Jackson Racing S/C RSX-S
05-06-2003, 10:53 AM
#1
Cost Drivers!!!!
Thread Starter
Jackson Racing S/C RSX-S
Hondata ECU + Header + S/C= 255WHP
13.8 1/4 mile with a 2.8 short time. They spun wheels through first three gears. With a nice set of tires you can hit 12's. NICE! SRT4 who?
13.8 1/4 mile with a 2.8 short time. They spun wheels through first three gears. With a nice set of tires you can hit 12's. NICE! SRT4 who?
05-06-2003, 11:07 AM
#4
'Cooter
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Shitside, Queens
Age: 46
Posts: 11,172
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
at the E-town meet in March, Peter from ClubRSX was pulling 13.9's against me with a 30mph headwind...he had Hondata, headers, reworked bottom-end, pullys, and intake at the time...now he's got an ITR tranny and a prototype IceBox SUPPOSEDLY giving 20hp to the wheels...im thinkin somewhere around 13.2 area
05-06-2003, 11:20 AM
#7
Cost Drivers!!!!
Thread Starter
Originally posted by KCPreki11
Your point of this thread wasn't based on quality, rather speed, more specifically the 1/4 mile. Don't turn it around.
Scooter, .7 off from an icebox and tranny?
Your point of this thread wasn't based on quality, rather speed, more specifically the 1/4 mile. Don't turn it around.
Scooter, .7 off from an icebox and tranny?
Nope.
The thread isn't about stock RSX-S v. SRT4. I was asserting that with the JR S/C RSXs won't have to run and hide.
Trending Topics
05-06-2003, 11:47 AM
#8
'Cooter
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Shitside, Queens
Age: 46
Posts: 11,172
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by KCPreki11
Your point of this thread wasn't based on quality, rather speed, more specifically the 1/4 mile. Don't turn it around.
Scooter, .7 off from an icebox and tranny?
Your point of this thread wasn't based on quality, rather speed, more specifically the 1/4 mile. Don't turn it around.
Scooter, .7 off from an icebox and tranny?
plus ITR tranny and icebox
05-06-2003, 11:56 AM
#9
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Age: 44
Posts: 6,227
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
why even race with a 30 mph headwind?? that just totally defeats the purpose of trying to get a new personal best time, not to mention, the formula of (30 mph headwind = .2-.3 seconds off the time) is far less than scientific 
id rather just go to the track on a GOOD day with OPTIMAL conditions....why waste the time, its all skeptisism and BS until PROVEN otherwise.
id rather just go to the track on a GOOD day with OPTIMAL conditions....why waste the time, its all skeptisism and BS until PROVEN otherwise.
05-06-2003, 11:59 AM
#10
Cost Drivers!!!!
Thread Starter
Originally posted by jimcol711
why even race with a 30 mph headwind?? that just totally defeats the purpose of trying to get a new personal best time, not to mention, the formula of (30 mph headwind = .2-.3 seconds off the time) is far less than scientific
id rather just go to the track on a GOOD day with OPTIMAL conditions....why waste the time, its all skeptisism and BS until PROVEN otherwise.
why even race with a 30 mph headwind?? that just totally defeats the purpose of trying to get a new personal best time, not to mention, the formula of (30 mph headwind = .2-.3 seconds off the time) is far less than scientific
id rather just go to the track on a GOOD day with OPTIMAL conditions....why waste the time, its all skeptisism and BS until PROVEN otherwise.
Dude what are you talkin about? Some people race for the pure enjoyment. Not everything is about the end result.
05-06-2003, 01:04 PM
#11
Safety Car
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: philly
Posts: 4,426
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
thats cool that there is a supercharger kit but i thought the S's were already running low 14's na with the hondadata headers intake etc., with a supercharger that time sounds weak, what was the trap speed?
