Our 6sp compared to others....
#1
Cruisin'
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2010
Location: SLC, UT
Age: 39
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Our 6sp compared to others....
I guess I could have posted this elsewhere but I figured this would create more feedback since the 6spd owners frequent here more often. My buddy is on the verge of purchasing a 06 Audi S4 6spd and he had me test drive it since this will be his first 6spd. I noticed immediately that the gear box on the S4 seemed really unresponsive and sluggish compared to our 6spd. The clutch also seemed sluggish. Maybe I'm too biased or uniformed but I just love the feel of our 6spd. It just feels more responsive and smooth compared to the S4. Is that how most of the 6spd Audi's feel? This was my first time test driving a 6spd Audi and so far seemed really unimpressed.
#2
Advanced
Whenever reading reviews on car magazines, I have noticed that Honda's manual trannys are always praised for their smoothness. I own a 6spd, and I have friends with Infinit G37 and BMW 335i test drive mine. And they say they like shifting on this car better because its smoother and the clutch feels lighter.
#3
Senior Moderator
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Better Neighborhood, Arizona
Posts: 45,641
Received 2,329 Likes
on
1,309 Posts
Honda manual transmissions have had an excellent reputation for decades.
#4
Registered Member
However to be honest, I have had no issues at all with my '04 manual's transmission or clutch assembly.
#5
Your Friendly Canadian
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Age: 31
Posts: 17,431
Received 1,485 Likes
on
1,049 Posts
Honda manual transmissions: teh shiz.
I've got two friends, one with a 5MT GT Mustang, another with a 95 teg with a relatively new clutch. I liked the Integra's transmission better because the shifter was light, and the clutch's takeup point was closer to the floor than the Mustang. The Mustang's shifts were long, and heavier. I liked it too, but IMO the Integra was better for day-to-day driving. The Mustang encourages slamming into gear which is great if you're in a drag race, not fun if you're engaging first to close a gap in traffic. The Mustang owner even admitted to having the gear pop out sometimes, because it wasn't engaged completely.
I've got two friends, one with a 5MT GT Mustang, another with a 95 teg with a relatively new clutch. I liked the Integra's transmission better because the shifter was light, and the clutch's takeup point was closer to the floor than the Mustang. The Mustang's shifts were long, and heavier. I liked it too, but IMO the Integra was better for day-to-day driving. The Mustang encourages slamming into gear which is great if you're in a drag race, not fun if you're engaging first to close a gap in traffic. The Mustang owner even admitted to having the gear pop out sometimes, because it wasn't engaged completely.
#7
Cruisin'
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2010
Location: SLC, UT
Age: 39
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'm glad your reading comprehension is on par! You should be proud!![Thumbs Up](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/thumbsup.gif)
Now back to the topic, Aman that's how the Audi's gearbox felt. I test drove it for quite a while. During quick accelerations if felt awesome and swift. However during normal traffic conditions, it just felt so unresponsive and shifting felt like more of a hassle compared to Acura/Honda gearbox.
![Thumbs Up](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/thumbsup.gif)
Now back to the topic, Aman that's how the Audi's gearbox felt. I test drove it for quite a while. During quick accelerations if felt awesome and swift. However during normal traffic conditions, it just felt so unresponsive and shifting felt like more of a hassle compared to Acura/Honda gearbox.
Trending Topics
#9
B A N N E D
iTrader: (4)
as others have said Honda's have had excellent trannies in smoothness and such for decades (and very linear engagement of clutches; minus the TL 6-speed though, kinda small engagement point compared to other Honda's)
and a stock Honda clutch and gearbox, is probably one of the easiest manual cars to learn on if you have never driven a manual
and a stock Honda clutch and gearbox, is probably one of the easiest manual cars to learn on if you have never driven a manual
#11
Senior Moderator
iTrader: (5)
Maybe the car your buddy is trying to buy was abused and needs tranny/clutch service?
#12
Tis true... however, I have driven several Audi's with manual trannies, including an S4 and I've always ranked their trannies as #2 on my list behind Honda/Acura. I've always loved Audi's manuals.
Maybe the car your buddy is trying to buy was abused and needs tranny/clutch service?
Maybe the car your buddy is trying to buy was abused and needs tranny/clutch service?
I've had two Audi's (a B7 A4 2.0T and now a B8 S4), and both tranny/clutch are good. Out of the 3 makes that I've owned, I would rank Honda/Acura first, Audi second, and BMW third.
#13
Team Owner
I just can't get used to Honda's manuals or most foreign manuals for that matter. I'm used to Domestic cars with half of those having a heavier than stock clutch. I was afraid of breaking the TL-S 6mt when I drove it. The clutch doesn't feel like it's connected to anything and the shifter feels fragile. I'm sure over time I would have gotten used to it but when you're used to the "heavier" transmission/clutches, it's hard to feel anything with the super light stuff.
