Evo vs NSX vs GT3 vs Nismo

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-02-2007, 09:34 PM
  #1  
Moderator Alumnus
Thread Starter
 
FiftyFive's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: SW Connecticut
Age: 38
Posts: 10,823
Received 52 Likes on 36 Posts
Evo vs NSX vs GT3 vs Nismo

Video

Go Evo Go!
Old 10-02-2007, 09:53 PM
  #2  
Lamborghini Aventador FTW
iTrader: (4)
 
AMGala's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: CT
Age: 39
Posts: 7,597
Received 73 Likes on 52 Posts
One more lap and the GT3 would've won, and two more laps and the NSX-R would've placed 2nd.
Old 10-02-2007, 10:04 PM
  #3  
Suzuka Master
 
FiveLiterCheater's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 6,030
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
I'd still take the NSX over all of those though!
Old 10-02-2007, 10:17 PM
  #4  
You'll Never Walk Alone
iTrader: (1)
 
iforyou's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Age: 37
Posts: 9,492
Received 834 Likes on 518 Posts
good old best motoring, it's pretty rare to see the NSX-R loses to the Evo! Poor Nismo though....
Old 10-02-2007, 10:27 PM
  #5  
Moderator Alumnus
Thread Starter
 
FiftyFive's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: SW Connecticut
Age: 38
Posts: 10,823
Received 52 Likes on 36 Posts
Originally Posted by AMGala
One more lap and the GT3 would've won, and two more laps and the NSX-R would've placed 2nd.
GT3 would have won but im not sure about the NSX beating out the Evo MR RS.
Old 10-02-2007, 10:37 PM
  #6  
Lamborghini Aventador FTW
iTrader: (4)
 
AMGala's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: CT
Age: 39
Posts: 7,597
Received 73 Likes on 52 Posts
Originally Posted by FiftyFive
GT3 would have won but im not sure about the NSX beating out the Evo MR RS.
Maybe not, but it looked like both the GT3 and NSX were catching up. Those Z's were way back though.
Old 10-02-2007, 10:44 PM
  #7  
Racer
 
TLdriver022's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Chicago,IL
Age: 35
Posts: 307
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
GT3 should have won!!!!!
Old 10-02-2007, 11:33 PM
  #8  
'Big Daddy Diggler'
 
bigman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Yonkers NY
Age: 42
Posts: 11,016
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by FiftyFive
Video

Go Evo Go!
Damn, an RX8 def cant hold of those cars like that
Old 10-03-2007, 01:13 AM
  #9  
Glacier Frost Mica CL-S
iTrader: (1)
 
INSPIRE 32V's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Dallas, TX
Age: 39
Posts: 2,168
Received 24 Likes on 18 Posts
dam evo FTMFW!
Old 10-03-2007, 01:13 AM
  #10  
I can't find my garage
 
mltk53's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: SoCal
Age: 35
Posts: 4,688
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
good race. gt3, good come back. the evo just sat back and relaxed. the nsx, ehh no compaints. but the 350's...sucker~
Old 10-03-2007, 01:20 AM
  #11  
You'll Never Walk Alone
iTrader: (1)
 
iforyou's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Age: 37
Posts: 9,492
Received 834 Likes on 518 Posts
if you have the full episode, you'd find out that the NSX-R lapped about 0.5s faster that he evo. Anyways, the JDM evo is so much faster than the USDM one.

In case you want to see the whole video, it is the October 2007 episode.

Last edited by iforyou; 10-03-2007 at 01:22 AM.
Old 10-03-2007, 07:25 AM
  #12  
Moderator Alumnus
Thread Starter
 
FiftyFive's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: SW Connecticut
Age: 38
Posts: 10,823
Received 52 Likes on 36 Posts
Originally Posted by iforyou
if you have the full episode, you'd find out that the NSX-R lapped about 0.5s faster that he evo. Anyways, the JDM evo is so much faster than the USDM one.

