy a PS3 with that money.
#84
The Third Ball
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Los Angeles, Ca
Age: 45
Posts: 49,250
Received 4,922 Likes
on
2,618 Posts
What you guys have to remember is that this change isnt going to happen for another 6 months.
Which means Warner Bros still has a lot of HD-DVD movies coming out in the interim. They are honoring all deals and contracts until that time.
So, HD-DVD isnt quite dead yet. I'd say right now they are just about in the same place they were before the deal with paramount was made. We don't know what will happen in the next 6 months. HD-DVD may throw in the towel long before then, they may try and fight back. Who knows.
Until then I'm still bi-format.
Which means Warner Bros still has a lot of HD-DVD movies coming out in the interim. They are honoring all deals and contracts until that time.
So, HD-DVD isnt quite dead yet. I'd say right now they are just about in the same place they were before the deal with paramount was made. We don't know what will happen in the next 6 months. HD-DVD may throw in the towel long before then, they may try and fight back. Who knows.
Until then I'm still bi-format.
#85
Big White Chocolate
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: San Francisco, CA
Age: 51
Posts: 6,487
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes
on
6 Posts
What's interesting though is that a press release says Warner will release new HD DVDs in a "small window" after the Blu-ray and DVD versions. I'm sure Warner is going to do the absolute contractual minimum. While technically, they say they'll release HD DVDs until May, it'll be interesting to see how that plays out.
#86
The Third Ball
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Los Angeles, Ca
Age: 45
Posts: 49,250
Received 4,922 Likes
on
2,618 Posts
Originally Posted by NetEditor
What's interesting though is that a press release says Warner will release new HD DVDs in a "small window" after the Blu-ray and DVD versions. I'm sure Warner is going to do the absolute contractual minimum. While technically, they say they'll release HD DVDs until May, it'll be interesting to see how that plays out.
Well, you have to figure how many future releases they already have printed up and ready to go vs. what's on schedule to made.
#88
The Creator
Originally Posted by NetEditor
People on AVS are saying that "Shoot Em Up" has a bit transfer rate above what HD DVD is capable of. And the specs shown for either format shows Blu-ray has a higher transfer rate (as mention above in fsttyms1's post).
Shoot Em Up is the latest major release from Warner and it's the first title they've released where they're expected to use a seperate encode for HD-DVD and Blu-ray. It's also, I believe, the first time they've delayed an HD-DVD release well past the Blu-ray release. Given the timing, I wouldn't doubt it if they're intentionally trying to sabotage their HD-DVD release to give their format decision some wings. There's no other explanation for what they've done.
It's next to impossible to find any worthwhile discussion between the Blu-ray and HD-DVD camps at AVS. The admins temporarily shut down all HD-DVD/Blu-ray discussion not long ago because there's just so much nonsense.
That said, from what I've read regarding this title (in the Blu-ray specific forum of course) people are clamoring over 40Mbps peaks using their PS3 bitrate meter which is notoriously inaccurate and also combines audio & video rates into one.
There have been titles which peaked over 50Mbps on Bluray and under 30Mbps on HD-DVD yet in side-by-side comparison reviews there have been no noticeable differences.
To my knowledge, there is only one Bluray title with an AVERAGE bitrate over 30Mbps and it's not encoded in VC-1 (which has higher quality at lower bitrates).
I'm all for theoretically higher ceilings, but if they don't add up to end results than I don't think they're worth paying for.
Originally Posted by NetEditor
The triple-layer HD DVD, as far as I know, is not backward compatible. That's big deal, rendering triple-layer discs difficult and potentially impossible to implement among the installed user base.
If there were ever a need, HD-DVD would clearly have an answer.
Originally Posted by NetEditor
Concerning combo discs, I'm just using my own experience (the few glitches I've experienced on either format involved combo discs) and what I've read on AVS. Most of the HD DVD guys seem to hate combos. And combos are more expensive.
I havent had any glitches playing HD-DVD combos, and I havent read any major reports of glitches with combos... which is suprising given that almost all of HD-DVD's major titles are combo.
