Building a 2000 HP 4G63

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 7, 2011 | 12:43 PM
  #1  
ghttf's Avatar
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,038
Likes: 0
Building a 2000 HP 4G63

Saw this on farm of minds. Not finished yet...



So, getting 700whp/L from 2.0L @ 8500rpm is no small feat, but what do you need if you get bored and want to shoot for 2000 hp?
<br />
<br />
Cast Garrett compressor wheels (right) tend to come apart above 50 psi. CNC billet aluminum wheels (middle) are stronger, but why not be different and use your own CNC billet titanium (left) compressor?<br />
<img src="http://img43.imageshack.us/img43/4817/compwheels.jpg" border="0" alt="" /><br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
You'll need a turbo big enough for the job, which in this case is a 108mm twinscroll T4 turbo, with custom quad ball bearing CHRA and 100psi capability.<br />
<img src="http://img97.imageshack.us/img97/5795/gt47killer.jpg" border="0" alt="" /><br />
<br />
<img src="http://img541.imageshack.us/img541/2928/turbo3.jpg" border="0" alt="" /><br />
<br />
<img src="http://img232.imageshack.us/img232/3429/2000hpturbo.jpg" border="0" alt="" /><br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
To get enough airflow at 12,000rpm(!) to get the job done, you'll need a skillfully ported head, complete with titanium valves and copper-beryllium valve seats:<br />
<img src="http://img686.imageshack.us/img686/8733/cylinder5.jpg" border="0" alt="" /><br />
<br />
<img src="http://img5.imageshack.us/img5/3448/cylinder.jpg" border="0" alt="" /><br />
<br />
<img src="http://img94.imageshack.us/img94/4258/cylinder1.jpg" border="0" alt="" /><br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
And you're going to need a set of camshafts to handle the rpm and withstand tremendous ramp pressures, so why not a set of hollow titanium billets with DLC at only 234 grams each?<br />
<br />
<img src="http://img820.imageshack.us/img820/1853/titaniumcams.jpg" border="0" alt="" /><br />
<br />
<img src="http://img13.imageshack.us/img13/1205/titaniumcams1.jpg" border="0" alt="" /><br />
<br />
<img src="http://img156.imageshack.us/img156/3443/titaniumcams2.jpg" border="0" alt="" /><br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
And since there is no aftermarket rod up to the task, just ask for a set of billet mmcs-titanium connecting rods at 286g each. Rod/Stroke ratio is 2.07:<br />
<br />
<img src="http://img651.imageshack.us/img651/1227/titanium1.jpg" border="0" alt="" /><br />
<br />
<img src="http://img707.imageshack.us/img707/3097/titanium2.jpg" border="0" alt="" /><br />
<br />
<br />
For pistons, a set of custom beryllium pistons with DLC fits the bill, and since methanol is the fuel, 13:1 SCR is fine:<br />
<br />
<img src="http://img822.imageshack.us/img822/5373/pistonnew3.jpg" border="0" alt="" /><br />
<br />
<img src="http://img9.imageshack.us/img9/966/pistonnew2.jpg" border="0" alt="" /><br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
A strong piston pin is needed as well:<br />
<br />
<img src="http://img517.imageshack.us/img517/7840/pincustom.jpg" border="0" alt="" /><br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Toss in a custom titanium billet crank:<br />
<br />
<img src="http://img686.imageshack.us/img686/1179/crankti.jpg" border="0" alt="" /><br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
A set of 9000cc/min injectors:<br />
<br />
<img src="http://img43.imageshack.us/img43/3491/850lbsinj.jpg" border="0" alt="" /><br />
<br />
<br />
And since a factory 4G63 block probably wouldn't hold up, just CNC machine your own from billet aluminum:<br />
<br />
<img src="http://img171.imageshack.us/img171/1241/billet1.jpg" border="0" alt="" /><br />
<br />
<img src="http://img15.imageshack.us/img15/2074/billet2.jpg" border="0" alt="" /><br />
<br />
<br />
No head gasket is used:<br />
<br />
<img src="http://img163.imageshack.us/img163/6619/2000hpengine2.jpg" border="0" alt="" /><br />
<br />
<br />
And to put all that power to the gearbox, one needs a suitable multiplate clutch:<br />
<br />
<img src="http://img63.imageshack.us/img63/3985/clutch1.jpg" border="0" alt="" /><br />
<br />
<br />
Yes, it is smaller than a cam gear:<br />
<br />
<img src="http://img156.imageshack.us/img156/8171/clutch3f.jpg" border="0" alt="" /><br />
<br />
<img src="http://img714.imageshack.us/img714/9788/clutch4s.jpg" border="0" alt="" /><br />
<br />
<br />
An example of very efficient turbo manifold design from one of their recent projects:<br />
<br />
<img src="http://img824.imageshack.us/img824/7996/project2.jpg" border="0" alt="" /><br />
<br />
<img src="http://img820.imageshack.us/img820/8940/project1.jpg" border="0" alt="" /><br />
<br />
<br />
And last but not least, a dynosheet from this car, running 'only' 48psi and hydraulic cams:<br />
<br />
<img src="http://img156.imageshack.us/img156/2001/evo81523hp.jpg" border="0" alt="" /></div>
http://forums.evolutionm.net/evo-dyn...ne-2007-a.html
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2011 | 12:56 PM
  #2  
myron's Avatar
Suzuka Master
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 8,205
Likes: 269
From: Edmonton, Canada
I've seen this a couple of days ago. Not sure if it was on this forum or not. Fucking awesome tho
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2011 | 12:57 PM
  #3  
gatrhumpy's Avatar
Chapter Leader
(Northeast Florida)
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 35,532
Likes: 1,654
That sucker would hand a Viper its ass. Wow.
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2011 | 01:07 PM
  #4  
CanopyFlyer's Avatar
I Skydive, Therefore I Am
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 781
Likes: 0
From: At your right shoulder, no your left!
Originally Posted by gatrhumpy
That sucker would hand ANYTHING its ass. Wow.
Fixed.
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2011 | 01:14 PM
  #5  
Brandon24pdx's Avatar
Por Favor?
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,293
Likes: 10
Oh I think I see what's happening here
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2011 | 01:23 PM
  #6  
gatrhumpy's Avatar
Chapter Leader
(Northeast Florida)
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 35,532
Likes: 1,654
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2011 | 02:22 PM
  #7  
Stapler's Avatar
Drifting
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 2,340
Likes: 249
From: Tucson Az
I don't know much about turbo's but I see 3 exhausts. Are the two small ones for Blow off Valves?
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2011 | 04:10 PM
  #8  
knight rider's Avatar
Rooting for Acura
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 8,169
Likes: 1,842
From: Austin Burbs
Okay so what do they do to the frame, brakes, suspension, wheels and tires to make anything mounted on top of this monster drivable?
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2011 | 04:43 PM
  #9  
rondog's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 8,320
Likes: 129
From: yonkers, NY
Thats insane, imagine that in a daily driver.
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2011 | 04:49 PM
  #10  
AMUA6's Avatar
ScoobyZINE
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 3,986
Likes: 41
From: Ocoee, TN
Fook mi
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2011 | 05:06 PM
  #11  
achenator's Avatar
Three Wheelin'
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,935
Likes: 198
From: New Orleans LA area
Wow, lose traction much?
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2011 | 05:14 PM
  #12  
Aman's Avatar
Your Friendly Canadian
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 17,447
Likes: 1,506
From: Toronto, Ontario
Holy shitake mushrooms

