Second car, which would you pick?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 24, 2007 | 08:56 PM
  #1  
Msnowdon's Avatar
Thread Starter
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 787
Likes: 0
Second car, which would you pick?

1984 911 Porsche Coupe with 38,000 miles. The car is the exterior color I want, but the interior is royal blue. Doesn't have a full service history, which makes it tough to pay the owner premium price of 25K.

2004 M3 Coupe - 3,800 miles, SMG, all the right options, again has a grey interior, which I really want black. 40K

2007 S2000 - Would be new, only draw back is no back seat to take the little ones with me.

Which car would you take?

Thanks
Reply
Old Feb 24, 2007 | 09:00 PM
  #2  
Centrum's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 245
Likes: 0
there is no 2007 s2000
Reply
Old Feb 24, 2007 | 09:06 PM
  #3  
Msnowdon's Avatar
Thread Starter
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 787
Likes: 0
http://automobiles.honda.com/models/...odelName=S2000

The above website shows a 2007 S2000
Reply
Old Feb 24, 2007 | 09:07 PM
  #4  
LuvMyTSX's Avatar
Senior Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 14,667
Likes: 13
From: NY
M3
Reply
Old Feb 24, 2007 | 09:21 PM
  #5  
ironviet's Avatar
Advanced
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 89
Likes: 0
From: Philly/HB/D.C./Nova
Go with the '04 M3. I have a TL and a '03.5 M3 Carbon Black and I couldn't be happier. IMO the gray interior holds up better. Black gets old looking faster. The M3 is fun by myself or with my fiance. The TL does the rest. Just take into account the cost of fixing it should anything go wrong. I have had problems with the ballast on the right side of the HID's as well as the weather stripping on passenger side. Other than that it is a perfect car.
Reply
Old Feb 24, 2007 | 09:33 PM
  #6  
Will Y.'s Avatar
Registered but harmless
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 14,888
Likes: 1,164
From: Los Angeles, CA
S2000 only because I wouldn't want to deal with the SMG along with the M3's other quirks, assuming I could afford it. I read that the SMG is great for balls-out driving, but not very good for day-to-day commuting, so there is no advantage over a manual transmission.

Last edited by Will Y.; Feb 24, 2007 at 09:38 PM.
Reply
Old Feb 24, 2007 | 09:44 PM
  #7  
subinf's Avatar
One on the right for me
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 27,914
Likes: 272
From: Bay Area, CA
m3
Reply
Old Feb 24, 2007 | 10:03 PM
  #8  
mio's Avatar
mio
Police
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,175
Likes: 2
From: SecretBase N/A
the price will drop when the new Gen m3 come out.
Reply
Old Feb 24, 2007 | 10:10 PM
  #9  
Crazy Bimmer's Avatar
Senior Moderator
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 34,937
Likes: 638
From: Chicago Burbs
Since its a 2nd car and guessing just driving for fun...

I would say a used NSX.

Fun to drive, reliable and stands out! Be different!
Reply
Old Feb 24, 2007 | 10:30 PM
  #10  
GreenMonster's Avatar
Senior Moderator
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 35,218
Likes: 15
From: Swansea, MA
As much as I love 911's, I'd probably have to go with the S2k... upkeep and maintenance is going to be alot cheaper on a new car then a 23 y/o porsche... the other side of the coin is that a 911 won't depreciate like a S2K will, so the happy medium might be a used S2k...
Reply
Old Feb 24, 2007 | 10:31 PM
  #11  
Ishakir's Avatar
Racer
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 284
Likes: 0
M3 x12390810239182093180923091823
Reply
Old Feb 24, 2007 | 10:49 PM
  #12  
minkl81's Avatar
Safety Car
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 3,584
Likes: 17
From: Beaverton, OR
Originally Posted by Crazy Sellout
Since its a 2nd car and guessing just driving for fun...

I would say a used NSX.

