My god I want a new Escalade!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-25-2006, 09:12 PM
  #81  
Safety Car
 
pimpin-tl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Abilene, TX
Age: 49
Posts: 3,992
Received 148 Likes on 99 Posts
Originally Posted by CLpower
Escalade > Denali
Looks just like the Caddy. So it can't be ugly.



pimpin-tl is offline  
Old 10-25-2006, 09:14 PM
  #82  
Moderator Alumnus
 
Beltfed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Communist, NY
Posts: 9,574
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by pimpin-tl
Umm obviously you do not.

http://www.edmunds.com/new/2007/gmc/.../standard.html

6 spd in the GMC Denali is the last one I was talking about.
Oh whatever.....I don't care what the last thing you were talking about.

The fact is, all three models have different HP ratings......one engine and tranny (Tahoe).
Beltfed is offline  
Old 10-25-2006, 09:15 PM
  #83  
Safety Car
 
pimpin-tl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Abilene, TX
Age: 49
Posts: 3,992
Received 148 Likes on 99 Posts
Still the point stays. Why pay $30+k more for a Caddy for nothing more than the nameplate and .1 of a liter? lol
pimpin-tl is offline  
Old 10-25-2006, 09:17 PM
  #84  
Moderator Alumnus
 
Beltfed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Communist, NY
Posts: 9,574
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by pimpin-tl
Hmm your worried about the resale value on a Denali, but when you pull the numbers the Escalade actually drops worse for some reason. Both have a terrible resale value.

GMC DENALI 2006

Good
$33,030
(Selected)

Caddy Escalade

Good
$37,790
(Selected)

Wow how can that be? The Escalade had a worse resale value. Ouch!

In the real world, anyone that has a clue knows the Caddy pulls more $ on the used market than a Denali does. And the Denali is not that much cheaper.

The Denali has always been the bastard stepchild........nobody cares about it. Its not the cheapest (Tahoe) and has no prestige (Escalade).

So where does it fit? Answer.....no place.
Beltfed is offline  
Old 10-25-2006, 09:19 PM
  #85  
Safety Car
 
pimpin-tl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Abilene, TX
Age: 49
Posts: 3,992
Received 148 Likes on 99 Posts
No, in the real world everyone knows that Caddy has the worst resale value of any car period.

The Denali is 45k new possible cheaper with discounts. The Escalade, 70k. Yea a lot cheaper and no discounts on Caddys usually.
pimpin-tl is offline  
Old 10-25-2006, 09:19 PM
  #86  
Moderator Alumnus
 
Beltfed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Communist, NY
Posts: 9,574
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by pimpin-tl
Still the point stays. Why pay $30+k more for a Caddy for nothing more than the nameplate and .1 of a liter? lol
An Escalade is not $30k more than a Denali.....are you insane?

A Tahoe LTZ with a few options is almost $45k.
Beltfed is offline  
Old 10-25-2006, 09:22 PM
  #87  
Moderator Alumnus
 
Beltfed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Communist, NY
Posts: 9,574
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by pimpin-tl
The Denali is 45k new possible cheaper with discounts. The Escalade, 70k. Yea a lot cheaper and no discounts on Caddys usually.
The Escalade isn't quite $70k......try is bases at just over $55k (Denali $49k). Decent options you're at $60k. Go overboard like an idiot, you're at $65k.

You can get discounts all day on the 07 Escalade.

And news flash, GM cars in general have lackluster resale values.
Beltfed is offline  
Old 10-25-2006, 09:24 PM
  #88  
Safety Car
 
pimpin-tl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Abilene, TX
Age: 49
Posts: 3,992
Received 148 Likes on 99 Posts
2007 GMC Yukon
Denali 4dr SUV AWD (6.2L 8cyl 6A)
MSRP Invoice
National Base Price (excludes destination charge)
A note about advertising fees $47,470 $43,435


2007 Cadillac Escalade
4dr SUV AWD (6.2L 8cyl 6A)
MSRP Invoice
National Base Price (excludes destination charge)
A note about advertising fees $56,775 $52,517

Okay, about 10k more. Someone here said 70k earlier and I was going by that. And still again, 10k more for nameplate. Escalade has a worse resale value still even when its 10k more.

