Excellent Article About How People Respond To Radical Design Changes
#1
I feel strongly both ways
Thread Starter
Excellent Article About How People Respond To Radical Design Changes
I ran across this on a BMW message board, but it pretty well describes the angst/learning/acceptance curve that people feel when their cars are replaced with a new model.
Applies equally well to the 4G TL as to the BMW line.
http://www.bmwblog.com/2011/06/11/co...-time-to-grow/
Applies equally well to the 4G TL as to the BMW line.
http://www.bmwblog.com/2011/06/11/co...-time-to-grow/
#2
IMO, the Bangle butt was going to work no matter whether people liked it or not because of all of that discussion about it. As they say in Hollywood...there is no such thing as bad publicity.
Having said that, the Bangle cars were released at the beginning of and lasted through the real estate/internet bubble. People were throwing money around. House wives becoming mortgage brokers by passing a simple exam and then pulling down 400K a year. That sort of thing.
It's Acura’s misfortune (stupidity?) to have released its "Bangle butt" during a recession. Maybe it still has added to its brand through notoriety...but, alas, no spike in sales.
Having said that, the Bangle cars were released at the beginning of and lasted through the real estate/internet bubble. People were throwing money around. House wives becoming mortgage brokers by passing a simple exam and then pulling down 400K a year. That sort of thing.
It's Acura’s misfortune (stupidity?) to have released its "Bangle butt" during a recession. Maybe it still has added to its brand through notoriety...but, alas, no spike in sales.
#3
the Bangle cars were released at the beginning of and lasted through the real estate/internet bubble. People were throwing money around. House wives becoming mortgage brokers by passing a simple exam and then pulling down 400K a year. That sort of thing.
It's Acura’s misfortune (stupidity?) to have released its "Bangle butt" during a recession. Maybe it still has added to its brand through notoriety...but, alas, no spike in sales.
It's Acura’s misfortune (stupidity?) to have released its "Bangle butt" during a recession. Maybe it still has added to its brand through notoriety...but, alas, no spike in sales.
The 4th gen TL is one of the best car in its segment, tremendous value for the money....but it was released when the economy thanked which did not help...and Acura chickened out and revamped the design because it could not stomach the "acceptance time" for the new design to sets in with potential customers.....in my opinion it should have spent the refresh money further improving the value proposition of the car and fixing one serius flaw...lack of folding seats at the back...I personally know of at least one person that did not buy the car just because of this...
Standing behind your product is marketing 101...the 4th TL was never "universally" regarded as ugly (a la' Pontiac Aztek so to speak), but simply very polarizing...some think is beautiful some think is horrible...and people reporting about receiving compliments for the car (myself included) is a proof of that.
Lastly, unfortunately Acura is no BMW in terms of image and it cannot "dare" to be too adventurous in its design....this is part of the power of a brand and the reason why a brand is one of the biggest asset for a company...again, think if the hideous X6 was made by Hyundai....how many would have been sold???
#4
This does tell all!!
I agree with that...and that column says exactly what I been saying on this forum for quite sometime...I remember very well the outrage at the launch of the 5 Series E60 "Bangle must go!!", "I will not buy this 5 series" and so on....BMW just marched on because it knew it had an excellent product...and the rest is history....the E60 has been the best selling 5 Series so far.
The 4th gen TL is one of the best car in its segment, tremendous value for the money....but it was released when the economy thanked which did not help...and Acura chickened out and revamped the design because it could not stomach the "acceptance time" for the new design to sets in with potential customers.....in my opinion it should have spent the refresh money further improving the value proposition of the car and fixing one serious flaw...lack of folding seats at the back...I personally know of at least one person that did not buy the car just because of this...
Standing behind your product is marketing 101...the 4th TL was never "universally" regarded as ugly (a la' Pontiac Aztek so to speak), but simply very polarizing...some think is beautiful some think is horrible...and people reporting about receiving compliments for the car (myself included) is a proof of that.
Lastly, unfortunately Acura is no BMW in terms of image and it cannot "dare" to be too adventurous in its design....this is part of the power of a brand and the reason why a brand is one of the biggest asset for a company...again, think if the hideous X6 was made by Hyundai....how many would have been sold???
