My god I want a new Escalade!
#82
Moderator Alumnus
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Communist, NY
Posts: 9,574
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by pimpin-tl
Umm obviously you do not.
http://www.edmunds.com/new/2007/gmc/.../standard.html
6 spd in the GMC Denali is the last one I was talking about.
http://www.edmunds.com/new/2007/gmc/.../standard.html
6 spd in the GMC Denali is the last one I was talking about.
The fact is, all three models have different HP ratings......one engine and tranny (Tahoe).
#84
Moderator Alumnus
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Communist, NY
Posts: 9,574
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by pimpin-tl
Hmm your worried about the resale value on a Denali, but when you pull the numbers the Escalade actually drops worse for some reason. Both have a terrible resale value.
GMC DENALI 2006
Good
$33,030
(Selected)
Caddy Escalade
Good
$37,790
(Selected)
Wow how can that be? The Escalade had a worse resale value. Ouch!
GMC DENALI 2006
Good
$33,030
(Selected)
Caddy Escalade
Good
$37,790
(Selected)
Wow how can that be? The Escalade had a worse resale value. Ouch!
In the real world, anyone that has a clue knows the Caddy pulls more $ on the used market than a Denali does. And the Denali is not that much cheaper.
The Denali has always been the bastard stepchild........nobody cares about it. Its not the cheapest (Tahoe) and has no prestige (Escalade).
So where does it fit? Answer.....no place.
#85
Safety Car
No, in the real world everyone knows that Caddy has the worst resale value of any car period.
The Denali is 45k new possible cheaper with discounts. The Escalade, 70k. Yea a lot cheaper and no discounts on Caddys usually.
The Denali is 45k new possible cheaper with discounts. The Escalade, 70k. Yea a lot cheaper and no discounts on Caddys usually.
#86
Moderator Alumnus
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Communist, NY
Posts: 9,574
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by pimpin-tl
Still the point stays. Why pay $30+k more for a Caddy for nothing more than the nameplate and .1 of a liter? lol
A Tahoe LTZ with a few options is almost $45k.
#87
Moderator Alumnus
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Communist, NY
Posts: 9,574
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by pimpin-tl
The Denali is 45k new possible cheaper with discounts. The Escalade, 70k. Yea a lot cheaper and no discounts on Caddys usually.
You can get discounts all day on the 07 Escalade.
And news flash, GM cars in general have lackluster resale values.
#88
Safety Car
2007 GMC Yukon
Denali 4dr SUV AWD (6.2L 8cyl 6A)
MSRP Invoice
National Base Price (excludes destination charge)
A note about advertising fees $47,470 $43,435
2007 Cadillac Escalade
4dr SUV AWD (6.2L 8cyl 6A)
MSRP Invoice
National Base Price (excludes destination charge)
A note about advertising fees $56,775 $52,517
Okay, about 10k more. Someone here said 70k earlier and I was going by that. And still again, 10k more for nameplate. Escalade has a worse resale value still even when its 10k more.
Denali 4dr SUV AWD (6.2L 8cyl 6A)
MSRP Invoice
National Base Price (excludes destination charge)
A note about advertising fees $47,470 $43,435
2007 Cadillac Escalade
4dr SUV AWD (6.2L 8cyl 6A)
MSRP Invoice
National Base Price (excludes destination charge)
A note about advertising fees $56,775 $52,517
Okay, about 10k more. Someone here said 70k earlier and I was going by that. And still again, 10k more for nameplate. Escalade has a worse resale value still even when its 10k more.
Last edited by pimpin-tl; 10-25-2006 at 09:26 PM.
#89
Senior Moderator
Originally Posted by CLpower
i'm sorry, but I find it funny all you guys are bitching about buying an "70K stupid SUV". You guys should all be driving tercels. In your theory sports cars aren't "proper" because you'll most likely never max it out and be able to drive it to it's full potential. A $70K sedan is stupid when you could buy a $20K one, etc, etc.
That, and I'll never be able to park in Chinatown. Or anywhere for that matter unless I'm visiting my Uncle Benny out in the dude ranch.
But...with a $70K sedan, which I may never have the skills to drive, at least I'm no longer a bane of society. I can park where I want; get better mileage...and have something that looks better than a clunky SUV with dishplates?
![Shrug](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/shrug.gif)
Please don't ban me.
![Big Grin](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
#90
Moderator Alumnus
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Communist, NY
Posts: 9,574
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Yumchah
But see...there's a difference. With an SUV, I'm hated. Frowned upon. Spat at. Hissed at. Cursed at. Middle-fingered at. Yelled at cuz my shoulder check nearly ran over a grandmaw driving next to me.
