(VIDS) me v. supercharged cl-s, me vs. 350z

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-24-2003 | 06:36 PM
  #161  
darrinb's Avatar
///M POWER
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 15,299
Likes: 1
From: West Bloomfield, MI
allmotor is confused

modaddict dynoed 240 on his tl-s WITH OUT HEADERS, so a blown cl-s or tl-s w/ headers should be right in between 260-270ish
Old 09-24-2003 | 06:56 PM
  #162  
Joe5.0's Avatar
TQ > MPG
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 3,624
Likes: 8
From: Metro Detroit
All this talk of mods and hp for the money invested makes me glad I own a Mustang.

Maybe it's just me, as I'm sure it is, but why not just get a used LS1 Camaro or TA and have a low 13 second car bone stock. Leave the CL/TL to be the nice comfortable daily driver. RWD, solid axle, low tech cars are designed to go fast, and have the supporting strength to support crazy hp levels. The 5AT in the CL can barely take the stock hp level without taking a shit (or so it seems), and I'm sure the stock clutch and 6 speed aren't designed to run anything in the 13's. :o

Just my opinion.
Old 09-24-2003 | 07:01 PM
  #163  
typeR's Avatar
Senior Moderator
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 7,588
Likes: 48
From: Port Richey, FL
Originally posted by jtkz13


Maybe it's just me, as I'm sure it is, but why not just get a used LS1 Camaro or TA and have a low 13 second car bone stock. Leave the CL/TL to be the nice comfortable daily driver. RWD, solid axle, low tech cars are designed to go fast, and have the supporting strength to support crazy hp levels. The 5AT in the CL can barely take the stock hp level without taking a shit (or so it seems), and I'm sure the stock clutch and 6 speed aren't designed to run anything in the 13's. :o

Just my opinion.
it's just you ...we dont want a muscle car...we want our car and we want it to go faster ,handle better,and look better,and we enjoy the fact that people get surprised at how well it can do those things
Old 09-24-2003 | 07:06 PM
  #164  
TL_Type_S's Avatar
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 1,014
Likes: 0
From: Illinois, USA
I love the thrill of surprising unsuspecting G owners and bimmer owners... it's fun.
Old 09-24-2003 | 07:08 PM
  #165  
darrinb's Avatar
///M POWER
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 15,299
Likes: 1
From: West Bloomfield, MI
Originally posted by typeR
it's just you ...we dont want a muscle car...we want our car and we want it to go faster ,handle better,and look better,and we enjoy the fact that people get surprised at how well it can do those things
yea, but i wouldnt mind having a ls1 that can run loww 11's, for 2500 dollars u can add new heads and cams that will has 170whp!!, add a 150 shot of gas and you'll have a car that can get u into serious trouble, if i had $$$ to but alot od cars that would be on my list
Old 09-24-2003 | 07:11 PM
  #166  
typeR's Avatar
Senior Moderator
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 7,588
Likes: 48
From: Port Richey, FL
Originally posted by allmotor_2000
Unless you pull sub 1.8s 60-foots, you need 107-108mph to hit a 13.1 given the weight of our CL-S. 107-108mph on a car of our weight is around 310whp.

The M3 launched well (sub 2.0s 60-foots) pulls 13.4s E.T's @ 106mph. It makes 280+ whp I believe.

I can totally understand a 13.78 or whatever that you ran @ 101-102mph - it hooked and your car makes power. A 13.1 is VERY difficult unless you somehow extract 40-50 more hp.
with just a 1.9 it''ll be 13.5 assuming the rest stays the same ...now subtract 50lbs worth of rotational mass..and another 50 of dead weight....exhaust,b pipe ,ur pulley,piggy back,40 doesnt sound so far fetched but thats assuming 10 from the exhaust combo and 10 from the pulley...oh did i mention im hoping the ecu to eliminate the rev limiter,change lower the vtec engagement point ,and allow for fuel curve and timing adjustments,maybe my mph was off not sure but,i do think the number is achievable....btw again please dont take this the wrong way ,and this will be the last i say about this in this thread but i've gone 2.0 atleast 10 times and the day i ran my PB it was 14.0 at 101 13.9 at 102 13.84 at 101 and 13.794 at 101.54
Old 09-24-2003 | 07:34 PM
  #167  
RUF87's Avatar
Lead Footed
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 3,415
Likes: 15
From: Plano - Texas
Originally posted by typeR
it's just you ...we dont want a muscle car...we want our car and we want it to go faster ,handle better,and look better,and we enjoy the fact that people get surprised at how well it can do those things
It's just in our blood . . . always looking to mod . . that's why they call us gear-heads or hot rodders.

