Truck vs. SUV = OMG

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-28-2012, 06:21 PM
  #81  
Banned
 
Saintor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: MTL, Canada
Age: 57
Posts: 2,905
Received 124 Likes on 104 Posts
Originally Posted by teranfon
And although the electronic aids worked well, they still weren't completely perfect in all situations.
How about 95% of them? It will prevent the worst most of the time, and twice on Sundays.

Why people do drive in winter without proper winter tires is beyond me.

We have a law here about it.

Now there is a law about ESP too.
Old 02-28-2012, 06:22 PM
  #82  
Moderator Alumnus
 
teranfon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 6,547
Received 196 Likes on 99 Posts
Originally Posted by Saintor
How about 95% of them? It will prevent the worst most of the time, and twice on Sundays.

Why people do drive in winter without proper winter tires is beyond me.

We have a law here about it.

Now there is a law about ESP too.

Source please. Independent.
Old 02-28-2012, 06:23 PM
  #83  
I drive a Subata.
iTrader: (1)
 
JS + XES's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Socal
Age: 39
Posts: 20,301
Received 2,603 Likes on 1,571 Posts
Source: Saintor
Old 02-28-2012, 06:35 PM
  #84  
Banned
 
Saintor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: MTL, Canada
Age: 57
Posts: 2,905
Received 124 Likes on 104 Posts
Originally Posted by teranfon
Source please. Independent.
Fact: all major car makers embraced it and all statistics support massively that it works. A breakthrough, that is.

This is as good of a game-changer as it gets.

If you go straight and stomp it on a wet surface, you will continue to go straight with ESP/TC. NO initial excessive swerving like in the video. When there is no ESP/TC, many many many more fatal accidents like this one happen.

But as I said above, it seems that not all people have the ability *to get it*.
Old 02-28-2012, 06:38 PM
  #85  
I drive a Subata.
iTrader: (1)
 
JS + XES's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Socal
Age: 39
Posts: 20,301
Received 2,603 Likes on 1,571 Posts
Old 02-28-2012, 06:43 PM
  #86  
Moderator Alumnus
 
teranfon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 6,547
Received 196 Likes on 99 Posts
Originally Posted by Saintor
Fact: all major car makers embraced it and all statistics support massively that it works. A breakthrough, that is.

This is as good of a game-changer as it gets.

If you go straight and stomp it on a wet surface, you will continue to go straight with ESP/TC. NO excessive swerving like in the video. When there is no ESP/TC, many many many more fatal accidents like this one happen.

But as I said above, it seems that not all people have the ability *to get it*.

Yes, it does work. No one here is denying that. What people are refuting, and I'm one of them, is that ESP is a magical solution that solves all driver errors and masks all road conditions. It does not. The driver, equipment, and vehicle aids all play a part in reducing traffic accidents and fatalities. In this particular instance it's impossible to say what would have saved the driver. It was probably a combination of many things that led to his death, none of which any of us can answer with 100% certainty.
Old 02-28-2012, 06:43 PM
  #87  
The sizzle in the Steak
 
Moog-Type-S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Southern California
Posts: 71,436
Received 1,877 Likes on 1,297 Posts
How about 95% of them? It will prevent the worst most of the time, and twice on Sundays.
Proof?
Link?
Old 02-28-2012, 06:47 PM
  #88  
I drive a Subata.
iTrader: (1)
 
JS + XES's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Socal
Age: 39
Posts: 20,301
Received 2,603 Likes on 1,571 Posts
Damn, I'm learning something new today.

ESP, check.

Thanks, Saintor.
Old 02-28-2012, 06:48 PM
  #89  
Banned
 
Saintor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: MTL, Canada
Age: 57
Posts: 2,905
Received 124 Likes on 104 Posts
all driver errors and masks all road conditions
That's ridiculous to even imagine this.

