2002 6 speed Maxima dyno (sheet inside)
Originally posted by Maximized
Better do a little more research on how much a C5 weighs
Hint, you are about 300 lbs off
Better do a little more research on how much a C5 weighs
Hint, you are about 300 lbs off
Originally posted by blubyu2k2
so your telling me a C5 traps 106 when an LS1 camaro also traps 106 weighing 200lbs more. Again I think a C5 traps a little higher than 106.
so your telling me a C5 traps 106 when an LS1 camaro also traps 106 weighing 200lbs more. Again I think a C5 traps a little higher than 106.
Originally posted by scalbert
We can't really compare his traps with others for a good indication unless he was running stock weight and tires. I suspect he would be in line with other cars and be in the 100 MPH range with that power, maybe a little higher. Nor can we hypothesize on what an extra 400 revs would do as the same has to be applied on the other side. I have a few ideas on how to increase top end air flow on the J32A2 and if we could get 500 more revs it could continue making power to 7500 revs.
If the cars weighed the same and were making the power shown here I suspect that it would be very close and both cars would trap within 1 MPH. The difference would probably be made in the launch at it does have an impact on terminal speed.
IMO, his high trap is not just from weight reduction but also from the overall gearing changes. I would like to see how much of an impact his slicks played in this. Do you know the diameter for the stock wheels/tires and for the slicks?? Also, what was run on the dyno??
We can't really compare his traps with others for a good indication unless he was running stock weight and tires. I suspect he would be in line with other cars and be in the 100 MPH range with that power, maybe a little higher. Nor can we hypothesize on what an extra 400 revs would do as the same has to be applied on the other side. I have a few ideas on how to increase top end air flow on the J32A2 and if we could get 500 more revs it could continue making power to 7500 revs.
If the cars weighed the same and were making the power shown here I suspect that it would be very close and both cars would trap within 1 MPH. The difference would probably be made in the launch at it does have an impact on terminal speed.
IMO, his high trap is not just from weight reduction but also from the overall gearing changes. I would like to see how much of an impact his slicks played in this. Do you know the diameter for the stock wheels/tires and for the slicks?? Also, what was run on the dyno??
Originally posted by Maximized
Camaros put down more hp to the wheels because believe it or not, the live axle is more effecient than the C5s IRS suspension. The typical C5 traps 106-108.
Camaros put down more hp to the wheels because believe it or not, the live axle is more effecient than the C5s IRS suspension. The typical C5 traps 106-108.
To clear few things about what STOCK LS1's trap at.
Auto F-bodies trap between 103-105mph.
M6 F-bodies trap between 105-109mph.
Auto C5's trap between 104-107mph.
M6 C5's trap between 108-111mph.
Bolt on M6 F-body traps 111-113mph. Mine did 112mph.
Auto F-bodies trap between 103-105mph.
M6 F-bodies trap between 105-109mph.
Auto C5's trap between 104-107mph.
M6 C5's trap between 108-111mph.
Bolt on M6 F-body traps 111-113mph. Mine did 112mph.
Originally posted by Fast Gold
To clear few things about what STOCK LS1's trap at.
Auto F-bodies trap between 103-105mph.
M6 F-bodies trap between 105-109mph.
Auto C5's trap between 104-107mph.
M6 C5's trap between 108-111mph.
Bolt on M6 F-body traps 111-113mph. Mine did 112mph.
To clear few things about what STOCK LS1's trap at.
Auto F-bodies trap between 103-105mph.
M6 F-bodies trap between 105-109mph.
Auto C5's trap between 104-107mph.
M6 C5's trap between 108-111mph.
Bolt on M6 F-body traps 111-113mph. Mine did 112mph.
Originally posted by blubyu2k2
Its a never ending issue. Next time Im at the track I will make a video of Matt running a stock or near stock LS1 and be sure to have video. If I was to do that then everyone would start "well the LS1 driver must suck". Its a never ending battle, he has timeslips, videos, dynos and people still try and say its not legit or doesn't add up. Ohh well cant please everyone:o
Its a never ending issue. Next time Im at the track I will make a video of Matt running a stock or near stock LS1 and be sure to have video. If I was to do that then everyone would start "well the LS1 driver must suck". Its a never ending battle, he has timeslips, videos, dynos and people still try and say its not legit or doesn't add up. Ohh well cant please everyone:o
Originally posted by Fast Gold
To clear few things about what STOCK LS1's trap at.
Auto F-bodies trap between 103-105mph.
M6 F-bodies trap between 105-109mph.
Auto C5's trap between 104-107mph.
M6 C5's trap between 108-111mph.
Bolt on M6 F-body traps 111-113mph. Mine did 112mph.
To clear few things about what STOCK LS1's trap at.
Auto F-bodies trap between 103-105mph.
M6 F-bodies trap between 105-109mph.
Auto C5's trap between 104-107mph.
M6 C5's trap between 108-111mph.
Bolt on M6 F-body traps 111-113mph. Mine did 112mph.
Originally posted by blubyu2k2
I thought he ran on DR's? But I agree it is a good matchup and a good sleeper
I thought he ran on DR's? But I agree it is a good matchup and a good sleeper
Originally posted by blubyu2k2
