Buying Crossover: Murano vs. Edge

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 2, 2010 | 03:55 AM
  #41  
Shift_Acura's Avatar
Thread Starter
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,030
Likes: 4
From: Vancouver, BC
Originally Posted by Allen-
OP, since they don't need three rows, what about a used Mazda CX-7? Plenty sporty, turbo power when you need it, four cylinder economy when you want it, sexy styling, and a nice interior. Available with AWD too. Not sure if Mazda does CPO but I'm sure you could get an extended warranty. Only thing against them is average gas mileage due to the Turbo engine and a little excess weight, which is better for safety. Since they aren't buying a sports car, I doubt they'll car about the few extra pounds. Check one out.
Checked out the CX-7 and RDX in detail. The interior of both is too small, especially the back seat. The Mazda defintaley didnt feel as responsive power wise as the Edge and Murano due to turbo lag although the Handling on the RDX and CX-7 is

Also I've heard some horror stories about the Gas mileage in those turbos, not to mention you need premium to begin with
Reply
Old May 2, 2010 | 03:58 AM
  #42  
Shift_Acura's Avatar
Thread Starter
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,030
Likes: 4
From: Vancouver, BC
Originally Posted by F23A4
Having driven the 09 enough times, I have to agree. The 2G Murano - particularly the LE and loaded SL - is definitely an Infiniti-grade vehicle.

They always were Infiniti grade. Even the Maxima has been since 04, but nobody cared because Infiniti Interiors were crap until 06+ for the FX and 07+ for the G
Reply
Old May 2, 2010 | 04:07 AM
  #43  
Shift_Acura's Avatar
Thread Starter
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,030
Likes: 4
From: Vancouver, BC
Originally Posted by Allen-

To the OP, is there anything else that fits their needs?
Lexus RX (too expensive)
Acura MDX (too expensive)
Pilot (ugly)
Highlander (ugly)
Santa Fe (meh)
Volvo XC90 (ugly + expensive)
Dodge Journey (no explanation needed)

The List could go on but we concluded that Crossovers which depreciate more than average but are better than average vehicles were the Edge and Murano

We are also looking at but are not AS interested in the new Ford Escape (240HP V6) and the new Subaru Forrester (Symmetrical AWD would be better for the snow than Ford or Nissans crappier systems)


Originally Posted by dallison
one thing people never check on is maintenance. How much are the tires on each vehicle. I am going to assume the murano tires are more low profile than the edge. So they typically would be more.
I think nissan still uses a timing chain in their v6 motors but i don't know if the edge has a belt or chain. Also, check the insurance on both.
We are looking at vehicles with lower mileage so those arent really big concerns. We also dont keep our cars for more than a couple of years. Insurance should be about the same, car insurance here is alot simpler than US, only one company that you can go through (ICBC) so theres no shopping around for better rates.

Last edited by Shift_Acura; May 2, 2010 at 04:10 AM.
Reply
Old May 2, 2010 | 05:15 AM
  #44  
SodaLuvr's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 3,966
Likes: 13
From: Walnut Creek, CA
On the Muranos, the warranty of the CVT has been extended to 10/120k. Most failures were with the early model Muranos.

However, the Murano has had significant issues with the transfer case on the AWD models. It is a very expensive 2k+ repair that is NOT covered by the CVT warranty extension.

Personally, I'd get an Edge instead in hopes of a lower TCO.
Reply
Old May 2, 2010 | 07:53 AM
  #45  
RaviNJCLs's Avatar
Team Owner
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 37,141
Likes: 624
From: Landisville, PA
I hate the CVT too, but your parents may not. Have them test it out. They are about equal on gas. The Murano may be a bit more expensive.

For me, as much as I love Nissan products I think the newer Muranos are butt ugly and I would seriously consider the Edge or even the Ford Flex.
Reply
Old May 2, 2010 | 12:42 PM
  #46  
Allen-'s Avatar
is out, so the
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 756
Likes: 3
Originally Posted by Shift_Acura
Checked out the CX-7 and RDX in detail. The interior of both is too small, especially the back seat. The Mazda defintaley didnt feel as responsive power wise as the Edge and Murano due to turbo lag although the Handling on the RDX and CX-7 is

Also I've heard some horror stories about the Gas mileage in those turbos, not to mention you need premium to begin with
Premium was moved from the required to recommended column for the CX-7 in 2008. But if its too small...