Most. M-O-S-T. Specially ones like in the video with no second party and a straight line.
Old 02-28-2012, 06:56 PM
  #90  
Race Director
iTrader: (7)
 
crazyasiantl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Clovis CA
Age: 37
Posts: 12,594
Received 596 Likes on 430 Posts
traction/stability control is not a save-all

take my old 2G TL for example: we were hit with a good amount of rain a couple of years ago, at the time, my tires were not perfect, but had decent thread. I was doing a good 40 in a 65 due to the conditions and the standing water.

was the car stable? no.
was i somewhat shitting bricks? yes.
i was about to put all of my confidence in the driver aids? no.

during most of that drive, the /!\ light was flashing.


as i recall, there have been quite a few members on the board that have gotten in accidents in less than ideal conditions. did they expect the driver aids to save them from spinning? probably not. shit happens. get on with it.
Old 02-28-2012, 06:58 PM
  #91  
Race Director
iTrader: (7)
 
crazyasiantl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Clovis CA
Age: 37
Posts: 12,594
Received 596 Likes on 430 Posts
would you expect driver aids to do anything here? no.

look at the conditions

http://jalopnik.com/5878390/snow-tur...nto-morons-too
Old 02-28-2012, 07:06 PM
  #92  
Moderator
 
ttribe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 15,319
Received 5,937 Likes on 2,928 Posts
Originally Posted by Saintor
Fact: all major car makers embraced it and all statistics support massively that it works. A breakthrough, that is.

This is as good of a game-changer as it gets.

If you go straight and stomp it on a wet surface, you will continue to go straight with ESP/TC. NO initial excessive swerving like in the video. When there is no ESP/TC, many many many more fatal accidents like this one happen.

But as I said above, it seems that not all people have the ability *to get it*.
And the logical fallacy parade continues.
Old 02-28-2012, 07:32 PM
  #93  
Ultra Negro
iTrader: (1)
 
OperationDarkie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: South Holland, IL
Age: 42
Posts: 1,178
Likes: 0
Received 35 Likes on 28 Posts
Well honestly we do not know how many variables there are in this situation, for instance, what type of tires did he have? Were they inflated to the proper pressure? Did he accidentally shift into a lower gear? Did a tire go flat causing the sudden loss of traction?

I am sorry but stability control was not going to help that guy he went into snap oversteer in snowed conditions, physics took over and physics won. So obviously you can see he had limited traction as is.
Old 02-28-2012, 07:59 PM
  #94  
I drive a Subata.
iTrader: (1)
 
JS + XES's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Socal
Age: 39
Posts: 20,301
Received 2,603 Likes on 1,571 Posts
Saintor > Physics in Saintor's book.
Old 02-29-2012, 12:45 AM
  #95  
S E L L
 
Gfaze's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Modesto, CA
Age: 45
Posts: 12,767
Received 51 Likes on 40 Posts
Originally Posted by teranfon
I agree. I also think proper tires are the most important things you can have on a vehicle for winter use.

My 2011 F150 has four wheel drive, traction control, roll stability control, low tire pressure warning, and trailer sway control. A few months ago I drove it for the first time in the snow. It did not perform as expected. The electronic aids certainly helped, but being a vehicle with a high center of gravity it was clearly uncomfortable. Within a week I had changed it's tires to a set of Blizzaks mounted on steel wheels. The difference in performance was staggering. The vehicle responded as it was designed to and was much safer. And although the electronic aids worked well, they still weren't completely perfect in all situations. I think anyone with any common sense wouldn't expect them to be.
The thing about common sense is that it doesn't seem to be very common these days.
The following 4 users liked this post by Gfaze:
Aman (02-29-2012), civicdrivr (03-01-2012), mrmako (03-04-2012), PortlandRL (03-01-2012)
Old 02-29-2012, 06:05 AM
  #96  
Chapter Leader
(Northeast Florida)
iTrader: (1)
 
gatrhumpy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Age: 44
Posts: 35,532
Received 1,652 Likes on 1,117 Posts
That truck got destroyed!
Old 02-29-2012, 07:00 AM
  #97  
Senior Moderator
iTrader: (5)
 
juniorbean's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: The QC
Posts: 28,461
Received 1,760 Likes on 1,046 Posts
Originally Posted by Saintor
How about 95% of them? It will prevent the worst most of the time, and twice on Sundays.
Not sure about that. From the very link you quoted and posted from the IIHS...
Originally Posted by IIHS by Saintor
Electronic stability control could prevent nearly one-third of all fatal crashes and reduce rollover risk by as much as 80%; effect is found on single- and multiple-vehicle crashes
I may not be Srinivasa Ramanujan... but I do know that 33% is definitely a lower number then your 95% (and twice on Sundays)...
The following users liked this post:
mrmako (03-04-2012)
Old 02-29-2012, 07:44 AM
  #98  
Senior Moderator
 
fsttyms1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Appleton WI
Age: 49
Posts: 81,383
Received 3,063 Likes on 2,119 Posts
Its a much smaller percentage.

