Turbo Kit: Who's interested?
#43
East Coast Boost.!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: NYC & LI
Posts: 4,365
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
thanks juniorbean
![Titand19 is offline](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/maestro/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
#45
Not Fast Enough
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: MO
Age: 45
Posts: 270
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
how reliable do you think it would be, could i use it as daily driver, how long do you think the engine would last. --little bit interested for the right price---
kevin
03
6-spd
icebox
kevin
03
6-spd
icebox
![SLY1TYPES is offline](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/maestro/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
#46
East Coast Boost.!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: NYC & LI
Posts: 4,365
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It's very reliable. That's the reason why we did not rush into this. I have been running the turbo for a while now. The turbo won't kick in unless you give it gas. For me, during regular driving, I can't even tell I have the turbo.
![Titand19 is offline](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/maestro/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
#47
Safety Car
Originally posted by SLY1TYPES
how reliable do you think it would be, could i use it as daily driver, how long do you think the engine would last. --little bit interested for the right price---
kevin
03
6-spd
icebox
how reliable do you think it would be, could i use it as daily driver, how long do you think the engine would last. --little bit interested for the right price---
kevin
03
6-spd
icebox
![allmotor_2000 is offline](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/maestro/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
#48
Originally posted by allmotor_2000
At 5psi, you are boosting just as much as the Comptech S/C... but with the intercooler its a colder intake-charge which reduces the chance for detonation. It's the same fuel-pump and FPR as the Comptech S/C... so in my opinion, its more reliable than the Comptech S/C... for significantly more power.
At 5psi, you are boosting just as much as the Comptech S/C... but with the intercooler its a colder intake-charge which reduces the chance for detonation. It's the same fuel-pump and FPR as the Comptech S/C... so in my opinion, its more reliable than the Comptech S/C... for significantly more power.
Also, the CT's proto CLS 6sp has been dyno'd at around 325 whp. How much do you think a Turbo Charged (using your kit with 5lbs of boost) CLS 6sp with all the other CT mods would dyno at?
![NSX-Tuner is offline](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/maestro/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
#49
East Coast Boost.!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: NYC & LI
Posts: 4,365
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Allmotor dynoed 350whp and 312lb when he had the kit on his car. After we make the kits, I will get my car dyno tuned with a VAFC and a few other additional mods. I also additionally have the crank pulley which allmotor did not have when he he had the turbo on his car. It gave me 10hp NA, who knows what it will do FI. I'm looking to get at least 15hp out of the VAFC. Hope to put down approx 400whp. Seems like a reach, but reasonably feasible.
![Titand19 is offline](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/maestro/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
#50
Suzuka Master
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Woodstock, GA
Age: 53
Posts: 9,431
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by Titand19
Allmotor dynoed 350whp and 312lb when he had the kit on his car.
Allmotor dynoed 350whp and 312lb when he had the kit on his car.
Allmotor dyno'd 319 at about 5 PSI boost. The 350 WHP number came by way of unbolting the exhaust and running more boost. This goes to show the potential of running a turbo but not indicative of the so far mentioned kit.
![scalbert is offline](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/maestro/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
#51
The anti-misshift
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Canton, Michigan
Age: 46
Posts: 664
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Is it with all CT bolt-on stuff to achieve 350whp?
![CCType-S is offline](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/maestro/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
#52
Suzuka Master
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Woodstock, GA
Age: 53
Posts: 9,431
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by cls6sp03
Also, the CT's proto CLS 6sp has been dyno'd at around 325 whp.
Also, the CT's proto CLS 6sp has been dyno'd at around 325 whp.
![scalbert is offline](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/maestro/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
#53
Suzuka Master
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Woodstock, GA
Age: 53
Posts: 9,431
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by Titand19
After we make the kits, I will get my car dyno tuned with a VAFC and a few other additional mods.
After we make the kits, I will get my car dyno tuned with a VAFC and a few other additional mods.