EDIT: Check out that dynograph? Turbo lag much? Some cars here probably have more low-end grunt than this bad boy.

Last edited by Aman; Jan 7, 2011 at 05:17 PM.
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2011 | 07:54 PM
  #13  
fsttyms1's Avatar
Senior Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 81,385
Likes: 3,068
From: Appleton WI
That is impressive, but useless. Though Ive seen similar builds from a duramax (stock block though) running just shy of 100psi. Hp is similar to that and tq is double the hp shown.
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2011 | 08:11 PM
  #14  
friesm2000's Avatar
B A N N E D
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 8,502
Likes: 15
From: Colorado
FUCK


Originally Posted by fsttyms1
That is impressive, but useless. Though Ive seen similar builds from a duramax (stock block though) running just shy of 100psi. Hp is similar to that and tq is double the hp shown.

but still a good example though, to making more power (just on the extreme side though)
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2011 | 08:30 PM
  #15  
05TLdcc's Avatar
Coal
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 7,363
Likes: 137
From: Freaking everywhere
Originally Posted by knight rider
Okay so what do they do to the frame, brakes, suspension, wheels and tires to make anything mounted on top of this monster drivable?
this. every freaking component has to be upgraded to handle this kind of power. its insane.
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2011 | 09:13 PM
  #16  
v6cord2k5's Avatar
seizure force field!
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 8,971
Likes: 115
From: Monkeytown
Originally Posted by Aman
Holy shitake mushrooms

