2002 6 speed Maxima dyno (sheet inside)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 6, 2004 | 04:27 PM
  #81  
blubyu2k2's Avatar
maxima troll :)
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 184
Likes: 0
From: NC
Originally posted by Maximized
Better do a little more research on how much a C5 weighs Hint, you are about 300 lbs off
so your telling me a C5 traps 106 when an LS1 camaro also traps 106 weighing 200lbs more. Again I think a C5 traps a little higher than 106.
Reply
Old May 6, 2004 | 04:33 PM
  #82  
Maximized's Avatar
Suzuka Master
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 5,579
Likes: 0
From: Chicago Suburbs
Originally posted by blubyu2k2
so your telling me a C5 traps 106 when an LS1 camaro also traps 106 weighing 200lbs more. Again I think a C5 traps a little higher than 106.
Camaros put down more hp to the wheels because believe it or not, the live axle is more effecient than the C5s IRS suspension. The typical C5 traps 106-108.
Reply
Old May 6, 2004 | 04:33 PM
  #83  
blubyu2k2's Avatar
maxima troll :)
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 184
Likes: 0
From: NC
Originally posted by scalbert
We can't really compare his traps with others for a good indication unless he was running stock weight and tires. I suspect he would be in line with other cars and be in the 100 MPH range with that power, maybe a little higher. Nor can we hypothesize on what an extra 400 revs would do as the same has to be applied on the other side. I have a few ideas on how to increase top end air flow on the J32A2 and if we could get 500 more revs it could continue making power to 7500 revs.

If the cars weighed the same and were making the power shown here I suspect that it would be very close and both cars would trap within 1 MPH. The difference would probably be made in the launch at it does have an impact on terminal speed.

IMO, his high trap is not just from weight reduction but also from the overall gearing changes. I would like to see how much of an impact his slicks played in this. Do you know the diameter for the stock wheels/tires and for the slicks?? Also, what was run on the dyno??
He has trapped 106 numerous times on the stock 17's so the gearing changes isn't making a huge difference in the trap speeds. The area under the curve is whats making the trap speeds which is very strong when comparing it to the CLS. The facts are there and a chart would make it a lot easier to understand. 20+ whp differences in the mid range with make the car faster at the track by quite a good margain. Im talking about from 4500-6000 (usable power in any gear at the track) not just low rpms. I trap 100mph in my automatic on stock wheels and tires with full interior and he walks me like Im sitting still. He will trap at least 104 with full interior and stock wheels and tires. He ran with approx 200lbs of weight reduction which normally 100lbs = .1 and 1 mph. So 200lbs added when trapping 106 on "street tires" would put him right at 104.
Reply
Old May 6, 2004 | 04:42 PM
  #84  
blubyu2k2's Avatar
maxima troll :)
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 184
Likes: 0
From: NC
Originally posted by Maximized
Camaros put down more hp to the wheels because believe it or not, the live axle is more effecient than the C5s IRS suspension. The typical C5 traps 106-108.
Its a never ending issue. Next time Im at the track I will make a video of Matt running a stock or near stock LS1 and be sure to have video. If I was to do that then everyone would start "well the LS1 driver must suck". Its a never ending battle, he has timeslips, videos, dynos and people still try and say its not legit or doesn't add up. Ohh well cant please everyone:o
Reply
Old May 6, 2004 | 05:19 PM
  #85  
Fast Gold's Avatar
Instructor
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 246
Likes: 0
From: Mclean VA
To clear few things about what STOCK LS1's trap at.
Auto F-bodies trap between 103-105mph.
M6 F-bodies trap between 105-109mph.
Auto C5's trap between 104-107mph.
M6 C5's trap between 108-111mph.

Bolt on M6 F-body traps 111-113mph. Mine did 112mph.
Reply
Old May 6, 2004 | 05:55 PM
  #86  
Maximized's Avatar
Suzuka Master
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 5,579
Likes: 0
From: Chicago Suburbs
Originally posted by Fast Gold
To clear few things about what STOCK LS1's trap at.
Auto F-bodies trap between 103-105mph.
M6 F-bodies trap between 105-109mph.
Auto C5's trap between 104-107mph.
M6 C5's trap between 108-111mph.