The 4th gen TL is one of the best car in its segment, tremendous value for the money....but it was released when the economy thanked which did not help...and Acura chickened out and revamped the design because it could not stomach the "acceptance time" for the new design to sets in with potential customers.....in my opinion it should have spent the refresh money further improving the value proposition of the car and fixing one serious flaw...lack of folding seats at the back...I personally know of at least one person that did not buy the car just because of this...
Standing behind your product is marketing 101...the 4th TL was never "universally" regarded as ugly (a la' Pontiac Aztek so to speak), but simply very polarizing...some think is beautiful some think is horrible...and people reporting about receiving compliments for the car (myself included) is a proof of that.
Lastly, unfortunately Acura is no BMW in terms of image and it cannot "dare" to be too adventurous in its design....this is part of the power of a brand and the reason why a brand is one of the biggest asset for a company...again, think if the hideous X6 was made by Hyundai....how many would have been sold???
![Thumbs Up](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/thumbsup.gif)
![Thumbs Up](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/thumbsup.gif)
Last edited by RSLTSX09XMNAVWX; 06-14-2011 at 02:24 AM.
#6
Suzuka Master
As I have said several times, the only ones complaining about the looks of the '12 are the owners of the '09-'11.
As you said, they are "justifying" their purchases and they sure don't need to.
#7
I don't think they can let it go.. "Acura chickened out"? LOL.. sure.. let sales fall to near zero!
As I have said several times, the only ones complaining about the looks of the '12 are the owners of the '09-'11.
As you said, they are "justifying" their purchases and they sure don't need to.
As I have said several times, the only ones complaining about the looks of the '12 are the owners of the '09-'11.
As you said, they are "justifying" their purchases and they sure don't need to.
Trending Topics
#10
#11
I think the key is the word eventually...eventually did sell well...I tried to pull up some info on the web on it but I cannot find anything but I remember that sales were initially soft...and, as I said before, BMW is a much more established brand than Acura, loyal customer base...
#12
Today people evaluate everything before spending a penny.
Damn, the point of the OP post isn't that the 2012 is pretty and the 2011 is not. It's how people react to design change.
#13
People were able to see past the Bangle designs eventually, especially the last generation 5 series, as these were still the best BMW's to date which also saw some of their most significant advancements in brand history, plus a badge that carries as much false esteem (in the minds of it's consumers at least) as BMW does, helps makes up for a lot.
Unfortunately, Acura is a more modest brand and doesn't have that last part going for them. As already mentioned, we are also talking about substantial differences in economics. Most of the BMW redesigns came at a time where more people were financially confident and sure that they would be in a new car in 3 years anyway, where folks now need to be sure they are able to live with a car for the long haul just in case. It also helps that BMW sales are something like 3/4 leases, Acura's are about 50% at best.
It should go without saying that the recent Acura design trend as well as the Bangle BMW's, cost(s) these brands more sales than the average design does. The one thing I can say for Acura is at least it is an obvious attempt to build better brand recognition and further diversity from Honda. While I wouldn't say mission accomplished just yet, it appears to be something the designs are actually succeeding at. BMW didn't exactly have those problems.
Unfortunately, Acura is a more modest brand and doesn't have that last part going for them. As already mentioned, we are also talking about substantial differences in economics. Most of the BMW redesigns came at a time where more people were financially confident and sure that they would be in a new car in 3 years anyway, where folks now need to be sure they are able to live with a car for the long haul just in case. It also helps that BMW sales are something like 3/4 leases, Acura's are about 50% at best.
It should go without saying that the recent Acura design trend as well as the Bangle BMW's, cost(s) these brands more sales than the average design does. The one thing I can say for Acura is at least it is an obvious attempt to build better brand recognition and further diversity from Honda. While I wouldn't say mission accomplished just yet, it appears to be something the designs are actually succeeding at. BMW didn't exactly have those problems.
Last edited by winstrolvtec; 06-14-2011 at 01:18 PM.