What about a CX-9? It may be too big, but what about a Saturn Outlook XR? CPO 2006ish Cadillac SRX? 2005-6 Acura MDX?
Reply
Old May 4, 2010 | 02:58 AM
  #47  
Shift_Acura's Avatar
Thread Starter
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,030
Likes: 4
From: Vancouver, BC
Those are all abit out of the price range since we want something with very low mileage.
Reply
Old May 4, 2010 | 08:42 AM
  #48  
smarty666's Avatar
Three Wheelin'
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,372
Likes: 5
From: NJ
Since I have a 2010 Max, I know a little bit about the CVT and problems Murano owners have had because I looked at the Murano as well when shopping last year.

Almost all of the CVT and transfer case issues are related to the 1st Gen Murano from 03-07. I personally would not get a Murano from any of those model years. Keep in mind, that vehicle was Nissan's attempt at putting a completely new technology, for them at least, into full market production. There were bound to be problems with it because it was a new piece of technology for Nissan.

I would recommend the 2009 and 2010 Murano because it has the 2nd Gen CVT in it, like my Maxima, that has had almost all those problems/kinks, that the 1st Gen CVT had, fixed and worked out of them and have heard no problems with the 09 and 10 Murano with CVT troubles. Personally, I would take the Murano over the Edge since I think the quality/fit and finish is a little bit better in the Murano then in the Edge but both are nice vehicles and you really can't go wrong with either of them.

So far, I have about 10k miles on my Max and overall I love the CVT! It is so much more efficient and smooth shifting over the 1st Gen CVT and the fuel economy I'm getting out of my Maxima is incredible considering the amount of HP and torque under the hood. The only downside to the 2nd Gen CVT is that if you accelerate quickly (by gunning it) the CVT causes the engine to produce very loud rev drones, so we call it, and you hear it in the cabin, but other than that, the CVT has come along way from the 1st Gen one in the 1st Gen Murano and 6th Gen Maxima. I've heard, that Nissan is already working on the 3rd Gen CVT which is going to have the engine designed around the transmission, and supposedly, all that rev drone and noise is going to be elminated and then you'll have absolutely no qualms with the CVT at all!!

Last edited by smarty666; May 4, 2010 at 08:46 AM.
Reply
Old May 5, 2010 | 01:37 PM
  #49  
Allen-'s Avatar
is out, so the
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 756
Likes: 3
I know its not a crossover, but 2006ish Nissan Pathfinder? The V6 gets OK mileage and its is decently powerful. Interior on 2008+ models is great. They are weirdly narrow on the inside, however.

Or, what about a Hyundai Veracruz? Nice interior, nice styling, good engine, and decent gas mileage. Check one out.
Reply
Old May 5, 2010 | 02:17 PM
  #50  
jim165's Avatar
Corn-Fed Mule
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 224
Likes: 1
From: All Up In Dat AZZ...Beotch!
Originally Posted by pimpin-tl
2009 Murano







2007 Murano







2009 Ford Edge






Just wanted to complete this post with the refreshed Edge. I'm a fan. Don't know if it's out of your folk's price range, but I'd definitely do this one over the Murano based on the cool interior alone...







Reply
Old May 5, 2010 | 03:23 PM
  #51  
brizey's Avatar
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,181
Likes: 3
From: DFW
Man, the new sync displays are sicko.
Reply
Old May 6, 2010 | 05:30 AM
  #52  
Shift_Acura's Avatar
Thread Starter
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,030
Likes: 4
From: Vancouver, BC
at the new Edge.

That interior alone might be worth the wait and few extra $$.
You can actually get a base Lincoln MKX for close to the same price of a Fully loaded Edge.


About the Pathfinder: I really like the current gen and also the 4Runner. I kind of wanted my parents to move away from the whole body on frame style and get a more "stylish" crossover (better ride quality and fuel economy). Not really liking the Veracruz though.