Besides, I had a V8 Muscle car that would rip my hands from the steering wheel, just about throw the passenger in the rear seat, you name it, but I still enjoy playing with my TLS . . .

13's or Bust!

Ruf
Old 09-24-2003 | 07:42 PM
  #168  
ModAddict's Avatar
Three Wheelin'
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,796
Likes: 0
From: Grand Rapids, Michigan
Originally posted by darrinb
allmotor is confused

modaddict dynoed 240 on his tl-s WITH OUT HEADERS, so a blown cl-s or tl-s w/ headers should be right in between 260-270ish
I'll let you know soon.
Old 09-24-2003 | 10:19 PM
  #169  
EVANCRUZ's Avatar
Instructor
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 110
Likes: 0
From: San Bernardino
Originally posted by typeR
it's just you ...we dont want a muscle car...we want our car and we want it to go faster ,handle better,and look better,and we enjoy the fact that people get surprised at how well it can do those things


WELL SAID....
Old 09-24-2003 | 11:13 PM
  #170  
Red Rider's Avatar
Subie Dubie
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 5,987
Likes: 1
From: PDX
Originally posted by darrinb
allmotor is confused

modaddict dynoed 240 on his tl-s WITH OUT HEADERS, so a blown cl-s or tl-s w/ headers should be right in between 260-270ish
Yeah, i have headers also. So even though i haven't dynoed the car i should be at 270 or so.
Old 09-25-2003 | 07:06 AM
  #171  
allmotor_2000's Avatar
Safety Car
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 4,910
Likes: 1
From: So Cal
Originally posted by Red Rider
Yeah, i have headers also. So even though i haven't dynoed the car i should be at 270 or so.
Yup... was not aware that was pre-headers - thanks for the clarification!!
Old 09-25-2003 | 07:47 AM
  #172  
r10apple's Avatar
lover and fighter
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 2,417
Likes: 32
From: St Augustine, Florida
I think some of the lower 13sec times are very optimistic. I do think that somewhere along the way, mid 13's for you guys are clearly achievable. I'd be happy to get the sedan to 13.99 in all honesty...
Old 09-25-2003 | 07:49 AM
  #173  
typeR's Avatar
Senior Moderator
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 7,588
Likes: 48
From: Port Richey, FL
Originally posted by r10apple
I think some of the lower 13sec times are very optimistic. I do think that somewhere along the way, mid 13's for you guys are clearly achievable. I'd be happy to get the sedan to 13.99 in all honesty...
what about a coupe
Old 09-25-2003 | 08:01 AM
  #174  
r10apple's Avatar
lover and fighter
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 2,417
Likes: 32
From: St Augustine, Florida
what about a coupe
That's why I said "you guys"!

Besides, no offense typeR, but you also live here in h=ll. It's way too humid/hot/generally crummy in the long run. It was like 81 degrees with 96% humidity at 9am this morning. My car felt like I filled the gas tank full of jello compared to last weekend when it was 67 degrees and 58% humidity...

I love the sun and fun but I wish winter would come so I can finally at least take it to the track for something moderately respectable...
Old 09-25-2003 | 08:37 AM
  #175  
ferizzo's Avatar
still a Masshole
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 8,774
Likes: 2
From: New York, NY
I would still think Modaddicts 240hp SC TLS would pull on on Mike's car because the power gained on the SCed car is throughout the powerband not just peak hp. I know you know this allmotor and are just playing devil's advocate.
Old 09-25-2003 | 09:03 AM
  #176  
typeR's Avatar
Senior Moderator
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 7,588
Likes: 48
From: Port Richey, FL
Originally posted by r10apple
That's why I said "you guys"!

Besides, no offense typeR, but you also live here in h=ll. It's way too humid/hot/generally crummy in the long run. It was like 81 degrees with 96% humidity at 9am this morning. My car felt like I filled the gas tank full of jello compared to last weekend when it was 67 degrees and 58% humidity...