#14
Senior Moderator
Honda manual transmissions=butter. End of story. When I test drove Honda S2000s it was the first time I'd used a manual transmission in 12 years. It felt like I'd never stopped driving manuals.
I've never tried an Audi manual, however. Would love to!
I've never tried an Audi manual, however. Would love to!
#15
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
I just can't get used to Honda's manuals or most foreign manuals for that matter. I'm used to Domestic cars with half of those having a heavier than stock clutch. I was afraid of breaking the TL-S 6mt when I drove it. The clutch doesn't feel like it's connected to anything and the shifter feels fragile. I'm sure over time I would have gotten used to it but when you're used to the "heavier" transmission/clutches, it's hard to feel anything with the super light stuff.
It took me about a month to freakin figure out my car.
the engagement is so low, and there just isnt enough feedback(or the heavier feeling you're describing) for me to shift properly.
It took me one day to master the Challenger.
#16
אני עומד עם ישראל
Hey Justin. I'm there with you. Back in '06 I was test driving 6MT and Auto TLs. The 6MT was just not smooth for me. I mised the boat on the Type S that clutch felt a lot like a more "traditional" Honda.
#18
In the Mid-South meow
iTrader: (2)
Honda 6spd's get even better with a short shift kit, weighted knob, aluminum shift bushings and GM Synchromesh.
![Big Grin](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
#20
Trolling Canuckistan
#21
Cruisin'
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2010
Location: SLC, UT
Age: 39
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Tis true... however, I have driven several Audi's with manual trannies, including an S4 and I've always ranked their trannies as #2 on my list behind Honda/Acura. I've always loved Audi's manuals.
Maybe the car your buddy is trying to buy was abused and needs tranny/clutch service?
Maybe the car your buddy is trying to buy was abused and needs tranny/clutch service?
Do it! You won't regret it!
#22
Three Wheelin'
I've always loved Honda's light and responsive clutch. The old cable transmissions were a bit sloppy. Then early hydraulic transmissions were notchy, but also precise. I'd imagine they've improved since the release of the 4th gen TL.
I've never enjoyed driving a car with a heavy clutch. It's always given me a numb, detached feeling. Not all that bad for drag racing, but for auto-x and track days, I like sticking with the Honda's.
I've never enjoyed driving a car with a heavy clutch. It's always given me a numb, detached feeling. Not all that bad for drag racing, but for auto-x and track days, I like sticking with the Honda's.
#23
I just can't get used to Honda's manuals or most foreign manuals for that matter.................................. I'm sure over time I would have gotten used to it but when you're used to the "heavier" transmission/clutches, it's hard to feel anything with the super light stuff.
Terry
#24
I've always loved Honda's light and responsive clutch. The old cable transmissions were a bit sloppy. Then early hydraulic transmissions were notchy, but also precise. I'd imagine they've improved since the release of the 4th gen TL.
I've never enjoyed driving a car with a heavy clutch. It's always given me a numb, detached feeling. Not all that bad for drag racing, but for auto-x and track days, I like sticking with the Honda's.
I've never enjoyed driving a car with a heavy clutch. It's always given me a numb, detached feeling. Not all that bad for drag racing, but for auto-x and track days, I like sticking with the Honda's.
![Agree](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/agree.gif)
#25
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
I find the same thing. I don't drive my 6MT all that often, but when I do I always have to get used to the clutch. It feels way too light and I usually over-rev the engine until I get used to it. That being said, I love the shifter itself and cog selection of the gearbox.
Terry
Terry
I find myself over-revving when in quick situations, like taking a right turn at a red light.
#27
AZ Community Team
One of the reasons Hodna/Acura MT shift so smooth is the use of linear ball bearings and sleeve needle bearing used in the shift linkage inside the gearbox. I've only take apart three MT's in my life (Honda, Ford, Toyota) the one I noticed on the Honda's was the use of the percise bearings on the shift fork rods and linkage action. If you ever get a chance to mess around with a Honda MT taken apart move the shift forks around, it's pretty amazing how little force is needed.
My 05 TL 6MT is getting more notchy as time goes on (57K miles) so I'm going to replace with the GM Synchromesh in the next week or two. Hoping for the same results others have gotten.
My 05 TL 6MT is getting more notchy as time goes on (57K miles) so I'm going to replace with the GM Synchromesh in the next week or two. Hoping for the same results others have gotten.