#14
Most of the BMW redesigns came at a time where more people were financially confident and sure that they would be in a new car in 3 years anyway, where folks now need to be sure they are able to live with a car for the long haul just in case. It also helps that BMW sales are something like 3/4 leases, Acura's are about 50% at best.
IMHO Acura pays a lot the fact of not having a more diversified model range....and I think that up to a point the BMW clientele is a bit different compared to Acura......I suspect Acura buyers tend to be more frugal, value oriented and so more sensitive to the economy compared to BMW, Mercedes and even Lexus typical customers...and I admit that the 4th gen TL design is probably even more polarizing than the Bangle 5 Series...
Luuxury brands (for everything) are doing very well in this economy...but this is a discussion for another day...
![Roll Eyes](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/rolleyes.gif)
So probably there are a lot of factors involved...less articulated model range, more economy sensitive clientele, less brand power....
However I read floating around that the TL sold 13.5k TL year to date in 2011 compared to about 15K Infiniti G37...if it is true so is doing not so bad after all....it would be nice if we could find a source of reliable data with the breakdown in single model sales.
Last edited by saturno_v; 06-14-2011 at 01:30 PM.
#15
IMO Acura owners do not have as much disposable income as people who can afford German luxury brands. The recession is why you don't see as many German brands but you do still see them...people who can really afford them are still buying them. People making $500 a week and using liars loans don 't exist anymore. Leaving Acura owners who are solid financially but not probably rich.
#16
IMO Acura owners do not have as much disposable income as people who can afford German luxury brands. The recession is why you don't see as many German brands but you do still see them...people who can really afford them are still buying them. People making $500 a week and using liars loans don 't exist anymore. Leaving Acura owners who are solid financially but not probably rich.
#17
I agree for the most part however we have to say that the bad economy is for everyone....BMW, Acura, Audi, Infiniti and so on.....still BMW and even Porsche are going gangbuster.
IMHO Acura pays a lot the fact of not having a more diversified model range....and I think that up to a point the BMW clientele is a bit different compared to Acura......I suspect Acura buyers tend to be more frugal, value oriented and so more sensitive to the economy compared to BMW, Mercedes and even Lexus typical customers...and I admit that the 4th gen TL design is probably even more polarizing than the Bangle 5 Series...
Luuxury brands (for everything) are doing very well in this economy...but this is a discussion for another day...![Roll Eyes](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/rolleyes.gif)
So probably there are a lot of factors involved...less articulated model range, more economy sensitive clientele, less brand power....
However I read floating around that the TL sold 13.5k TL year to date in 2011 compared to about 15K Infiniti G37...if it is true so is doing not so bad after all....it would be nice if we could find a source of reliable data with the breakdown in single model sales.
IMHO Acura pays a lot the fact of not having a more diversified model range....and I think that up to a point the BMW clientele is a bit different compared to Acura......I suspect Acura buyers tend to be more frugal, value oriented and so more sensitive to the economy compared to BMW, Mercedes and even Lexus typical customers...and I admit that the 4th gen TL design is probably even more polarizing than the Bangle 5 Series...
Luuxury brands (for everything) are doing very well in this economy...but this is a discussion for another day...
![Roll Eyes](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/rolleyes.gif)
So probably there are a lot of factors involved...less articulated model range, more economy sensitive clientele, less brand power....
However I read floating around that the TL sold 13.5k TL year to date in 2011 compared to about 15K Infiniti G37...if it is true so is doing not so bad after all....it would be nice if we could find a source of reliable data with the breakdown in single model sales.
G25/37 sedan - 41,653
G25 sales started the last qtr in 2010
http://www.torquenews.com/113/nissan...-2010-us-sales
http://www.autospies.com/images/user...20December.JPG
TL 34,049
http://www.vtec.net/news/news-item?news_item_id=948717
G37 sold abt 22% more than the TL in 2010.
Up to May 2011
.
G25/37 sedan - 17,683
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/Infini....html?x=0&.v=1
TL - 13,118
http://www.vtec.net/news/news-item?news_item_id=983312
G is outselling the TL by over 34%.