But stating that you will dyno after kits are made seems to be putting the cart before the horse. Additionally, what sense does it make to dyno a car with extra mods that will not be included in the kit? Most buyers want to know what to expect out of the kit. Not with other items added, the exhaust unbolted and running more boost than they will.
Also, have legal issues been consulted?? With a turbo it is far too easy to turn up the boost. If someone does and blows their engine what legal aspects are planned for?? We witness deceivers on this board everyday; people running nitrous and wanting warranty service. So the possibility is real and one all tuners need to deal with.
![scalbert is offline](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/maestro/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
#54
East Coast Boost.!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: NYC & LI
Posts: 4,365
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Scalbert, I will be dyno tunning my car after the kits are made. I highly reccommend that anyone with FI get some form of A/F device. The original kit will be coming off my car within the next few days.
In terms of legal issues, the car runs perfect at 5psi. Anyone who turns up the boost should be aware of the consequences.
In terms of legal issues, the car runs perfect at 5psi. Anyone who turns up the boost should be aware of the consequences.
![Titand19 is offline](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/maestro/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
#55
Instructor
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Chicago/Washington DC
Posts: 165
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
just to get this straight when allmotor dyno'd at 319HP is was with just the turbo kit at 5psi and no other mods? i'm just trying to get an idea of exactly what gains will be expected
![schoeny14 is offline](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/maestro/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
#56
Safety Car
Okay... all you guys are wrong!!!
I dyno'd 327whp with STOCK EXHAUST... and 345whp with the exhaust unbolted. If you had an aftermarket exhaust (which the Comptech prototype car has)... I estimate around 335-340whp @ 5.5psi. I did NOT increase the boost at all during the dyno session. I only increased the boost by 1psi when I took it to the track on race-gas.
http://photos.yahoo.com/bc/gunjan_ra...c=ph%26.view=t
The YELLOW # is 5.5psi STOCK EXHAUST
The GREEN # is 5.5psi EXHAUST UNBOLTED
A 'fair' # with an aftermarket exhaust would be around 335whp.
The Comptech 'prototype' has the lightened flywheel AND the 7psi pulley among other mods. I am sure if I bolted the turbo back onto my car now, it would be ~400whp @ 5.5psi - no exaggeration.
However, on a stock CL-S 6spd with stock manifolds, stock exhaust etc., I'll expect 295-305whp, honestly. The true potential is realized with an exhaust system.
I dyno'd 327whp with STOCK EXHAUST... and 345whp with the exhaust unbolted. If you had an aftermarket exhaust (which the Comptech prototype car has)... I estimate around 335-340whp @ 5.5psi. I did NOT increase the boost at all during the dyno session. I only increased the boost by 1psi when I took it to the track on race-gas.
http://photos.yahoo.com/bc/gunjan_ra...c=ph%26.view=t
The YELLOW # is 5.5psi STOCK EXHAUST
The GREEN # is 5.5psi EXHAUST UNBOLTED
A 'fair' # with an aftermarket exhaust would be around 335whp.
The Comptech 'prototype' has the lightened flywheel AND the 7psi pulley among other mods. I am sure if I bolted the turbo back onto my car now, it would be ~400whp @ 5.5psi - no exaggeration.
However, on a stock CL-S 6spd with stock manifolds, stock exhaust etc., I'll expect 295-305whp, honestly. The true potential is realized with an exhaust system.
![allmotor_2000 is offline](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/maestro/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
#57
You're right on the money allmotor; true potential is gained from the exhaust and downpipe system. I'm sure with a custom exhaust, a lot of power can be obtained at the same boost level. But damn; that's crazy you get that much power from just that much boost. Congrats man and good luck on sales.
![importtuner is offline](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/maestro/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
#58
Originally posted by allmotor_2000
At 5psi, you are boosting just as much as the Comptech S/C... but with the intercooler its a colder intake-charge which reduces the chance for detonation. It's the same fuel-pump and FPR as the Comptech S/C... so in my opinion, its more reliable than the Comptech S/C... for significantly more power.