EDIT: Check out that dynograph? Turbo lag much? Some cars here probably have more low-end grunt than this bad boy.
I wouldn't mind 200hp at 4k RPM...
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2011 | 09:56 PM
  #17  
Aman's Avatar
Your Friendly Canadian
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 17,447
Likes: 1,506
From: Toronto, Ontario
^ That can't be too far off what you're making now though, can it?
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2011 | 10:04 PM
  #18  
StreetKA's Avatar
Suzuka Master
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 7,108
Likes: 575
:Unfuckinbeliveble:
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2011 | 10:31 PM
  #19  
achenator's Avatar
Three Wheelin'
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,935
Likes: 198
From: New Orleans LA area
This is amazing. My buddy has an 08 350z with 723 rwhp and I have seen what he has gone through to make that somewhat reliable. ($$$$). This is a whole different level.
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2011 | 10:35 PM
  #20  
v6cord2k5's Avatar
seizure force field!
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 8,971
Likes: 115
From: Monkeytown
Are there videos of this thing in action?


Originally Posted by Aman
^ That can't be too far off what you're making now though, can it?
I'd be lucky to make that at 6.5k...
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2011 | 11:26 PM
  #21  
CLtotheTL32's Avatar
Moderator
15 Year Member
Shutterbug
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 36,793
Likes: 9,618
From: Charlotte
Originally Posted by AMUA6
Fook mi
No, fook yu!

That's an amazing build. I wonder how long it took to design and get everything made.
Reply
Old Jan 8, 2011 | 12:23 AM
  #22  
Aman's Avatar
Your Friendly Canadian
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 17,447
Likes: 1,506
From: Toronto, Ontario
Originally Posted by v6cord2k5
I'd be lucky to make that at 6.5k...
Really? 2005 Accord V6s are rated at 240 hp at something like 6k rpm, right?

At 3750, this car is making only 100 horsepower. Is an Accord making less than that at that rpm?


Either way, the feeling of hitting boost in this thing must be biblical.
Reply
Old Jan 8, 2011 | 12:34 AM
  #23  
v6cord2k5's Avatar
seizure force field!
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 8,971
Likes: 115
From: Monkeytown
240bhp... Driveterrain losses and such would probably rob me that measly 40. This race Evo is probably a whole ton lighter and the dynapack measures hp at the hub. Not to mention all the light materials probably mean this thing revs oh so freely.

Reply
Old Jan 8, 2011 | 12:36 AM
  #24  
Aman's Avatar
Your Friendly Canadian
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 17,447
Likes: 1,506
From: Toronto, Ontario
Forgot about the bhp vs. whp thing. Or hhp...
Reply
Old Jan 8, 2011 | 01:14 AM
  #25  
SpiderX1016's Avatar
Three Wheelin'
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,785
Likes: 96
Those parts are pretty. Too bad you can't see the valves once it's closed up but they're so nice.
Reply
Old Jan 8, 2011 | 12:09 PM
  #26  
TheMirror's Avatar
Disinformation Terminator
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,930
Likes: 0
From: NorCal
Reply
Old Jan 8, 2011 | 01:36 PM
  #27  
Crazy Bimmer's Avatar
Senior Moderator
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 34,937
Likes: 638
From: Chicago Burbs
turbo lag
Reply
Old Jan 8, 2011 | 02:13 PM
  #28  
Costco's Avatar
Moderator
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 29,869
Likes: 3,489
Jesus, I've never even heard of copper-beryllium seats

Everything looks like freaking overkill for a gas-powered automobile engine. The rods look insane, machining a block from a block of billet aluminum

I've seen big turbos before, but his hand in the pictures with the housing and the compressor wheel...... holy crap.

Streetability and low end power don't really mean crap, since there's probably a 0.00% chance, give or take that this car will see the street.
Reply
Old Jan 8, 2011 | 03:44 PM
  #29  
Brandon24pdx's Avatar
Por Favor?
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,293
Likes: 10
Nah it's just a 1/4 drag racer. Hell it doesn't even run on gasoline.
Reply
Old Jan 8, 2011 | 03:47 PM
  #30  
Brandon24pdx's Avatar
Por Favor?
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,293
Likes: 10
Originally Posted by Stapler
I don't know much about turbo's but I see 3 exhausts. Are the two small ones for Blow off Valves?
Wastegates. One apparently wasn't enough to bypass enough exhaust to keep the turbo from spinning out of control.
Reply
Old Jan 8, 2011 | 05:29 PM
  #31  
friesm2000's Avatar
B A N N E D
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 8,502
Likes: 15
From: Colorado
Originally Posted by Brandon24pdx
Wastegates. One apparently wasn't enough to bypass enough exhaust to keep the turbo from spinning out of control.
or more like, it is a twin scroll turbo, which means it has two different inlets to the turbine side, and they wanted to maintain them separate, so they had to put on two wastegates in order to do that
Reply
Old Jan 8, 2011 | 06:54 PM
  #32  
Aman's Avatar
Your Friendly Canadian
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 17,447
Likes: 1,506
From: Toronto, Ontario
Or maybe they're just cool like that