As for price, I havent noticed the combo discs to be more expensive than non-combo. If there is any trend for that it's likely because most of the combos are popular titles. Even if they are more expensive then non-combo HD-DVD's, they're still cheaper than the single format Blu-rays!
Originally Posted by NetEditor
Michael Bay has been very adamant about his support for Blu-ray. Spielberg specifically has said that the movies he has directed are not part of the DreamWorks deal, and numerous times has had to quash rumors that his movies will be released on HD DVD. His lone hi-def release is on Blu-ray, too.
But as I said before, I'm not so much happy for Blu-ray as I'm happy that there looks to be one format, which I think is needed for HD to gain mass adoption.
But as I said before, I'm not so much happy for Blu-ray as I'm happy that there looks to be one format, which I think is needed for HD to gain mass adoption.
I would almost guarantee that there has been monetary compensation.
Remember, Paramount stated they went HD-DVD because of it's "superior features" only later for it to leak that they were paid $150mill to support the format. It goes both ways.
Not a one of these people chose one format over the other because it was better for the consumer. They're all going for what's best for their pockets.
Originally Posted by NetEditor
But as I said before, I'm not so much happy for Blu-ray as I'm happy that there looks to be one format, which I think is needed for HD to gain mass adoption.
We're to the point where every major release is on an HD format, players are affordable, and media is as cheap as it would ever be if not for competition.
While I see some benefits to a 1 format world, I fear it as well... especially if Bluray is indeed the winner. Prepare for higher prices and lower quality.
![2 Cents](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/2cents.gif)
#89
The Third Ball
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Los Angeles, Ca
Age: 45
Posts: 49,250
Received 4,922 Likes
on
2,618 Posts
Originally Posted by soopa
I'm not so sure having one format at this juncture will prove to be of any benefit to the consumer. There's something to be said for competition, even if it slows adoption.
We're to the point where every major release is on an HD format, players are affordable, and media is as cheap as it would ever be if not for competition.
While I see some benefits to a 1 format world, I fear it as well... especially if Bluray is indeed the winner. Prepare for higher prices and lower quality.
![2 Cents](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/2cents.gif)
Hell right now on BB.com you can get certain BR titles for 14.99 and not shitty ones at that.
I mean fuck,
![rofl](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/rofl.gif)
![rofl](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/rofl.gif)
![pofl](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/pofl.gif)
#90
The Creator
![Roll Eyes](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/rolleyes.gif)
Lower quality indeed... a prime example is Shoot Em Up, which if not for the current state of competition would likely be a typical 25Mbps/avg title.
Nearly every Bluray price drop has been in response to an HD-DVD price drop. There's nothing to say prices will continue to decline without competition.
You do make a decent point in regards to downloadable media as competition for the hard formats... but were already there... and as of yet digital downloads have posed to be no solid alternative to tangible, collectible, hard media.
#91
Big White Chocolate
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: San Francisco, CA
Age: 51
Posts: 6,487
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes
on
6 Posts
Originally Posted by soopa
Shoot Em Up is the latest major release from Warner and it's the first title they've released where they're expected to use a seperate encode for HD-DVD and Blu-ray. It's also, I believe, the first time they've delayed an HD-DVD release well past the Blu-ray release. Given the timing, I wouldn't doubt it if they're intentionally trying to sabotage their HD-DVD release to give their format decision some wings. There's no other explanation for what they've done.
Originally Posted by soopa
It's next to impossible to find any worthwhile discussion between the Blu-ray and HD-DVD camps at AVS. The admins temporarily shut down all HD-DVD/Blu-ray discussion not long ago because there's just so much nonsense.
Originally Posted by soopa
That said, from what I've read regarding this title (in the Blu-ray specific forum of course) people are clamoring over 40Mbps peaks using their PS3 bitrate meter which is notoriously inaccurate and also combines audio & video rates into one.
Originally Posted by soopa
There's no information either way if it'll be backwards compatible or not, but most are expecting it will be. In any case, there's currently absolutely no need for a 50GB disc... even Bluray movies continue to be produced on 35GB discs.
If there were ever a need, HD-DVD would clearly have an answer.
If there were ever a need, HD-DVD would clearly have an answer.
Originally Posted by soopa
I wasnt aware of any Bluray combo discs?
