(VIDS) me v. supercharged cl-s, me vs. 350z
#121
Originally posted by danny25
you got any pics of the plenum installed?
you got any pics of the plenum installed?
http://www.crawfordzcar.com/
I'd post them but I can't get to them because their site relies on active-x stuff which is blocked here at my work. I haven't taken pictures of my install yet. probably soon.
#122
Originally posted by zeroday
there's pictures on crawford's website:
http://www.crawfordzcar.com/
I'd post them but I can't get to them because their site relies on active-x stuff which is blocked here at my work. I haven't taken pictures of my install yet. probably soon.
there's pictures on crawford's website:
http://www.crawfordzcar.com/
I'd post them but I can't get to them because their site relies on active-x stuff which is blocked here at my work. I haven't taken pictures of my install yet. probably soon.
#123
Ah, the compromises between design and engineering. Have a nice engine cover and retain hood clearance and restrict power output. Or have an less attractive engine bay but retain the power that should be there to begin with.
#125
Originally posted by scalbert
Ah, the compromises between design and engineering. Have a nice engine cover and retain hood clearance and restrict power output. Or have an less attractive engine bay but retain the power that should be there to begin with.
Ah, the compromises between design and engineering. Have a nice engine cover and retain hood clearance and restrict power output. Or have an less attractive engine bay but retain the power that should be there to begin with.
#127
If I had money to burn I would be getting all_motor's turbo, he would custom tune it for the 3.5L, I would get everything made, custom made, then I would have a custom sleeper ready to blow away some corvettes, vipers, the works.
But no, im broke and in college :/
I think anyone here would love to have something that would blow away, however, when your work is finally done (or install all yourself) its gonna cost close to a corvette. Now we thinking stock corvette, how you know their corvette aint modded?
it goes on and on, we modded more, they mod more, etc etc when does the MONEY end?
ah screw it, ill put the money down for a 10,000 Hp machine, 15,000 lb ft trq and I wont be fully satisfied, because theres always something to do betta!
just some philosophy, when it end?
But no, im broke and in college :/
I think anyone here would love to have something that would blow away, however, when your work is finally done (or install all yourself) its gonna cost close to a corvette. Now we thinking stock corvette, how you know their corvette aint modded?
it goes on and on, we modded more, they mod more, etc etc when does the MONEY end?
ah screw it, ill put the money down for a 10,000 Hp machine, 15,000 lb ft trq and I wont be fully satisfied, because theres always something to do betta!
just some philosophy, when it end?
#130
Originally posted by zeroday
actually this is the more expensive and nicer looking polished version..mine is powdercoated silver and the welds are more visible.
actually this is the more expensive and nicer looking polished version..mine is powdercoated silver and the welds are more visible.
#131
Originally posted by zeroday
actually this is the more expensive and nicer looking polished version..mine is powdercoated silver and the welds are more visible.
actually this is the more expensive and nicer looking polished version..mine is powdercoated silver and the welds are more visible.
It ain't pretty, but for 20 hp, who cares. I think I actually like this version better than the chrome one.
#135
So, $1000 Headers (or $400 for OBX), $300 for the IceBox, $700 for Exhaust, $300 for UR Pulleys. That's $2300 - now these guys have an argument vs. the $4500 S/C. Otherwise... everybody just enjoy what you buy and stop complaining!!
#136
Originally posted by allmotor_2000
So, $1000 Headers (or $400 for OBX), $300 for the IceBox, $700 for Exhaust, $300 for UR Pulleys. That's $2300
So, $1000 Headers (or $400 for OBX), $300 for the IceBox, $700 for Exhaust, $300 for UR Pulleys. That's $2300
#137
realize that Reds car would pull away from Mike the same way he did from me.
we all know where we're at when it comes to available mods for the cl-s. once you have i/h/e/p and light wheels, the next step is either n2o or s/c.
you gotta pay if you wanna play.
we all know where we're at when it comes to available mods for the cl-s. once you have i/h/e/p and light wheels, the next step is either n2o or s/c.
you gotta pay if you wanna play.
#139
Originally posted by allmotor_2000
So, $1000 Headers (or $400 for OBX), $300 for the IceBox, $700 for Exhaust, $300 for UR Pulleys. That's $2300 - now these guys have an argument vs. the $4500 S/C. Otherwise... everybody just enjoy what you buy and stop complaining!!
So, $1000 Headers (or $400 for OBX), $300 for the IceBox, $700 for Exhaust, $300 for UR Pulleys. That's $2300 - now these guys have an argument vs. the $4500 S/C. Otherwise... everybody just enjoy what you buy and stop complaining!!
#140
Originally posted by SiGGy
Getting the jump makes a difference on the 350z race.
I was mearly pointing out that the S/C didn't have that much more power for being F/I.
I would bet a 75 shot on a well tuned N/A ride would yield good gains, and possibly even a faster time. As you can stage the N20 power for your available traction.
IMO $4500 for the little FWHP gain isn't worth it.