The TL used to dominate the segment.
#18
Probably so but maybe the competition (and the G in this particular case) was not as strong.....personally I think the older Gs were not visually appealing...and the existence of the smaller engine (the G25) and a lower starting MSRP price (3.5K) surely helps even more...
Last edited by saturno_v; 06-14-2011 at 03:44 PM.
#19
6th Gear
For whatever reason, "Acura sales have slipped" (in comparison to some of the brands they aspire to and do compete with.) The major car review/enthusiast magazines seem to be quite willing to attribute this slippage, in part, to design (or styling.) Moreover, those who actually get paid to opine on such subjects seem willing, too, to attribute Acura's sales performance issues (whatever they may be) to the brand not having a V8 (like Audi, BMW, Infiniti, Lexus, etc etc) offering.
I find this last "justification" [for being included or excluded] somewhat perplexing since -- for example -- Audi's bread and butter car, the A4 2.0T quattro (often in Premium+ trim) can only be had with 4 or a 6 cylinder power -- both blown (the V6 is technically called an S4, of course). And the always well reviewed Bimmer 3 series is typically equipped with a 6, too. By the way, I am speaking about the brand's availability of a V8 (or whatever the "it" item is), not simply an individual model's being offered with "it."
In fact, the A6 or the 5 or the M or the E, to pick four have repeatedly (and somewhat recently) been in comparo tests that -- not too long ago -- would have had to include an RL to preclude hate mail from the readership. No more, Acura, in the Premium or entry-level luxury class is, er, "not included" -- for whatever reason (V8, or lack of a V8 often cited.) This is a hoot since hardly anyone (% or quantity) actually buys an M56X or one of the others with the V8 option box ticked (when offered, that is.)
At the same time, R&T does a pretty good article for Acura TL fans, comparing a TL to an [Audi] S4, despite the Audis +5 figure cost disadvantage. As I recall R&T even says, words to the effect "this is a comparo most folks shopping for a new car would not make."
So Acura comes out with a new design that many customers and most reviewers are put-off by. Now they hurry, quick-fast, to make it right and overall they did a pretty decent job.
But, where they seem -- IMHO -- to be missing out on a legitimate claim to the Premium Sport Luxury class is NOT in the lack of a V8, but in the lack of either optional or standard "features" that many of their European (and Japanese) competition offers.
Some of the things not included in an Acura [TL] (and NOT able to be spec'd -- and paid for) are somewhat confusing (some of these things seem necessary primarily from a marketing standpoint, but -- that's not the point, just like a V8 (or whatever) option is not the point, it is in some bizzaro world important that "you coulda hadda V8"):
o bi-xenon headlights
o 15% articulating headlights
o reverse camera articulating site-lines
o automatic -- rain sensing -- windshield wipers
o needle sweep of tach and speedo upon ignition (programmable)
o digital speed indication (supplimental)
o wood trim (real)
o Blind Spot assist on virtually any trim
o Automatic Cruise Control
o Automatic rear window shade and rear side window shades
o More flexible paint and interior color combinations (why not white paint and umber leather for example; or, why no red leather option at any price?)
o Remote activation of windows, sunroof, up & down via key fob
o An interior button array that thinks less is more (despite the boos and hisses about iDrive, Command and MMI)
o A touch screen
o rear heated seats
o fold down rear seats
o rear biased AWD
o more than a 6 speed auto-transmission (when the rest of the world is now touting 8 speeds and "clutchless manuals" e.g., DSG, etc)
o a sport package (that included both trim bits and real hardware tweaks, not just bling)
o factory backup-sensors (Parktronic by whatever name Acura dreamed up)
o HD radio
o audio system premium+ upgrade offering
And on and on and on.
Please note, my comments suggested that these items be able to be optioned (if at all possible) -- not that they be put in the base auto (increasing the MSRP.) Truth be told, lots of folks would still be happy as a pig in slop to simply buy a TL AWD w/ Tech and be done with it, no personalization, no off the color scheme chart selections, etc.