In case you want to see the whole video, it is the October 2007 episode.
How is the JDM Evo faster than the USDM one? I'd wanna hear this.
Old 10-03-2007, 07:47 AM
  #13  
Safety Car
 
pimpin-tl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Abilene, TX
Age: 49
Posts: 3,992
Received 148 Likes on 99 Posts
Originally Posted by FiftyFive
Video

Go Evo Go!
I think the Z's needed better drivers. They weren't even pushing the cars. lol. There was a discussion somewhere about this video. That both the Z's did not have good drivers compared to the other cars. They weren't redlining, or pushing the cars hard. That NISMO should have been right with the EVO without a problem.
Old 10-03-2007, 07:50 AM
  #14  
Time to Climb
 
godfather2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Little Rock, AR
Age: 43
Posts: 6,395
Received 47 Likes on 37 Posts
i'll take a gt3, please
Old 10-03-2007, 07:56 AM
  #15  
Moderator
 
Costco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 29,869
Received 3,489 Likes on 2,089 Posts
I thought the JDM Evo IX GT has 315 hp? Correct me if I'm wrong, I read that in multiple articles before, but I'm not sure how, possibly ECU differences and U.S. smog requirements, but I'm not exactly sure. I'm confused how they named it a Evo IX MR RS, but doesn't it have the same engine as the IX GT?

It was the Mine's 350Z that crashed, not the NISMO Z. They strip their cars of ABS to save weight, but it screws the driver most of the time.

Never drove a GT3 before but the driver seemed to be shifting relatively slow to how I usually see those guys drive. Of course it should have won, as a matter of fact it has the most power and probably handles even better than the NSX.
Old 10-03-2007, 08:14 AM
  #16  
Moderator Alumnus
Thread Starter
 
FiftyFive's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: SW Connecticut
Age: 38
Posts: 10,823
Received 52 Likes on 36 Posts
Originally Posted by I Go To Costco
I thought the JDM Evo IX GT has 315 hp? Correct me if I'm wrong, I read that in multiple articles before, but I'm not sure how, possibly ECU differences and U.S. smog requirements, but I'm not exactly sure. I'm confused how they named it a Evo IX MR RS, but doesn't it have the same engine as the IX GT?

It was the Mine's 350Z that crashed, not the NISMO Z. They strip their cars of ABS to save weight, but it screws the driver most of the time.

Never drove a GT3 before but the driver seemed to be shifting relatively slow to how I usually see those guys drive. Of course it should have won, as a matter of fact it has the most power and probably handles even better than the NSX.
All Evos 7 and up have the same engine, however the IX has Mivec. In Japan the Evo IX is rated at 280hp. There is not much difference if any between the power between the JDM and USDM models. If anything smog laws are tighter in Japan.

Even with better drivers, the Zs would have still been last.
Old 10-03-2007, 09:03 AM
  #17  
Suzuka Master
 
nokiaman's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Maryland
Posts: 6,271
Received 236 Likes on 97 Posts
Regardless of who won(shoulda been the gt3) that is still an incredible piece of driving.
Old 10-03-2007, 09:13 AM
  #18  
I disagree with unanimity
iTrader: (2)
 
sho_nuff1997's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: WI
Age: 46
Posts: 14,035
Received 27 Likes on 20 Posts
i think the GT3 was sandbaggin till the last 2 laps.
Old 10-03-2007, 09:31 AM
  #19  
Safety Car
 
pimpin-tl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Abilene, TX
Age: 49
Posts: 3,992
Received 148 Likes on 99 Posts
Originally Posted by FiftyFive
Even with better drivers, the Zs would have still been last.
Doubtful when the NISMO handles as good as a Lotus Exige in tests.
Old 10-03-2007, 09:59 AM
  #20  
Moderator Alumnus
Thread Starter
 
FiftyFive's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: SW Connecticut
Age: 38
Posts: 10,823
Received 52 Likes on 36 Posts
Originally Posted by pimpin-tl
Doubtful when the NISMO handles as good as a Lotus Exige in tests.
Still...Would have been behind the Evo, NSX and GT3.

