Pix from Infected Mushroom (srika's club pics thread)
#321
Senior Moderator
Thread Starter
#322
Senior Moderator
Thread Starter
50th Anniv Playmate Colleen Shannon @ Sound-bar
![](https://img75.imageshack.us/img75/8702/img2186fot6.jpg)
#324
Senior Moderator
Thread Starter
Originally Posted by einsatz
Is it me, or is there a sort of grid pattern in the noise?
That's weird.
She's yummy.
That's weird.
She's yummy.
#325
I kAnt Spel guD
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Chicagoland, IL
Posts: 1,319
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
most camera's use a Bayer filter for the colors since sensors can only read black and white, by principle all noise should conform to the Bayer patter of a 2-green, 1-blue, 1-red grid in some form.
#326
Senior Moderator
Thread Starter
picture of a picture...
![](http://img87.imageshack.us/img87/9717/image1td6.jpg)
![](http://img87.imageshack.us/img87/9717/image1td6.jpg)
![](http://img185.imageshack.us/img185/6880/mrc23sm3.jpg)
#327
Senior Moderator
Thread Starter
god I cannot wait to pick up the 24-70 2.8... /thinkingoutloud
#328
Big Block go VROOOM!
Originally Posted by srika
god I cannot wait to pick up the 24-70 2.8... /thinkingoutloud
#329
Senior Moderator
Thread Starter
Originally Posted by Billiam
If I didn't have the 5D, I think I'd probably be leaning toward the IS on the 24-105.
#330
Big Block go VROOOM!
My thought is that the 5D's low noise is probably worth about 1-1.5 stops of exposure by itself. In my mind that partially negates the "necessity" of IS on the 24-105 and makes me lead toward the greater creative DoF control with the f/2.8 glass.
#331
Senior Moderator
Thread Starter
oh ok. I would have to agree with you. From what I've seen, for shots where I look through the viewfinder, where I'm able to stabilize, the IS isn't as big a factor. The IS does help a lot when I'm taking a shot without looking into the VF, such as the one you see in the first post on this page.
I had been wondering about how the 2.8 doesn't have IS, but I guess you don't really need it on such a fast lens, eh.
I had been wondering about how the 2.8 doesn't have IS, but I guess you don't really need it on such a fast lens, eh.
#332
Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Not Las Vegas (SF Bay Area)
Age: 40
Posts: 63,279
Received 2,793 Likes
on
1,988 Posts
noooo... the 24-70 2.8 is a lens i want ![Frown](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/frown.gif)
i love how its nickname is called "the brick"
![Frown](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/frown.gif)
i love how its nickname is called "the brick"
#333
Senior Moderator
Thread Starter
yea its one heavy mother..
#334
Senior Moderator
Thread Starter
Good one from Saturday nite.. Junkie XL. This is JPG - very minimal PP on this..
![](https://img520.imageshack.us/img520/2281/jxl01155af2.jpg)
#335
Senior Moderator
Thread Starter
looks like I oversharpened just a tad above... sometimes after you work on a ton of pics you get kinda numb to it lol.... :<
this one is converted from RAW... no NR applied. can you tell any difference?
this one is converted from RAW... no NR applied. can you tell any difference?
![](http://www.delobbo.com/gallery2/d/39408-2/IMG_040707_004.jpg)
#336
Senior Moderator
Thread Starter
Originally Posted by srika
I'm gonna try this next time. I think another part of the issue is the LCD. It's just not accurate. And, you have to go by faith. I know this because sometimes I've taken a pic that LOOKS overexposed on the LCD.. I look at it at home and it looks fine. Maybe I'm in some kind of "comfort zone" with the underexposing, where pics can look good "enough" - but maybe they can look a lot better! There is SO MUCH to photography. I love it. :P
#338
is learning to moonwalk i
Originally Posted by srika
picture of a picture...
![](http://img87.imageshack.us/img87/9717/image1td6.jpg)
![](http://img87.imageshack.us/img87/9717/image1td6.jpg)
![rofl](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/rofl.gif)
As for the Raw photo, the foreground/subject look good, but the background looks like it could use a bit of NR.