He has trapped 106 numerous times on the stock 17's so the gearing changes isn't making a huge difference in the trap speeds. The area under the curve is whats making the trap speeds which is very strong when comparing it to the CLS. The facts are there and a chart would make it a lot easier to understand. 20+ whp differences in the mid range with make the car faster at the track by quite a good margain. Im talking about from 4500-6000 (usable power in any gear at the track) not just low rpms. I trap 100mph in my automatic on stock wheels and tires with full interior and he walks me like Im sitting still. He will trap at least 104 with full interior and stock wheels and tires. He ran with approx 200lbs of weight reduction which normally 100lbs = .1 and 1 mph. So 200lbs added when trapping 106 on "street tires" would put him right at 104.
He has trapped 106 numerous times on the stock 17's so the gearing changes isn't making a huge difference in the trap speeds. The area under the curve is whats making the trap speeds which is very strong when comparing it to the CLS. The facts are there and a chart would make it a lot easier to understand. 20+ whp differences in the mid range with make the car faster at the track by quite a good margain. Im talking about from 4500-6000 (usable power in any gear at the track) not just low rpms. I trap 100mph in my automatic on stock wheels and tires with full interior and he walks me like Im sitting still. He will trap at least 104 with full interior and stock wheels and tires. He ran with approx 200lbs of weight reduction which normally 100lbs = .1 and 1 mph. So 200lbs added when trapping 106 on "street tires" would put him right at 104.
Just to be clear, a stock wheel/tire Maxima running stock weight would trap at 104 MPH when making 247 WHP. I know the area has been presented but it is not significant enough from the information I have seen.
Once again, I am not denouncing the claim. I am just trying to find the reason for the variance as this is not the norm. Could the dyno have been off?? It still stands that the car should be making 300+ WHP to make these speeds.
Lastly, you guys need to come down to Commerce, GA. to run. I need some good FWD V6 competition to make the shake down runs with my CL.
Originally posted by darrinb
i'm really not into gutting the interior and all that, even though it would guarantee me 13's, no one here takes out more than the spare/jack
i'm really not into gutting the interior and all that, even though it would guarantee me 13's, no one here takes out more than the spare/jack
Originally posted by scalbert
The area has been shown to be less than thought of. A plot only gives a graphical representation of the actual numbers. The numbers show something different than what is being conveyed; the J32A2 makes more total power in the range presented.
Just to be clear, a stock wheel/tire Maxima running stock weight would trap at 104 MPH when making 247 WHP. I know the area has been presented but it is not significant enough from the information I have seen.
Once again, I am not denouncing the claim. I am just trying to find the reason for the variance as this is not the norm. Could the dyno have been off?? It still stands that the car should be making 300+ WHP to make these speeds.
Lastly, you guys need to come down to Commerce, GA. to run. I need some good FWD V6 competition to make the shake down runs with my CL.
The area has been shown to be less than thought of. A plot only gives a graphical representation of the actual numbers. The numbers show something different than what is being conveyed; the J32A2 makes more total power in the range presented.
Just to be clear, a stock wheel/tire Maxima running stock weight would trap at 104 MPH when making 247 WHP. I know the area has been presented but it is not significant enough from the information I have seen.
Once again, I am not denouncing the claim. I am just trying to find the reason for the variance as this is not the norm. Could the dyno have been off?? It still stands that the car should be making 300+ WHP to make these speeds.
Lastly, you guys need to come down to Commerce, GA. to run. I need some good FWD V6 competition to make the shake down runs with my CL.
There are plenty of SC'ed and turbo Maximas from that area that run from time to time. You should come to Rockingham and run us and keith in his CL.
Originally posted by blubyu2k2
You should come to Rockingham and run us and keith in his CL.
You should come to Rockingham and run us and keith in his CL.
Originally posted by mrsteve
Peace.
Originally Posted by scalbert
This is a bit of an old post. Thanks for resurrecting the dead. 
But it did bring back memories as I was on vacation during this thread.

But it did bring back memories as I was on vacation during this thread.

Originally Posted by scalbert
I have a few ideas on how to increase top end air flow on the J32A2 and if we could get 500 more revs it could continue making power to 7500 revs.
this is interesting since i now have the capability to raise the limiter.
Originally Posted by SR20DEN
So whena re we going to meet at a track one weekend for some friendly racing? I'll agree to your terms of full interior. 

Heck, you guys can make it down from Charlotte in just a few hours, maybe even 2.5 hours. It takes me nearly 1.5 hours to get to Atlanta Dragway from my house on the northwest side of Atlanta.
Originally Posted by mattg
what did you mean by this? something to do w/ the res?
this is interesting since i now have the capability to raise the limiter.
this is interesting since i now have the capability to raise the limiter.
We'll see soon enough but it will be a combination of things.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
JarrettLauderdale
2G CL Dynograph Gallery
5
Sep 21, 2015 07:51 PM







