Cameras & Photography Because there aren't already enough ways to share photos...

Canon: News, Rumors and Discussion Thread

Thread Tools
 
Old 08-26-2010, 08:57 AM
  #41  
dom
Senior Moderator
 
dom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Toronto, Canada
Age: 47
Posts: 47,710
Received 801 Likes on 662 Posts
And no AF in movie mode ?!?!
Old 08-26-2010, 08:59 AM
  #42  
Burning Brakes
 
SaaBaaDoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: GA
Age: 48
Posts: 882
Received 478 Likes on 129 Posts
Originally Posted by wndrlst
So glad I bought the hiccup. It's an awesome camera with the perfect blend of functions for my needs.
I'm glad I bought mine as well.

I was thinking of getting rid of the 7D for a while, but the AF system is awesome on it.
Old 08-26-2010, 09:01 AM
  #43  
nnInn
 
jupitersolo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 37,670
Received 1,084 Likes on 646 Posts
Originally Posted by wndrlst
The fisheye is the most tempting to me. I might need to save up for that one. I could wish it were a little faster, but at least it's a constant aperture. Tokina's is still in the running for me to replace my 10-22.


So glad I bought the hiccup. It's an awesome camera with the perfect blend of functions for my needs.


Tokina has a 10-17mm f/e at about $550
Old 08-26-2010, 09:31 AM
  #44  
Senior Moderator
 
synth19's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 16,424
Received 719 Likes on 201 Posts



Old 08-26-2010, 09:34 AM
  #45  
nnInn
 
jupitersolo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 37,670
Received 1,084 Likes on 646 Posts
^^ That's an $11,000 dollar chart
Old 08-26-2010, 09:36 AM
  #46  
Earth-bound misfit
 
wndrlst's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Age: 47
Posts: 31,704
Received 608 Likes on 312 Posts
Originally Posted by jupitersolo


Tokina has a 10-17mm f/e at about $550
The 11-16 f/2.8 is what I want. It doesn't have to truly be a fisheye - I just like the ultra-wide angle. I love what I've seen of it wide open. UWA AND bokeh? Be-still my heart!!
Old 08-26-2010, 09:46 AM
  #47  
Senior Moderator
 
synth19's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 16,424
Received 719 Likes on 201 Posts
Originally Posted by jupitersolo
^^ That's an $11,000 dollar chart
Peanuts!
Old 08-26-2010, 09:49 AM
  #48  
nnInn
 
jupitersolo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 37,670
Received 1,084 Likes on 646 Posts
It didn't say it here, but the 60D has become a SD card body.
Old 08-26-2010, 09:52 AM
  #49  
Moderator
Thread Starter
 
Mizouse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Not Las Vegas (SF Bay Area)
Age: 39
Posts: 63,180
Received 2,774 Likes on 1,977 Posts
Originally Posted by dom
And no AF in movie mode ?!?!
IIRC AFAIK they do have AF in movie mode. like nikon it's contrast detect. It's also slow.
Old 08-26-2010, 09:53 AM
  #50  
Moderator
Thread Starter
 
Mizouse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Not Las Vegas (SF Bay Area)
Age: 39
Posts: 63,180
Received 2,774 Likes on 1,977 Posts
Originally Posted by jupitersolo
It didn't say it here, but the 60D has become a SD card body.
Hmmm.. It shouldve said so in the article i quoted..
Old 08-26-2010, 10:01 AM
  #51  
nnInn
 
jupitersolo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 37,670
Received 1,084 Likes on 646 Posts
Originally Posted by Mizouse
IIRC AFAIK they do have AF in movie mode. like nikon it's contrast detect. It's also slow.
Not any the market yet, so how has someone determine that it is slow?
Old 08-26-2010, 11:58 AM
  #52  
Moderator Alumnus
 
ChodTheWacko's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Ronkonkoma, NY
Age: 51
Posts: 4,295
Received 121 Likes on 86 Posts
Originally Posted by jupitersolo
60D sounds like Canon as they have always done, seems like the 7D was just a hiccup.
I don't understand your logic here, or perhaps not understand what you mean by the 7D being a hiccup. There's a lot of good stuff in the 7D over the 50D.

