BASELINE Dyno for B6 S4
#5
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
i was pretty happy with the pull especially with the car being bone stock with only 7700 miles. some of the B6 S4's there with DPs and catbacks were producing around 259-260's HP. those numbers are at the wheels not the crank.
i guess it also depends on the kind of dyno used. this was a mustang dyno.
i guess it also depends on the kind of dyno used. this was a mustang dyno.
Trending Topics
#8
Racer
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: West Hartford, CT
Age: 39
Posts: 451
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
yeah not much impressed,especially it's a manual transmission. The loss through powertrain shouldn't be that much. I mean isn't the car nearly 340Hp at the crank..
#9
Suzuka Master
Originally Posted by Fossil_TL
yeah not much impressed,especially it's a manual transmission. The loss through powertrain shouldn't be that much. I mean isn't the car nearly 340Hp at the crank..
#10
I have to admit it isn't what I expected, though maybe AWD is sapping more than I would have thought. I was disappointed in my stock baseline on a Mustang dyno at 271 hp and my car was only supposed to have 333hp. How does this match with other 4.2 S4s?
#12
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
people often ignore the torque numbers. the car is just amazing when it starts pulling. this is the reason why a lot of people call it a BEAST.
here is what the pros think of the car:
http://www.caranddriver.com/article....rticle_id=6568
http://www.caranddriver.com/article....rticle_id=8682
here is what the pros think of the car:
http://www.caranddriver.com/article....rticle_id=6568
http://www.caranddriver.com/article....rticle_id=8682
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
D-Rob
1G RDX Performance Parts & Modifications
62
01-05-2016 11:44 AM
JarrettLauderdale
2G CL Dynograph Gallery
5
09-21-2015 07:51 PM
DISRUPTV
Car Talk
17
05-15-2003 09:51 PM