Not sure what you're doing wrong.
![Smile](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
Its a nice rig.
#91
Senior Moderator
^ Whoa...! See, I guess I should contradict myself a bit...![Big Grin](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
There are some SUVs I'd totally love to be in...and that Range Rover is indeed one of them. Escalades, Navigators, Yukons, etc. are what I was more implying...
![Big Grin](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
There are some SUVs I'd totally love to be in...and that Range Rover is indeed one of them. Escalades, Navigators, Yukons, etc. are what I was more implying...
#93
Senior Moderator
hey Beltfed how's the reliability on that RR.. compared to like, normal cars.
and oh yea, looks nice. I swear the interior of the '03+ RR's is just about one of the nicest places to be. Everything is so f'ing refined.
and oh yea, looks nice. I swear the interior of the '03+ RR's is just about one of the nicest places to be. Everything is so f'ing refined.
#94
teh Senior Instigator
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Huntington Beach, CA -> Ashburn, VA -> Raleigh, NC -> Walnut Creek, CA
Age: 42
Posts: 44,090
Received 957 Likes
on
328 Posts
Originally Posted by pimpin-tl
Umm obviously you do not.
http://www.edmunds.com/new/2007/gmc/.../standard.html
6 spd in the GMC Denali is the last one I was talking about.
http://www.edmunds.com/new/2007/gmc/.../standard.html
6 spd in the GMC Denali is the last one I was talking about.
And for one, the 403 HP 6.2L is not available in the denali; i may be mistaken 6.2L w/ 380 HP but I believe it's only available in the xl
#95
teh Senior Instigator
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Huntington Beach, CA -> Ashburn, VA -> Raleigh, NC -> Walnut Creek, CA
Age: 42
Posts: 44,090
Received 957 Likes
on
328 Posts
Originally Posted by pimpin-tl
Okay, about 10k more. Someone here said 70k earlier and I was going by that. And still again, 10k more for nameplate. Escalade has a worse resale value still even when its 10k more.
The escalade retail value is better then the other two. And for one, it has many more options then the other two to, so they aren't the same exact car. It's like comparing a camry to an lexus ES
#96
teh Senior Instigator
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Huntington Beach, CA -> Ashburn, VA -> Raleigh, NC -> Walnut Creek, CA
Age: 42
Posts: 44,090
Received 957 Likes
on
328 Posts
Originally Posted by pimpin-tl
No, in the real world everyone knows that Caddy has the worst resale value of any car period.
Actually, many cars have a far worse resale value then the caddy. I know my acura did, and a know a guy that lost almost $100K on an Audi S8 in 6 years.
You really need to learn more before you step into these conversations.
#97
teh Senior Instigator
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Huntington Beach, CA -> Ashburn, VA -> Raleigh, NC -> Walnut Creek, CA
Age: 42
Posts: 44,090
Received 957 Likes
on
328 Posts
Originally Posted by Yumchah
But see...there's a difference. With an SUV, I'm hated. Frowned upon. Spat at. Hissed at. Cursed at. Middle-fingered at. Yelled at cuz my shoulder check nearly ran over a grandmaw driving next to me.
That, and I'll never be able to park in Chinatown. Or anywhere for that matter unless I'm visiting my Uncle Benny out in the dude ranch.
But...with a $70K sedan, which I may never have the skills to drive, at least I'm no longer a bane of society. I can park where I want; get better mileage...and have something that looks better than a clunky SUV with dishplates?![Shrug](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/shrug.gif)
Please don't ban me.![Big Grin](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
That, and I'll never be able to park in Chinatown. Or anywhere for that matter unless I'm visiting my Uncle Benny out in the dude ranch.
But...with a $70K sedan, which I may never have the skills to drive, at least I'm no longer a bane of society. I can park where I want; get better mileage...and have something that looks better than a clunky SUV with dishplates?
![Shrug](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/shrug.gif)
Please don't ban me.
![Big Grin](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
I drove a 96 tahoe for two years and have spent much time in a few different navigators (drove a 01 for almost 8 months. I was never spat at, frowned at, yelled at. And never once had a hard time parking anywhere
![Shrug](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/shrug.gif)
#98
Burning Brakes
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Posts: 951
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
ooooo $55k for cheap plastics, fake wood, good old reliable GM, shitty gas mileage and the Caddy emblem on the grille. oh ya, and dont forget finishing last to almost last overall in every SUV comparison test it's been in since it came out in '99. Whew, man, I cant wait to get $55K so I can spend it on that.