Bolt on M6 F-body traps 111-113mph. Mine did 112mph.
I have never seen those high of traps at my track.
Reply
Old May 6, 2004 | 05:59 PM
  #87  
Fast Gold's Avatar
Instructor
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 246
Likes: 0
From: Mclean VA
Originally posted by Maximized
I have never seen those high of traps at my track.
Well, u have to look harder
Reply
Old May 6, 2004 | 06:00 PM
  #88  
Maximized's Avatar
Suzuka Master
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 5,579
Likes: 0
From: Chicago Suburbs
Originally posted by blubyu2k2
Its a never ending issue. Next time Im at the track I will make a video of Matt running a stock or near stock LS1 and be sure to have video. If I was to do that then everyone would start "well the LS1 driver must suck". Its a never ending battle, he has timeslips, videos, dynos and people still try and say its not legit or doesn't add up. Ohh well cant please everyone:o
The numbers just dont add up, like I stated before. A 106 trap is unheard of even for N/A 350Z's which are modded(aftermarket intake manifold included).
Reply
Old May 6, 2004 | 06:05 PM
  #89  
blubyu2k2's Avatar
maxima troll :)
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 184
Likes: 0
From: NC
Originally posted by Fast Gold
To clear few things about what STOCK LS1's trap at.
Auto F-bodies trap between 103-105mph.
M6 F-bodies trap between 105-109mph.
Auto C5's trap between 104-107mph.
M6 C5's trap between 108-111mph.

Bolt on M6 F-body traps 111-113mph. Mine did 112mph.
thanks for the clarification
Reply
Old May 6, 2004 | 09:35 PM
  #90  
typeR's Avatar
Senior Moderator
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 7,588
Likes: 48
From: Port Richey, FL
Originally posted by blubyu2k2
I thought he ran on DR's? But I agree it is a good matchup and a good sleeper
toyo T1-s 235/45/17 and rescently i went 2.020 on nitto 555 not draggers regular....i went 8.81 eventhough i hit the rev limiter 3 times at the end...might have been an 8.71 only guessing but thats about 13.4
Reply
Old May 6, 2004 | 10:05 PM
  #91  
scalbert's Avatar
Suzuka Master
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 9,431
Likes: 0
From: Woodstock, GA
Originally posted by blubyu2k2
He has trapped 106 numerous times on the stock 17's so the gearing changes isn't making a huge difference in the trap speeds. The area under the curve is whats making the trap speeds which is very strong when comparing it to the CLS. The facts are there and a chart would make it a lot easier to understand. 20+ whp differences in the mid range with make the car faster at the track by quite a good margain. Im talking about from 4500-6000 (usable power in any gear at the track) not just low rpms. I trap 100mph in my automatic on stock wheels and tires with full interior and he walks me like Im sitting still. He will trap at least 104 with full interior and stock wheels and tires. He ran with approx 200lbs of weight reduction which normally 100lbs = .1 and 1 mph. So 200lbs added when trapping 106 on "street tires" would put him right at 104.
The area has been shown to be less than thought of. A plot only gives a graphical representation of the actual numbers. The numbers show something different than what is being conveyed; the J32A2 makes more total power in the range presented.

Just to be clear, a stock wheel/tire Maxima running stock weight would trap at 104 MPH when making 247 WHP. I know the area has been presented but it is not significant enough from the information I have seen.

Once again, I am not denouncing the claim. I am just trying to find the reason for the variance as this is not the norm. Could the dyno have been off?? It still stands that the car should be making 300+ WHP to make these speeds.

Lastly, you guys need to come down to Commerce, GA. to run. I need some good FWD V6 competition to make the shake down runs with my CL.
Reply
Old May 6, 2004 | 11:21 PM
  #92  
darrinb's Avatar
///M POWER
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 15,299
Likes: 1
From: West Bloomfield, MI
i'm really not into gutting the interior and all that, even though it would guarantee me 13's, no one here takes out more than the spare/jack
Reply
Old May 7, 2004 | 05:47 AM
  #93  
mrsteve's Avatar
Team Owner
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 36,474
Likes: 249
From: Leesburg, Virginia
Originally posted by darrinb
i'm really not into gutting the interior and all that, even though it would guarantee me 13's, no one here takes out more than the spare/jack
Reply
Old May 7, 2004 | 07:09 AM
  #94  
blubyu2k2's Avatar
maxima troll :)
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 184
Likes: 0
From: NC
Originally posted by scalbert
The area has been shown to be less than thought of. A plot only gives a graphical representation of the actual numbers. The numbers show something different than what is being conveyed; the J32A2 makes more total power in the range presented.

Just to be clear, a stock wheel/tire Maxima running stock weight would trap at 104 MPH when making 247 WHP. I know the area has been presented but it is not significant enough from the information I have seen.

