Rental Review: 2015 Chrysler 200

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-16-2015 | 02:33 PM
  #1  
PortlandRL's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evil Mazda Driver
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 11,212
Likes: 174
From: Portland, Oregon
Rental Review: 2015 Chrysler 200

2015 Chrysler 200

Chrysler and Fiat come together to make a world-class American car…and succeed.

By Andrew Fields (aka PortlandRL)

For the longest time, very few people actively sought a Chrysler 200 for their next car, be it for purchase or even getting stuck with one as a rental. The 200 was originally the Sebring sedan, renamed in 2007 and lightly restyled in 2010 but despite a name similar to the larger and far more popular 300, no amount of tweaking could disguise the fact that the original 200 was woefully out of date. The interior was cramped, materials were painfully cheap and the whole car showed the age of a design penned during George W. Bush’s first term. Fiat-Chrysler patched up the original 200 as best they could while working on its replacement that came to market in June of last year. With styling reminiscent of the Chevrolet Impala after a rigorous regimen of P90X and a choice of four cylinder or V6 engines with front or all wheel drive, Chrysler had (and still does have) a lot riding on the 200’s chassis.

My four days with a 2015 200 Limited in Granite Crystal Metallic began in the dark at Baltimore-Washington Airport after two flights from Portland, Oregon had me traveling for twelve hours. I was so tired that the 200 was honestly the most beautiful thing I’d seen all day as it would be the final vehicle take me to my hotel across the state line in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania. At that point I just wanted to sleep so my initial impressions of the 200 were blurred by exhaustion and the first two hours I spent behind the wheel have been all but forgotten.

The next morning I began my first of three days in Pennsylvania right as the sun rose and after breakfast at Waffle House, I pointed the 200’s winged grille logo west on the Pennsylvania Turnpike towards the railroading town of Altoona. The 200 gobbled up the miles between Harrisburg and Altoona with ease and in that first day, the odometer tucked another 300 miles under its belt. I finished off the first tank of fuel having covered 460 miles but the range to empty display saying I could still do another 140.

One of the major points of concern or contention that owners and potential buyers of the 200 have is the 9-speed automatic transmission. Engineering a transmission with nine cogs is a massive undertaking and while there are some owners and reviewers that have been dissatisfied with its performance, I cannot say I’m one of them. The transmission can be a little slow and dim-witted at times, especially when shifting between drive and reverse. It can also be very hesitant to downshift as it seems programmed towards maximizing efficiency rather than performance. With that being said, I experienced none of the horror stories claimed by others. No slipping shifts, no lurching or grinding and this was in a rental car with 20,000 miles on the odometer. The only problem I had with the 9-speed ‘box the entire time I had it was a rough 3rd-to-4th shift when cold. As soon as the transmission came up to temperature, it was smooth as silk.

Performance from the 2.4 liter ‘Tigershark’ MultiAir four-cylinder engine was acceptable but few would describe it as quick. The engine idles smoothly but some vibration can be felt through the brake pedal when stopped at a red light. I only showed the right pedal the floor on one occasion when I got caught off guard by a short merge ramp ahead of me and a semi coming up fast on my left. The 2.4 revs freely and delivers its power smoothly and though it gets a little raspy towards the higher end of the rev band, it usually goes about its business without drawing any attention to itself. I think I’d sacrifice a few MPGs and have the ultimate sleeper in the 290-horsepower V6 model.

In the past, Chrysler interiors tended to commit the sin of being comfortable and functional but with no effort made to hide where the cost cutting took place. In the 200, you get to have your cake and eat it, too. The 8-way power cloth driver’s seat is supportive where it matters but comfortable all over with four-way power lumbar adjustment being a nice surprise. The armrest is nicely padded but fore-aft adjustment of it would be greatly appreciated. The three-spoke steering wheel is leather wrapped (with optional heating on S and C trim levels) and very comfortable to grip on long freeway runs. All interior materials are of high-quality, feel great and, based on how mine survived its rental car treatment, will take any abuse you and your family can dish out. Driver controls take some getting used to but once you are, you’ll wonder why all cars aren’t laid out this way. I never quite warmed to the rotary dial shift selector, primarily because I missed having somewhere to rest my hand while on the road and less so due to the fact that I would occasionally grab the fan control knob instead of shifting into reverse. If the dial were higher up on the dash, it would be perfect.