#100
Safety Car
Originally Posted by CLpower
you started off by saying tahoe.
And for one, the 403 HP 6.2L is not available in the denali; i may be mistaken 6.2L w/ 380 HP but I believe it's only available in the xl
And for one, the 403 HP 6.2L is not available in the denali; i may be mistaken 6.2L w/ 380 HP but I believe it's only available in the xl
#101
Safety Car
Originally Posted by CLpower
The escalade retail value is better then the other two. And for one, it has many more options then the other two to, so they aren't the same exact car. It's like comparing a camry to an lexus ES
You have already been wrong saying the Denalli didn't come with the 6.2 standard. LOL.
#102
Safety Car
Originally Posted by CLpower
Actually, many cars have a far worse resale value then the caddy. I know my acura did, and a know a guy that lost almost $100K on an Audi S8 in 6 years.
You really need to learn more before you step into these conversations.
You really need to learn more before you step into these conversations.
Learn more? You have been the one thats been completely wrong in this thread so far.
![Why Me](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/whyme.gif)
#103
Safety Car
![Arrow](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/icons/icon2.gif)
Originally Posted by CLpower
Actually, many cars have a far worse resale value then the caddy. I know my acura did, and a know a guy that lost almost $100K on an Audi S8 in 6 years.
You really need to learn more before you step into these conversations.
You really need to learn more before you step into these conversations.
All around 60k of miles and good condition selected. Looks like the Audi did lose a lot. But lower Audis like the A4 and A6 hold their values much better. The Caddy still has a poor resale value compared to your ACURA or most other cars.
2002 Caddy Escalade AWD V8 Price when new $55k~ The Caddy lost $30k
Excellent
$25,610
Good
$24,165
(Selected)
Fair
$22,190
2002 Acura CL-S Price when new $29-32k The Acura lost $16645
Excellent
$15,355
Good
$14,375
(Selected)
Fair
$13,135
2002 Audi S8 AWD $85k new
Excellent
$33,355
Good
$31,525
(Selected)
Fair
$28,985
So the Audi lost about $51645
#104
teh Senior Instigator
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Huntington Beach, CA -> Ashburn, VA -> Raleigh, NC -> Walnut Creek, CA
Age: 42
Posts: 44,090
Received 957 Likes
on
328 Posts
Originally Posted by pimpin-tl
Many more options? Please show us these more options. I don't see them listed.
You have already been wrong saying the Denalli didn't come with the 6.2 standard. LOL.
You have already been wrong saying the Denalli didn't come with the 6.2 standard. LOL.
Can you comprehend posts? First off, the Denali and the Escalade have different power ratings between the two, the motors aren't identical, and as belt mentioned earlier.. I wasn't wrong anywhere. Youwere arguing earlier about the Tahoe, which DOES NOT even have the option for the 6.2L. then when you realized you were wrong you didn't even mention it etc, you all of a sudden threw in the denali
Let me quote you just so you don't get confused; i'll put it into simple steps:
Originally Posted by pimpin-tl
They are exactly the same. Same engine, drivetrain. Interial panels and exterior panels are the only thing different. Are you blind?! It's been a known fact for years the Tahoe is the Escalade.
and then you reply to my
Originally Posted by CLpower
the engine and drivetrain are no longer the same ![Smile](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
escalade has the 403 HP 6.3L Tahoe has the 5.3
![Smile](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
escalade has the 403 HP 6.3L Tahoe has the 5.3
Originally Posted by pimpin-tl
DriveTrain is the same, engine is different. But I wouldn't pay 30k+ for just a engine upgrade.
Then you brought in the Denali, which I never denied came w/ the 6.2L, because it does, but FYI; you brought the denali out of left field when we were talking about the tahoe
And then you had the balls to call a 30K difference, you do your research don't ya? I don't care if you got the # from someone in this thread. get your facts straight before you post and try to act like you know it all.
fyi, there is roughly a 5-7K difference between the Denali (48-50K) and the Escalade (55K), and to me it's worth it for the front end alone. Now, go look at a fully loaded Escalade and a fully loaded Denali and tell me they are identical. I've done this matchup.
i'll sit here and
![Whistle](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/whistle.gif)
#105
Safety Car
Excellent
$22,285
Good
$20,970
(Selected)
Fair
$19,275
Woah, can't be.....The Denali has a better resale value.
Denali new $38-42k for that body style, and looky....it only lost. $19,715.
My point proven.
$22,285
Good
$20,970
(Selected)
Fair
$19,275
Woah, can't be.....The Denali has a better resale value.