Last edited by pimpin-tl; 10-25-2006 at 09:26 PM.
pimpin-tl is offline  
Old 10-25-2006, 09:28 PM
  #89  
Senior Moderator
 
Yumcha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 167,399
Received 22,773 Likes on 13,967 Posts
Originally Posted by CLpower
i'm sorry, but I find it funny all you guys are bitching about buying an "70K stupid SUV". You guys should all be driving tercels. In your theory sports cars aren't "proper" because you'll most likely never max it out and be able to drive it to it's full potential. A $70K sedan is stupid when you could buy a $20K one, etc, etc.
But see...there's a difference. With an SUV, I'm hated. Frowned upon. Spat at. Hissed at. Cursed at. Middle-fingered at. Yelled at cuz my shoulder check nearly ran over a grandmaw driving next to me.

That, and I'll never be able to park in Chinatown. Or anywhere for that matter unless I'm visiting my Uncle Benny out in the dude ranch.




But...with a $70K sedan, which I may never have the skills to drive, at least I'm no longer a bane of society. I can park where I want; get better mileage...and have something that looks better than a clunky SUV with dishplates?





Please don't ban me.
Yumcha is online now  
Old 10-25-2006, 09:47 PM
  #90  
Moderator Alumnus
 
Beltfed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Communist, NY
Posts: 9,574
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Yumchah
But see...there's a difference. With an SUV, I'm hated. Frowned upon. Spat at. Hissed at. Cursed at. Middle-fingered at. Yelled at cuz my shoulder check nearly ran over a grandmaw driving next to me.
I've driven my oldman's RR plenty...and have never been spat at, hissed at, cursed at, middle fingered at.

Not sure what you're doing wrong.

Its a nice rig.



Beltfed is offline  
Old 10-25-2006, 10:17 PM
  #91  
Senior Moderator
 
Yumcha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 167,399
Received 22,773 Likes on 13,967 Posts
^ Whoa...! See, I guess I should contradict myself a bit...

There are some SUVs I'd totally love to be in...and that Range Rover is indeed one of them. Escalades, Navigators, Yukons, etc. are what I was more implying...
Yumcha is online now  
Old 10-26-2006, 12:53 AM
  #92  
Burning Brakes
 
Papa_Sean's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Queens, NY
Age: 41
Posts: 793
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hey how bout one of these




Papa_Sean is offline  
Old 10-26-2006, 01:14 AM
  #93  
Senior Moderator
 
srika's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 58,186
Received 10,258 Likes on 5,221 Posts
hey Beltfed how's the reliability on that RR.. compared to like, normal cars.

and oh yea, looks nice. I swear the interior of the '03+ RR's is just about one of the nicest places to be. Everything is so f'ing refined.
srika is offline  
Old 10-26-2006, 09:29 AM
  #94  
teh Senior Instigator
 
CLpower's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Huntington Beach, CA -> Ashburn, VA -> Raleigh, NC -> Walnut Creek, CA
Age: 42
Posts: 44,090
Received 957 Likes on 328 Posts
Originally Posted by pimpin-tl
Umm obviously you do not.

http://www.edmunds.com/new/2007/gmc/.../standard.html

6 spd in the GMC Denali is the last one I was talking about.
you started off by saying tahoe.


And for one, the 403 HP 6.2L is not available in the denali; i may be mistaken 6.2L w/ 380 HP but I believe it's only available in the xl
CLpower is offline  
Old 10-26-2006, 09:30 AM
  #95  
teh Senior Instigator
 
CLpower's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Huntington Beach, CA -> Ashburn, VA -> Raleigh, NC -> Walnut Creek, CA
Age: 42
Posts: 44,090
Received 957 Likes on 328 Posts
Originally Posted by pimpin-tl

Okay, about 10k more. Someone here said 70k earlier and I was going by that. And still again, 10k more for nameplate. Escalade has a worse resale value still even when its 10k more.

The escalade retail value is better then the other two. And for one, it has many more options then the other two to, so they aren't the same exact car. It's like comparing a camry to an lexus ES
CLpower is offline  
Old 10-26-2006, 09:32 AM
  #96  
teh Senior Instigator
 
CLpower's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Huntington Beach, CA -> Ashburn, VA -> Raleigh, NC -> Walnut Creek, CA
Age: 42
Posts: 44,090
Received 957 Likes on 328 Posts
Originally Posted by pimpin-tl
No, in the real world everyone knows that Caddy has the worst resale value of any car period.

