350Z Final Specs!!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 21, 2002 | 04:25 PM
  #1  
LuxSport's Avatar
Thread Starter
Advanced
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 82
Likes: 0
From: NC
350Z Final Specs!!!

These are the final specs of the 350Z, although this pic may have been doctored or altered or just a plain out fake



That is performance close to, but not better, than the NSX. But the Z only cost 34,500 fully loaded.
Reply
Old Jun 21, 2002 | 04:40 PM
  #2  
vince's Avatar
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 939
Likes: 0
From: Irvine, CA
300hp? I thought Nissan meant ~280 when they said 275+. Nice surprize.
Reply
Old Jun 21, 2002 | 04:46 PM
  #3  
NOVAwhiteTypeS's Avatar
Suzuka Master
25 Year Member
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 7,601
Likes: 0
From: VA
HOLY SHIT did that say 13.6 1/4 and sub 5's for 0~60??
Reply
Old Jun 21, 2002 | 04:51 PM
  #4  
CharlesNguyen's Avatar
Racer
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 418
Likes: 0
From: Dallas, Texas
I think it's FAKE / altered...

None of the Nissan 350Z enthusiasts sites have this info. nor NissanDriven.com has the HP nor performance yet....

Would be nice though... I'll take one please...
Reply
Old Jun 21, 2002 | 05:58 PM
  #5  
ACLS's Avatar
A-CL Madman
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
From: Virginia beach,VA
I am seriously thinking about trading my cls for this. but of course I have to test drive it first. I think they said august timeframe for release.
Cant wait to test drive it though.
Reply
Old Jun 21, 2002 | 06:27 PM
  #6  
soopa's Avatar
The Creator
 
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 37,950
Likes: 8
From: Albany, NY
that is the fakest pic i have ever seen.

certainly not from any marketing department... id bet its just some kids wishful thinking.


and the prices have already been released... 34,500 loaded is not the case... go to nissandriven.com and read the prices.

cost more then that loaded.
Reply
Old Jun 21, 2002 | 07:23 PM
  #7  
Black CL-S 4-Life's Avatar
Floyd Mayweather Jr.
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 14,078
Likes: 5
From: The City of Syrup Screwston, Texas
I agree that pic is fake. I like the 350Z but the G35 just looks a little better.
Reply
Old Jun 21, 2002 | 09:44 PM
  #8  
TypeSKid's Avatar
....................
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 5,063
Likes: 0
From: united states
i dont think its real, no way!!!


If so, I'm going to get the Z instead of the evo 7!!!
Reply
Old Jun 22, 2002 | 12:32 AM
  #9  
EZZ's Avatar
EZZ
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,071
Likes: 0
Originally posted by TypeSKid
i dont think its real, no way!!!


If so, I'm going to get the Z instead of the evo 7!!!
Its a fake from a dude at my350Z.com. Even IF the performance specs are that good, the evo 7 would still smoke it.
Reply
Old Jun 22, 2002 | 11:08 AM
  #10  
gavriil's Avatar
Moderator Alumnus
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 16,399
Likes: 8
From: Washington DC (NOVA)
Originally posted by vince
300hp? I thought Nissan meant ~280 when they said 275+. Nice surprize.

Nissan says 280 plus HP on their website. 260 plus lb-ft of torque. They are also saying that 0-60 will be below 6 seconds.
Reply
Old Jun 22, 2002 | 11:17 AM
  #11  
SiGGy's Avatar
Moderator Alumnus
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 9,263
Likes: 2
From: Lenexa, KS
Originally posted by ACLS
I am seriously thinking about trading my cls for this. but of course I have to test drive it first. I think they said august timeframe for release.
Cant wait to test drive it though.
Add me to that list too I've been excited about this car for awhile. But I want to drive it 1st. And let it be out for over a year. Nissan doesn't have a very good manufacturering quality history. I'll let someone else beta test version 1 of the 350Z... But I want one!
Reply
Old Jun 22, 2002 | 12:09 PM
  #12  
topdaytrader's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 238
Likes: 1
From: Los Angeles
WRX can smoke that shit. Not even need to mention STI.
Reply
Old Jun 22, 2002 | 12:54 PM
  #13  
importtuner's Avatar
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 878
Likes: 0
From: USA
Your so xxxxxx dumb. You shouldn't even compare the two. Its just like you comparing a xxxxxx Lamborghini to an NSX. For the billionaire you claim to be in; I would have thought you would have more class than to make stupid remarks as that
-importtuner
Reply
Old Jun 22, 2002 | 04:39 PM
  #14  
EZZ's Avatar
EZZ
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,071
Likes: 0
Originally posted by topdaytrader
WRX can smoke that shit. Not even need to mention STI.
Stock for stock, the wrx is gonna get smoked, especially from a roll. Now the STi is a whole new story
Reply
Old Jun 22, 2002 | 04:42 PM
  #15  
gavriil's Avatar
Moderator Alumnus
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 16,399
Likes: 8
From: Washington DC (NOVA)
Originally posted by topdaytrader
WRX can smoke that shit. Not even need to mention STI.

I disagree about the WRX. I am expecting the Z doing consistent 5.8 runs for the 60mph. Which is what the WRX does. But next year the WRX will be making at least 245HP due to the arrival of the Evo 8 which will make 250HP. So you might see mid 5s from the WRX next year.
Reply
Old Jun 22, 2002 | 06:23 PM
  #16  
LuxSport's Avatar
Thread Starter
Advanced
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 82
Likes: 0
From: NC
SORRY GUYS BUT IT HAS BEEN REPORTED THAT THIS PIC IS A FAKE. I am pissed
Reply
Old Jun 22, 2002 | 11:02 PM
  #17  
TypeSKid's Avatar
....................
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 5,063
Likes: 0
From: united states
Originally posted by gavriil



I disagree about the WRX. I am expecting the Z doing consistent 5.8 runs for the 60mph. Which is what the WRX does. But next year the WRX will be making at least 245HP due to the arrival of the Evo 8 which will make 250HP. So you might see mid 5s from the WRX next year.

evo8? you mean, Evolution 7?

250hp? It will be a bit more than that.
Reply
Old Jun 22, 2002 | 11:11 PM
  #18  
SilverBulletCLS_RENAMED's Avatar
Instructor
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 243
Likes: 0
From: San Francisco
no duh!!!! the wrx is gonna be just as fast as the z with less hp to 60 cause its got awd. but i bet the wrx wont be able to keep up on the freeway.
Reply
Old Jun 22, 2002 | 11:19 PM
  #19  
JRock's Avatar
Old timer
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 9,224
Likes: 1
From: .
Originally posted by NOVAwhiteTypeS
HOLY SHIT did that say 13.6 1/4 and sub 5's for 0~60??
Clearly says 5.2 for 0-60. Sub 6 yes, but not sub 5.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
vpasla1
Car Parts for Sale
6
Sep 17, 2016 07:24 PM
iRaw
ILX Photograph Gallery
30
Aug 5, 2016 04:41 PM
xsilverhawkx
2G TL Problems & Fixes
4
Oct 5, 2015 11:00 AM
Tribalheads
4G TL Tires, Wheels & Suspension
1
Sep 29, 2015 03:24 PM
thegipper
3G TL (2004-2008)
5
Sep 28, 2015 01:01 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:10 AM.