New J Series Plastic Manifold?
#1
Moderator
Thread Starter
New J Series Plastic Manifold?
I saw a Ridgeline Review today on YouTube and it was one of the few that actually removed the Engine Cover to show the bare engine, With horror I noticed the new Manifold was made from plastic...
That is cheap, very cheap to say the least...... I know Honda did this to save weight but it actually ends up looking pretty cheap on Honda Side, The Magnesium Manifold was pretty light and it was strong.
Now we have something that might brittle with heat and break.
That is cheap, very cheap to say the least...... I know Honda did this to save weight but it actually ends up looking pretty cheap on Honda Side, The Magnesium Manifold was pretty light and it was strong.
Now we have something that might brittle with heat and break.
#2
I saw a Ridgeline Review today on YouTube and it was one of the few that actually removed the Engine Cover to show the bare engine, With horror I noticed the new Manifold was made from plastic...
That is cheap, very cheap to say the least...... I know Honda did this to save weight but it actually ends up looking pretty cheap on Honda Side, The Magnesium Manifold was pretty light and it was strong.
Now we have something that might brittle with heat and break.
That is cheap, very cheap to say the least...... I know Honda did this to save weight but it actually ends up looking pretty cheap on Honda Side, The Magnesium Manifold was pretty light and it was strong.
Now we have something that might brittle with heat and break.
#6
Senior Moderator
Umm...
I'll just leave this new thread from 2G RL right here:
https://acurazine.com/forums/second-...ded%2A-949753/
TL;DR?
here's the pic:
The following users liked this post:
rockstar143 (09-22-2016)
#7
GEEZER
My Audi has a plastic intake manifold... :dontcare:
The following users liked this post:
justnspace (09-21-2016)
Trending Topics
#8
Senior Moderator
I saw a Ridgeline Review today on YouTube and it was one of the few that actually removed the Engine Cover to show the bare engine, With horror I noticed the new Manifold was made from plastic...
That is cheap, very cheap to say the least...... I know Honda did this to save weight but it actually ends up looking pretty cheap on Honda Side, The Magnesium Manifold was pretty light and it was strong.
Now we have something that might brittle with heat and break.
That is cheap, very cheap to say the least...... I know Honda did this to save weight but it actually ends up looking pretty cheap on Honda Side, The Magnesium Manifold was pretty light and it was strong.
Now we have something that might brittle with heat and break.
There are a bunch of reasons to go to plastic (they arent cheap brittle things like you might expect, most have fiberglass infused to aid in strength), It can be stronger, lighter, They dont absorb as much heat as alum/mag and they also absorb sound better making the engine quieter all of which make it much more attractive to manufacturers.
The following 6 users liked this post by fsttyms1:
00TL-P3.2 (09-21-2016),
1killercls (09-22-2016),
Aman (09-21-2016),
Costco (09-21-2016),
gatrhumpy (09-22-2016),
and 1 others liked this post.
#10
Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Dirty H-Town, Amerikkka
Posts: 28,432
Received 7,772 Likes
on
5,045 Posts
But the plastic part isn't containing any significant pressure. It's all structural.
FWIW, this plastic manifold will likely be a-okay. I seem to remember the hatchbacky Impreza going to a plastic manifold and all the Subie boys were initially. But then it was okay.
This will be okay too.
Just take deep breaths and remember that it will be alright.
FWIW, this plastic manifold will likely be a-okay. I seem to remember the hatchbacky Impreza going to a plastic manifold and all the Subie boys were initially. But then it was okay.
This will be okay too.
Just take deep breaths and remember that it will be alright.
#12
Team Owner
So Nissan has been using plastic manifolds for years now. Without issue, I should add.
If my engine is going to explode, like the one posted above, I'd prefer plastic also. Why? Because plastic will blow out before any other damage potentially happens. That nice cast one... who knows what else happened inside the engine with all that pressure. Either way... the odds of an explosion like that happening are VERY small. And cost of replacing a plastic manifold? I can get one for much less from Nissan, than a metal one from Honda.