Actually, many cars have a far worse resale value then the caddy. I know my acura did, and a know a guy that lost almost $100K on an Audi S8 in 6 years.



You really need to learn more before you step into these conversations.
CLpower is offline  
Old 10-26-2006, 09:35 AM
  #97  
teh Senior Instigator
 
CLpower's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Huntington Beach, CA -> Ashburn, VA -> Raleigh, NC -> Walnut Creek, CA
Age: 42
Posts: 44,090
Received 957 Likes on 328 Posts
Originally Posted by Yumchah
But see...there's a difference. With an SUV, I'm hated. Frowned upon. Spat at. Hissed at. Cursed at. Middle-fingered at. Yelled at cuz my shoulder check nearly ran over a grandmaw driving next to me.

That, and I'll never be able to park in Chinatown. Or anywhere for that matter unless I'm visiting my Uncle Benny out in the dude ranch.




But...with a $70K sedan, which I may never have the skills to drive, at least I'm no longer a bane of society. I can park where I want; get better mileage...and have something that looks better than a clunky SUV with dishplates?





Please don't ban me.

I drove a 96 tahoe for two years and have spent much time in a few different navigators (drove a 01 for almost 8 months. I was never spat at, frowned at, yelled at. And never once had a hard time parking anywhere (including chinatown actually). Gas mileage wasn't bad either, avg'd around 16 which was just a tad less then my GTO, and more then the BMW my dad drives. (hell just a few less then my acura got (19))
CLpower is offline  
Old 10-26-2006, 10:38 AM
  #98  
Burning Brakes
 
daemonicus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Posts: 951
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
ooooo $55k for cheap plastics, fake wood, good old reliable GM, shitty gas mileage and the Caddy emblem on the grille. oh ya, and dont forget finishing last to almost last overall in every SUV comparison test it's been in since it came out in '99. Whew, man, I cant wait to get $55K so I can spend it on that.
daemonicus is offline  
Old 10-26-2006, 11:15 AM
  #99  
99 TL, 06 E350
 
Black Tire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Toronto
Age: 44
Posts: 5,030
Received 164 Likes on 110 Posts
For pimp status...can't beat the Range Rover.
Black Tire is offline  
Old 10-26-2006, 12:08 PM
  #100  
Safety Car
 
pimpin-tl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Abilene, TX
Age: 49
Posts: 3,992
Received 148 Likes on 99 Posts
Originally Posted by CLpower
you started off by saying tahoe.


And for one, the 403 HP 6.2L is not available in the denali; i may be mistaken 6.2L w/ 380 HP but I believe it's only available in the xl
Per the website of its a DENALI period, it comes with a 6.2L. Same size as the Escalade.
pimpin-tl is offline  
Old 10-26-2006, 12:09 PM
  #101  
Safety Car
 
pimpin-tl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Abilene, TX
Age: 49
Posts: 3,992
Received 148 Likes on 99 Posts
Originally Posted by CLpower
The escalade retail value is better then the other two. And for one, it has many more options then the other two to, so they aren't the same exact car. It's like comparing a camry to an lexus ES
Many more options? Please show us these more options. I don't see them listed.

You have already been wrong saying the Denalli didn't come with the 6.2 standard. LOL.
pimpin-tl is offline  
Old 10-26-2006, 12:10 PM
  #102  
Safety Car
 
pimpin-tl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Abilene, TX
Age: 49
Posts: 3,992
Received 148 Likes on 99 Posts
Originally Posted by CLpower
Actually, many cars have a far worse resale value then the caddy. I know my acura did, and a know a guy that lost almost $100K on an Audi S8 in 6 years.



You really need to learn more before you step into these conversations.
Prove it. I have never seen a Acura lose as bad as a GM product period. A Audi S8 lose 100k in 6 years? Seriously doubt that.

Learn more? You have been the one thats been completely wrong in this thread so far.
pimpin-tl is offline  
Old 10-26-2006, 12:23 PM
  #103  
Safety Car
 
pimpin-tl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Abilene, TX
Age: 49
Posts: 3,992
Received 148 Likes on 99 Posts
Arrow

Originally Posted by CLpower
Actually, many cars have a far worse resale value then the caddy. I know my acura did, and a know a guy that lost almost $100K on an Audi S8 in 6 years.



You really need to learn more before you step into these conversations.

All around 60k of miles and good condition selected. Looks like the Audi did lose a lot. But lower Audis like the A4 and A6 hold their values much better. The Caddy still has a poor resale value compared to your ACURA or most other cars.