Fun to drive, reliable and stands out! Be different!
definitely. NSX became alot affordable these days. if your looking upto $40K for your second car, used NSX can be found in that range too.
Reply
Old Feb 24, 2007 | 11:12 PM
  #13  
GunMetaL CLSPiG's Avatar
Racer
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 359
Likes: 0
From: SuGaR LanD
I will take the S2000, because I have for myself as a second car too and I love it!
Reply
Old Feb 24, 2007 | 11:49 PM
  #14  
Garnet Canuck's Avatar
Racer
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 286
Likes: 0
From: Rothesay, New Brunswick, Canada
It would definitely be a tough choice between the M3 and the S2K, but I think in the end I would choose a new S2k over an 04 M3.
Reply
Old Feb 25, 2007 | 02:48 AM
  #15  
JCVTLS's Avatar
Instructor
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 131
Likes: 0
I would vote for the M3 if it was a 6 speed. The Porsche is going to be the best of the lot in terms of retaining value. The S2000 will be the best to maintain. I would go for the S2000 just because it is a Honda and we all know what that means.
Reply
Old Feb 25, 2007 | 06:22 AM
  #16  
Magic Man's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 356
Likes: 0
From: Jersey
M3 no question
Reply
Old Feb 25, 2007 | 07:24 AM
  #17  
jz-97-c7's Avatar
givin the business
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,556
Likes: 0
From: Sasebo, Japan
M3...it's not 23 years old and has a backseat
Reply
Old Feb 25, 2007 | 07:48 AM
  #18  
Saintor's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 2,905
Likes: 124
From: MTL, Canada
M3 but I wouldn't take SMG.
Reply
Old Feb 25, 2007 | 08:23 AM
  #19  
CGTSX2004's Avatar
Team Owner
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 24,299
Likes: 380
From: Beach Cities, CA
Originally Posted by GreenMonster
As much as I love 911's, I'd probably have to go with the S2k... upkeep and maintenance is going to be alot cheaper on a new car then a 23 y/o porsche... the other side of the coin is that a 911 won't depreciate like a S2K will, so the happy medium might be a used S2k...
:agree;

Both the Porsche and the BMW will require very pricey maintenance and the BMW will definitely be out of its "free maintenance" period already. The S2000 will be new, still in warranty, and require minimal maintenance over the next few years.
Reply
Old Feb 25, 2007 | 09:07 AM
  #20  
Msnowdon's Avatar
Thread Starter
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 787
Likes: 0
IF the M3 was a convertable, i would jump on that, more fun as a second car with the girls.

Keep your eyes out for a low miles M3 Vert for me!
Reply
Old Feb 25, 2007 | 12:14 PM
  #21  
ironviet's Avatar
Advanced
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 89
Likes: 0
From: Philly/HB/D.C./Nova
yeah i'm not too big on smg but at the same time the s2k and m3 are 2 very very different cars in different price ranges. both have great value but if money is no object, m3 gets another vote by me. test drive them both back to back and you'll know what i'm talking about. both are high revving machines.
Reply
Old Feb 25, 2007 | 01:01 PM
  #22  
Crazy Bimmer's Avatar
Senior Moderator
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 34,937
Likes: 638
From: Chicago Burbs
Originally Posted by CGTSX2004
:agree;

the BMW will require very pricey maintenance and the BMW will definitely be out of its "free maintenance" period already.

TSX costs $129 to do an oil change.

Whats pricey on the BMW that makes it expensive to maintain? (dead horse)

Just curious on why people say that. I need reasons people and then i will shut up about it.

But the Honda will of course be more reliable.

Last edited by Crazy Bimmer; Feb 25, 2007 at 01:04 PM.
Reply
Old Feb 25, 2007 | 01:11 PM
  #23  
Crazy Bimmer's Avatar
Senior Moderator
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 34,937
Likes: 638
From: Chicago Burbs
https://acurazine.com/forums/showthread.php?t=36385

Forget honda, right?

Ok ill shut up now cuz im even annoying myself
Reply
Old Feb 25, 2007 | 01:16 PM
  #24  
GreenMonster's Avatar
Senior Moderator
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 35,218
Likes: 15
From: Swansea, MA
The BMW has 3800 miles on it, so reliability and maintenace costs shouldn't be a factor for a long while (this is going to be used as a 2nd car)...
Reply
Old Feb 25, 2007 | 02:52 PM
  #25  
LuvMyTSX's Avatar
Senior Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 14,667
Likes: 13
From: NY
Originally Posted by Crazy Sellout
https://acurazine.com/forums/showthread.php?t=36385

Forget honda, right?