On my final evening with the 200, I finally found a way to sum up the car and it was at that point that I began to realize just what a wonderful packaging job Chrysler has done with it. We continually hear that full-size cars are dying in America and cars like the 200 are why. I usually find myself in four or five rental cars per year and the 200 is by far the best highway car I’ve driven, period. When given an open stretch of highway, the 200 feels more in its element than Michael Phelps does at swim practice. It hunkers down and tracks like it’s on rails, gobbling up miles like no other car I’ve ever driven. It’s hardly flustered by ruts, grooved pavement or frost heaves that pockmark the roads of the east coast and if you’re brave enough to take your hands off the wheel, it will continue down the middle of the lane for so long you’ll start to think it’s autonomous. Not only that but the trunk is enormous, it can do 500+ miles on a tank and I routinely exceeded the EPA highway rating of 36 MPG without trying, sometimes by as much as ten percent. As I returned to my hotel in Harrisburg after dinner with a friend in Allentown, I told myself that if I had to drive all the way home to Oregon instead of fly, the 200 would be my first choice.

Complaints I have about the car are few and, in the grand scheme of things, insignificant for most. The smart key system works great but the only access button for locking and unlocking resides on the driver’s door. Even my 2012 Elantra has an access button on the passenger side so there’s no excuse for Chrysler to omit one here. Rear seat access is an absolute joke due the sloping roofline and the position of the rear wheels and the headlights are on the weak side, even when using the high beams. Finally, the center console armrest was starting to develop divots where other renters had used it. You could see but not feel them and as I’m not sure what sort of (mis)use caused the divots, I won’t hold it against the car.

Despite these little niggles, I found myself missing the gray Chrysler already as I dropped the car off in the Hertz return line. I requested the 200 at the start of the trip out of curiosity, expecting to be let down but now, I find myself fighting the urge to order a 200C in Vivid Blue with the Mocha leather interior and I’ve never considered a Chrysler product…ever. The car is that good. ●

The Good: Excellent road manners, handsome styling inside and out, gargantuan trunk, superb fuel mileage with bladder-bursting range, controls fall easily to hand, excellent value for the money.

The Bad: Rear seat access acceptable only for gymnasts, rotary dial shifter still odd, headlights brought to you by candles.

The Big Picture: A first-class choice for crossing state lines in a single bound, the 200 is proof that America can still make a world-class highway cruiser.
Old 10-16-2015 | 03:55 PM
  #2  
knight rider's Avatar
Rooting for Acura
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 8,092
Likes: 1,767
From: Austin Burbs
Interesting write up. When I'm on business I always get a 200. Half the time I can find the S model, which is cool. I agree with most of your points. I think the 200 is actually a nice looking car from all angles and sides, inside and out. I even like the wheel design on the S model. I also like the use of the DRLs. They look more like florescent bulbs than LEDs, which is refreshing to me at least.

It's not powerful at all, even in S trim. When I put it in Sport mode and hit the paddle shifters I was not impressed. Also, I didn't like all the plastic in the interior although it is laid out nicely.

I would say, if you liked the Limited model, and you're curious about getting one, check out the S as well.

edit: I just went to the configurator, and you can drop a V6 in it, so there ya go...

http://www.chrysler.com/hostc/bmo/CU...do#/powertrain

Last edited by knight rider; 10-16-2015 at 03:57 PM.
Old 10-16-2015 | 04:26 PM
  #3  
Sarlacc's Avatar
The Third Ball
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 49,450
Likes: 5,116
From: Los Angeles, Ca
not sure if it holds to other new chryslers...but in the Durango...a quick double tap of the accelerator pedal does a quick 1 to 2 gear downshift and put the vehicle in a bit more aggressive mode. Its actually faster than enabling the paddle shifters.
The following users liked this post:
knight rider (10-16-2015)
Old 10-16-2015 | 04:30 PM
  #4  
knight rider's Avatar
Rooting for Acura
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 8,092
Likes: 1,767
From: Austin Burbs
Originally Posted by Sarlacc
not sure if it holds to other new chryslers...but in the Durango...a quick double tap of the accelerator pedal does a quick 1 to 2 gear downshift and put the vehicle in a bit more aggressive mode. Its actually faster than enabling the paddle shifters.
I'll have to try that in the JGC. My wife is going to kill me.
Old 10-16-2015 | 04:37 PM
  #5  
Sarlacc's Avatar
The Third Ball
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 49,450
Likes: 5,116
From: Los Angeles, Ca
Ive tried in my wife's Cherokee and it seems to work there as well...but not the aggressive switchover...but its not a sport model like my RT.
Old 10-16-2015 | 04:46 PM
  #6  
TacoBello's Avatar
Team Owner
 
Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 30,487
Likes: 4,416
From: In an igloo
Looks wise, I think chrysler hit a home run with the 200. I think it looks fantastic inside and out. I'm not surprised about the "plasticy" interior- afterall, it is an entry level car, so what can you expect?