![Tongue](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/tongue.gif)
Originally Posted by soopa
As for price, I havent noticed the combo discs to be more expensive than non-combo. If there is any trend for that it's likely because most of the combos are popular titles. Even if they are more expensive then non-combo HD-DVD's, they're still cheaper than the single format Blu-rays!
Originally Posted by soopa
I'm not so sure having one format at this juncture will prove to be of any benefit to the consumer. There's something to be said for competition, even if it slows adoption.
We're to the point where every major release is on an HD format, players are affordable, and media is as cheap as it would ever be if not for competition.
While I see some benefits to a 1 format world, I fear it as well... especially if Bluray is indeed the winner. Prepare for higher prices and lower quality.![2 Cents](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/2cents.gif)
We're to the point where every major release is on an HD format, players are affordable, and media is as cheap as it would ever be if not for competition.
While I see some benefits to a 1 format world, I fear it as well... especially if Bluray is indeed the winner. Prepare for higher prices and lower quality.
![2 Cents](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/2cents.gif)
If Blu-ray puts the prices too high, people won't buy. I don't think the normal schmoe on the street will pay twice as much for a BD movie or $500 for a player.
![2 Cents](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/2cents.gif)
#92
The Third Ball
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Los Angeles, Ca
Age: 45
Posts: 49,250
Received 4,922 Likes
on
2,618 Posts
Originally Posted by soopa
![Roll Eyes](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/rolleyes.gif)
Lower quality indeed... a prime example is Shoot Em Up, which if not for the current state of competition would likely be a typical 25Mbps/avg title.
Nearly every Bluray price drop has been in response to an HD-DVD price drop. There's nothing to say prices will continue to decline without competition.
You do make a decent point in regards to downloadable media as competition for the hard formats... but were already there... and as of yet digital downloads have posed to be no solid alternative to tangible, collectible, hard media.
The price drop on players came due to hd-dvd, which was a good thing. But now the consumers have the players and want the movies. So, the movies now go on sale. And they'll keep dropping. VHS prices dropped, CD prices dropped, DVD prices dropped, BR will drop, too.
digital downloads are here, but they havent been brought the public in an easy to use way that will show them right on your TV. Netflix's set top box will provide that functionality, and you already have the name netflix attached who we all know, love and use. As well as itunes. I'll pay $3 bucks to rent a movie that i can watch on an airplane on my iphone.
There is plenty of competition abound to keep prices in check.
#93
Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Not Las Vegas (SF Bay Area)
Age: 40
Posts: 63,254
Received 2,787 Likes
on
1,987 Posts
Originally Posted by joerockt
Uhhh, yea it is. Look at the 2 charts.
Video sales, rentals $3.6 billion
Internet $2.8 billion
Exotic dance clubs $2.0 billion
Cable/pay-per-view TV $1.8 billion
Novelties $1.7 billion
Magazines $950 million
Mobile $39 million
Total: $12.9 billion
3.6 Billion is the majority.
Video sales, rentals $3.6 billion
Internet $2.8 billion
Exotic dance clubs $2.0 billion
Cable/pay-per-view TV $1.8 billion
Novelties $1.7 billion
Magazines $950 million
Mobile $39 million
Total: $12.9 billion
3.6 Billion is the majority.
![rofl](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/rofl.gif)
i know ive put my fair share of money into that.
#94
Make MyTL Great Again
I'm another "sucker" who bought an HD DVD (only) player recently. As Soopa has already said HD DVD is better "for the consumer" compared to Blu Ray. I personally hate Sony as a company. As for the disc capacity, Blu-Ray has theoretically higher capacity (4 layer - 100 gig), but HD DVD has a higher actually created disc capacity (3 layer - 51 gig).
I hope Toshiba pulls something out of their ass asap or hd dvd really will be dead.
I hope Toshiba pulls something out of their ass asap or hd dvd really will be dead.
#95
The Third Ball
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Los Angeles, Ca
Age: 45
Posts: 49,250
Received 4,922 Likes
on
2,618 Posts
It wont happen.
As much as I dont like Sony anymore either. They arent going to sit with yet another failed format on their hands. PS3 has been a big enough disappointment to them, they are going to push bluray ahead and push and push and push.