The manifold just has air flowing through it... who cares if it's plastic
Also, the manifold will not deform with it being hot and then sprayed with cold water. It doesn't even get that hot.
C'mon guys...
If my engine is going to explode, like the one posted above, I'd prefer plastic also. Why? Because plastic will blow out before any other damage potentially happens. That nice cast one... who knows what else happened inside the engine with all that pressure. Either way... the odds of an explosion like that happening are VERY small. And cost of replacing a plastic manifold? I can get one for much less from Nissan, than a metal one from Honda.
The manifold just has air flowing through it... who cares if it's plastic
Also, the manifold will not deform with it being hot and then sprayed with cold water. It doesn't even get that hot.
C'mon guys...
Last edited by TacoBello; 09-21-2016 at 12:03 PM.
The following users liked this post:
Costco (09-21-2016)
#13
Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Dirty H-Town, Amerikkka
Posts: 28,432
Received 7,772 Likes
on
5,045 Posts
Caveat: Forced induction is another story...
But, see again: Subaru.
YMMV.
But, see again: Subaru.
YMMV.
#14
Suzuka Master
iTrader: (4)
Umm...
I'll just leave this new thread from 2G RL right here:
https://acurazine.com/forums/second-...ded%2A-949753/
TL;DR?
here's the pic:
I'll just leave this new thread from 2G RL right here:
https://acurazine.com/forums/second-...ded%2A-949753/
TL;DR?
here's the pic:
#15
Team Owner
#16
Senior Moderator
Here's your original question:
and you don't see the connection?
The following users liked this post:
Oh Sickest TL (09-21-2016)
#17
Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Dirty H-Town, Amerikkka
Posts: 28,432
Received 7,772 Likes
on
5,045 Posts
But like I said, that was the "sky is falling" response when Subaru started using plastic manifolds. It was for sure the death rattle of aftermarket tuning for the industry!!!
But that didn't really seem to be the case.
Mr. McGuire: I just want to say one word to you. Just one word.
Benjamin: Yes, sir.
Mr. McGuire: Are you listening?
Benjamin: Yes, I am.
Mr. McGuire: Plastics.
Benjamin: Yes, sir.
Mr. McGuire: Are you listening?
Benjamin: Yes, I am.
Mr. McGuire: Plastics.
#18
If high powered cars like the SRT Viper and McLaren MP4-12C are using plastic intake manifolds without problems, I doubt Honda would have any.
Besides, Honda's plastics are more superior to other manufacturers plastics
Besides, Honda's plastics are more superior to other manufacturers plastics
The following 3 users liked this post by AZuser:
#19
Team Owner
Yeah. I have no basis, but I feel like metal manifold would take more boost than plastic. Just in general...
But like I said, that was the "sky is falling" response when Subaru started using plastic manifolds. It was for sure the death rattle of aftermarket tuning for the industry!!!
But that didn't really seem to be the case.
Still relevant almost 50 years on.
But like I said, that was the "sky is falling" response when Subaru started using plastic manifolds. It was for sure the death rattle of aftermarket tuning for the industry!!!
But that didn't really seem to be the case.
Still relevant almost 50 years on.
The following users liked this post:
gatrhumpy (09-22-2016)
#21
Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Dirty H-Town, Amerikkka
Posts: 28,432
Received 7,772 Likes
on
5,045 Posts
#23
So Nissan has been using plastic manifolds for years now. Without issue, I should add.
If my engine is going to explode, like the one posted above, I'd prefer plastic also. Why? Because plastic will blow out before any other damage potentially happens. That nice cast one... who knows what else happened inside the engine with all that pressure. Either way... the odds of an explosion like that happening are VERY small. And cost of replacing a plastic manifold? I can get one for much less from Nissan, than a metal one from Honda.