Ok ill shut up now cuz im even annoying myself
Lol...first of all, that's Canadian dollars, and second, his dealer is on crack.
Reply
Old Feb 25, 2007 | 02:53 PM
  #26  
Mokos23's Avatar
Race Director
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 10,741
Likes: 0
From: Illinois
either the M3 or the 2007 s2000
Reply
Old Feb 25, 2007 | 02:59 PM
  #27  
Trackruner228's Avatar
Race Director
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 11,395
Likes: 0
From: Charlotte(home) /Raleigh (school), NC
Originally Posted by Crazy Sellout
TSX costs $129 to do an oil change.

Whats pricey on the BMW that makes it expensive to maintain? (dead horse)

Just curious on why people say that. I need reasons people and then i will shut up about it.

But the Honda will of course be more reliable.
I agree I dont think BMWs are expensive to maintain any more then any other car. Its just when they have something go wrong its expensive but thats true with any german car now just BMW. I just remember the town I grew up was one of those small no place towns and my dad had a BMW and of course because it was a small town if something would go wrong he would take it to him and it would be pretty pricey to fix. This was also at a friends discount thing too but I think if it doesnt break down a BMW is no more expensive then any other car.

As far as this paticular BMW goes I would say go for it expect it has SMG. Now I have never driven a SMG but from what I read its not that good. If you dont mind the SMG though I would say the BMW.
Reply
Old Feb 25, 2007 | 05:47 PM
  #28  
CGTSX2004's Avatar
Team Owner
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 24,299
Likes: 380
From: Beach Cities, CA
Originally Posted by Crazy Sellout
TSX costs $129 to do an oil change.

Whats pricey on the BMW that makes it expensive to maintain? (dead horse)

Just curious on why people say that. I need reasons people and then i will shut up about it.

But the Honda will of course be more reliable.
Where are you getting your prices? My local Acura dealer does the oil changes for free on cars purchased there and only $35 for cars not purchased there.

And the last BMW M3 owner I spoke to who just had a valve-train adjustment done according to the maintenance schedule coughed up around $2k for it at a private shop so I'm only going on what I have been told. A number of other M3 owners I have met have also mentioned that the car is expensive to take care of once it goes beyond the free maintenance period.
Reply
Old Feb 25, 2007 | 07:02 PM
  #29  
is300eater's Avatar
I Shoot with a Camera
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 23,068
Likes: 3,663
From: Vancouver BC
hands down M3

Originally Posted by Msnowdon
1984 911 Porsche Coupe with 38,000 miles. The car is the exterior color I want, but the interior is royal blue. Doesn't have a full service history, which makes it tough to pay the owner premium price of 25K.

2004 M3 Coupe - 3,800 miles, SMG, all the right options, again has a grey interior, which I really want black. 40K

2007 S2000 - Would be new, only draw back is no back seat to take the little ones with me.

Which car would you take?

Thanks
...just out of curiosity, if a M3 can possibly be a "2nd Car", what's your car now?

anyway, and who the hell buys a M3 and only put 3800 miles on it after 3-4 years??!! (I'm referring to the original owner)
Reply
Old Feb 25, 2007 | 07:09 PM
  #30  
derrick's Avatar
Senior Moderator
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 5,122
Likes: 30
From: Windsor, ON, Canada
If the TSX costs $129 to do an oil change, I'm going to Costco to pick up 6 quarts of Mobil1 for under $30 + a trip to Murray's for a Mobil1 filter and change it myself in the garage like I do for my 2002 TL-S ... (and bill the difference to my GF who owns the TSX)

Of the 3 choices, I'd be more inclined to recommend the new S2k.

I'm not going to beat a dead horse of BMW maintenance but will mention the SMG and rather harsh shifting mentioned in various car magazine commentaries.
Reply
Old Feb 25, 2007 | 07:12 PM
  #31  
GreenMonster's Avatar
Senior Moderator
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 35,218
Likes: 15
From: Swansea, MA
Originally Posted by CGTSX2004
Where are you getting your prices? My local Acura dealer does the oil changes for free on cars purchased there and only $35 for cars not purchased there.
It's $151 for the 7500 mile stuff up here (rotate tires, change oil, general inspections)...

$500 for 30K maintenance (I did mine for under $100)...

I've called around and all the acura dealers have the same pricing unless I make the 3 hour drive up to NH... where it was $89 for the same service that costs $151 down here...
Reply
Old Feb 25, 2007 | 07:18 PM
  #32  
ilitig8's Avatar
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,022
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by CGTSX2004
:agree;

Both the Porsche and the BMW will require very pricey maintenance and the BMW will definitely be out of its "free maintenance" period already. The S2000 will be new, still in warranty, and require minimal maintenance over the next few years.