Denali new $38-42k for that body style, and looky....it only lost. $19,715.
My point proven.
#106
teh Senior Instigator
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Huntington Beach, CA -> Ashburn, VA -> Raleigh, NC -> Walnut Creek, CA
Age: 42
Posts: 44,090
Received 957 Likes
on
328 Posts
Originally Posted by pimpin-tl
All around 60k of miles and good condition selected. Looks like the Audi did lose a lot. But lower Audis like the A4 and A6 hold their values much better. The Caddy still has a poor resale value compared to your ACURA or most other cars.
I had a first gen, bought it new, sold it 6 years later for 4K, bought for 29K.
BTW, I assume you pulled KBB #'s if that's the case atleast here in so cal, they are totally off. Which sucks because the realistic price of all those cars is a lot lower then they list (caddy included)
How about you get off the resale value one (i'll give you a win on this) and try tackling the rest
![Smile](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
#107
Safety Car
No obviously you can't. To maximize the features for price, the Denali is the one to get. And I said that in a post a few pages ago. You obviously are ignoring that. Power ratings are meanless with GM powerplants. We all know (like the TA, Camaro, C5 vette), if its a 6.2 L or 5.7L it still puts down the same power even if they say oh it has 350 hp or 315. So the number game doesn't work. You have been completely wrong on everything you said and I have proven that. So stop being so defense and admit you were wrong. LOL I threw in the Denali because I was wrong? You can't read obviously.
All my facts have been striaght. At least I have been backing up all my claims unlike yourself. Why are you argueing? Are you a GM fanboy now that you own a Pontiac that has been discontinued?
The difference in prices have been posted. EOD. You got owned.
All my facts have been striaght. At least I have been backing up all my claims unlike yourself. Why are you argueing? Are you a GM fanboy now that you own a Pontiac that has been discontinued?
The difference in prices have been posted. EOD. You got owned.
Originally Posted by CLpower
Can you comprehend posts? First off, the Denali and the Escalade have different power ratings between the two, the motors aren't identical, and as belt mentioned earlier.. I wasn't wrong anywhere. Youwere arguing earlier about the Tahoe, which DOES NOT even have the option for the 6.2L. then when you realized you were wrong you didn't even mention it etc, you all of a sudden threw in the denali
Let me quote you just so you don't get confused; i'll put it into simple steps:
and then you reply to my
w/
Then you brought in the Denali, which I never denied came w/ the 6.2L, because it does, but FYI; you brought the denali out of left field when we were talking about the tahoe
And then you had the balls to call a 30K difference, you do your research don't ya? I don't care if you got the # from someone in this thread. get your facts straight before you post and try to act like you know it all.
fyi, there is roughly a 5-7K difference between the Denali (48-50K) and the Escalade (55K), and to me it's worth it for the front end alone. Now, go look at a fully loaded Escalade and a fully loaded Denali and tell me they are identical. I've done this matchup.
i'll sit here and
while I wait for your reply. If I were you, i'd examine it really well; or even better, just not post.
Let me quote you just so you don't get confused; i'll put it into simple steps:
and then you reply to my
w/
Then you brought in the Denali, which I never denied came w/ the 6.2L, because it does, but FYI; you brought the denali out of left field when we were talking about the tahoe
And then you had the balls to call a 30K difference, you do your research don't ya? I don't care if you got the # from someone in this thread. get your facts straight before you post and try to act like you know it all.
fyi, there is roughly a 5-7K difference between the Denali (48-50K) and the Escalade (55K), and to me it's worth it for the front end alone. Now, go look at a fully loaded Escalade and a fully loaded Denali and tell me they are identical. I've done this matchup.
i'll sit here and
![Whistle](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/whistle.gif)
#109
Safety Car
Originally Posted by CLpower
I had a first gen, bought it new, sold it 6 years later for 4K, bought for 29K.
BTW, I assume you pulled KBB #'s if that's the case atleast here in so cal, they are totally off. Which sucks because the realistic price of all those cars is a lot lower then they list (caddy included)
How about you get off the resale value one (i'll give you a win on this) and try tackling the rest![Smile](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
BTW, I assume you pulled KBB #'s if that's the case atleast here in so cal, they are totally off. Which sucks because the realistic price of all those cars is a lot lower then they list (caddy included)
How about you get off the resale value one (i'll give you a win on this) and try tackling the rest
![Smile](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
#110
teh Senior Instigator
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Huntington Beach, CA -> Ashburn, VA -> Raleigh, NC -> Walnut Creek, CA
Age: 42
Posts: 44,090
Received 957 Likes
on
328 Posts
Originally Posted by pimpin-tl
Per the website of its a DENALI period, it comes with a 6.2L. Same size as the Escalade.