In the past the 'odd' SLRS have been very incremental, and the Evens have had signifigant improvements. The 60D is a big disappointment in that respect, I guess they wanted to expand it into a 4 tier - rebel - 60d - 7d - 1*
with the 5D somewhere in there.

But now that it's been announced, I do think it's a smart thing to do. I've believed for a while now that the **Ds aren't worth the money for most people. But I suspect the 60D will be, since it should be cheaper than the 50D.

I think a lot of the things that matter to existing XXD owners got downgraded in the 60D, but it did add various things that rebel owners would like. It wouldn't surprise me at all if the articulated screen never makes it to the rebel line.

- Frank
Old 08-26-2010, 12:00 PM
  #53  
nnInn
 
jupitersolo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 37,670
Received 1,084 Likes on 646 Posts
I meant as they did something the customer wanted. The 60D is just a "Super Rebel".
Old 08-26-2010, 12:01 PM
  #54  
Senior Moderator
 
srika's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 58,065
Received 9,994 Likes on 5,143 Posts
Originally Posted by ChodTheWacko
I don't understand your logic here
he's just mad about Nikon.
Old 08-26-2010, 12:02 PM
  #55  
nnInn
 
jupitersolo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 37,670
Received 1,084 Likes on 646 Posts
Originally Posted by srika
he's just mad about Nikon.
yeah right...
Old 08-26-2010, 12:34 PM
  #56  
Moderator
Thread Starter
 
Mizouse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Not Las Vegas (SF Bay Area)
Age: 39
Posts: 63,180
Received 2,774 Likes on 1,977 Posts
Originally Posted by jupitersolo
Not any the market yet, so how has someone determine that it is slow?
Reall? Thought the t2i could..
Old 08-26-2010, 12:44 PM
  #57  
dom
Senior Moderator
 
dom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Toronto, Canada
Age: 47
Posts: 47,710
Received 801 Likes on 662 Posts
My worry about this camera is that the rumored D95/D700 specs are true, it absolutely blows the 60D out of the water.

Then again, that would force the price of the 60D down to well below 1K which turns it into a pretty good value. We'll see.
Old 08-26-2010, 12:47 PM
  #58  
Senior Moderator
 
srika's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 58,065
Received 9,994 Likes on 5,143 Posts
Canon is resting on their laurels on that 60D, they have some breathing room, their breakthrough cam (that they needed bad) was the 7D. Nikon's breakthrough cam that they need is the next D90 - mainly because of the video lead Canon has taken. And, Nikon will have to do even more video-wise, they also need D3 and D700 level cams with 1080p video. my 2 cents!
Old 08-26-2010, 12:56 PM
  #59  
nnInn
 
jupitersolo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 37,670
Received 1,084 Likes on 646 Posts
Originally Posted by Mizouse
Reall? Thought the t2i could..
forget my post...
Old 08-26-2010, 12:57 PM
  #60  
Senior Moderator
 
srika's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 58,065
Received 9,994 Likes on 5,143 Posts
Polycarbonate resin with glass fibre on aluminum chassis
is this a fancy way of saying "plastic"? heh
Old 08-26-2010, 12:59 PM
  #61  
nnInn
 
jupitersolo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 37,670
Received 1,084 Likes on 646 Posts
Originally Posted by srika
Canon is resting on their laurels on that 60D, they have some breathing room, their breakthrough cam (that they needed bad) was the 7D. Nikon's breakthrough cam that they need is the next D90 - mainly because of the video lead Canon has taken. And, Nikon will have to do even more video-wise, they also need D3 and D700 level cams with 1080p video. my 2 cents!
The thing is, Nikon users (of those two bodies) are not worry about video in their dslr's. It's the camera that people wanted to start with it. And the D3s is more than what thought to get out of a dslr body at this time.
Old 08-26-2010, 12:59 PM
  #62  
Needs more Lemon Pledge
 