Theres way too many nice cars and SUV's these days lol
Reply
Old May 6, 2010 | 07:24 AM
  #53  
pimpin-tl's Avatar
Safety Car
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 3,995
Likes: 148
From: San Antonio, TX
Originally Posted by Shift_Acura
They always were Infiniti grade. Even the Maxima has been since 04, but nobody cared because Infiniti Interiors were crap until 06+ for the FX and 07+ for the G
Umm no. The Maxima had a crappy interior on the 6th gen till the 7th gen came out in 08 or 09 whenever the new bodystyle happened. It couldn't even compare to what Infiniti had. Infiniti fixed their interiors in 05 in most of their cars.
Reply
Old May 6, 2010 | 01:20 PM
  #54  
Shift_Acura's Avatar
Thread Starter
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,030
Likes: 4
From: Vancouver, BC
The 04-06 Maxima and 03-05 FX have the same screen and buttons under it.
Reply
Old May 6, 2010 | 02:16 PM
  #55  
Moog-Type-S's Avatar
The sizzle in the Steak
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 71,436
Likes: 1,877
From: Southern California
@ the new EDGE.

Inside and out is a stunner!

Those gauges are incredible.
Reply
Old May 6, 2010 | 02:35 PM
  #56  
pimpin-tl's Avatar
Safety Car
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 3,995
Likes: 148
From: San Antonio, TX
Originally Posted by Shift_Acura
The 04-06 Maxima and 03-05 FX have the same screen and buttons under it.

Not really.

Reply
Old May 6, 2010 | 11:42 PM
  #57  
Allen-'s Avatar
is out, so the
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 756
Likes: 3
What about a 2007+ Mitsubishi Outlander? It may be too small but they are sporty. Gas mileage is good even with the V6 and they come with all kinds of options. AWD can be set to Auto, FWD, or LOCK. Seems like all the owners on Edmunds have nothing but good things to say about them.

If that's too small, what about a 2006-7 Endeavor? I have seen loaded low mileage 2006's go for 12-13K. Both Mitsubishi models have good reliability ratings... Other than those, I'm out of suggestions.
Reply
Old May 7, 2010 | 12:06 AM
  #58  
Shift_Acura's Avatar
Thread Starter
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,030
Likes: 4
From: Vancouver, BC
Originally Posted by Allen-
What about a 2007+ Mitsubishi Outlander? It may be too small but they are sporty. Gas mileage is good even with the V6 and they come with all kinds of options. AWD can be set to Auto, FWD, or LOCK. Seems like all the owners on Edmunds have nothing but good things to say about them.

If that's too small, what about a 2006-7 Endeavor? I have seen loaded low mileage 2006's go for 12-13K. Both Mitsubishi models have good reliability ratings... Other than those, I'm out of suggestions.
Thanks man. You made some good suggestions. The new redesigned Outlander is nice, and definately pretty roomy inside. But it would have to be brand new since it was very recently redesigned and if we go for brand new it would probably be a 2011 Ford Edge. (Brand new Murano is WAY overpriced in Canada)
Reply
Old May 7, 2010 | 02:24 AM
  #59  
Danil ACE's Avatar
Sounders FC
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 950
Likes: 0
From: Seattle, WA
Feel free to send me questions on the Murano. My parents had an '03 SL and recently bought a '10 LE. Both were great (I'm actually a fan of the CVT). The new ones are definitely more upscale and the engine and CVT were refined quite a bit more (steering is also more sharp). I don't understand why everyone disses on CVT. It's always got power and doesn't need to downshift when you punch it, it just pulls strong.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Yumcha
Automotive News
70
Dec 7, 2020 05:39 PM
Yumcha
Automotive News
4
Aug 15, 2019 12:58 PM
giovane
2G RDX DIY & FAQ
12
Jul 8, 2016 10:46 PM
fifer16
1G RL (1996-2004)
0
Sep 19, 2015 03:41 PM
DiamondJoeQuimby
Car Parts for Sale
1
Sep 10, 2015 11:40 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:47 AM.