cl-s vs a6 2.7t
12-19-2006, 09:40 PM
#1
Banned
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2006
Age: 47
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
cl-s vs a6 2.7t
Whatever BS artist it was who said his acura CL-s smoked an audi a6 2.7t is LYING. No way any stock cl-s will beat a 2.7t, off the line, inthe long run, on mars, on the moon , not anywhere...If he did beat one, there was something wrong with it , or the driver didnt punch it all the way. I took the governer off my 2.7t, and got it up to about 165, no stock cl-s will do that...It also goes 0-6o in 6 flat, and its an auto(when its in auto stick mode)
12-19-2006, 09:51 PM
#3
I SMELL NAWZ
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: East Side San Jose, CA
Age: 38
Posts: 1,546
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
funny... i have a Tip 2.7T A6 as well and im also on a acura site...
i ran a 5.0 mustang / CL-s in my A6 on the 3-4th day i got it a little power brake launch in tip mode and neither of them beat me.
im bone stock...afraid to mod cause im still on warranty
i ran a 5.0 mustang / CL-s in my A6 on the 3-4th day i got it a little power brake launch in tip mode and neither of them beat me.
im bone stock...afraid to mod cause im still on warranty
12-19-2006, 10:01 PM
#5
I SMELL NAWZ
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: East Side San Jose, CA
Age: 38
Posts: 1,546
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Originally Posted by Crazy Sellout
I had a 2.7t A6 has a loaner and its plenty quick stock. Even with automatic.
I just dont like trolls who signed up just to make threads like this. Lame.
I just dont like trolls who signed up just to make threads like this. Lame.
12-19-2006, 10:30 PM
#6
Race Director
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Charlotte(home) /Raleigh (school), NC
Age: 35
Posts: 11,395
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Crazy Sellout
I had a 2.7t A6 has a loaner and its plenty quick stock. Even with automatic.
I just dont like trolls who signed up just to make threads like this. Lame.
I just dont like trolls who signed up just to make threads like this. Lame.
Trending Topics
12-19-2006, 10:53 PM
#8
I SMELL NAWZ
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: East Side San Jose, CA
Age: 38
Posts: 1,546
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Originally Posted by Trackruner228
isnt there some way the admins can check the ip adress to see if its somebody already on this site or something.
what would that matter most DSL ISP's have a static IP aress system. rest your modem and BAM your a different IP
12-20-2006, 03:29 AM
#12
I SMELL NAWZ
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: East Side San Jose, CA
Age: 38
Posts: 1,546
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Originally Posted by Edr0e
^ 
Wouldn't a 6 speed CL-S give the 2.7T a good run?
Wouldn't a 6 speed CL-S give the 2.7T a good run?
the one i ran was probably automatic but it was a type S it has exhaust sounded like an intake and tinted windows
but it really didnt seem to matter i could hear him hold the rev and launch broke tires screeching and i just shot ahead and kept pulling and at around 75 ish he just let off and he was WAYYYYY back there
12-20-2006, 08:52 AM
#13
Safety Car
Originally Posted by technojunky1
Whatever BS artist it was who said his acura CL-s smoked an audi a6 2.7t is LYING. No way any stock cl-s will beat a 2.7t, off the line, inthe long run, on mars, on the moon , not anywhere...If he did beat one, there was something wrong with it , or the driver didnt punch it all the way. I took the governer off my 2.7t, and got it up to about 165, no stock cl-s will do that...It also goes 0-6o in 6 flat, and its an auto(when its in auto stick mode)
12-20-2006, 08:58 AM
#14
Tristate ViP Crew
Originally Posted by pimpin-tl
Stock for stock a CL-S should beat it. But if the 2.7t even has a ECU/CHIP then no, it will smoke the CL-S. The A6 2.7t is extremly heavy.
I wanted an A6 but was worried about electrical gremlins so I just got the TL with its glass tranny instead.
12-20-2006, 09:02 AM
#15
Moderator Alumnus
Originally Posted by Crazy Sellout
You racing an automatic? :gheylaugh:
Go you, now get off this forum before you make us Audi owners look bad.
Go you, now get off this forum before you make us Audi owners look bad.
I know he didnt just register here to post that stupid shit.
12-20-2006, 10:09 PM
#16
I SMELL NAWZ
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: East Side San Jose, CA
Age: 38
Posts: 1,546
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Originally Posted by pimpin-tl
Stock for stock a CL-S should beat it. But if the 2.7t even has a ECU/CHIP then no, it will smoke the CL-S. The A6 2.7t is extremly heavy.
3745 lb's versus the type s's 3525 roughly 200 pounds
12-20-2006, 10:30 PM
#17
Suzuka Master
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Age: 46
Posts: 7,083
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Back in the day, I had an automatic 2001 CL-S and my good friend had a 2001 2.7T automatic.
We raced quite often and it essentially was a wash. I was a bit faster from a stop (the weight and slight turbo lag hampered his launch) and he was a bit faster from a roll.
I then got headers and an CAI for my CL and I was definitely faster than the 2.7T. But he could have chipped his car as well, so it really doesn't matter.
Either way, as I said, it doesn't matter at all. Neither car is a drag racer and I have no idea why you posted here.
We raced quite often and it essentially was a wash. I was a bit faster from a stop (the weight and slight turbo lag hampered his launch) and he was a bit faster from a roll.
I then got headers and an CAI for my CL and I was definitely faster than the 2.7T. But he could have chipped his car as well, so it really doesn't matter.
Either way, as I said, it doesn't matter at all. Neither car is a drag racer and I have no idea why you posted here.
12-21-2006, 08:00 AM
#22
Suzuka Master
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Age: 46
Posts: 7,083
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by daemonicus
a stock 2001 cl-s runs the 1/4 mile in 15.60 and a 2001 A6 2.7T runs it in 15.10.
case closed.
case closed.