Once again, I am not denouncing the claim. I am just trying to find the reason for the variance as this is not the norm. Could the dyno have been off?? It still stands that the car should be making 300+ WHP to make these speeds.

Lastly, you guys need to come down to Commerce, GA. to run. I need some good FWD V6 competition to make the shake down runs with my CL.
I don't think it would take 300+whp to make a 3300lb car with driver run 106 trap speed afterall a LS1 camaro weighs in at a heftly 3600+ with driver and they make right at 300whp stock and trap 106+ as stated above.
There are plenty of SC'ed and turbo Maximas from that area that run from time to time. You should come to Rockingham and run us and keith in his CL.
Reply
Old May 7, 2004 | 08:36 AM
  #95  
scalbert's Avatar
Suzuka Master
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 9,431
Likes: 0
From: Woodstock, GA
Originally posted by blubyu2k2
You should come to Rockingham and run us and keith in his CL.
A bit far for me. But if I am in the area I certainly will. Once tuned I expect to see 112 MPH traps especially at Rockingham compared to Commerce. But this will take about 380 WHP on a full interior, street tires CL-S6.
Reply
Old May 7, 2004 | 09:33 AM
  #96  
F23A4's Avatar
Senior Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 18,017
Likes: 1,737
Originally posted by mrsteve
+1!! I like racing and all but, I'm not willing to gutt my Maxima for a couple of tenths. Now if I had a boosted Civic or 1G GST/X, it'd be fair game for a gutted interior.

Peace.
Reply
Old Jun 6, 2004 | 02:39 PM
  #97  
SR20DEN's Avatar
10th Gear
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
From: Charlotte NC
Reply
Old Jun 6, 2004 | 02:54 PM
  #98  
scalbert's Avatar
Suzuka Master
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 9,431
Likes: 0
From: Woodstock, GA
Originally Posted by SR20DEN
This is a bit of an old post. Thanks for resurrecting the dead.

But it did bring back memories as I was on vacation during this thread.
Reply
Old Jun 6, 2004 | 03:53 PM
  #99  
mattg's Avatar
Senior Moderator
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 22,909
Likes: 388
From: OR
Originally Posted by SR20DEN
Reply
Old Jun 6, 2004 | 04:32 PM
  #100  
SR20DEN's Avatar
10th Gear
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
From: Charlotte NC
Originally Posted by scalbert
This is a bit of an old post. Thanks for resurrecting the dead.

But it did bring back memories as I was on vacation during this thread.
So whena re we going to meet at a track one weekend for some friendly racing? I'll agree to your terms of full interior.
Reply
Old Jun 6, 2004 | 04:33 PM
  #101  
mattg's Avatar
Senior Moderator
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 22,909
Likes: 388
From: OR
better get those runs on film. that would be awesome
Reply
Old Jun 6, 2004 | 06:28 PM
  #102  
mattg's Avatar
Senior Moderator
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 22,909
Likes: 388
From: OR
Originally Posted by scalbert
I have a few ideas on how to increase top end air flow on the J32A2 and if we could get 500 more revs it could continue making power to 7500 revs.
what did you mean by this? something to do w/ the res?

this is interesting since i now have the capability to raise the limiter.
Reply
Old Jun 6, 2004 | 07:06 PM
  #103  
scalbert's Avatar
Suzuka Master
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 9,431
Likes: 0
From: Woodstock, GA
Originally Posted by SR20DEN
So whena re we going to meet at a track one weekend for some friendly racing? I'll agree to your terms of full interior.
Ya'll got to make it down to Commerce, GA though. It is a bit hard for me to get too far away with the twins at home.

Heck, you guys can make it down from Charlotte in just a few hours, maybe even 2.5 hours. It takes me nearly 1.5 hours to get to Atlanta Dragway from my house on the northwest side of Atlanta.

Reply
Old Jun 6, 2004 | 07:08 PM
  #104  
scalbert's Avatar
Suzuka Master
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 9,431
Likes: 0
From: Woodstock, GA
Originally Posted by mattg
what did you mean by this? something to do w/ the res?

this is interesting since i now have the capability to raise the limiter.


We'll see soon enough but it will be a combination of things.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Yumcha
Automotive News
9
Feb 25, 2020 09:57 AM
JarrettLauderdale
2G CL Dynograph Gallery
5
Sep 21, 2015 07:51 PM
Yumcha
Automotive News
2
Sep 17, 2015 10:16 AM
PortlandRL
Car Talk
2
Sep 14, 2015 12:01 PM
VladkaR
2G TL Tires, Wheels & Suspension
2
Sep 2, 2015 11:36 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:05 PM.