At 5psi, you are boosting just as much as the Comptech S/C... but with the intercooler its a colder intake-charge which reduces the chance for detonation. It's the same fuel-pump and FPR as the Comptech S/C... so in my opinion, its more reliable than the Comptech S/C... for significantly more power.
Don't get me wrong. I'm interested in the turbo kit you guys are looking to sale. But CompTech has put a lot of time into development to make the SC and engine reliable enough to last a reasonable number of miles. Can you claim the same? Your turbo kit is very new and has only been installed in a couple of cars. So I'm a little worry about your claim of better reliability than the CT SC, especially with some of the power output claims.
For what your plan to sell this kit for, I would expect it to be of the same or better quality than the CT SC kit and hopefully a purely bolt-on solutions with all the necessary parts and no special hacks required, completely documented with assembly drawing, parts list and comprehensive instructions.
![NSX-Tuner is offline](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/maestro/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
#59
Safety Car
I am basing the 'reliability claim' for a GIVEN boost-level... say 5psi. I am using the Comptech FPR and in-tank fuel pump. So... would you agree that @ 5psi (all else being the same), the turbo-kit would achieve the SAME reliability as the Comptech S/C? Mechanical components are a different issue. This is an 'Eaton' vs. 'Garrett' issue.
Now... add the intercooler (cooler intake-charge). This helps curb detonation. Would this increase reliability or decrease reliability?
You are wrong to say 'the more power an engine outputs, the less reliable it will become'. If they boost the same and have the same fuel-pressure/psi, but one makes more power... that doesn't make it unreliable... just more efficient! Honestly, each car is different. I suggest each owner tune his/her car... this is just how it is unless we can provide a reprogrammed ECU!
I am not saying ours is a better solution than Comptech. It's a 'different' solution. The plan is a completely bolt-on kit with documented instructions, parts list and drawings.
The reason we have brought this to the attention of this forum is for interest. I/we are not going to spend time doing all this if there is no interest!!
Now... add the intercooler (cooler intake-charge). This helps curb detonation. Would this increase reliability or decrease reliability?
You are wrong to say 'the more power an engine outputs, the less reliable it will become'. If they boost the same and have the same fuel-pressure/psi, but one makes more power... that doesn't make it unreliable... just more efficient! Honestly, each car is different. I suggest each owner tune his/her car... this is just how it is unless we can provide a reprogrammed ECU!
I am not saying ours is a better solution than Comptech. It's a 'different' solution. The plan is a completely bolt-on kit with documented instructions, parts list and drawings.
The reason we have brought this to the attention of this forum is for interest. I/we are not going to spend time doing all this if there is no interest!!
![allmotor_2000 is offline](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/maestro/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
#60
Instructor
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Chicago/Washington DC
Posts: 165
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
allmotor, do you foresee any possible problems with the clutch/transmission holding up to this much power? as well as the internal engine components? i know its running basically same boost at the comptech SC, but you know your our engine real well so i figured you'd be the one to ask
![schoeny14 is offline](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/maestro/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
#61
Originally posted by allmotor_2000
I am basing the 'reliability claim' for a GIVEN boost-level... say 5psi. I am using the Comptech FPR and in-tank fuel pump. So... would you agree that @ 5psi (all else being the same), the turbo-kit would achieve the SAME reliability as the Comptech S/C? Mechanical components are a different issue. This is an 'Eaton' vs. 'Garrett' issue.
Now... add the intercooler (cooler intake-charge). This helps curb detonation. Would this increase reliability or decrease reliability?
You are wrong to say 'the more power an engine outputs, the less reliable it will become'. If they boost the same and have the same fuel-pressure/psi, but one makes more power... that doesn't make it unreliable... just more efficient! Honestly, each car is different. I suggest each owner tune his/her car... this is just how it is unless we can provide a reprogrammed ECU!
I am not saying ours is a better solution than Comptech. It's a 'different' solution. The plan is a completely bolt-on kit with documented instructions, parts list and drawings.
The reason we have brought this to the attention of this forum is for interest. I/we are not going to spend time doing all this if there is no interest!!