I ran it in 14.2 with headers and an intake only at Englishtown.
Again, neither car is really fast in a straight line stock, so I don't even know why people are debating this.
12-21-2006, 08:07 AM
#23
I
This would be a case of magazineraceomia...
And not even a magazine would have those numbers. A stock 6 speed CL-S has hit low 14s. An auto is not 1.5 seconds slower.
And not even a magazine would have those numbers. A stock 6 speed CL-S has hit low 14s. An auto is not 1.5 seconds slower.
Originally Posted by daemonicus
a stock 2001 cl-s runs the 1/4 mile in 15.60 and a 2001 A6 2.7T runs it in 15.10.
case closed.
case closed.
12-21-2006, 09:39 AM
#24
Safety Car
Originally Posted by daemonicus
a stock 2001 cl-s runs the 1/4 mile in 15.60 and a 2001 A6 2.7T runs it in 15.10.
case closed.
case closed.
12-21-2006, 09:49 AM
#25
Safety Car
Hmm the CL-S is much faster than the 2.7t stock for stock.
Audi A6 2.7 T S line quattro (sedan) 4wd - V6 2.7L twin turbo (265 hp) 5A + ABS
0-60 7.30
1/4 15.62
mph
92.50
Braking
118
Audi A6 sedan quattro - V6 3.0L (220 hp) 6M + ABS
0-60
8.37
1/4
16.17
mph
91.60
braking
128
Audi A6 2.7 T S line quattro (sedan) 4wd - V6 2.7L twin turbo (265 hp) 5A + ABS
0-60 7.30
1/4 15.62
mph
92.50
Braking
118
Audi A6 sedan quattro - V6 3.0L (220 hp) 6M + ABS
0-60
8.37
1/4
16.17
mph
91.60
braking
128
12-21-2006, 10:02 AM
#26
Suzuka Master
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Age: 46
Posts: 7,083
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by pimpin-tl
Mine ran 15.1 bone stock with bad conditions. I then ran a 14.2 at 99.8 mph with just OBX headers on my CL-S. It was also a Auto. Case Closed back at ya.
12-21-2006, 10:20 AM
#27
Drifting
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Rockville, Maryland
Age: 42
Posts: 2,126
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by pimpin-tl
Hmm the CL-S is much faster than the 2.7t stock for stock.
Audi A6 2.7 T S line quattro (sedan) 4wd - V6 2.7L twin turbo (265 hp) 5A + ABS
0-60 7.30
1/4 15.62
mph
92.50
Braking
118
Audi A6 sedan quattro - V6 3.0L (220 hp) 6M + ABS
0-60
8.37
1/4
16.17
mph
91.60
braking
128
Audi A6 2.7 T S line quattro (sedan) 4wd - V6 2.7L twin turbo (265 hp) 5A + ABS
0-60 7.30
1/4 15.62
mph
92.50
Braking
118
Audi A6 sedan quattro - V6 3.0L (220 hp) 6M + ABS
0-60
8.37
1/4
16.17
mph
91.60
braking
128
12-21-2006, 10:41 AM
#29
Safety Car
Originally Posted by zigzagzig
no clue where you got those stats, but im pretty sure those are wrong especially for the 2.7t. No way it does 0-60 slower than a civic si
They were done found with a simple internet search and found on a car forum actually for Audis.
12-21-2006, 11:01 AM
#30
Safety Car
I want to make a correction to a item i said. It actually has 250 hp. And the manual gearbox 6mt was able to pull this info:
Once you look under the hood things get more interesting. The 2.7T A6 shares the same 2.7 liter 250 hp bi-turbo V6 that is found in the Audi S4. The 6-speed transmission and brake system are also the same and the exhaust system is similar as well. Official performance numbers are 0-60 in 6.0 seconds and 14.7 seconds for the quarter mile - only slightly slower than the S4.
Once you look under the hood things get more interesting. The 2.7T A6 shares the same 2.7 liter 250 hp bi-turbo V6 that is found in the Audi S4. The 6-speed transmission and brake system are also the same and the exhaust system is similar as well. Official performance numbers are 0-60 in 6.0 seconds and 14.7 seconds for the quarter mile - only slightly slower than the S4.
12-21-2006, 02:05 PM
#31
Burning Brakes
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Posts: 951
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by FastAcura
This would be a case of magazineraceomia...
And not even a magazine would have those numbers. A stock 6 speed CL-S has hit low 14s. An auto is not 1.5 seconds slower.
And not even a magazine would have those numbers. A stock 6 speed CL-S has hit low 14s. An auto is not 1.5 seconds slower.
Originally Posted by pimpin-tl
Mine ran 15.1 bone stock with bad conditions. I then ran a 14.2 at 99.8 mph with just OBX headers on my CL-S. It was also a Auto. Case Closed back at ya.
anyways, i just got those stats online from MSN autos, so that's my proof. drag slips for proof, anyone?
i actually dont care either way, i dont really care for either car.
12-22-2006, 02:51 PM
#35
I've been watching technojunky1 ever since he posted this thread but I couldn't find any proof he's a spammer, but now I got my proof so I am going to ban him. I'll leave the thread open and let the Car Talk mods handle it.
Proof:
IP address does not exist
email address appears to also not exist
Registered, posted thread, hasn't been seen since
If technojunky1 reads this and wants to contest the ban, he can click on the Contact Us box at the bottom of the page and tell the admins his story.
Proof:
IP address does not exist
email address appears to also not exist
Registered, posted thread, hasn't been seen since
If technojunky1 reads this and wants to contest the ban, he can click on the Contact Us box at the bottom of the page and tell the admins his story.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
RSpyder
Car Parts for Sale
5
09-30-2015 12:46 AM
