Cameras & Photography Because there aren't already enough ways to share photos...

Is this macro shot bogus?

Thread Tools
 
Old Jun 22, 2007 | 04:09 PM
  #1  
NumberFive's Avatar
Thread Starter
Involuntary Karatechopper
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 428
Likes: 0
From: IL
Is this macro shot bogus?

I was talking to someone in another forum, and he said he took the following picture with his SD800:
http://www.system-32.com/files/insect.jpg

No EXIF data was saved.

Is it possible to get that kind of detail, that close, on an SD800?
Reply
Old Jun 22, 2007 | 04:22 PM
  #2  
jupitersolo's Avatar
nnInn
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 37,670
Likes: 1,084
This is from steves-digicam.com about the SD800

The camera has a very respectable macro focusing mode with coverage from 2.0 in.- 1.6 ft./5-50cm (WIDE), 1-1.6 ft./30-50cm (TELE).



And take a look at ken rockwell pictures half way down this page...

http://www.kenrockwell.com/canon/sd800.htm#perf

Last edited by jupitersolo; Jun 22, 2007 at 04:25 PM.
Reply
Old Jun 22, 2007 | 04:27 PM
  #3  
Billiam's Avatar
Big Block go VROOOM!
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 8,578
Likes: 1
From: Chicago Burbs
Go to the Flickr camera finder and search on macro within the SD800 IS. Seems pretty doable to me.
Reply
Old Jun 22, 2007 | 04:28 PM
  #4  
Whiskers's Avatar
Go Giants
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 70,003
Likes: 1,260
From: PA
Thats my camera
Reply
Old Jun 22, 2007 | 04:47 PM
  #5  
srika's Avatar
Moderator Alumnus
20 Year Member
Community Influencer
Loved
Top Answer: 1
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 64,159
Likes: 14,307
i believe it..
Reply
Old Jun 22, 2007 | 04:55 PM
  #6  
waTSX's Avatar
Have camera, will travel
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 7,783
Likes: 0
From: Federal Way, WA
I've gotten similar shots with my SD700. I don't see any reason why the SD800 should be any different. I think the macro capabilities of these cameras is actually pretty good, when you can get the focusing right. Lack of manual focusing is the only major drawback compared to SLR's, prosumers etc.
Reply
Old Jun 22, 2007 | 06:37 PM
  #7  
svtmike's Avatar
Team Owner
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 37,706
Likes: 3,904
From: Chicago
I agree that looks entirely within the capabilities of the SD800 (I have an SD600).

Something like this wouldn't be --

Reply
Old Jun 22, 2007 | 07:10 PM
  #8  
moeronn's Avatar
is learning to moonwalk i
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 15,520
Likes: 3
From: SoCal
^^ That was taken with your cell phone camera, right?
Reply
Old Jun 22, 2007 | 07:26 PM
  #9  
wndrlst's Avatar
Earth-bound misfit
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 31,704
Likes: 608
Reply
Old Jun 22, 2007 | 10:33 PM
  #10  
ChodTheWacko's Avatar
Moderator Alumnus
20 Year Member
Liked
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 4,295
Likes: 121
From: Ronkonkoma, NY
Originally Posted by NumberFive
I was talking to someone in another forum, and he said he took the following picture with his SD800:
http://www.system-32.com/files/insect.jpg

No EXIF data was saved.

Is it possible to get that kind of detail, that close, on an SD800?
That's certainly possible, and I don't consider that macro.
It's a close picture, but in terms of an SLR, you don't need a macro lens to take that sort of picture.

A real macro shot is where you are taking a picture of something that is not much larger than your camera's sensor. I.e. a couple of centimeters long.
Reply
Old Jun 22, 2007 | 10:56 PM
  #11  
kyle77777's Avatar
Gonna cost to catch up
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,859
Likes: 1
From: Olympia, WA
Originally Posted by svtmike
I agree that looks entirely within the capabilities of the SD800 (I have an SD600).

Something like this wouldn't be --

wtf is that
Reply
Old Jun 22, 2007 | 10:58 PM
  #12  
hrj's Avatar
hrj
Three Wheelin'
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,266
Likes: 1
From: Pacific Northwest
Mosquito?
Reply
Old Jun 22, 2007 | 11:38 PM
  #13  
mltk53's Avatar
I can't find my garage
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 4,688
Likes: 0
From: SoCal
Originally Posted by kyle77777
wtf is that
thats a transformer homie. =P
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2007 | 01:18 AM
  #14  
svtmike's Avatar
Team Owner
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 37,706
Likes: 3,904
From: Chicago
Originally Posted by hrj
Mosquito?
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2007 | 03:26 PM
  #15  
NumberFive's Avatar
Thread Starter
Involuntary Karatechopper
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 428
Likes: 0
From: IL
Originally Posted by ChodTheWacko
That's certainly possible, and I don't consider that macro.
It's a close picture, but in terms of an SLR, you don't need a macro lens to take that sort of picture.

A real macro shot is where you are taking a picture of something that is not much larger than your camera's sensor. I.e. a couple of centimeters long.
Can any of you tell what kind of insect that is? It looks like one of those really tiny bees, that's 1-2cm long.

I'm usually not skeptical about people's photos, but this guy has been known to pull some fast ones in the past.
Reply
Old Jun 25, 2007 | 11:23 PM
  #16  
ChodTheWacko's Avatar
Moderator Alumnus
20 Year Member
Liked
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 4,295
Likes: 121
From: Ronkonkoma, NY
Originally Posted by NumberFive
Can any of you tell what kind of insect that is? It looks like one of those really tiny bees, that's 1-2cm long.
dunno, but lets say the bee is 1 cm long.
That would make the picture 12 cm wide, which could be done with non macro lenses.
Reply
Old Jun 26, 2007 | 10:52 AM
  #17  
Billiam's Avatar
Big Block go VROOOM!
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 8,578
Likes: 1
From: Chicago Burbs
Originally Posted by ChodTheWacko
A real macro shot is where you are taking a picture of something that is not much larger than your camera's sensor. I.e. a couple of centimeters long.
It really doesn't have to do with the size of the object. It has to do with the maginification factor.

I personally don't feel there's a real hard and fast definition of "macro" but the place at which everyone seems to agree you're in macro-land is 1:1 magnification or greater. 1:1 magnification is when your optics are projecting an image on the sensor that is the same size as the real life object. For example, a dime is about 17.5mm in diameter. I'm at 1:1 if my optics are projecting a 17.5mm image of the dime onto my sensor.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
MrHeeltoe
1G TSX Tires, Wheels, & Suspension
20
Feb 23, 2023 01:54 PM
mvidal6
ILX
12
Nov 14, 2015 07:43 AM
detailersdomain
Wash & Wax
3
Oct 9, 2015 10:13 PM
MrHeeltoe
2G TSX Tires, Wheels & Suspension
3
Sep 29, 2015 10:43 PM
MrHeeltoe
3G TL Tires, Wheels & Suspension
0
Sep 28, 2015 05:43 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:34 AM.