Just say to ugly...say to RDX

CX7

 

I respectfully disagree. The RDX is not spectacular looking, but compared to the CX7, it's not any worse. The RDX has a much nicer interior, handles better and will have a higher residual value.

 

It all comes down to which looks better to the OP's eyes...

CX7 looks hotter anyways

 

i like the CX-7, not sure about the reliability issues though. also, i like the new murano more than the CX-7. i mean yes i still need to get used to the new murano grill, looks weird and futuristic to me.

 

personally i think the new 09 Murano the best looking one of the crew but that's my thoughts

 

better than the old murano?

 

ive driven both the rogue and outlander. i liked the outlander better.

the rogue has a nicer interior, soft touch dash, more comfy seats, the 2.5 is pretty strong. but it has crazy blind spots, rear hatch window is tiny, kinda ugly, cant adjust the rear seats, small cargo area, and only 3yr/36k warranty

the outlander has hard plastic everywhere, even though it has a v6 it was par with the rogue, seats are flat, hard to find dealer. but i love the split tail gate, LED tails, optional 10" sub and navi, adjustable rear seats, larger cargo area, easy to see out the rear, better looking, longer warranty

 

One of my coworkers just got a new Rogue. The thing is tiny. It's like a jacked up compact car. I honestly can't see how you'd fit much in it. I guess if you're just using it as a higher commuting car it'd be ok, but if you want to actually haul anything or have more utility than a sedan, the Rogue won't cut it.

 

yeah saw Rogue the other day at night, taillights look awful and yes it's a Sentra SUV basically. believe it or not if you thought the Rogue couldn't fit anything the Infiniti EX35 fits much less.

sign me up for Outlander, new Murano w/o leather, or the FJ cruiser.