My biggest concern with it is reliability. Chrysler/Dodge entry level products generally shit the bed in that regard. I've heard the 200 is no different, with constant transmission problems, amongst other things.
Old 10-16-2015 | 04:50 PM
  #7  
Sarlacc's Avatar
The Third Ball
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 49,450
Likes: 5,116
From: Los Angeles, Ca
Originally Posted by TacoBello
Looks wise, I think chrysler hit a home run with the 200. I think it looks fantastic inside and out. I'm not surprised about the "plasticy" interior- afterall, it is an entry level car, so what can you expect?

My biggest concern with it is reliability. Chrysler/Dodge entry level products generally shit the bed in that regard. I've heard the 200 is no different, with constant transmission problems, amongst other things.
I have a 2014 Jeep Cherokee Limited with the same 9 spd transmission. Over 15k miles and no issues.

Yes, some people have had issues with this NEW transmission...which is basically a computer in and of itself. And the issues have no been relegated to just FCA with this new 9spd trannies. Other makes/models have had issues as well.

I'm on my 3rd new Jeep/Dodge in the last 5 years. They have been solid and treated me well. I have no questions about their reliability. Maybe other people have had issues...but so have other Honda, Acura, Lexus, etc etc etc owners.
Old 10-16-2015 | 04:59 PM
  #8  
TacoBello's Avatar
Team Owner
 
Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 30,487
Likes: 4,416
From: In an igloo
Oh, I don't think all of their products are bad- I think when you start moving up the line, they have some nice vehicles with some nice features.

Like I said, I think the 200 is a very sharp looking vehicle. I was actually shocked to see that Chrysler built something that looked so good for the entry level market.
Old 10-17-2015 | 05:45 PM
  #9  
carz0159's Avatar
Racer
 
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 300
Likes: 55
From: North Jersey
Originally Posted by Sarlacc
I have a 2014 Jeep Cherokee Limited with the same 9 spd transmission. Over 15k miles and no issues.

Yes, some people have had issues with this NEW transmission...which is basically a computer in and of itself. And the issues have no been relegated to just FCA with this new 9spd trannies. Other makes/models have had issues as well.

I'm on my 3rd new Jeep/Dodge in the last 5 years. They have been solid and treated me well. I have no questions about their reliability. Maybe other people have had issues...but so have other Honda, Acura, Lexus, etc etc etc owners.

I've had a sh*t ton of issues with a 2015 200. Least reliable car I've ever had and apparently they were all recalled to fix the shifting into neutral and stalling that I've experienced. Mine was thankfully bought back finally, but the process was drawn out by FCA and the dealerships were all terrible. All 6 of them that didn't want to take the car because they told me they can't fix it. You better hope you're lucky when you get one a rental, because they all have issues.

As for the power, get the 200s or 200c with the V6.
Old 10-17-2015 | 08:24 PM
  #10  
Shoofin's Avatar
Senior Moderator
 
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 17,085
Likes: 740
From: Brooklyn, NY USA
I too, like the 200....It's not a bad vehicle...it's just that most out there just does it better
Old 10-17-2015 | 08:47 PM
  #11  
csmeance's Avatar
Senior Moderator
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 20,928
Likes: 2,019
From: Space Coast, FL
Great writeup! I like how you included the different levels of trims and options. Just wish there was a bit more personality and your own opinions in the writeup but great!

The 200 is like a cheaper version of the TLX. Great ideas, alright execution.
Old 10-29-2015 | 07:32 PM
  #12  
YeuEmMaiMai's Avatar
Suzuka Master
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,863
Likes: 435
Personally I would not consider it until there is more data on long term reliability. I have to admit though Fiat has really helped Chrysler get their stuff much improved.




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:51 AM.