I am basing the 'reliability claim' for a GIVEN boost-level... say 5psi. I am using the Comptech FPR and in-tank fuel pump. So... would you agree that @ 5psi (all else being the same), the turbo-kit would achieve the SAME reliability as the Comptech S/C? Mechanical components are a different issue. This is an 'Eaton' vs. 'Garrett' issue.
Now... add the intercooler (cooler intake-charge). This helps curb detonation. Would this increase reliability or decrease reliability?
You are wrong to say 'the more power an engine outputs, the less reliable it will become'. If they boost the same and have the same fuel-pressure/psi, but one makes more power... that doesn't make it unreliable... just more efficient! Honestly, each car is different. I suggest each owner tune his/her car... this is just how it is unless we can provide a reprogrammed ECU!
I am not saying ours is a better solution than Comptech. It's a 'different' solution. The plan is a completely bolt-on kit with documented instructions, parts list and drawings.
The reason we have brought this to the attention of this forum is for interest. I/we are not going to spend time doing all this if there is no interest!!
Concerning the reliability of TC vs. SC...
I guessing it would be correct to say that a SC at idle saps some of the engine's hp (just a few) through the SC pulleys, impellers, etc... From idle to WOT, the SC will proportionally sap more engine hp to make hp in order to induce increased intake manifold pressure. In other words, WOT @ 6000 RPM might produce a gross increase in hp of say 60whp, but the SC pulleys, impellers, etc... might eat up 10 whp, so the net would be 50 whp. The lost 10 whp would be seen by the engine as additional stress, heat, wear...
Conversly, a Turbo Charger requires much less hp to make hp since only the exhaust pressure on the turbine impellers is used to induce increased intake manifold pressure.
Hence, you claim that the Turbo Charger can be more reliable than a SC with the same amount of boost. However, I don't believe anything comes for free. I would expect that the exhaust valves, seats and guides might see more stress and/or wear with the Turbo Charger.
I understand that your kit will allow each person to set the boost level according to their needs. Will you provide guidelines and warnings for these different available range of boost settings? You may also want to consider setting a safe max boost level to protect yourselves from liability.
Also, CT claims 100k mile warranty for their SC with a suggested maintenance schedule. What can we expect for the Turbo Charger (turbine unit)?
![NSX-Tuner is offline](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/maestro/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
#62
Suzuka Master
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Woodstock, GA
Age: 53
Posts: 9,431
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by allmotor_2000
At 5psi, you are boosting just as much as the Comptech S/C...
At 5psi, you are boosting just as much as the Comptech S/C...
![Wink](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/wink.gif)
![scalbert is offline](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/maestro/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
#63
Suzuka Master
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Woodstock, GA
Age: 53
Posts: 9,431
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by allmotor_2000
Okay... all you guys are wrong!!!
I dyno'd 327whp with STOCK EXHAUST... and 345whp with the exhaust unbolted.
Okay... all you guys are wrong!!!
I dyno'd 327whp with STOCK EXHAUST... and 345whp with the exhaust unbolted.
Such as with my Typhoon and GS-T (with the T-25, T-Too Small) where boost would trail off as the revs climbed. With the exhaust opened up they both ran more boost of course, but mainly they were able to hold the boost they were making longer. This then increased the torque at the higher revs and subsequently increased HP noticeably.
So they made no more peak boost but actually made more boost at the higher revs and more peak power.
![scalbert is offline](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/maestro/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
#64
Suzuka Master
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Woodstock, GA
Age: 53
Posts: 9,431
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
BTW, you should have done your kit earlier and offered this six months ago.
One other thing, are you using the stock exhaust manifolds or are the Comptech headers required?? Lastly, will the shift linkage counter weight need to be cut or is the kit being redesigned??
As mentioned, depending on how a few things pan out and some decisions are made, I may go this route. Hrmm, a 3.5L turbo CL-S6 running 1.3 Bar...
![Wink](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/wink.gif)
One other thing, are you using the stock exhaust manifolds or are the Comptech headers required?? Lastly, will the shift linkage counter weight need to be cut or is the kit being redesigned??