Ive seen 2 accidents where ESP didnt save the driver/car from getting into an accident. Its not a save all, infact it caused one because the driver was under the impression that it didnt matter how he was driving because his AID would save him.
Old 02-29-2012, 07:17 PM
  #99  
Banned
 
Saintor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: MTL, Canada
Age: 57
Posts: 2,905
Received 124 Likes on 104 Posts
Originally Posted by juniorbean
Not sure about that. From the very link you quoted and posted from the IIHS...
I may not be Srinivasa Ramanujan... but I do know that 33% is definitely a lower number then your 95% (and twice on Sundays)...


We are not talking about all accidents, but this kind of accidents where the lost of control by driver on a straight line and no second party is the cause of accident.
Old 02-29-2012, 07:47 PM
  #100  
Banned
 
Saintor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: MTL, Canada
Age: 57
Posts: 2,905
Received 124 Likes on 104 Posts
Again... same scenario a few days later. Another accident that could have been 95%+ prevented with the help of ESP.

Old 02-29-2012, 07:51 PM
  #101  
8th Gear
 
woofster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There's no doubt ESP and TC is helpful but surely there are examples where a vehicle even with ESP is not enough to overcome the laws of physics. The bottom line is not relying on technology to save one's butt but common sense when driving in less than ideal conditions.
Old 02-29-2012, 07:53 PM
  #102  
I drive a Subata.
iTrader: (1)
 
JS + XES's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Socal
Age: 39
Posts: 20,301
Received 2,603 Likes on 1,571 Posts
Saintor, I wish you would have that magical ESP on your brain because I don't think you can ever think straight.
The following 10 users liked this post by JS + XES:
civicdrivr (02-29-2012), CLtotheTL32 (02-29-2012), crazyasiantl (02-29-2012), Ken1997TL (02-29-2012), mrmako (03-04-2012), Nabooly (03-02-2012), PortlandRL (03-01-2012), S14 n Tsx (03-01-2012), StreetKA (03-01-2012), thunder04 (03-03-2012) and 5 others liked this post. (Show less...)
Old 02-29-2012, 07:56 PM
  #103  
Regional Coordinator (Texas)
iTrader: (38)
 
nspec_ya4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Houston
Age: 38
Posts: 4,041
Received 607 Likes on 308 Posts
saw that on another forum. all i gotta say is






HOLY FUCKING SHIT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!





Old 02-29-2012, 07:56 PM
  #104  
Banned
 
Saintor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: MTL, Canada
Age: 57
Posts: 2,905
Received 124 Likes on 104 Posts
Originally Posted by JS + MS3
Saintor, I wish you would have that magical ESP on your brain because I don't think you can ever think straight.
If you have something on the subject, why not. It would change from the imbecile kind of stuff you use to write. You sound like a junior dog trying to draw the attention of something bigger.
Old 02-29-2012, 09:12 PM
  #105  
Whats up with RDX owners?
iTrader: (9)
 
civicdrivr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: VA
Age: 35
Posts: 36,323
Received 8,463 Likes on 4,981 Posts
What does it take to ban a guy here?
Old 02-29-2012, 09:19 PM
  #106  
Moderator
 
mdkxtreme's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Orange County, CA
Age: 37
Posts: 3,578
Received 322 Likes on 182 Posts
^ Don't know about you, but Saintor really isn't trolling here.
Old 02-29-2012, 09:30 PM
  #107  
Whats up with RDX owners?
iTrader: (9)
 
civicdrivr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: VA
Age: 35
Posts: 36,323
Received 8,463 Likes on 4,981 Posts
Its borderline in my mind.
Old 02-29-2012, 09:34 PM
  #108  
I drive a Subata.
iTrader: (1)
 
JS + XES's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Socal
Age: 39
Posts: 20,301
Received 2,603 Likes on 1,571 Posts
Originally Posted by mdkxtreme
^ Don't know about you, but Saintor really isn't trolling here.
He's 95% trolling.
The following 3 users liked this post by JS + XES:
civicdrivr (03-01-2012), crazyasiantl (03-01-2012), PortlandRL (03-01-2012)
Old 02-29-2012, 10:16 PM
  #109  
Whats up with RDX owners?
iTrader: (9)
 
civicdrivr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: VA
Age: 35
Posts: 36,323
Received 8,463 Likes on 4,981 Posts
Old 03-01-2012, 12:14 AM
  #110  
Race Director
iTrader: (7)
 
crazyasiantl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Clovis CA
Age: 37
Posts: 12,594
Received 596 Likes on 430 Posts
Originally Posted by JS + MS3
He's 95% trolling.
Old 03-01-2012, 07:14 AM
  #111  
Senior Moderator
iTrader: (5)
 