Check the Nur times..
Old 10-03-2007, 11:04 AM
  #21  
Racer
 
TLdriver022's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Chicago,IL
Age: 35
Posts: 307
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by godfather2
i'll take a gt3, please
yep!
Old 10-03-2007, 01:31 PM
  #22  
woooo!!
 
subtledreamer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: California
Posts: 2,985
Likes: 0
Received 20 Likes on 14 Posts
I think with 1 or 2 more laps, the finishing order would be same as the lap times -> GT3, NSX-R, Evo9, Z. Nonetheless I am impressed with the Evo's best lap time.

On a side note, Tsukuba is an awesome track... would love to take my S there in the future
Old 10-03-2007, 03:29 PM
  #23  
Safety Car
 
pimpin-tl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Abilene, TX
Age: 49
Posts: 3,992
Received 148 Likes on 99 Posts
Originally Posted by FiftyFive
Still...Would have been behind the Evo, NSX and GT3.

Check the Nur times..
I did, but where is a NISMO Z on the Nur times?
Old 10-03-2007, 04:04 PM
  #24  
Moderator Alumnus
Thread Starter
 
FiftyFive's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: SW Connecticut
Age: 38
Posts: 10,823
Received 52 Likes on 36 Posts
Originally Posted by pimpin-tl
Doubtful when the NISMO handles as good as a Lotus Exige in tests.
8:42 - 142.069 km/h - Lotus Exige, 179 PS/796 kg, (sport auto 11/00)
8:11 - 151,274 km/h - Mitsubishi Lancer EVO IX (Best Motoring video 14)

Ok i couldnt find it either
But you said it handled as well as an Exige
Old 10-03-2007, 05:09 PM
  #25  
Safety Car
 
pimpin-tl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Abilene, TX
Age: 49
Posts: 3,992
Received 148 Likes on 99 Posts
in a slalom test. The Z is way more powerful than the exige and its more setup for a road course anyways. So I would expect the NISMO to be somewhere between the EVO and the Exige somewhere.

Wish they would hurry up and test the darn thing.
Old 10-03-2007, 07:35 PM
  #26  
You'll Never Walk Alone
iTrader: (1)
 
iforyou's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Age: 37
Posts: 9,492
Received 834 Likes on 518 Posts
Originally Posted by FiftyFive
How is the JDM Evo faster than the USDM one? I'd wanna hear this.
When the Evo was first introduced in the States, there's no expensive ACD (replaced by cheap viscous coupling, which is a passive system), there's no AYC system (replaced by normal LSD system), and there's no 6MT. Then if you look up the specs, the US Evo only had 271hp and 273lb/ft of torque (vs 280ps, 289lb/ft in JDM model),
but in the end, the US Evo was still 70kg heavier than the JDM GSR model due to the installation of anti-intrusion bar at the front of the car meeting safety requirements.

Later though, ACD became standard and hp and torque became 286hp and 289lb/ft, but still no AYC.

In other words, earlier USDM Evo was much slower than the respective JDM model, but later it improved, but still lagged a bit behind the JDM model.
Old 10-03-2007, 07:37 PM
  #27  
You'll Never Walk Alone
iTrader: (1)
 
iforyou's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Age: 37
Posts: 9,492
Received 834 Likes on 518 Posts
In July 2007 of Best Motoring, The Nismo Z was as fast as the new Civic Type R on Tsukuba, which is still pretty good for the Z, considering the Type R is capable of beating even NSX-S-Zero, Lancer Evo 6, RX7 RS, R34 GTR on Suzuka.
Old 10-03-2007, 09:27 PM
  #28  
Safety Car
 
pimpin-tl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Abilene, TX
Age: 49
Posts: 3,992
Received 148 Likes on 99 Posts
Exactly. Reason why I said the Z had a bad driver.
Old 10-03-2007, 10:07 PM
  #29  
You'll Never Walk Alone
iTrader: (1)
 
iforyou's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Age: 37
Posts: 9,492
Received 834 Likes on 518 Posts
those are 2 different episodes with 2 different drivers.