As mentioned, depending on how a few things pan out and some decisions are made, I may go this route. Hrmm, a 3.5L turbo CL-S6 running 1.3 Bar...
![Wink](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/wink.gif)
![Big Grin](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
![scalbert is offline](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/maestro/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
#65
Moderator Alumnus
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Carrollton, Texas
Age: 46
Posts: 17,856
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I said it once, and I'll say it again, if i had a 6 speed, I'd be all up in this.
![mantis23 is offline](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/maestro/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
#66
Safety Car
Originally posted by scalbert
BTW, you should have done your kit earlier and offered this six months ago.
One other thing, are you using the stock exhaust manifolds or are the Comptech headers required?? Lastly, will the shift linkage counter weight need to be cut or is the kit being redesigned??
As mentioned, depending on how a few things pan out and some decisions are made, I may go this route. Hrmm, a 3.5L turbo CL-S6 running 1.3 Bar...
BTW, you should have done your kit earlier and offered this six months ago.
![Wink](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/wink.gif)
One other thing, are you using the stock exhaust manifolds or are the Comptech headers required?? Lastly, will the shift linkage counter weight need to be cut or is the kit being redesigned??
As mentioned, depending on how a few things pan out and some decisions are made, I may go this route. Hrmm, a 3.5L turbo CL-S6 running 1.3 Bar...
![Wink](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/wink.gif)
![Big Grin](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
On the previous question... the stress/strain on the exhaust-valves, ring-landings etc is more dependant on EGT (Exhaust Gas Temp), A/F (Air Fuel Ratio, IAT (Intake Air Temp) and Cylinder Temps than it is on even 2-3psi of boost!!!
You guys need to understand that PSI is not killing the motors (unless you boost some ungodly amount!!).
In terms of reliability... I ran my car HARD for 2 months with the kit... and now its NA and is running stronger than ever
![Smile](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
![allmotor_2000 is offline](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/maestro/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
#67
East Coast Boost.!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: NYC & LI
Posts: 4,365
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I've been running the shit out of my car. Everything is great. I normally do multiple runs up to about 135mph about 3 times a week. Just to make sure everything is running ok![Big Grin](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
Also, I will provide instuctions on both paper and in video format to ease installation.
![Big Grin](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
Also, I will provide instuctions on both paper and in video format to ease installation.
![Titand19 is offline](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/maestro/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
#68
Censored User
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Miami - just one day, I would like to drive without getting cut off!
Age: 55
Posts: 866
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'm interested. I'd just like to see some dyno results.
![JaDia4 is offline](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/maestro/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
#69
Senior Moderator
iTrader: (5)
Originally posted by JaDia4
I'm interested. I'd just like to see some dyno results.
I'm interested. I'd just like to see some dyno results.
Originally posted by allmotor_2000
Okay... all you guys are wrong!!!
I dyno'd 327whp with STOCK EXHAUST... and 345whp with the exhaust unbolted. If you had an aftermarket exhaust (which the Comptech prototype car has)... I estimate around 335-340whp @ 5.5psi. I did NOT increase the boost at all during the dyno session. I only increased the boost by 1psi when I took it to the track on race-gas.
http://photos.yahoo.com/bc/gunjan_ra...c=ph%26.view=t
The YELLOW # is 5.5psi STOCK EXHAUST
The GREEN # is 5.5psi EXHAUST UNBOLTED
A 'fair' # with an aftermarket exhaust would be around 335whp.
The Comptech 'prototype' has the lightened flywheel AND the 7psi pulley among other mods. I am sure if I bolted the turbo back onto my car now, it would be ~400whp @ 5.5psi - no exaggeration.
However, on a stock CL-S 6spd with stock manifolds, stock exhaust etc., I'll expect 295-305whp, honestly. The true potential is realized with an exhaust system.
Okay... all you guys are wrong!!!