The manifold just has air flowing through it... who cares if it's plastic
Also, the manifold will not deform with it being hot and then sprayed with cold water. It doesn't even get that hot.
C'mon guys...
If my engine is going to explode, like the one posted above, I'd prefer plastic also. Why? Because plastic will blow out before any other damage potentially happens. That nice cast one... who knows what else happened inside the engine with all that pressure. Either way... the odds of an explosion like that happening are VERY small. And cost of replacing a plastic manifold? I can get one for much less from Nissan, than a metal one from Honda.
The manifold just has air flowing through it... who cares if it's plastic
Also, the manifold will not deform with it being hot and then sprayed with cold water. It doesn't even get that hot.
C'mon guys...
#24
Moderator
Thread Starter
Holy crap what happened to that engine? That's the real question.. If something that bad was bound to happen I dunno what type of material would endure the explosion.
To my original Point.. I feel that Honda is Cutting costs where it shouldn't.. Honda V6s are only placed in the highest of trims or their high end cars (Since the Ridgeline is the only Truck Honda sells and its asking PREMIUM for it) I dunno why it should have cheap out on the engine and placed more weight to the car? Remember that the new Ridgeline is using HSS and ACE Structure compared to the Old One it WEIGHTS THE SAME... So If Honda wanted to lower the weight by using a plastic manifold why add useless crap like IN BED AUDIO?
And Look I know there are a lot of brands using Plastic Manifolds since years, Honda own 4 cyl engines use them a lot.. But back to my point, They are used on the CHEAPEST TRIMS which use the 4 cyl. Even the Odyssey which use a V6 isn't cheap..
Now you can say Nissan has be using it on the VQ35 but I do not own a Nissan nor would want to with their crappy CVTs.. I own a Honda (Acura) so I care about the new IDEAS Honda is getting about how to Prioritize Dumb things over using the Magnesium Allow Manifold which not only worked well, it gave the Engine a Premium Feel and to some that is way more important than IN BED AUDIO.
If using plastic would in any shape or form Lower the GVW or Get better MPGs? (I though of this as its main purpose since Plastic does not heatsoak as much as Metal) but since the New Ridgeline basically weights the same what is the point? Its getting better MPGs because of the DI Engine, Trans and VCM not because they lowered the weight by using a Plastic Manifold.
Perhaps I am over analyzing this but in no way its a Rant, I cant do anything about it or Honda care about my opinion.. This is just a TOPIC of Conversation so do not get mad or anything.
To my original Point.. I feel that Honda is Cutting costs where it shouldn't.. Honda V6s are only placed in the highest of trims or their high end cars (Since the Ridgeline is the only Truck Honda sells and its asking PREMIUM for it) I dunno why it should have cheap out on the engine and placed more weight to the car? Remember that the new Ridgeline is using HSS and ACE Structure compared to the Old One it WEIGHTS THE SAME... So If Honda wanted to lower the weight by using a plastic manifold why add useless crap like IN BED AUDIO?
And Look I know there are a lot of brands using Plastic Manifolds since years, Honda own 4 cyl engines use them a lot.. But back to my point, They are used on the CHEAPEST TRIMS which use the 4 cyl. Even the Odyssey which use a V6 isn't cheap..
Now you can say Nissan has be using it on the VQ35 but I do not own a Nissan nor would want to with their crappy CVTs.. I own a Honda (Acura) so I care about the new IDEAS Honda is getting about how to Prioritize Dumb things over using the Magnesium Allow Manifold which not only worked well, it gave the Engine a Premium Feel and to some that is way more important than IN BED AUDIO.
If using plastic would in any shape or form Lower the GVW or Get better MPGs? (I though of this as its main purpose since Plastic does not heatsoak as much as Metal) but since the New Ridgeline basically weights the same what is the point? Its getting better MPGs because of the DI Engine, Trans and VCM not because they lowered the weight by using a Plastic Manifold.
