TL or RL?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 23, 2012 | 05:39 PM
  #1  
nyte ryder's Avatar
Thread Starter
10th Gear
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 10
Likes: 1
From: BOSTON
TL or RL?

Hi, I got a quick question I'm. Having a hard time deciding which model to go with between the tl or rl if its tl I'm think in 03 type s or 04 rl. Not sure they both have alot of customizable potential. Any insight guys??? (help)
Reply
Old Nov 23, 2012 | 05:51 PM
  #2  
gnuts's Avatar
3.5 psi
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 4,487
Likes: 798
From: Canada
03 TL's have the glass tranny, so i'd stay away from those.
Reply
Old Nov 23, 2012 | 05:59 PM
  #3  
nyte ryder's Avatar
Thread Starter
10th Gear
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 10
Likes: 1
From: BOSTON
I've heard that too. Once upon a time was told the rl tranny are strong
Reply
Old Nov 23, 2012 | 08:08 PM
  #4  
CLtotheTL32's Avatar
Moderator
15 Year Member
Shutterbug
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 36,793
Likes: 9,620
From: Charlotte
The TL is more sporty and the RL is more luxurious. It depends what you want out of the car.
Reply
Old Nov 23, 2012 | 08:29 PM
  #5  
24no7's Avatar
UA6 SSM TL
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,386
Likes: 106
Id say go for the RL
Reply
Old Nov 23, 2012 | 08:43 PM
  #6  
Ken1997TL's Avatar
Senior Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 45,641
Likes: 2,335
From: Better Neighborhood, Arizona
I've owned both before. An '02 RL and a '03 TL.

The RL would be more reliable and more luxurious. Far quieter, better highway ride, tracks straight. Better stereo too. 10 speakers, better amplifier plus XM.

The TL will give you much better highway mileage, 30+ vs 24 and less understeer.
Reply
Old Nov 23, 2012 | 09:28 PM
  #7  
MR1's Avatar
MR1
05/5AT/Navi/ABP/Quartz
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 3,348
Likes: 53
From: Central CA
There was no Type S in 2003. I'd go with an RL even though I love my TL. There is limited mod potential for either but more for the TL.
Reply
Old Nov 23, 2012 | 09:36 PM
  #8  
Ken1997TL's Avatar
Senior Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 45,641
Likes: 2,335
From: Better Neighborhood, Arizona
Originally Posted by MR1
There was no Type S in 2003. I'd go with an RL even though I love my TL. There is limited mod potential for either but more for the TL.
There was definitely a Type S in 2003
Reply
Old Nov 23, 2012 | 11:14 PM
  #9  
nyte ryder's Avatar
Thread Starter
10th Gear
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 10
Likes: 1
From: BOSTON
Thx,guys I'll post some picks when I pick up the rl. And I was pretty sure they made a type s tl in 03
Reply
Old Nov 24, 2012 | 05:03 AM
  #10  
F23A4's Avatar
Senior Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 18,017
Likes: 1,737
As Ken indicated, there was a 3.2TL Type S during the 2003 model year.

I look forward to seeing pics of the RL.
Reply
Old Nov 24, 2012 | 05:41 AM
  #11  
HairyMonkey019's Avatar
Drifting
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 2,173
Likes: 223
From: !909!
The TL did come with a type s in 02 and 03.... i should know

anyways, the RL was a good choice. boss car
Reply
Old Nov 24, 2012 | 05:16 PM
  #12  
Acuraluvr's Avatar
Spinnin them beats
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 4,767
Likes: 47
From: Delaware
Could you save a bit more for an 04 TL? Reworked everything, better body style than both... I dont think the price would be a huge difference. 8 speakers, navi, 270 horse, way better looking.
Reply
Old Nov 24, 2012 | 09:52 PM
  #13  
MR1's Avatar
MR1
05/5AT/Navi/ABP/Quartz
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 3,348
Likes: 53
From: Central CA
Originally Posted by Ken1997TL
There was definitely a Type S in 2003
Read twice, answer once.
Sorry, I was thinking about 2004, first year of 3G.
Reply
Old Nov 24, 2012 | 11:33 PM
  #14  
oo7spy's Avatar
Senior Moderator
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 31,897
Likes: 7,251
From: Austin, TX
LEGEND.
Reply
Old Nov 25, 2012 | 12:28 AM
  #15  
AZuser's Avatar
_
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 19,344
Likes: 3,440
Neither?
Reply
Old Nov 25, 2012 | 05:41 AM
  #16  
dallison's Avatar
registered pw
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 38,859
Likes: 366
From: south central pa
The rl is nice but i didn't always enjoy 20 mpg on premium. The champagne color made it look a bit dated too.
Besides that they are generally bulletproof. We had a 2000 and 2003 and i never regretted either purchase.
Reply
Old Nov 25, 2012 | 10:23 AM
  #17  
F23A4's Avatar
Senior Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 18,017
Likes: 1,737
Originally Posted by Acuraluvr
Could you save a bit more for an 04 TL? Reworked everything, better body style than both... I dont think the price would be a huge difference. 8 speakers, navi, 270 horse, way better looking.
I generally agree with that statement.
Reply
Old Nov 25, 2012 | 01:55 PM
  #18  
MTEAZY's Avatar
brahs be jelly
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 1,836
Likes: 247
I hear TL = Top of the Line..
Reply




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:32 PM.