I dyno'd 327whp with STOCK EXHAUST... and 345whp with the exhaust unbolted. If you had an aftermarket exhaust (which the Comptech prototype car has)... I estimate around 335-340whp @ 5.5psi. I did NOT increase the boost at all during the dyno session. I only increased the boost by 1psi when I took it to the track on race-gas.
http://photos.yahoo.com/bc/gunjan_ra...c=ph%26.view=t
The YELLOW # is 5.5psi STOCK EXHAUST
The GREEN # is 5.5psi EXHAUST UNBOLTED
A 'fair' # with an aftermarket exhaust would be around 335whp.
The Comptech 'prototype' has the lightened flywheel AND the 7psi pulley among other mods. I am sure if I bolted the turbo back onto my car now, it would be ~400whp @ 5.5psi - no exaggeration.
However, on a stock CL-S 6spd with stock manifolds, stock exhaust etc., I'll expect 295-305whp, honestly. The true potential is realized with an exhaust system.
![juniorbean is offline](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/maestro/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
#70
Originally posted by scalbert
We witness deceivers on this board everyday; people running nitrous and wanting warranty service.
We witness deceivers on this board everyday; people running nitrous and wanting warranty service.
![Chuckle](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/chuckle.gif)
![KeKe](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/keke.gif)
Juker008
![Juker008 is offline](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/maestro/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
#71
Originally posted by scalbert
Hrmm, a 3.5L turbo CL-S6 running 1.3 Bar...
Hrmm, a 3.5L turbo CL-S6 running 1.3 Bar...
![Wink](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/wink.gif)
![Big Grin](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
19 pounds...hmm I would think u would've wanted 1.4 bars :P .
Juker008
![Juker008 is offline](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/maestro/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
#72
Originally posted by mantis23
I said it once, and I'll say it again, if i had a 6 speed, I'd be all up in this.
I said it once, and I'll say it again, if i had a 6 speed, I'd be all up in this.
Juker008
![Juker008 is offline](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/maestro/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
#73
East Coast Boost.!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: NYC & LI
Posts: 4,365
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
OK guys, so, Who's down?
![Titand19 is offline](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/maestro/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
#74
Go Allmotor and titand19!!! The fact you guys are considering this turbo build for our CL's rocks!!! My only problem is I have
the sick slushbox! Keep up the hard work and common people, what are you waiting for?! If I only had a 6spd!!!
Thanks again for your attempt at making our CL's fast as a Vette or whatever!!!
the sick slushbox! Keep up the hard work and common people, what are you waiting for?! If I only had a 6spd!!!
Thanks again for your attempt at making our CL's fast as a Vette or whatever!!!
![Big Grin](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
![blazerbob1 is offline](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/maestro/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
#75
East Coast Boost.!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: NYC & LI
Posts: 4,365
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I think we are waiting for some serious people. So far it seems that the only people interested have autos. Just out of curiousity, who has an auto and would be down?
![Titand19 is offline](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/maestro/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
#77
Senior Moderator
iTrader: (5)
Originally posted by Titand19
I think we are waiting for some serious people. So far it seems that the only people interested have autos. Just out of curiousity, who has an auto and would be down?
I think we are waiting for some serious people. So far it seems that the only people interested have autos. Just out of curiousity, who has an auto and would be down?
![juniorbean is offline](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/maestro/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
#78
East Coast Boost.!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: NYC & LI
Posts: 4,365
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The project will not begin until we get some serious people involved. As of now, there are no members who have confirmed that they would want the kit and would be able to put down a deposit.
![Titand19 is offline](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/maestro/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
#79
ex 6 Speed owner :(
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Huntington Beach, CA
Age: 49
Posts: 960
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I will chime in again to say that I am very interested. I live near and have met "Allmotor" and would love to help out with the fab work (just to be involved and to learn). As for the downpayment, I will be better able to guage when that will be available next week when I find out what my raise will be from a recent promotion. Thanks for creating the opportunity...
![BlueCLS6 is offline](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/maestro/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
#80
East Coast Boost.!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: NYC & LI
Posts: 4,365
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
BlueCLS6, seeing as you are the only one who is interested, I guess we're justing waiting for you to start production.
![Titand19 is offline](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/maestro/statusicon/user_offline.gif)