Intresting intake.../mini SC for IS300
11-17-2004, 08:19 PM
#1
Race Director
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: NY
Age: 38
Posts: 12,434
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
11-18-2004, 12:44 AM
#2
Advanced
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: BC
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
talk about some dumb people...
11-25-2004, 01:01 AM
#6
woooo!!
i didnt wanna read all the details but,
unless i see some dynos to prove otherwise...
*edit:
NEVER MIND..
This is silly.
An intake is just a bent pipe with a filter on the end. They are all the same. The only differenes would be the size of the pipe, how and where it is bent, and the type of filter on the end. They should all produce about the same gains WITHOUT the use of an AFC or piggyback ECU. A pipe is a pipe is a pipe.
An intake is just a bent pipe with a filter on the end. They are all the same. The only differenes would be the size of the pipe, how and where it is bent, and the type of filter on the end. They should all produce about the same gains WITHOUT the use of an AFC or piggyback ECU. A pipe is a pipe is a pipe.
unless i see some dynos to prove otherwise...
*edit:
NEVER MIND..
11-25-2004, 07:48 AM
#7
Moderator Alumnus
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Windsor-Quebec corridor
Age: 47
Posts: 7,709
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes
on
4 Posts
Too exciting to be true. I wish it was though, could have meant nice applications for the TSX.
:sigh: I guess there's no such things as easy power gains...
:sigh: I guess there's no such things as easy power gains...
Trending Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
CLASSYCLS
Car Parts for Sale
4
07-03-2003 01:40 PM