Frankly, Rear-Drive Biased AWD (having had both F and R and 50 50 myself) with a system like SH-AWD is, from a practical perspective, not necessary. But just remember that the professional nit pickers will always tout rear-biased AWD over front-biased AWD and that SOMEONE -- some paying customers -- must care. After having driven rear biased Audis and Bimmers and now having driven the 2012 TL SH-AWD (advance), I would not at all be concerned that the Acura was nominally an FWD vehicle, only shifting into full combat mode from time to time. But that is just me.
Acura -- with genuinely fine cars -- is driving toward the edge of the circle of car classes that it has worked hard to achieve membership in (Premium, Lux, Sport Lux and Entry Level Lux). Offering additional revenue stream items (aka options) would be one way -- perhaps -- to avoid going over the edge. Of course, the previously mentioned V8 or at least a super or turbo charged V6 wouldn't hurt either.
I find this last "justification" [for being included or excluded] somewhat perplexing since -- for example -- Audi's bread and butter car, the A4 2.0T quattro (often in Premium+ trim) can only be had with 4 or a 6 cylinder power -- both blown (the V6 is technically called an S4, of course). And the always well reviewed Bimmer 3 series is typically equipped with a 6, too. By the way, I am speaking about the brand's availability of a V8 (or whatever the "it" item is), not simply an individual model's being offered with "it."
In fact, the A6 or the 5 or the M or the E, to pick four have repeatedly (and somewhat recently) been in comparo tests that -- not too long ago -- would have had to include an RL to preclude hate mail from the readership. No more, Acura, in the Premium or entry-level luxury class is, er, "not included" -- for whatever reason (V8, or lack of a V8 often cited.) This is a hoot since hardly anyone (% or quantity) actually buys an M56X or one of the others with the V8 option box ticked (when offered, that is.)
At the same time, R&T does a pretty good article for Acura TL fans, comparing a TL to an [Audi] S4, despite the Audis +5 figure cost disadvantage. As I recall R&T even says, words to the effect "this is a comparo most folks shopping for a new car would not make."
So Acura comes out with a new design that many customers and most reviewers are put-off by. Now they hurry, quick-fast, to make it right and overall they did a pretty decent job.
But, where they seem -- IMHO -- to be missing out on a legitimate claim to the Premium Sport Luxury class is NOT in the lack of a V8, but in the lack of either optional or standard "features" that many of their European (and Japanese) competition offers.
Some of the things not included in an Acura [TL] (and NOT able to be spec'd -- and paid for) are somewhat confusing (some of these things seem necessary primarily from a marketing standpoint, but -- that's not the point, just like a V8 (or whatever) option is not the point, it is in some bizzaro world important that "you coulda hadda V8"):
o bi-xenon headlights
o 15% articulating headlights
o reverse camera articulating site-lines
o automatic -- rain sensing -- windshield wipers
o needle sweep of tach and speedo upon ignition (programmable)
o digital speed indication (supplimental)
o wood trim (real)
o Blind Spot assist on virtually any trim
o Automatic Cruise Control
o Automatic rear window shade and rear side window shades
o More flexible paint and interior color combinations (why not white paint and umber leather for example; or, why no red leather option at any price?)
o Remote activation of windows, sunroof, up & down via key fob
o An interior button array that thinks less is more (despite the boos and hisses about iDrive, Command and MMI)
o A touch screen
o rear heated seats
o fold down rear seats
o rear biased AWD
o more than a 6 speed auto-transmission (when the rest of the world is now touting 8 speeds and "clutchless manuals" e.g., DSG, etc)
o a sport package (that included both trim bits and real hardware tweaks, not just bling)
o factory backup-sensors (Parktronic by whatever name Acura dreamed up)
o HD radio
o audio system premium+ upgrade offering
And on and on and on.
Please note, my comments suggested that these items be able to be optioned (if at all possible) -- not that they be put in the base auto (increasing the MSRP.) Truth be told, lots of folks would still be happy as a pig in slop to simply buy a TL AWD w/ Tech and be done with it, no personalization, no off the color scheme chart selections, etc.