#29
teh Senior Instigator
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Huntington Beach, CA -> Ashburn, VA -> Raleigh, NC -> Walnut Creek, CA
Age: 42
Posts: 44,090
Received 957 Likes
on
328 Posts
i'll disagree, i've driven porsches of all model years and have always been impressed. Yes, an old 912 isn't as smooth by todays standards, but it was back then
#30
Three Wheelin'
#32
Someday, an RS6 Avant+
I had an old Audi 5000s with a 5 speed. The take up seemed like forever, but the grab was pretty good. Sure it had longer throws, but it felt solid.
I agree you may have been driving an abused clutch.
I agree you may have been driving an abused clutch.
#33
Team Owner
#34
Heh, yup. They're not smooth but I've grown to like how it feels with a Hurst short shifter. I can only imagine how nice the MGWs are. Firm, solid shifts, feels like a bolt-action mechanism. The stock shifter is beyond garbage though... at least on the F-Body.
#35
AZ Community Team
The newest Porsche's feel great from just shifting in the dealership.
#36
B A N N E D
iTrader: (4)
One of the reasons Hodna/Acura MT shift so smooth is the use of linear ball bearings and sleeve needle bearing used in the shift linkage inside the gearbox. I've only take apart three MT's in my life (Honda, Ford, Toyota) the one I noticed on the Honda's was the use of the percise bearings on the shift fork rods and linkage action. If you ever get a chance to mess around with a Honda MT taken apart move the shift forks around, it's pretty amazing how little force is needed.
My 05 TL 6MT is getting more notchy as time goes on (57K miles) so I'm going to replace with the GM Synchromesh in the next week or two. Hoping for the same results others have gotten.
My 05 TL 6MT is getting more notchy as time goes on (57K miles) so I'm going to replace with the GM Synchromesh in the next week or two. Hoping for the same results others have gotten.
and as far as shifting effort, wait till a honda get's like 150k or so on it (with alot of shifting done on it, as in a bit of city driving), some of them get to the point where a flick of your pinkie will literally shift it into the next gear, cause they are so loose and such (but you can still feel what gear you are going in though)
#37
^oh you're right on that. My Integra had 160k+ on it and I could pop it out of gear without even using the clutch. Just let off the gas and quickly pull it into neutral... not sure if other lower mileages Hondas could do that, always forgot to try it, or was too scared to do it on someone else's car.
#39
AZ Community Team
it takes extra money to produce all those bearings and such (and i will say Toyota's are not that bad, but they could still use improvement to meet Honda ones though)
and as far as shifting effort, wait till a honda get's like 150k or so on it (with alot of shifting done on it, as in a bit of city driving), some of them get to the point where a flick of your pinkie will literally shift it into the next gear, cause they are so loose and such (but you can still feel what gear you are going in though)
and as far as shifting effort, wait till a honda get's like 150k or so on it (with alot of shifting done on it, as in a bit of city driving), some of them get to the point where a flick of your pinkie will literally shift it into the next gear, cause they are so loose and such (but you can still feel what gear you are going in though)
![Thumbs Up](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/thumbsup.gif)
My wife's 86 Integra gearbox got better with miles, we donated it at 254K miles and it was still shifting great and even had the OEM clutch. I used Mobil1 or Castro Syntec 10W-30 for the MT fluid and that worked very well. My 2005 TL has become more notchy with miles so I'm going to try the GM MT FM Synchromesh fluid.
Last edited by Legend2TL; 10-13-2010 at 06:21 AM.
#40
Yes, Honda m/ts are superb.
However, it took me a minute to get used to the setup on my TL.
That's not a bad thing, but the clutch is tricky.
Aside from the 3rd gear issue that pops up occasionally (which I'll be having them fix before the powertrain warranty is up), it's flawless. The way the shifter snick snicks and how precise it is, I don't think I'm missing out on anything from another manufacturer.
Like I said, the clutch was tricky at first, but I was and still am impressed with how solid it is, even with >60k.
I don't abuse the car per se, but it did bark into third a few times when I first got it. Barking second is almost too easy.
Ask the guy with the 400k Legend who is still on his OEM clutch. That is insane.
However, it took me a minute to get used to the setup on my TL.
That's not a bad thing, but the clutch is tricky.
Aside from the 3rd gear issue that pops up occasionally (which I'll be having them fix before the powertrain warranty is up), it's flawless. The way the shifter snick snicks and how precise it is, I don't think I'm missing out on anything from another manufacturer.
Like I said, the clutch was tricky at first, but I was and still am impressed with how solid it is, even with >60k.
I don't abuse the car per se, but it did bark into third a few times when I first got it. Barking second is almost too easy.
Ask the guy with the 400k Legend who is still on his OEM clutch. That is insane.