Newest episode, November 2007, they tested a lot of cars in Sugo this time, Civic Type R, Modulo Civic Type R (Civic Type R with bodykit), and Nismo fairlady Z, they all got 1:44.5 to 1:44.7. For comparison, they also tested LP640 (1:37.8), Gallardo Spyder (1:40), XKR (1:46), Lotus Exige (1:43).

Just a reminder that all of these drivers are professional drivers.
Old 10-04-2007, 06:57 AM
  #30  
Moderator Alumnus
Thread Starter
 
FiftyFive's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: SW Connecticut
Age: 38
Posts: 10,823
Received 52 Likes on 36 Posts
Yea, I see. The Nismo is pretty fast and with a better driver probably could have stayed right with the Evo. I'm hoping they take it on Nurburgring sometime soon!
Old 10-04-2007, 11:29 AM
  #31  
Burning Brakes
 
runnerX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Fremont, CA
Age: 46
Posts: 1,140
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Is it only me to notice that in Best Motoring, Japanese cars tend to win a lot more than any other cars... not sure if it is coincident.
Old 10-04-2007, 11:35 AM
  #32  
Burning Brakes
 
runnerX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Fremont, CA
Age: 46
Posts: 1,140
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If you look at Nurburgring laptime

Here

GT3 did it in 7:39
NSX-R didi it in 7:56
Evo IX did it in 8:11

I think Best Motoring is bias towards Jap cars.
Old 10-04-2007, 12:19 PM
  #33  
Moderator Alumnus
Thread Starter
 
FiftyFive's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: SW Connecticut
Age: 38
Posts: 10,823
Received 52 Likes on 36 Posts
Originally Posted by runnerX
If you look at Nurburgring laptime

Here

GT3 did it in 7:39
NSX-R didi it in 7:56
Evo IX did it in 8:11

I think Best Motoring is bias towards Jap cars.
Possible, NSX-R is fast!
Old 10-04-2007, 12:44 PM
  #34  
Moderator
 
Costco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 29,869
Received 3,489 Likes on 2,089 Posts
Nurburgring lap times are with only 1 car on the track. In Best Motoring they race 6 cars on the track at the same time and the more powerful, better performing cars are placed at the bottom of the grid. Plus they usually run on Tsukuba which is a pretty technical course... only 1 straightaway, hence the closer lap times.
Old 10-04-2007, 01:10 PM
  #35  
You'll Never Walk Alone
iTrader: (1)
 
iforyou's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Age: 37
Posts: 9,492
Received 834 Likes on 518 Posts
I have a feeling that Nissan deliberately made the 350z a slower car so that it won't threaten the GTR. Remember, when 350z was first introduced, the R34 GTR was still in production, it wouldn't make sense if the cheaper 350z is faster than the R34 GTR. In Japan, the top (as in fastest cars) are still the Evo, STi, GTR, NSX, RX7, while the "2nd division" cars are cars like the 350z, S2k, the FWD Type Rs, RX8, etc.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Oakes
Wash & Wax
9
11-12-2015 09:34 PM
detailersdomain
Wash & Wax
3
10-09-2015 10:13 PM
Specmiata82
2G TSX Tires, Wheels & Suspension
4
09-30-2015 10:04 AM
Yumcha
Automotive News
4
09-15-2015 06:44 PM
frostwhiteh22at
Car Parts for Sale
0
09-06-2015 12:48 PM



Quick Reply: Evo vs NSX vs GT3 vs Nismo



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:02 AM.