Why no head gasket?
Reply
Old Jan 8, 2011 | 09:15 PM
  #33  
friesm2000's Avatar
B A N N E D
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 8,502
Likes: 15
From: Colorado
Originally Posted by Aman
Or maybe they're just cool like that

Why no head gasket?
first i see no coolant jackets in the new block, probably because they would compromise the strength of the block too much (and even then it hardly runs more then ten seconds at a time probably); so no need to keep water contained

second, you probably cannot find one strong enough to withstand the forces inside the cylinders; so to get the best seal, you just get two perfectly flat surfaces (even then i think with the cylinder cast iron sleeves, it will create a higher point, and compress the aluminum in the head some, thous creating a "seal", which is good enough for the time needed (and to compensate for any "leakage", they just bump up the boost some)
Reply
Old Jan 8, 2011 | 09:41 PM
  #34  
S14 n Tsx's Avatar
mmmmmm....
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 20,524
Likes: 95
From: Glendale, CA
holy batman..
Reply
Old Jan 9, 2011 | 12:19 AM
  #35  
jayhawk815's Avatar
Drifting
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,079
Likes: 22
From: Dodge City, KS
Originally Posted by Aman
Really? 2005 Accord V6s are rated at 240 hp at something like 6k rpm, right?

At 3750, this car is making only 100 horsepower. Is an Accord making less than that at that rpm?


Either way, the feeling of hitting boost in this thing must be biblical.
And impossible to control. I've never seen a hp curve quite like this on a gasoline engine intended for automobile usage. It has a 300% increase in hp from 5500-6500 rpm. Absolute absurdity.
Reply
Old Jan 9, 2011 | 05:25 AM
  #36  
speedemon90's Avatar
Suzuka Master
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 9,012
Likes: 439
From: SoCal
God damn, just looking at that dino is intense. First off, there is an immense amount of turbo lag, but then again he has freaking huge ass turbos. I bet this spins all the way through 4th. Driving that think must have been scary on the dyno once the turbos kicked in, even though you know you are strapped in.
Reply
Old Jan 9, 2011 | 06:26 PM
  #37  
OperationDarkie's Avatar
Ultra Negro
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,178
Likes: 35
From: South Holland, IL
Originally Posted by friesm2000
or more like, it is a twin scroll turbo, which means it has two different inlets to the turbine side, and they wanted to maintain them separate, so they had to put on two wastegates in order to do that
Nah I don't think it is a twin scroll, it is just because he has so much pressure he ran 2 50 psi rated wastegates, at least that is what it looks like to me.
Reply
Old Jan 9, 2011 | 06:31 PM
  #38  
LasVegasTL's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,675
Likes: 28
From: Las Vegas/Bay Area
Unleash the Krakken!!!!
Reply
Old Jan 9, 2011 | 06:44 PM
  #39  
Aman's Avatar
Your Friendly Canadian
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 17,447
Likes: 1,506
From: Toronto, Ontario
Originally Posted by friesm2000
first i see no coolant jackets in the new block, probably because they would compromise the strength of the block too much (and even then it hardly runs more then ten seconds at a time probably); so no need to keep water contained

second, you probably cannot find one strong enough to withstand the forces inside the cylinders; so to get the best seal, you just get two perfectly flat surfaces (even then i think with the cylinder cast iron sleeves, it will create a higher point, and compress the aluminum in the head some, thous creating a "seal", which is good enough for the time needed (and to compensate for any "leakage", they just bump up the boost some)
The second paragraph makes sense, but are you saying this guy's running with no type of cooling at all?

Originally Posted by jayhawk815
And impossible to control. I've never seen a hp curve quite like this on a gasoline engine intended for automobile usage. It has a 300% increase in hp from 5500-6500 rpm. Absolute absurdity.
But the builder makes it clear that this motor is just here to make lots and lots of power, nothing else.
Reply
Old Jan 9, 2011 | 06:45 PM
  #40  
friesm2000's Avatar
B A N N E D
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 8,502
Likes: 15
From: Colorado
Originally Posted by OperationDarkie
Nah I don't think it is a twin scroll, it is just because he has so much pressure he ran 2 50 psi rated wastegates, at least that is what it looks like to me.
it is indeed a twinscroll TYVM (3rd picture down in original post)

but for quick referance:


Last edited by friesm2000; Jan 9, 2011 at 06:58 PM.
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:14 AM.