Which would you choose: Z4 or S2k?

I know some of you might say go SLK 350 or even 280, but there ain't no 280 in Canada (Darn it!) and 350 is just too expensive.

Anyone know if a successor for the S2k would come out soon?

 

I would definatly go for the S2k, it should be cheaper then a Z4... pluss the aftermarket company embrasse the S2000... If you can't get a new S2k, go buy a used one, they are fairly cheap now a days.

 

thanks, but i dun plan on doing any modding except wheels(for sure) and bodykit(slim chance). BMW is doing a clearance sale, the rate is very low. The monthly payments are within a hundred bucks, so the cheaper part does not apply unless I buy a used S2k. However, I dunno which model year i should get, i heard there have been many changes over the years...?

 

If you can afford the Z4, i'd get that, the performace is on par with the S2000, plus you get a bit more luxury and the BMW prestige

 

I never really liked the BMW Z4, if I recall its an American only car. The S2k is more of a true sports car then the Z4 - IMO, its lighter and more bare bones. There is better feedback transmitted to the driver through the S2k, and its overall a more fun car to take on a spirited drive. If it was my only car, I would perhaps think about the more refined BMW, but for sheer thrills my nod is to the S2k.

 

I'd get the z4 for sure.

 

A brand new S2K is a bit more driveable in daily situations due to the larger 2.2L engine and the more relaxed 8000RPM redline. The older ones had a 9000RPM redline and have a harsh ride, to the point of being punishing.

 

A bit more driveable compared to an old s2k, but he's comparing it to a z4. Z4 takes a lot more of the rough edges off the s2k.

 

Z4 =

Get the S2K hands down.

 

Says the guy with the S2k!


Oh and i also would go with the Z4.. torque does wonders.

 

s2000! Hands down...

 

If it's going to be his only car, there's no question that it should be the Z4. To live with the S2000 as anything other than a weekend ripper/fun car is crazy IMO.

 

Z4, no doubt about it...

 

if the payments arent that far off, then i dont see the reason to get a S2k over a Z4.

hmmm, equal performance, similar price. i MUST say: BMW convertible > Honda

 

z4 if you can afford it, whoever said its america only, they are all over europe, just fyi

 

I like the S2K exterior a LOT better then the Z4. But the interior, flat torque curve, and the smoothness of the I6 in the Z4 would make me pick it over the S2K to drive everyday. But for a weekend fun car S2K hands down!

 

S2k

 

Z4 is soooo freakin' ugly. That in itself should persuade you to get a S2000.

 

I wasn't sure if that was a myth or not, which is why I made the statement if I recall thanks for clearing it up

 

Zed4

 

are you going to drive it around town? more torque = z4

are you going to redline @ every stop light? s2k

track? either one.

 

The Z4 is uber

 

I love the z4.

 

Z4 is fugly! But I don't know if I'd want an S2000 as a daily driver.

 

My uncle has one. It's a nice ride.

 

As long as you're not getting a 2.5i automatic Z4 ( :ghey: ) then go for the Z4. The rims on the 3.0 are sweeeeeeeeeeet. And it's bigger. Go for bigger.

 

The Z4 is somewhat feminine, but has heated seats and available navi. Also has a built-in boot of sorts.

Love the dual exhaust on the S2k. Like the rims, too.

 

and how is Z4 which comes out to about 40,000 similar priced to S2K which can be obtained at 30,000????

if you are leasing then = Z4

Purchasing I will def say S2K. Better reliability and save yourself extra 10g for mods!

J

 

s2k lists at right around $34,000, they aren't really selling for $30k new are they?

 

They are indeed, but I still think I am going hold off and possibly pay a touch more and wait for a 2006(rumored to be the last year). The S2k is not a "hot" car anymore, from a sales stand point, so they are willing to deal, you should not pay a penny over $30k for one any more.

That's why I don't understand how people feel the zero down $384/month is a good deal. Would you sell a 3 year old S2k with 36k on it for a touch over $16k? I doubt it, its costing you an extra $4k+ to drive the thing for those first three years to just give it back. Unless your reasons are tax modivated it makes sense to purchase this car. You can buy them at 10% off msrp and they still have good residual value. Sure you could probably invest the difference and make the money back, but you'll have to pay taxes on the interest and it may be tough - if your not a shrewd investor - to make $4k+ off the $14k difference in three years, not to mention most people would just blow the difference.... But now I am rambling.

Cliffnotes, if you have the money to buy this car you'd be better served to buy it then to lease it, unless its through a business for tax breaks- of course this is all IMO.

 

Used M Roadster?

 

M roadster!

 

and don't even think fo the SLK!

 

Sounds about right. When I was at the dealer the other day the service guy said they are discontinuing the s2k and bringing back the prelude.

 

Yeah, I'd get the M roadster instead! Those things can HAUL!

Check out this one against a 600 rwhp Supra (very large file)

http://www.viegeo.com/2jzftp/Supra/mymovie.mpg

 

ultimate penis car. :gheylaugh:

I'd still rock it.

 

spend the 10Gs on the BMW name

 

get a 350z

get touring (heated seats, misc. luxary things) + 6mt

you can get the grand touring roadster if you really want a vert...has all options includuing the brembo breaks

 

slk55 amg

 

Ferrari 360 Spyder