2002 Caddy Escalade AWD V8 Price when new $55k~ The Caddy lost $30k

Excellent
$25,610

Good
$24,165
(Selected)

Fair
$22,190


2002 Acura CL-S Price when new $29-32k The Acura lost $16645

Excellent
$15,355

Good
$14,375
(Selected)

Fair
$13,135


2002 Audi S8 AWD $85k new

Excellent
$33,355

Good
$31,525
(Selected)

Fair
$28,985

So the Audi lost about $51645
pimpin-tl is offline  
Old 10-26-2006, 12:29 PM
  #104  
teh Senior Instigator
 
CLpower's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Huntington Beach, CA -> Ashburn, VA -> Raleigh, NC -> Walnut Creek, CA
Age: 42
Posts: 44,090
Received 957 Likes on 328 Posts
Originally Posted by pimpin-tl
Many more options? Please show us these more options. I don't see them listed.

You have already been wrong saying the Denalli didn't come with the 6.2 standard. LOL.


Can you comprehend posts? First off, the Denali and the Escalade have different power ratings between the two, the motors aren't identical, and as belt mentioned earlier.. I wasn't wrong anywhere. Youwere arguing earlier about the Tahoe, which DOES NOT even have the option for the 6.2L. then when you realized you were wrong you didn't even mention it etc, you all of a sudden threw in the denali



Let me quote you just so you don't get confused; i'll put it into simple steps:

Originally Posted by pimpin-tl
They are exactly the same. Same engine, drivetrain. Interial panels and exterior panels are the only thing different. Are you blind?! It's been a known fact for years the Tahoe is the Escalade.

and then you reply to my

Originally Posted by CLpower
the engine and drivetrain are no longer the same


escalade has the 403 HP 6.3L Tahoe has the 5.3
w/

Originally Posted by pimpin-tl
DriveTrain is the same, engine is different. But I wouldn't pay 30k+ for just a engine upgrade.

Then you brought in the Denali, which I never denied came w/ the 6.2L, because it does, but FYI; you brought the denali out of left field when we were talking about the tahoe


And then you had the balls to call a 30K difference, you do your research don't ya? I don't care if you got the # from someone in this thread. get your facts straight before you post and try to act like you know it all.







fyi, there is roughly a 5-7K difference between the Denali (48-50K) and the Escalade (55K), and to me it's worth it for the front end alone. Now, go look at a fully loaded Escalade and a fully loaded Denali and tell me they are identical. I've done this matchup.






i'll sit here and while I wait for your reply. If I were you, i'd examine it really well; or even better, just not post.
CLpower is offline  
Old 10-26-2006, 12:33 PM
  #105  
Safety Car
 
pimpin-tl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Abilene, TX
Age: 49
Posts: 3,992
Received 148 Likes on 99 Posts
Excellent
$22,285

Good
$20,970
(Selected)

Fair
$19,275

Woah, can't be.....The Denali has a better resale value.

Denali new $38-42k for that body style, and looky....it only lost. $19,715.

My point proven.
pimpin-tl is offline  
Old 10-26-2006, 12:35 PM
  #106  
teh Senior Instigator
 
CLpower's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Huntington Beach, CA -> Ashburn, VA -> Raleigh, NC -> Walnut Creek, CA
Age: 42
Posts: 44,090
Received 957 Likes on 328 Posts
Originally Posted by pimpin-tl
All around 60k of miles and good condition selected. Looks like the Audi did lose a lot. But lower Audis like the A4 and A6 hold their values much better. The Caddy still has a poor resale value compared to your ACURA or most other cars.

I had a first gen, bought it new, sold it 6 years later for 4K, bought for 29K.



BTW, I assume you pulled KBB #'s if that's the case atleast here in so cal, they are totally off. Which sucks because the realistic price of all those cars is a lot lower then they list (caddy included)


How about you get off the resale value one (i'll give you a win on this) and try tackling the rest
CLpower is offline  
Old 10-26-2006, 12:37 PM
  #107  
Safety Car
 
pimpin-tl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Abilene, TX
Age: 49
Posts: 3,992
Received 148 Likes on 99 Posts
No obviously you can't. To maximize the features for price, the Denali is the one to get. And I said that in a post a few pages ago. You obviously are ignoring that. Power ratings are meanless with GM powerplants. We all know (like the TA, Camaro, C5 vette), if its a 6.2 L or 5.7L it still puts down the same power even if they say oh it has 350 hp or 315. So the number game doesn't work. You have been completely wrong on everything you said and I have proven that. So stop being so defense and admit you were wrong. LOL I threw in the Denali because I was wrong? You can't read obviously.