#339
Senior Moderator
Thread Starter
haha didnt even notice that.
btw here are 2 raw files, in case anybody is like, really bored, and feels like taking a stab at em..
btw here are 2 raw files, in case anybody is like, really bored, and feels like taking a stab at em..
![Wish](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/wish.gif)
#340
I kAnt Spel guD
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Chicagoland, IL
Posts: 1,319
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by srika
god I cannot wait to pick up the 24-70 2.8... /thinkingoutloud
If I shoot chromes however the 24-70L is still my favorite combo on an Elan7 - likely the best feeling combo I have ever held. I prefer the feel of the Elan even to that of the Eos 3.
#341
Senior Moderator
Thread Starter
Originally Posted by MrChad
I love my 24-70L but it has seen very little use since my switch to digital my 17-40L lives on my 30D now, much lighter and with ISO 1250-3200 being so clean the f4 isn't an issue for me -- actually I prefer 4 to the DOF of 2.8 it's very shallow some days for me.
If I shoot chromes however the 24-70L is still my favorite combo on an Elan7 - likely the best feeling combo I have ever held. I prefer the feel of the Elan even to that of the Eos 3.
If I shoot chromes however the 24-70L is still my favorite combo on an Elan7 - likely the best feeling combo I have ever held. I prefer the feel of the Elan even to that of the Eos 3.
#342
is learning to moonwalk i
IIRC, Both of those are EF lenses, right? Then at their widest angle, they should give you the same coverage.
Just remembered you're using a 5D which means they have to be EF lenses.
![Doh](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/doh.gif)
#343
I kAnt Spel guD
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Chicagoland, IL
Posts: 1,319
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by srika
Ok this is kinda distressing me. Am I gonna be able to do wide-angle shots like this with the 24-70 2.8??? That's all I need to know. I have trouble with DOF on the 24-105 f/4 when I have a group of people who are standing 2-3+ deep... one thing I have figured out is that the more you zoom in, the shallower DOF gets. I did not know that. So when I need maximum DOF I use the widest possible - which in my case right now is 24mm.
f/4 and IS is likely more useful to you then f/2.8 will ever be for maximum DOF.
If you really want or need an F/2.8 I'd look at the 17-55/2.8 IS if you have a crop body. Else 24mm should be plenty wide on a 5D or FF.
#344
Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Not Las Vegas (SF Bay Area)
Age: 40
Posts: 63,279
Received 2,793 Likes
on
1,988 Posts
i think since you're shooting in low light and w/ fast moving subjects 2.8 would be nice so you can get the extra stop of shutter speed
#345
I miss my 03 CL-S :(
Originally Posted by srika
btw here are 2 raw files, in case anybody is like, really bored, and feels like taking a stab at em..
![](http://mysite.verizon.net/vze1mz4p/IMG_4818.jpg)
I actually like how the patterns in what she's wearing looks on the image.
#346
Senior Moderator
Thread Starter
Originally Posted by MrChad
DOF is more a function of aperture then focal length, but that's not entire accurate to say. Wider glass helps but f/8-16 in 24 vs. 17 will help more.
f/4 and IS is likely more useful to you then f/2.8 will ever be for maximum DOF.
If you really want or need an F/2.8 I'd look at the 17-55/2.8 IS if you have a crop body. Else 24mm should be plenty wide on a 5D or FF.
f/4 and IS is likely more useful to you then f/2.8 will ever be for maximum DOF.
If you really want or need an F/2.8 I'd look at the 17-55/2.8 IS if you have a crop body. Else 24mm should be plenty wide on a 5D or FF.
24mm
![](http://www.delobbo.com/gallery2/d/30950-2/IMG_140.jpg)
40mm
![](http://www.delobbo.com/gallery2/d/30948-2/IMG_139.jpg)
24mm
![](http://www.delobbo.com/gallery2/d/30972-2/IMG_151.jpg)
50mm
![](http://www.delobbo.com/gallery2/d/22081-2/IMG_047.jpg)
#347
Senior Moderator
Thread Starter
Originally Posted by einsatz
OK Seeing as I haven't played around with the Camera RAW stuff in PS since I got it, I decided to give it a shot. I seem to have gotten distracted and cropped off parts I wasn't interested in. Those legs look yummy.