As much as I dont like Sony anymore either. They arent going to sit with yet another failed format on their hands. PS3 has been a big enough disappointment to them, they are going to push bluray ahead and push and push and push.
#96
trill recognize trill
Originally Posted by Sarlacc
It wont happen.
As much as I dont like Sony anymore either. They arent going to sit with yet another failed format on their hands. PS3 has been a big enough disappointment to them, they are going to push bluray ahead and push and push and push.
As much as I dont like Sony anymore either. They arent going to sit with yet another failed format on their hands. PS3 has been a big enough disappointment to them, they are going to push bluray ahead and push and push and push.
#97
Kang Ho
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: SJ, CA
Age: 41
Posts: 2,872
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
downloading these HD contents takes a very long time with high speed internet!! Blu-Ray looks pretty good. I got both format. I just want one to win by the end of this year. I wonder what kind of announcement will happen at CES. My company didnt let me to go CES
![Yuck](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/yuck.gif)
#98
The Third Ball
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Los Angeles, Ca
Age: 45
Posts: 49,250
Received 4,922 Likes
on
2,618 Posts
Originally Posted by SupaRookie
downloading these HD contents takes a very long time with high speed internet!! Blu-Ray looks pretty good. I got both format. I just want one to win by the end of this year. I wonder what kind of announcement will happen at CES. My company didnt let me to go CES ![Yuck](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/yuck.gif)
![Yuck](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/yuck.gif)
#101
The Third Ball
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Los Angeles, Ca
Age: 45
Posts: 49,250
Received 4,922 Likes
on
2,618 Posts
Originally Posted by zeroday
<< happy with my upconverting dvd player while all this BS plays out.
My Samsung BluRay player does an OK job, but its noticeably softer, the Xbox is very crisp.
#102
Kang Ho
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: SJ, CA
Age: 41
Posts: 2,872
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The one thing I dont like about my PS3 is that it doesnt support DTS:MA (someone on AVS told me). I have the very original PS3 firmware because my brother loaded a linux OS on it so we can copy the movies. Now that I got a new receiver and sub, I wish it could do both TrueHD and DTS:MA.
#103
The Third Ball
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Los Angeles, Ca
Age: 45
Posts: 49,250
Received 4,922 Likes
on
2,618 Posts
Originally Posted by SupaRookie
The one thing I dont like about my PS3 is that it doesnt support DTS:MA (someone on AVS told me). I have the very original PS3 firmware because my brother loaded a linux OS on it so we can copy the movies. Now that I got a new receiver and sub, I wish it could do both TrueHD and DTS:MA.
#104
I shoot people
Originally Posted by Sarlacc
My HD-DVD drive on my XBOX360 does an amazing job upconverting through HDMI.
My Samsung BluRay player does an OK job, but its noticeably softer, the Xbox is very crisp.
My Samsung BluRay player does an OK job, but its noticeably softer, the Xbox is very crisp.
![Why Me](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/whyme.gif)
#105
The Third Ball
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Los Angeles, Ca
Age: 45
Posts: 49,250
Received 4,922 Likes
on
2,618 Posts
BTW.
Warner wanted to make a Hybrid disc that contained both HD-DVD and Bluray...again neither camp could agree.
Warner wanted to make a Hybrid disc that contained both HD-DVD and Bluray...again neither camp could agree.
#106
The Third Ball
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Los Angeles, Ca
Age: 45
Posts: 49,250
Received 4,922 Likes
on
2,618 Posts
Originally Posted by is300eater
so, wait! The XBox 360's HD-DVD plays and upconverts regular DVD?!?! (I know, I know... welcome to 12 months ago
) Is this on ALL of them? Or only newer version? I got mine right when it came out...
![Why Me](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/whyme.gif)
It ONLY upconverts through HDMI or VGA...but most TVs arent set up for the proper color space with the VGA cables.
This is a huge reason I upgraded to the Elite for HDMI. This was before HDMI trickled down to the Pro model as well.
#107
I shoot people
Originally Posted by Sarlacc
It ONLY upconverts through HDMI or VGA...but most TVs arent set up for the proper color space with the VGA cables.