Perhaps I am over analyzing this but in no way its a Rant, I cant do anything about it or Honda care about my opinion.. This is just a TOPIC of Conversation so do not get mad or anything.
Last edited by Skirmich; 09-21-2016 at 07:59 PM.
#26
Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Dirty H-Town, Amerikkka
Posts: 28,432
Received 7,772 Likes
on
5,045 Posts
I'm super pissed over here.
One other thing to consider... the almighty $$$
Which do you think costs less: a plastic manifold or a magnesium manifold?
For an additional point, how many times less expensive do you think the cheaper option is?
And for the last point, how many vehicles with the plastic manifold does HoMoCo produce a year?
For extra credit, do the math to multiply the cost difference by the number of units produced. Express your answer, rounded to the nearest ten thousand dollars (your choice of currencies, but please specify). In 500 words or less, explain why you think the choice to move from magnesium to plastic does or does not make sense from a corporate finance standpoint.
Your answers are due to me by 11:59 pm Friday night. Late answers will not be accepted and will not be graded.
One other thing to consider... the almighty $$$
Which do you think costs less: a plastic manifold or a magnesium manifold?
For an additional point, how many times less expensive do you think the cheaper option is?
And for the last point, how many vehicles with the plastic manifold does HoMoCo produce a year?
For extra credit, do the math to multiply the cost difference by the number of units produced. Express your answer, rounded to the nearest ten thousand dollars (your choice of currencies, but please specify). In 500 words or less, explain why you think the choice to move from magnesium to plastic does or does not make sense from a corporate finance standpoint.
Your answers are due to me by 11:59 pm Friday night. Late answers will not be accepted and will not be graded.
#27
Senior Moderator
Counterpoint: magnesium is a naturally occurring metal out of the earth. Plastic involves manufacturing and chemicals
I'll stick to magnesium
I'll stick to magnesium
#29
Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Dirty H-Town, Amerikkka
Posts: 28,432
Received 7,772 Likes
on
5,045 Posts
The following 6 users liked this post by cu2wagon:
00TL-P3.2 (09-22-2016),
KaMLuNg (09-22-2016),
Oh Sickest TL (09-21-2016),
rockstar143 (09-22-2016),
RPhilMan1 (09-22-2016),
and 1 others liked this post.
#30
Senior Moderator
Holy crap what happened to that engine? That's the real question.. If something that bad was bound to happen I dunno what type of material would endure the explosion.
To my original Point.. I feel that Honda is Cutting costs where it shouldn't.. Honda V6s are only placed in the highest of trims or their high end cars (Since the Ridgeline is the only Truck Honda sells and its asking PREMIUM for it) I dunno why it should have cheap out on the engine and placed more weight to the car? Remember that the new Ridgeline is using HSS and ACE Structure compared to the Old One it WEIGHTS THE SAME... So If Honda wanted to lower the weight by using a plastic manifold why add useless crap like IN BED AUDIO?
And Look I know there are a lot of brands using Plastic Manifolds since years, Honda own 4 cyl engines use them a lot.. But back to my point, They are used on the CHEAPEST TRIMS which use the 4 cyl. Even the Odyssey which use a V6 isn't cheap..
Now you can say Nissan has be using it on the VQ35 but I do not own a Nissan nor would want to with their crappy CVTs.. I own a Honda (Acura) so I care about the new IDEAS Honda is getting about how to Prioritize Dumb things over using the Magnesium Allow Manifold which not only worked well, it gave the Engine a Premium Feel and to some that is way more important than IN BED AUDIO.
If using plastic would in any shape or form Lower the GVW or Get better MPGs? (I though of this as its main purpose since Plastic does not heatsoak as much as Metal) but since the New Ridgeline basically weights the same what is the point? Its getting better MPGs because of the DI Engine, Trans and VCM not because they lowered the weight by using a Plastic Manifold.