juniorbean's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: The QC
Posts: 28,461
Received 1,760 Likes on 1,046 Posts
Originally Posted by Saintor
We are not talking about all accidents, but this kind of accidents where the lost of control by driver on a straight line and no second party is the cause of accident.
You can't be serious. Again, from YOUR post and the link YOU posted. They are clearly talking about ALL fatal accidents (which this one was)...
Originally Posted by IIHS by Saintor
Electronic stability control could prevent nearly one-third of all fatal crashes and reduce rollover risk by as much as 80%; effect is found on single- and multiple-vehicle crashes
So... ... right back at you. I won't bother posting an obnoxiously large photo to prove my point... your posts are doing that work for me...
Old 03-01-2012, 02:48 PM
  #112  
mmmmmm....
 
S14 n Tsx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Glendale, CA
Posts: 20,524
Received 95 Likes on 81 Posts
Originally Posted by JS + MS3
He's 95% trolling.
and don't forget about the twice on Sundays part
Old 03-02-2012, 02:58 AM
  #113  
Moderator
 
Costco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 29,869
Received 3,489 Likes on 2,089 Posts
How did I miss out on this?!

Terrible accident... . However Saintor just makes it worse. Had that guy on my ignore list for as long as I can remember, thanks for reminding me why.

just wait until you guys see his rants on how BMW > *
Old 03-02-2012, 09:01 AM
  #114  
7# werC 2uoYeeS
iTrader: (1)
 
mrstak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: NYC
Posts: 3,415
Received 527 Likes on 387 Posts


these kinds of videos makes me even more cautious during snowy conditions. drive safe guys...
Old 03-02-2012, 09:07 AM
  #115  
Instructor
 
Stoianoff31's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Age: 36
Posts: 194
Received 11 Likes on 9 Posts
Originally Posted by Saintor
Check what ESP will do for you (combined with TC); exactly preventing the kind of excessive slippage we saw in this accident. It will also do something that no driver can; controlling the brakes of an individual corner.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NiZjeeMExY4

Even better at high speed of 70mph (toward the end of the video).

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K3m24...feature=fvwrel
Ok the video with the two pacificas is BS. the car without the esp on is turning the car much more agressively. totally bogus promo video
Old 03-02-2012, 04:52 PM
  #116  
Banned
 
Saintor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: MTL, Canada
Age: 57
Posts: 2,905
Received 124 Likes on 104 Posts
Originally Posted by juniorbean
You can't be serious. Again, from YOUR post and the link YOU posted. They are clearly talking about ALL fatal accidents (which this one was)...
So... ... right back at you. I won't bother posting an obnoxiously large photo to prove my point... your posts are doing that work for me...
You are referring to the right data in my links and despite this, you want to suggest that I used them to support the 95% I wrote for a particular condition?

When I assume some people have the minimal skills to understand something easy, I am always puzzled by the actual low capacity of analysis they really have. You are NOT making sense.
Old 03-02-2012, 04:54 PM
  #117  
Moderator
 
ttribe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 15,319
Received 5,937 Likes on 2,928 Posts
Originally Posted by Saintor
You are referring to the right data in my links and despite this, you want to suggest that I used them to support the 95% I wrote for a particular condition?

When I assume some people have the minimal skills to understand something easy, I am always puzzled by the actual low capacity of analysis they really have. You are NOT making sense.
Poisoning the Well Fallacy (Link)
Old 03-02-2012, 04:59 PM
  #118  
Banned
 
Saintor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: MTL, Canada
Age: 57
Posts: 2,905
Received 124 Likes on 104 Posts
Originally Posted by ttribe
Poisoning the Well Fallacy
We are not sure to understand your fascination about phallus, but we are not interested.
Old 03-02-2012, 05:04 PM
  #119  
_
 
AZuser's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 18,692
Received 3,097 Likes on 1,867 Posts
I think Saintor and SSFTSX would get along just fine.
The following users liked this post:
civicdrivr (03-02-2012)
Old 03-02-2012, 05:06 PM
  #120  
Moderator
 
Costco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 29,869
Received 3,489 Likes on 2,089 Posts
Hello, anyone moderating? Tired of moronic poster wasting my time.

shamelessly stolen fron somebody's sig
The following users liked this post:
civicdrivr (03-02-2012)


Quick Reply: Truck vs. SUV = OMG



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:24 AM.