This is a huge reason I upgraded to the Elite for HDMI. This was before HDMI trickled down to the Pro model as well.
This is a huge reason I upgraded to the Elite for HDMI. This was before HDMI trickled down to the Pro model as well.
![Shrug](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/shrug.gif)
#108
Just dial 1911
Join Date: May 2004
Location: San Diego, CA
Age: 49
Posts: 12,144
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Originally Posted by Sarlacc
Unless youre running some seriously high quality audio components or have your set up in a proper type room, you'll never really notice the difference between regular DD and DTS.
![Huh](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/huh.gif)
#109
The Third Ball
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Los Angeles, Ca
Age: 45
Posts: 49,250
Received 4,922 Likes
on
2,618 Posts
Originally Posted by joerockt
![Huh](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/huh.gif)
I've noticed that if your ear isnt trained, many people wont really notice a huge difference.
#110
Kang Ho
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: SJ, CA
Age: 41
Posts: 2,872
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Sarlacc
Unless youre running some seriously high quality audio components or have your set up in a proper type room, you'll never really notice the difference between regular DD and DTS.
EDIT:
![](http://www.6ave.com/assets/product/images400/B809D483C4904CCB8F2D4D1591B6DD43.jpg)
![](http://www.6ave.com/assets/product/images400/1B84090548584078BAC86B54D41D7FEE.jpg)
Last edited by SupaRookie; 01-06-2008 at 11:10 PM.
#111
Just dial 1911
Join Date: May 2004
Location: San Diego, CA
Age: 49
Posts: 12,144
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Originally Posted by Sarlacc
are you an audiophile?
I've noticed that if your ear isnt trained, many people wont really notice a huge difference.
I've noticed that if your ear isnt trained, many people wont really notice a huge difference.
#112
I shoot people
with my Onkyo receiver (800 series can't remember the exact model at th moment) you can definitely hear the difference if you have it in the "DTS" mode or not... and I'm not an audiophile
#114
Originally Posted by Sarlacc
My HD-DVD drive on my XBOX360 does an amazing job upconverting through HDMI.
My Samsung BluRay player does an OK job, but its noticeably softer, the Xbox is very crisp.
My Samsung BluRay player does an OK job, but its noticeably softer, the Xbox is very crisp.
#115
The Third Ball
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Los Angeles, Ca
Age: 45
Posts: 49,250
Received 4,922 Likes
on
2,618 Posts
Originally Posted by joerockt
If I was, I wouldnt have bought a 3805. But I can guarantee if I played the movie U571 in DD then in DTS for anyone, they would notice the difference.
![Big Grin](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
Im saying most people wont really be able to hear the difference in the newer HD audio formats.
#116
The Third Ball
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Los Angeles, Ca
Age: 45
Posts: 49,250
Received 4,922 Likes
on
2,618 Posts
Originally Posted by jupitersolo
I had to use my xbox using component cables right before Christmas it was a much better picture than my upconverting DVD player.
#117
Just dial 1911
Join Date: May 2004
Location: San Diego, CA
Age: 49
Posts: 12,144
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Originally Posted by SupaRookie
but I didnt have anyway to demo it.
#118
Just dial 1911
Join Date: May 2004
Location: San Diego, CA
Age: 49
Posts: 12,144
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Originally Posted by Sarlacc
you got me wrong on that. Yes, you can tell a difference between DD and DTS. DTS is usually much louder ![Big Grin](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
Im saying most people wont really be able to hear the difference in the newer HD audio formats.
![Big Grin](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
Im saying most people wont really be able to hear the difference in the newer HD audio formats.
#119
Kang Ho
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: SJ, CA
Age: 41
Posts: 2,872
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by joerockt
If you want to demo something, just purchase it from Crutchfield then send it back within 30 days for free. I've done that several times. No hassles.
EDIT: IS U571 on HD-DVD or Blu-Ray? If so, I need to rent it.
#120
Big White Chocolate
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: San Francisco, CA
Age: 51
Posts: 6,487
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes
on
6 Posts
While I'm no fan of Sony, you guys do realize that Microsoft was a big supporter of HD DVD. Either way you go, you have a big anti-consumer company backing one of the formats.