05-06-2003, 01:07 PM
#12
'Cooter
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Shitside, Queens
Age: 46
Posts: 11,172
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by jimcol711
why even race with a 30 mph headwind?? that just totally defeats the purpose of trying to get a new personal best time, not to mention, the formula of (30 mph headwind = .2-.3 seconds off the time) is far less than scientific
id rather just go to the track on a GOOD day with OPTIMAL conditions....why waste the time, its all skeptisism and BS until PROVEN otherwise.
why even race with a 30 mph headwind?? that just totally defeats the purpose of trying to get a new personal best time, not to mention, the formula of (30 mph headwind = .2-.3 seconds off the time) is far less than scientific
id rather just go to the track on a GOOD day with OPTIMAL conditions....why waste the time, its all skeptisism and BS until PROVEN otherwise.
well perhaps this helps put things into perspective...back in Nov, when i set up the Acura Wars meet, the wind was so bad that they only had the 1/8 mile open, so that sucked
the March Honda/Acura meet was hyped up bigtime b/c of the fact that it was 1/4 AND autox combined, and b/c the schedule at E-town is so booked on weekends, rescheduling would b near impossible, so they basically said screw it, we're racing anyway...and part of the competition was combining times together, so it wasn't so much a race for personal best as it was a race against everyone else
05-06-2003, 01:10 PM
#13
Cost Drivers!!!!
Thread Starter
Originally posted by heyitsme
thats cool that there is a supercharger kit but i thought the S's were already running low 14's na with the hondadata headers intake etc., with a supercharger that time sounds weak, what was the trap speed?
thats cool that there is a supercharger kit but i thought the S's were already running low 14's na with the hondadata headers intake etc., with a supercharger that time sounds weak, what was the trap speed?
05-06-2003, 01:34 PM
#16
Moderator Alumnus
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: CRY, CRY SOME MORE!
Age: 48
Posts: 11,829
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
1 Post
Zapata,
I understood your post the way you wrote it and I agree. The RSX is a very well built car, and now w/ even more power it will be a car that surely will get second looks at the track. Now, pop on the right tires and less resistence and that car will FLY.
I understood your post the way you wrote it and I agree. The RSX is a very well built car, and now w/ even more power it will be a car that surely will get second looks at the track. Now, pop on the right tires and less resistence and that car will FLY.
05-06-2003, 02:22 PM
#17
Suzuka Master
Join Date: May 2001
Location: PA
Posts: 5,773
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Why would Jackson racing even let that time out and not wait until they could get their best time? Doesn't seem smart...I know they want people to see there is hope from JR and all...but...
05-06-2003, 08:06 PM
#19
Cost Drivers!!!!
Thread Starter
Originally posted by allmotor_2000
There are NA RSX's making 230-240whp..!!
There are NA RSX's making 230-240whp..!!
Yea. although keep in mind that the S/C is boosting at 4.8psi
Moreover, i'd like to see some dyno charts where the trq curve of the S/C RSX will eat the trq curve of the N/A RSX.
05-06-2003, 08:52 PM
#20
Full-Time IDIoT---DoH!!!
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: DUMB ISLAND
Age: 41
Posts: 4,654
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes
on
10 Posts
Originally posted by allmotor_2000
There are NA RSX's making 230-240whp..!!
There are NA RSX's making 230-240whp..!!
what should these run in the 1/4 mile?
what will it take 2 get an rsx to make 203-240whp?
05-06-2003, 09:18 PM
#21
Safety Car
The K20A is a wonderful motor. Add an intake, header, TODA Spec A cams, Hondata ECU and pulleys... 220whp. Take the cat out and unbolt the exhaust.. 230whp. Port the manifold and get a bigger TB... 240whp.
05-06-2003, 09:19 PM
#22
Safety Car
Yes... the S/C is boosting 4.8psi... but in my opinion... a forced-induction/nitrous car should make more than an NA car... given all else is equal (like both have stock bottom-ends, for example).
05-06-2003, 09:51 PM
#23
Cost Drivers!!!!
Thread Starter
Originally posted by allmotor_2000
Yes... the S/C is boosting 4.8psi... but in my opinion... a forced-induction/nitrous car should make more than an NA car... given all else is equal (like both have stock bottom-ends, for example).
Yes... the S/C is boosting 4.8psi... but in my opinion... a forced-induction/nitrous car should make more than an NA car... given all else is equal (like both have stock bottom-ends, for example).
05-06-2003, 10:04 PM
#25
Cost Drivers!!!!
Thread Starter
Originally posted by allmotor_2000
I'm not saying that car doesn't run quick.... I am sure its very fast... just comparing, that's all.
I'm not saying that car doesn't run quick.... I am sure its very fast... just comparing, that's all.
Comparing what though?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
cycdaniel
1G TSX Performance Parts & Modifications
8
12-17-2019 10:58 AM
lanechanger
Member Cars for Sale
4
10-13-2015 10:56 AM
Mugen TSX
Eastern Canada
0
09-01-2015 11:11 PM