I love the sun and fun but I wish winter would come so I can finally at least take it to the track for something moderately respectable...
i miss read you first response i thought you were saying we should be happy to get our sedans to 13.9 but you were speaking of your car...
Old 09-25-2003 | 09:19 AM
  #177  
allmotor_2000's Avatar
Safety Car
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 4,910
Likes: 1
From: So Cal
Originally posted by ferizzo
I would still think Modaddicts 240hp SC TLS would pull on on Mike's car because the power gained on the SCed car is throughout the powerband not just peak hp. I know you know this allmotor and are just playing devil's advocate.


But... being the :devil: during an 'acceleration' run, RPM's don't quite drop below 5K, so what does the power-band look in the 5K to redline region? Assume gearing and weight is the same - now it will really depend on who had what for lunch to make up for the 4hp difference
Old 09-25-2003 | 09:31 AM
  #178  
scalbert's Avatar
Suzuka Master
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 9,431
Likes: 0
From: Woodstock, GA
Originally posted by ferizzo
I would still think Modaddicts 240hp SC TLS
His headers are on the car now so it is in the 265 - 270 WHP range.
Old 09-25-2003 | 09:32 AM
  #179  
ModAddict's Avatar
Three Wheelin'
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,796
Likes: 0
From: Grand Rapids, Michigan
I wonder if I could hold 3rd gear thru the traps,...
Old 09-25-2003 | 09:36 AM
  #180  
scalbert's Avatar
Suzuka Master
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 9,431
Likes: 0
From: Woodstock, GA
I am sure you would hold 3rd; at least for the time being.
Old 09-25-2003 | 09:43 AM
  #181  
ferizzo's Avatar
still a Masshole
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 8,774
Likes: 2
From: New York, NY
Originally posted by scalbert
His headers are on the car now so it is in the 265 - 270 WHP range.
Yeah, yeah I know! Just like the turbo is back on titand19s car.

Originally posted by allmotor_2000
so what does the power-band look in the 5K to redline region? Assume gearing and weight is the same - now it will really depend on who had what for lunch to make up for the 4hp
also depending on whether they go above 110 and hit 4th!
Old 09-25-2003 | 09:44 AM
  #182  
r10apple's Avatar
lover and fighter
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 2,417
Likes: 32
From: St Augustine, Florida
Modaddict/typeR: Do you guys ever use s/s anymore or is it pointless? I'd think mabe highway speeds for third would be okay, but from a stop???
Old 09-25-2003 | 11:41 AM
  #183  
Juker008's Avatar
TRELOS
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 1,752
Likes: 0
From: S. WPB Fla.
Originally posted by ModAddict
I wonder if I could hold 3rd gear thru the traps,...


When I was pushing 270 WHP I was taching out 3rd 20'-25' before the finish line. So if u are pushing less than that, then u have a better chance keepign 3rd before the end. If not then I would recomend another 20WHP to have 4th in a decent RPM band before the end.







Juker008
Old 09-25-2003 | 12:03 PM
  #184  
Juker008's Avatar
TRELOS
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 1,752
Likes: 0
From: S. WPB Fla.
Originally posted by r10apple
Modaddict/typeR: Do you guys ever use s/s anymore or is it pointless? I'd think mabe highway speeds for third would be okay, but from a stop???

I use SS whenever I need to squeeze between two cars and don't want to rear end the car in front of me.








Juker008
Old 09-25-2003 | 12:15 PM
  #185  
Red Rider's Avatar
Subie Dubie
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 5,987
Likes: 1
From: PDX
SS almost all the time with the SC, love to punch it in 2nd and shift into 3rd with that whine
Old 09-25-2003 | 12:36 PM
  #186  
r10apple's Avatar
lover and fighter
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 2,417
Likes: 32
From: St Augustine, Florida
SS almost all the time with the SC, love to punch it in 2nd and shift into 3rd with that whine
And how long is that, red? 2 seconds???
<I'm being facetious>
Old 09-25-2003 | 12:57 PM
  #187  
mattg's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Moderator
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 22,909
Likes: 388
From: OR
Originally posted by ModAddict
I wonder if I could hold 3rd gear thru the traps,...
all of the times i've run 14.3 and below it's very close to redline in 3rd. when i ran in the 14.1's i was basically at the rev. limiter through the traps.