I actually like how the patterns in what she's wearing looks on the image.
I actually like how the patterns in what she's wearing looks on the image.
#348
Senior Moderator
Thread Starter
Originally Posted by srika
I am quite sure I get deeper DOF as focal length decreases. Take a look at this comparison of only a 16mm difference - I took the first shot and then zoomed in a little - I wonder if its more a function of the camera/lens combination or if its a general rule of thumb?
50mm
![](http://www.delobbo.com/gallery2/d/22081-2/IMG_047.jpg)
50mm
![](http://www.delobbo.com/gallery2/d/22081-2/IMG_047.jpg)
#349
Suzuka Master
Originally Posted by srika
I am quite sure I get deeper DOF as focal length decreases. Take a look at this comparison of only a 16mm difference - I took the first shot and then zoomed in a little - I wonder if its more a function of the camera/lens combination or if its a general rule of thumb?
#350
Senior Moderator
Thread Starter
makes sense.
![Doh](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/doh.gif)
#351
I kAnt Spel guD
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Chicagoland, IL
Posts: 1,319
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by danny25
It's a rule of thumb. The longer the focal length the shallower the DOF given the same aperture. I believe the DOF may technically be the same, but since you're zoomed in the effect is exaggerated.
High ISO, IS, and some type of the support (bean bag, tripod, monopod) and f8 are the only way to go for maximum DOF. And the blurry fast moving people should make great shots at 1/1
![Smile](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
#352
Senior Moderator
Thread Starter
^^^ god.. these is way more to DOF than I thought..
:P
![Sad](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/sad.gif)
![](http://www.delobbo.com/gallery2/d/40523-2/grace_041407_053.jpg)
#353
Senior Moderator
Thread Starter
#354
Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Not Las Vegas (SF Bay Area)
Age: 40
Posts: 63,279
Received 2,793 Likes
on
1,988 Posts
![Naughty](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/naughty.gif)
is this with the 24-70?
care to introduce me to your friends
![Wish](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/wish.gif)
#355
Senior Moderator
Thread Starter
Glad you asked... nope! Same lens, 24-105 f/4 IS. All of these were at f/5, ISO 500. A combination of factors - the ceiling had white tiles, that really helped. Most places I shoot, the ceiling is BLACK, usually matte black. sux. Or, there is no ceiling, just a bunch of random unpredictable lights. And also, I put a little extra effort into these pics..
![Ninja](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/ninja.gif)
#356
Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Not Las Vegas (SF Bay Area)
Age: 40
Posts: 63,279
Received 2,793 Likes
on
1,988 Posts
Originally Posted by srika
Glad you asked... nope! Same lens, 24-105 f/4 IS. All of these were at f/5, ISO 500. A combination of factors - the ceiling had white tiles, that really helped. Most places I shoot, the ceiling is BLACK, usually matte black. sux. Or, there is no ceiling, just a bunch of random unpredictable lights. And also, I put a little extra effort into these pics.. ![Ninja](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/ninja.gif)
![Ninja](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/ninja.gif)
![Tongue](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/tongue.gif)
#357
Senior Moderator
Thread Starter
Originally Posted by Mizouse
is that to my question about introducing me to your friends or you using the 24-70 ![Tongue](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/tongue.gif)
![Tongue](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/tongue.gif)
#358
Senior Moderator
Thread Starter
Originally Posted by srika
^^^ god.. these is way more to DOF than I thought..
:P
![](http://www.delobbo.com/gallery2/d/40523-2/grace_041407_053.jpg)
![Sad](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/sad.gif)
![](http://www.delobbo.com/gallery2/d/40523-2/grace_041407_053.jpg)
![rofl](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/rofl.gif)
#359
Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Not Las Vegas (SF Bay Area)
Age: 40
Posts: 63,279
Received 2,793 Likes
on
1,988 Posts
Originally Posted by srika
WTF????? i think i was looking at the pic while typing the response.... ![rofl](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/rofl.gif)
![rofl](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/rofl.gif)
#360
Suzuka Master
Originally Posted by srika
WTF????? i think i was looking at the pic while typing the response.... ![rofl](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/rofl.gif)
![rofl](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/rofl.gif)
![pofl](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/pofl.gif)