Frankly, Rear-Drive Biased AWD (having had both F and R and 50 50 myself) with a system like SH-AWD is, from a practical perspective, not necessary. But just remember that the professional nit pickers will always tout rear-biased AWD over front-biased AWD and that SOMEONE -- some paying customers -- must care. After having driven rear biased Audis and Bimmers and now having driven the 2012 TL SH-AWD (advance), I would not at all be concerned that the Acura was nominally an FWD vehicle, only shifting into full combat mode from time to time. But that is just me.
Acura -- with genuinely fine cars -- is driving toward the edge of the circle of car classes that it has worked hard to achieve membership in (Premium, Lux, Sport Lux and Entry Level Lux). Offering additional revenue stream items (aka options) would be one way -- perhaps -- to avoid going over the edge. Of course, the previously mentioned V8 or at least a super or turbo charged V6 wouldn't hurt either.
Last edited by markcincinnati; 06-14-2011 at 04:49 PM.
#20
Racer
Probably so but maybe the competition (and the G in this particular case) was not as strong.....personally I think the older Gs were not visually appealing...and the existence of the smaller engine (the G25) and a lower starting MSRP price (3.5K) surely helps even more...
#21
Trolling Canuckistan
I think the key is the word eventually...eventually did sell well...I tried to pull up some info on the web on it but I cannot find anything but I remember that sales were initially soft...and, as I said before, BMW is a much more established brand than Acura, loyal customer base...
![Werd](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/werd.gif)
BMW had existed for about 70 years before Acura debuted, they had a little more time to establish customer base.
#22
I'm Craig
iTrader: (2)
Didn't read through all the responses in here, but I think the sales figures really tell the tale of the 4G TL the best. Economy or not...sales are no where NEAR the amount that the 3G TL were. I'm curious to see the numbers for 2011 with the 2012 TL.
3rd Gen
2004 77,895
2005 78,218
2006 71,348
2007 58,545
2008 48,766
4th Gen
2009 33,620
2010 34,049
3rd Gen
2004 77,895
2005 78,218
2006 71,348
2007 58,545
2008 48,766
4th Gen
2009 33,620
2010 34,049
#23
Senior Moderator
iTrader: (5)
Didn't read through all the responses in here, but I think the sales figures really tell the tale of the 4G TL the best. Economy or not...sales are no where NEAR the amount that the 3G TL were. I'm curious to see the numbers for 2011 with the 2012 TL.
3rd Gen
2004 77,895
2005 78,218
2006 71,348
2007 58,545
2008 48,766
4th Gen
2009 33,620
2010 34,049
3rd Gen
2004 77,895
2005 78,218
2006 71,348
2007 58,545
2008 48,766
4th Gen
2009 33,620
2010 34,049
![Werd](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/werd.gif)
I think the problem with the Acura was three-fold. One, it was a somewhat radical redesign, two... it was fugly, and three... with the exception of the 2009 (which was out in 2008) it had to battle through a recession. The Bangle BMW's grew on people... but the TL, not so much. The 2012 is slightly better and I'm with you... curious if the 2011 numbers are higher or if Acura scared off too many people...
Oh, and I just have to include this pic, just b/c of the topic:
![](http://i47.photobucket.com/albums/f159/RaulMonkey/Animated/beating-a-dead-horse.gif)
#25
Three Wheelin'
The following users liked this post:
juniorbean (06-15-2011)
#27
Senior Moderator
![Werd](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/werd.gif)
I think the problem with the Acura was three-fold. One, it was a somewhat radical redesign, two... it was fugly, and three... with the exception of the 2009 (which was out in 2008) it had to battle through a recession. The Bangle BMW's grew on people... but the TL, not so much. The 2012 is slightly better and I'm with you... curious if the 2011 numbers are higher or if Acura scared off too many people...
Oh, and I just have to include this pic, just b/c of the topic:
![](http://i47.photobucket.com/albums/f159/RaulMonkey/Animated/beating-a-dead-horse.gif)
![Agree](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/agree.gif)
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
detailersdomain
Wash & Wax
3
10-09-2015 10:13 PM
SinCityTLX
5G TLX (2015-2020)
20
10-07-2015 01:24 PM