All my facts have been striaght. At least I have been backing up all my claims unlike yourself. Why are you argueing? Are you a GM fanboy now that you own a Pontiac that has been discontinued?

The difference in prices have been posted. EOD. You got owned.

Originally Posted by CLpower
Can you comprehend posts? First off, the Denali and the Escalade have different power ratings between the two, the motors aren't identical, and as belt mentioned earlier.. I wasn't wrong anywhere. Youwere arguing earlier about the Tahoe, which DOES NOT even have the option for the 6.2L. then when you realized you were wrong you didn't even mention it etc, you all of a sudden threw in the denali



Let me quote you just so you don't get confused; i'll put it into simple steps:




and then you reply to my



w/




Then you brought in the Denali, which I never denied came w/ the 6.2L, because it does, but FYI; you brought the denali out of left field when we were talking about the tahoe


And then you had the balls to call a 30K difference, you do your research don't ya? I don't care if you got the # from someone in this thread. get your facts straight before you post and try to act like you know it all.







fyi, there is roughly a 5-7K difference between the Denali (48-50K) and the Escalade (55K), and to me it's worth it for the front end alone. Now, go look at a fully loaded Escalade and a fully loaded Denali and tell me they are identical. I've done this matchup.






i'll sit here and while I wait for your reply. If I were you, i'd examine it really well; or even better, just not post.
pimpin-tl is offline  
Old 10-26-2006, 12:38 PM
  #108  
We dont love these hoes
 
Sdog2012's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Age: 38
Posts: 3,737
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The new escalade is sweet, got to drive a new EXT about a week ago, soo much better than the older ones, pretty much everything about them
Sdog2012 is offline  
Old 10-26-2006, 12:39 PM
  #109  
Safety Car
 
pimpin-tl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Abilene, TX
Age: 49
Posts: 3,992
Received 148 Likes on 99 Posts
Originally Posted by CLpower
I had a first gen, bought it new, sold it 6 years later for 4K, bought for 29K.



BTW, I assume you pulled KBB #'s if that's the case atleast here in so cal, they are totally off. Which sucks because the realistic price of all those cars is a lot lower then they list (caddy included)


How about you get off the resale value one (i'll give you a win on this) and try tackling the rest
More excuses as usual. Off huh? Got another viable source? Please post your data. We will be waiting.
pimpin-tl is offline  
Old 10-26-2006, 12:40 PM
  #110  
teh Senior Instigator
 
CLpower's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Huntington Beach, CA -> Ashburn, VA -> Raleigh, NC -> Walnut Creek, CA
Age: 42
Posts: 44,090
Received 957 Likes on 328 Posts
Originally Posted by pimpin-tl
Per the website of its a DENALI period, it comes with a 6.2L. Same size as the Escalade.
Okay, so then I was partially wrong. The shorter denali, not just the XL, come w/ the 6.2L. However they are still not the same identical motor as in the Escalade.
CLpower is offline  
Old 10-26-2006, 12:42 PM
  #111  
Safety Car
 
pimpin-tl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Abilene, TX
Age: 49
Posts: 3,992
Received 148 Likes on 99 Posts
BTW, your GTO has lost 10k since it was bought. If you have a 2005 near 15k of miles.

pimpin-tl is offline  
Old 10-26-2006, 12:42 PM
  #112  
teh Senior Instigator
 
CLpower's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Huntington Beach, CA -> Ashburn, VA -> Raleigh, NC -> Walnut Creek, CA
Age: 42
Posts: 44,090
Received 957 Likes on 328 Posts
Originally Posted by pimpin-tl
No obviously you can't. To maximize the features for price, the Denali is the one to get. And I said that in a post a few pages ago. You obviously are ignoring that. Power ratings are meanless with GM powerplants. We all know (like the TA, Camaro, C5 vette), if its a 6.2 L or 5.7L it still puts down the same power even if they say oh it has 350 hp or 315. So the number game doesn't work. You have been completely wrong on everything you said and I have proven that. So stop being so defense and admit you were wrong. LOL I threw in the Denali because I was wrong? You can't read obviously.