I would expect $4500 of mods to RUN, not walk away...
especially with F/I
You for sure pulled away, but it was a slow walk.
I've been drag racing all sorts of cars for probably close to 10 years now.
I also have owned a bunch of Camaros & TA's. Which $4500 goes a lot further. This is probably why I don't see the practicality in it... speed vs. money anyway...
And /w CT headers... $5500...
Just my .02c feel free to give me my change back.
Getting the jump makes a difference on the 350z race.
I was mearly pointing out that the S/C didn't have that much more power for being F/I.
I would bet a 75 shot on a well tuned N/A ride would yield good gains, and possibly even a faster time. As you can stage the N20 power for your available traction.
IMO $4500 for the little FWHP gain isn't worth it.
I would expect $4500 of mods to RUN, not walk away...
especially with F/I
You for sure pulled away, but it was a slow walk.
I've been drag racing all sorts of cars for probably close to 10 years now.
I also have owned a bunch of Camaros & TA's. Which $4500 goes a lot further. This is probably why I don't see the practicality in it... speed vs. money anyway...
And /w CT headers... $5500...
Just my .02c feel free to give me my change back.
#142
Originally posted by mattg
realize that Reds car would pull away from Mike the same way he did from me.
we all know where we're at when it comes to available mods for the cl-s. once you have i/h/e/p and light wheels, the next step is either n2o or s/c.
you gotta pay if you wanna play.
realize that Reds car would pull away from Mike the same way he did from me.
we all know where we're at when it comes to available mods for the cl-s. once you have i/h/e/p and light wheels, the next step is either n2o or s/c.
you gotta pay if you wanna play.
#143
Originally posted by mattg
realize that Reds car would pull away from Mike the same way he did from me.
we all know where we're at when it comes to available mods for the cl-s. once you have i/h/e/p and light wheels, the next step is either n2o or s/c.
you gotta pay if you wanna play.
realize that Reds car would pull away from Mike the same way he did from me.
we all know where we're at when it comes to available mods for the cl-s. once you have i/h/e/p and light wheels, the next step is either n2o or s/c.
you gotta pay if you wanna play.
#145
Originally posted by allmotor_2000
So Mike... for the 236whp, how much $$ in mods did you spend?
So Mike... for the 236whp, how much $$ in mods did you spend?
btw, I hadn't bought the SSRs yet.
#151
Originally posted by typeR
i'd say that's true near 100% but there are small variances and mikes car is a little stronger than most...but dont leave out the 3.5 as an alternative....i really dont wanna sound like im tooting my own horn , but one trap of 102 and several at 101 with a 13.7 best 50* 50% if i remember though good weather not perfect...and this is with stock wheels and no pulley and stock exhaust...i really believe with the wheels the pulley the exhaust,and some possible tuning there is a real low 13 here...i mean real low 13.1 .2@ 104-5
i'd say that's true near 100% but there are small variances and mikes car is a little stronger than most...but dont leave out the 3.5 as an alternative....i really dont wanna sound like im tooting my own horn , but one trap of 102 and several at 101 with a 13.7 best 50* 50% if i remember though good weather not perfect...and this is with stock wheels and no pulley and stock exhaust...i really believe with the wheels the pulley the exhaust,and some possible tuning there is a real low 13 here...i mean real low 13.1 .2@ 104-5
The M3 launched well (sub 2.0s 60-foots) pulls 13.4s E.T's @ 106mph. It makes 280+ whp I believe.
I can totally understand a 13.78 or whatever that you ran @ 101-102mph - it hooked and your car makes power. A 13.1 is VERY difficult unless you somehow extract 40-50 more hp.
#152
Originally posted by mattg
realize that Reds car would pull away from Mike the same way he did from me.
we all know where we're at when it comes to available mods for the cl-s. once you have i/h/e/p and light wheels, the next step is either n2o or s/c.
you gotta pay if you wanna play.
realize that Reds car would pull away from Mike the same way he did from me.
we all know where we're at when it comes to available mods for the cl-s. once you have i/h/e/p and light wheels, the next step is either n2o or s/c.
you gotta pay if you wanna play.
#155
Originally posted by typeR
i'd say that's true near 100% but there are small variances and mikes car is a little stronger than most...but dont leave out the 3.5 as an alternative....
i'd say that's true near 100% but there are small variances and mikes car is a little stronger than most...but dont leave out the 3.5 as an alternative....
i personally would love to have the 3.5 conversion.
#158
Originally posted by typeR
because no other cl-s has dyno'd that high
because no other cl-s has dyno'd that high
It's faster, no it's got more HP . . . it's faster . . . more HP . . . .
suddenly they throw open their doors and get after it . .
so would this make a great car commercial?
Ruf
#159
Originally posted by allmotor_2000
He makes 236whp vs. Red Rider's 240whp.
He makes 236whp vs. Red Rider's 240whp.
i guarantee if you dyno'd both cars on the same dyno 1 after another there would be much more than a 4 whp difference.