Perhaps I am over analyzing this but in no way its a Rant, I cant do anything about it or Honda care about my opinion.. This is just a TOPIC of Conversation so do not get mad or anything.
To my original Point.. I feel that Honda is Cutting costs where it shouldn't.. Honda V6s are only placed in the highest of trims or their high end cars (Since the Ridgeline is the only Truck Honda sells and its asking PREMIUM for it) I dunno why it should have cheap out on the engine and placed more weight to the car? Remember that the new Ridgeline is using HSS and ACE Structure compared to the Old One it WEIGHTS THE SAME... So If Honda wanted to lower the weight by using a plastic manifold why add useless crap like IN BED AUDIO?
And Look I know there are a lot of brands using Plastic Manifolds since years, Honda own 4 cyl engines use them a lot.. But back to my point, They are used on the CHEAPEST TRIMS which use the 4 cyl. Even the Odyssey which use a V6 isn't cheap..
Now you can say Nissan has be using it on the VQ35 but I do not own a Nissan nor would want to with their crappy CVTs.. I own a Honda (Acura) so I care about the new IDEAS Honda is getting about how to Prioritize Dumb things over using the Magnesium Allow Manifold which not only worked well, it gave the Engine a Premium Feel and to some that is way more important than IN BED AUDIO.
If using plastic would in any shape or form Lower the GVW or Get better MPGs? (I though of this as its main purpose since Plastic does not heatsoak as much as Metal) but since the New Ridgeline basically weights the same what is the point? Its getting better MPGs because of the DI Engine, Trans and VCM not because they lowered the weight by using a Plastic Manifold.
Perhaps I am over analyzing this but in no way its a Rant, I cant do anything about it or Honda care about my opinion.. This is just a TOPIC of Conversation so do not get mad or anything.
So if honda didnt reduce weight where they could do you think the new ridgeline would weigh the same as the old? Its stronger, more features, electronics etc.. Everything adds up. Weight reduction needs to happen as well. A pound here a few lbs there, all adds up. With cafe standards tightening up every little bit adds up. Same goes for mpg. You cant just look at 1 vehicles mpg rating. You have to add them up across the whole line up. Thats how they meet cafe regulations. Also need to look at NVH. manufacturers are finding ways to make the vehicles even more quiet and smooth. Plastics are used to help reduce resonances, vibrations/sounds that may other wise be heard in a alloy manifold. There are many things to consider as to why it may be better than an alloy manifold. I think you are just over analyzing it
Serious question. Other than your reasoning of it being a dumb idea, why do you think its dumb? Just because its plastic? So why did the magnesium give it a premium feel or should i say what gave it that, especially over a newer composite design? Is it still more premium even if it doesnt perform as well as the plastic?
Here is a good read for ya
Plastics Under the Hood
Why Does My Car Have a Plastic Intake Manifold?
#31
Moderator
Thread Starter
Fatty that are some really good reads right there....
So basically it all comes down to manufacture costs and CAFE Restraints?
I didn´t think the plastic manifold was dumb, I just think it wasn´t worth it look at the 3rd gen MDX that kept the Magnesium Manifold but They added features and the weight was shaved by a whopping +/-300lbs compared to the previous gen, This weight difference is noticeable in all levels of performance and MPGs.
Also I do think using Plastic instead of any Metal is Cheap, I like my Engines in Full Metal Jackets.. What is next? Plastic SH-AWD Diff Case? Plastic Gas Tank? (Oh wait that already happened)
So basically it all comes down to manufacture costs and CAFE Restraints?
I didn´t think the plastic manifold was dumb, I just think it wasn´t worth it look at the 3rd gen MDX that kept the Magnesium Manifold but They added features and the weight was shaved by a whopping +/-300lbs compared to the previous gen, This weight difference is noticeable in all levels of performance and MPGs.
Also I do think using Plastic instead of any Metal is Cheap, I like my Engines in Full Metal Jackets.. What is next? Plastic SH-AWD Diff Case? Plastic Gas Tank? (Oh wait that already happened)
Last edited by Skirmich; 09-21-2016 at 11:48 PM.