The M3 will still be in the free maintenance period, since my 04 was on the first boat of 04's and still has 8 months left.

I would pick the M3, then again I did. I am not a huge SMG fan BUT as a "second" car you should be able to exploit its strengths more often.

My M3 has been a solid car without one trip to the shop for anything but the routine. Has been a good track car as well though for serious tracking brakes need upgrading but most drivers only need euro rotors/pads/fluid unless you are a serious trail braker.
Reply
Old Feb 25, 2007 | 07:20 PM
  #33  
GreenMonster's Avatar
Senior Moderator
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 35,218
Likes: 15
From: Swansea, MA
Originally Posted by is300eater
...just out of curiosity, if a M3 can possibly be a "2nd Car", what's your car now?
Mike has a TL:

https://acurazine.com/forums/car-talk-5/done-tl-what-should-i-get-351440/

Originally Posted by is300eater
anyway, and who the hell buys a M3 and only put 3800 miles on it after 3-4 years??!! (I'm referring to the original owner)
It might be a car that's left in a vacation home ?? Only used a few weekends every year... People with tons of money can afford to do wacky shit like that... And the buyer should be happy that they did.

The same type of person who would only put 23K miles on a s2K in 6 years...

http://www.cars.com/go/search/detail...paId=215634516

I really need to take that S2k for a test drive
Reply
Old Feb 25, 2007 | 07:29 PM
  #34  
Crazy Bimmer's Avatar
Senior Moderator
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 34,937
Likes: 638
From: Chicago Burbs
Originally Posted by CGTSX2004
Where are you getting your prices? My local Acura dealer does the oil changes for free on cars purchased there and only $35 for cars not purchased there.


Well the manual says to do oil changes at every 10k miles. The 10k service costs $129 at the dealer which includes oil change and rotating tires. But we all know this can be done for MUCH cheaper. Just stating dealer prices.

Sounds expensive if you go by the manual. In which case if you do that then all cars are expensive to maintain.

You are correct about the valve-train adjustment, i forgot about those. I think thats really the only major thing though. Ok so you win, an M3 is slightly more to take care of since its a high performance machine. Then again so is the S2k.

:surrender I just wanted to kill the stereotypes that people have with german cars.
Reply
Old Feb 25, 2007 | 07:35 PM
  #35  
Crazy Bimmer's Avatar
Senior Moderator
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 34,937
Likes: 638
From: Chicago Burbs
Hell if it was me, i too would pick the S2k as a 2nd car.

A roadster that i can toss around, perfect!
Reply
Old Feb 25, 2007 | 11:22 PM
  #36  
gdubb's Avatar
Mazda3 and Honda Civic in
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 5,635
Likes: 1
From: Houston
s2000
Reply
Old Feb 26, 2007 | 07:29 AM
  #37  
cob3683's Avatar
Burn some dust here
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 5,709
Likes: 13
From: Atlanta
Probably the S2000. I would go for the new 335i over the M3 (90% of the performance, looks better , new car warranty) so that shoots that option. As far as the 911 goes, it is just too old (for me at least).
Reply
Old Feb 26, 2007 | 07:59 AM
  #38  
West6MT's Avatar
Senior Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 9,295
Likes: 169
From: Toronto
Originally Posted by Crazy Sellout
TSX costs $129 to do an oil change.

Whats pricey on the BMW that makes it expensive to maintain? (dead horse)

Just curious on why people say that. I need reasons people and then i will shut up about it.

But the Honda will of course be more reliable.

What????????? Who pays $129 for an oil change for their TSX??? I pay 1/3rd of that Canadian. (ie type A service - oil and filter - works out to like $42 I think it is, with tax, when I get it done at the dealership). Im getting a Type A done on Thursday,.....They also lube joints and check the tires (rotate if necessary).
Reply
Old Feb 26, 2007 | 08:05 AM
  #39  
West6MT's Avatar
Senior Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 9,295
Likes: 169
From: Toronto
Anyway,............S2K FTW!
Reply
Old Feb 26, 2007 | 08:06 AM
  #40  
KaMLuNg's Avatar
Senior Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 15,518
Likes: 1,096
S2K... ill be faithful to Honda...
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:22 PM.