#112
teh Senior Instigator
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Huntington Beach, CA -> Ashburn, VA -> Raleigh, NC -> Walnut Creek, CA
Age: 42
Posts: 44,090
Received 957 Likes
on
328 Posts
Originally Posted by pimpin-tl
No obviously you can't. To maximize the features for price, the Denali is the one to get. And I said that in a post a few pages ago. You obviously are ignoring that. Power ratings are meanless with GM powerplants. We all know (like the TA, Camaro, C5 vette), if its a 6.2 L or 5.7L it still puts down the same power even if they say oh it has 350 hp or 315. So the number game doesn't work. You have been completely wrong on everything you said and I have proven that. So stop being so defense and admit you were wrong. LOL I threw in the Denali because I was wrong? You can't read obviously.
All my facts have been striaght. At least I have been backing up all my claims unlike yourself. Why are you argueing? Are you a GM fanboy now that you own a Pontiac that has been discontinued?
The difference in prices have been posted. EOD. You got owned.
All my facts have been striaght. At least I have been backing up all my claims unlike yourself. Why are you argueing? Are you a GM fanboy now that you own a Pontiac that has been discontinued?
The difference in prices have been posted. EOD. You got owned.
I can't believe you are now trying to compare the LS1 to the engines. Your facts have not been straight in the least, atleast I have admitted where I was mistaken.
yes, I'm not all of a sudden a Gm fanboy because I bought a discontinued pontiac
![rofl](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/rofl.gif)
#113
Safety Car
Originally Posted by CLpower
Okay, so then I was partially wrong. The shorter denali, not just the XL, come w/ the 6.2L. However they are still not the same identical motor as in the Escalade.
![Why Me](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/whyme.gif)
#114
teh Senior Instigator
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Huntington Beach, CA -> Ashburn, VA -> Raleigh, NC -> Walnut Creek, CA
Age: 42
Posts: 44,090
Received 957 Likes
on
328 Posts
Originally Posted by pimpin-tl
BTW, your GTO has lost 10k since it was bought. If you have a 2005 near 15k of miles.
![Smile](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
![Smile](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
Have a 2006 w/ 16k on it, I've lost some, but if that bothered me I wouldn't have bought the car. I didn't buy it for what I can sell it for 3-4 years down the road.
nice try though
![Smile](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
#115
teh Senior Instigator
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Huntington Beach, CA -> Ashburn, VA -> Raleigh, NC -> Walnut Creek, CA
Age: 42
Posts: 44,090
Received 957 Likes
on
328 Posts
Originally Posted by pimpin-tl
lol. Yes they are. ![Why Me](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/whyme.gif)
![Why Me](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/whyme.gif)
![Smile](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
#116
teh Senior Instigator
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Huntington Beach, CA -> Ashburn, VA -> Raleigh, NC -> Walnut Creek, CA
Age: 42
Posts: 44,090
Received 957 Likes
on
328 Posts
Originally Posted by pimpin-tl
More excuses as usual. Off huh? Got another viable source? Please post your data. We will be waiting.
A viable source for what? That KBB prices are off? Go through the autotrader and see what cars are selling for and then look up their KBB.
Do I really need a viable source to show I paid 29K for my first gen and got 3800 for it on a trade 6 years later?
#117
Moderator Alumnus
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Communist, NY
Posts: 9,574
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by srika
hey Beltfed how's the reliability on that RR.. compared to like, normal cars.
and oh yea, looks nice. I swear the interior of the '03+ RR's is just about one of the nicest places to be. Everything is so f'ing refined.
and oh yea, looks nice. I swear the interior of the '03+ RR's is just about one of the nicest places to be. Everything is so f'ing refined.
I have to admit as well, that the newer RRs have very nice interiors. But also, the above RR has the luxury package which is like $5k.
#118
Senior Moderator
iTrader: (5)
Originally Posted by CLpower
I can't believe you are now trying to compare the LS1 to the engines. Your facts have not been straight in the least, atleast I have admitted where I was mistaken.
yes, I'm not all of a sudden a Gm fanboy because I bought a discontinued pontiac
It's unreal what a tool you are.
yes, I'm not all of a sudden a Gm fanboy because I bought a discontinued pontiac
![rofl](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/rofl.gif)
Don't sweat it CL... at this rate he'll hijack the wrong thread, argue with the wrong mod/admin, and end up with a vacation.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Skirmich
2G TL (1999-2003)
37
09-15-2015 06:41 PM