All my facts have been striaght. At least I have been backing up all my claims unlike yourself. Why are you argueing? Are you a GM fanboy now that you own a Pontiac that has been discontinued?

The difference in prices have been posted. EOD. You got owned.


I can't believe you are now trying to compare the LS1 to the engines. Your facts have not been straight in the least, atleast I have admitted where I was mistaken.


yes, I'm not all of a sudden a Gm fanboy because I bought a discontinued pontiac It's unreal what a tool you are.
CLpower is offline  
Old 10-26-2006, 12:43 PM
  #113  
Safety Car
 
pimpin-tl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Abilene, TX
Age: 49
Posts: 3,992
Received 148 Likes on 99 Posts
Originally Posted by CLpower
Okay, so then I was partially wrong. The shorter denali, not just the XL, come w/ the 6.2L. However they are still not the same identical motor as in the Escalade.
lol. Yes they are.
pimpin-tl is offline  
Old 10-26-2006, 12:43 PM
  #114  
teh Senior Instigator
 
CLpower's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Huntington Beach, CA -> Ashburn, VA -> Raleigh, NC -> Walnut Creek, CA
Age: 42
Posts: 44,090
Received 957 Likes on 328 Posts
Originally Posted by pimpin-tl
BTW, your GTO has lost 10k since it was bought. If you have a 2005 near 15k of miles.


Have a 2006 w/ 16k on it, I've lost some, but if that bothered me I wouldn't have bought the car. I didn't buy it for what I can sell it for 3-4 years down the road.


nice try though
CLpower is offline  
Old 10-26-2006, 12:43 PM
  #115  
teh Senior Instigator
 
CLpower's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Huntington Beach, CA -> Ashburn, VA -> Raleigh, NC -> Walnut Creek, CA
Age: 42
Posts: 44,090
Received 957 Likes on 328 Posts
Originally Posted by pimpin-tl
lol. Yes they are.
have you seen dyno's from the Escalade and the Denali to show that GM is doing the same thing they did w/ the LS1's? Nope, you haven't
CLpower is offline  
Old 10-26-2006, 12:44 PM
  #116  
teh Senior Instigator
 
CLpower's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Huntington Beach, CA -> Ashburn, VA -> Raleigh, NC -> Walnut Creek, CA
Age: 42
Posts: 44,090
Received 957 Likes on 328 Posts
Originally Posted by pimpin-tl
More excuses as usual. Off huh? Got another viable source? Please post your data. We will be waiting.

A viable source for what? That KBB prices are off? Go through the autotrader and see what cars are selling for and then look up their KBB.




Do I really need a viable source to show I paid 29K for my first gen and got 3800 for it on a trade 6 years later?
CLpower is offline  
Old 10-26-2006, 01:18 PM
  #117  
Moderator Alumnus
 
Beltfed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Communist, NY
Posts: 9,574
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by srika
hey Beltfed how's the reliability on that RR.. compared to like, normal cars.

and oh yea, looks nice. I swear the interior of the '03+ RR's is just about one of the nicest places to be. Everything is so f'ing refined.
Reliability has been fine, no major issues to be noted.........BMW at the heart.

I have to admit as well, that the newer RRs have very nice interiors. But also, the above RR has the luxury package which is like $5k.
Beltfed is offline  
Old 10-26-2006, 03:54 PM
  #118  
Senior Moderator
iTrader: (5)
 
juniorbean's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: The QC
Posts: 28,461
Received 1,760 Likes on 1,046 Posts
Originally Posted by CLpower
I can't believe you are now trying to compare the LS1 to the engines. Your facts have not been straight in the least, atleast I have admitted where I was mistaken.


yes, I'm not all of a sudden a Gm fanboy because I bought a discontinued pontiac It's unreal what a tool you are.
He's done this on several threads in Car Talk. And the funny part is that he seems to always argue with Mega Mods or Admins.

Don't sweat it CL... at this rate he'll hijack the wrong thread, argue with the wrong mod/admin, and end up with a vacation.
juniorbean is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
drillzzz
2G CL (2001-2003)
19
07-28-2019 06:30 PM
brboy
2G RL (2005-2012)
5
10-05-2015 11:34 AM
Skirmich
2G TL (1999-2003)
37
09-15-2015 06:41 PM



Quick Reply: My god I want a new Escalade!



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:30 AM.