to run in the high 13's i think you would have to use 4th.
Old 09-25-2003 | 01:00 PM
  #188  
mattg's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Moderator
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 22,909
Likes: 388
From: OR
Originally posted by Juker008
When I was pushing 270 WHP I was taching out 3rd 20'-25' before the finish line.
so did you bounce it off the limiter or let off the throtte a bit?
Old 09-25-2003 | 01:04 PM
  #189  
darrinb's Avatar
///M POWER
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 15,299
Likes: 1
From: West Bloomfield, MI
wtf

i doubt any auto cl-s can hold third, i still got plent of third left as i cross the traps, we trap at around 95-100ish, 3rd dont end till 110, unless your trapping at around 110 your ass is staying in 3rd gear

i dunno, is there sometin im missin, if u have more hp/trq do the gears end at a lower mph??
Old 09-25-2003 | 01:07 PM
  #190  
mattg's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Moderator
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 22,909
Likes: 388
From: OR
darrin, trap speed isn't the exact speed you are going when you cross the finish line.

it's the average speed of the last 66'. someone correct me if i'm wrong.
Old 09-25-2003 | 01:10 PM
  #191  
darrinb's Avatar
///M POWER
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 15,299
Likes: 1
From: West Bloomfield, MI
i think it might be the mph at like 1300 feet in
Old 09-25-2003 | 01:11 PM
  #192  
Mike's Avatar
Senior Moderator
 
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 10,925
Likes: 12
From: location location
cuz i said so you post whore! Btw, i was trapping at 100mph and I was launching like your granny b/c of traction problems.

Originally posted by mattg



why would anyone think that Mike's car is making more whp than mine?
Old 09-25-2003 | 01:11 PM
  #193  
darrinb's Avatar
///M POWER
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 15,299
Likes: 1
From: West Bloomfield, MI
but if your traping at the very end of third that would put u at around 110 right, i dunno

modaddict/redrider

since u guys got the blower on what mph are u at in 3rd @ 7200 rpms
Old 09-25-2003 | 01:12 PM
  #194  
scalbert's Avatar
Suzuka Master
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 9,431
Likes: 0
From: Woodstock, GA
Trap speed is determined over the last 66 feet. The time to travel over that last 66 feet is used to determine the MPH since the distance is fixed. So it is almost an average speed.

However, you will not vary +/- 10 MPH over that last 66 feet. You may have a variance of 5 - 6 MPH at most which would put the terminal velocity at just over 100 MPH. That would put it close to redline.

Also, the tachs are not perfect either and may vary from car to car +/- 200 RPM or so.
Old 09-25-2003 | 01:17 PM
  #195  
darrinb's Avatar
///M POWER
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 15,299
Likes: 1
From: West Bloomfield, MI
so they trake your speed at 1254 feet and 1320 feet and average the mph??
Old 09-25-2003 | 01:24 PM
  #196  
vinarnold's Avatar
Drifting
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 2,199
Likes: 0
From: long island
very nice
Old 09-25-2003 | 01:26 PM
  #197  
scalbert's Avatar
Suzuka Master
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 9,431
Likes: 0
From: Woodstock, GA
No, they measure the time between the two points and calculate the speed. If you trapped at 98 MPH you would have taken 0.459 seconds to travel that 66 feet.
Old 09-25-2003 | 02:39 PM
  #198  
allmotor_2000's Avatar
Safety Car
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 4,910
Likes: 1
From: So Cal
Originally posted by ferizzo
Yeah, yeah I know! Just like the turbo is back on titand19s car.

also depending on whether they go above 110 and hit 4th!
Yeah right... it takes a LOT to go 110mph, trust me!!
Old 09-25-2003 | 08:58 PM
  #199  
darrinb's Avatar
///M POWER
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 15,299
Likes: 1
From: West Bloomfield, MI
Originally posted by scalbert
No, they measure the time between the two points and calculate the speed. If you trapped at 98 MPH you would have taken 0.459 seconds to travel that 66 feet.
thanks for the specs steve
Old 09-26-2003 | 01:40 AM
  #200  
mattg's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Moderator
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 22,909
Likes: 388
From: OR
Originally posted by Mike
cuz i said so you post whore! Btw, i was trapping at 100mph and I was launching like your granny b/c of traction problems.
are you threatening me?


Quick Reply: (VIDS) me v. supercharged cl-s, me vs. 350z



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:29 AM.