#32
Skirmich, while I do feel Honda is currently undergoing some massive cost cutting with their current Acura lineup, I don't necessarily think this is a major part of it. Just look at the interior quality to get a good feel for that.
Despite the MDX selling for 50-70k here, it is still doing remarkably well compared to the otber competiton so they must still be doing something right!
Despite the MDX selling for 50-70k here, it is still doing remarkably well compared to the otber competiton so they must still be doing something right!
#33
#36
Senior Moderator
Originally Posted by rockstar143
thoiboi...i was actually trying to remember where that intake that cracked was posted to repost here.
Immediately thought to post that to show that plastic or not, a failure can occur.
Great minds
Immediately thought to post that to show that plastic or not, a failure can occur.
Great minds
#37
Senior Moderator
Fatty that are some really good reads right there....
So basically it all comes down to manufacture costs and CAFE Restraints?
I didn´t think the plastic manifold was dumb, I just think it wasn´t worth it look at the 3rd gen MDX that kept the Magnesium Manifold but They added features and the weight was shaved by a whopping +/-300lbs compared to the previous gen, This weight difference is noticeable in all levels of performance and MPGs.
Also I do think using Plastic instead of any Metal is Cheap, I like my Engines in Full Metal Jackets.. What is next? Plastic SH-AWD Diff Case? Plastic Gas Tank? (Oh wait that already happened)
So basically it all comes down to manufacture costs and CAFE Restraints?
I didn´t think the plastic manifold was dumb, I just think it wasn´t worth it look at the 3rd gen MDX that kept the Magnesium Manifold but They added features and the weight was shaved by a whopping +/-300lbs compared to the previous gen, This weight difference is noticeable in all levels of performance and MPGs.
Also I do think using Plastic instead of any Metal is Cheap, I like my Engines in Full Metal Jackets.. What is next? Plastic SH-AWD Diff Case? Plastic Gas Tank? (Oh wait that already happened)
I guess im just try to figure out why does the intake mani need to be metal to you? Is it just a look thing to you? If it isnt weaker, and actually improves the engine why is it still cheap? Why isnt it worth it?
The BMWs (even the M series) use it, do you feel they are cheap or any less of a car because of it?
Personally id be more upset that they still use a Timing Belt, not a Chain and SHOC which to me lessen(make it cheap) the vehicle more than a plastic/composite intake manifold.
#39
Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Dirty H-Town, Amerikkka
Posts: 28,432
Received 7,772 Likes
on
5,045 Posts
I guess im just try to figure out why does the intake mani need to be metal to you? Is it just a look thing to you? If it isnt weaker, and actually improves the engine why is it still cheap? Why isnt it worth it?
The BMWs (even the M series) use it, do you feel they are cheap or any less of a car because of it?
Personally id be more upset that they still use a Timing Belt, not a Chain and SHOC which to me lessen(make it cheap) the vehicle more than a plastic/composite intake manifold.
The BMWs (even the M series) use it, do you feel they are cheap or any less of a car because of it?
Personally id be more upset that they still use a Timing Belt, not a Chain and SHOC which to me lessen(make it cheap) the vehicle more than a plastic/composite intake manifold.
What they need to do is start making those parts out of "high density composite thermosetting polymer resin".
Now, all of a sudden, it's like the underhood is chocked full of science! And we use science to make luxury, so...
#40
Senior Moderator
Originally Posted by cu2wagon
The thing is, "plastic" is cheap.
What they need to do is start making those parts out of "high density composite thermosetting polymer resin".
Now, all of a sudden, it's like the underhood is chocked full of science! And we use science to make luxury, so...
What they need to do is start making those parts out of "high density composite thermosetting polymer resin".
Now, all of a sudden, it's like the underhood is chocked full of science! And we use science to make luxury, so...