stogie1020's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Age: 51
Posts: 52,768
Received 2,000 Likes on 1,173 Posts
Integrated Speedlight Transmitter is pretty cool... Would be even better if they went to a built in wireless ETTL trigger.
Old 08-26-2010, 01:04 PM
  #63  
Senior Moderator
 
srika's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 58,065
Received 9,994 Likes on 5,143 Posts
Originally Posted by jupitersolo
The thing is, Nikon users (of those two bodies) are not worry about video in their dslr's. It's the camera that people wanted to start with it. And the D3s is more than what thought to get out of a dslr body at this time.
I don't doubt that to be the case, and I would never say the D3 is lacking in anything. Talking more from a "big picture" perspective, I would bet Nikon doesn't enjoy reading about how Hollywood has embraced the 5D2.
Old 08-26-2010, 01:09 PM
  #64  
nnInn
 
jupitersolo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 37,670
Received 1,084 Likes on 646 Posts
Originally Posted by srika
I don't doubt that to be the case, and I would never say the D3 is lacking in anything. Talking more from a "big picture" perspective, I would bet Nikon doesn't enjoy reading about how Hollywood has embraced the 5D2.
Nikon listens to their Pro users, the one's that have been using them for many years, they put out equipment based on this, not what is written about in papers. That's why they have the best FF high ISO bodies.
Old 08-26-2010, 01:10 PM
  #65  
Senior Moderator
 
srika's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 58,065
Received 9,994 Likes on 5,143 Posts
I don't doubt that to be the case. Now tell me why they would *EVER* put video into a D3? Even a couple of years ago people would have thought this would NEVER happen.
Old 08-26-2010, 01:16 PM
  #66  
nnInn
 
jupitersolo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 37,670
Received 1,084 Likes on 646 Posts
Originally Posted by srika
I don't doubt that to be the case. Now tell me why they would *EVER* put video into a D3? Even a couple of years ago people would have thought this would NEVER happen.
Video is coming (it's here), but it's not the rush that Canon has put into it. It's not like people are not going to buy their bodies because it isn't there. They can't keep the D3s on the shelf, because of it's high ISO and IQ, not because it offers video.
Old 08-26-2010, 01:30 PM
  #67  
Senior Moderator
 
srika's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 58,065
Received 9,994 Likes on 5,143 Posts
Originally Posted by jupitersolo
Video is coming (it's here), but it's not the rush that Canon has put into it. It's not like people are not going to buy their bodies because it isn't there. They can't keep the D3s on the shelf, because of it's high ISO and IQ, not because it offers video.
I know it has 720p video already, my question is, why did they put it in the D3, if the users didn't care for it.
Old 08-26-2010, 01:33 PM
  #68  
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
 
justnspace's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 86,295
Received 16,260 Likes on 11,971 Posts
camera pron!
Old 08-26-2010, 01:37 PM
  #69  
nnInn
 
jupitersolo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 37,670
Received 1,084 Likes on 646 Posts
Originally Posted by srika
I know it has 720p video already, my question is, why did they put it in the D3, if the users didn't care for it.
Not that it isn't cared for, not a priority. They are not freaking out that Hollywood isn't using their bodies. Nikon is a camera company, Canon is a consumer electronics company, two different mindsets.
Old 08-26-2010, 02:48 PM
  #70  
Moderator
Thread Starter
 
Mizouse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Not Las Vegas (SF Bay Area)
Age: 39
Posts: 63,180
Received 2,774 Likes on 1,977 Posts
Old 08-26-2010, 04:32 PM
  #71  
Senior Moderator
 
synth19's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 16,424
Received 719 Likes on 201 Posts
finally some drama in this section! How I've wanted to ban ppl and lock threads in photography! lol !
Old 08-26-2010, 04:39 PM
  #72  
Senior Moderator
 
srika's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 58,065
Received 9,994 Likes on 5,143 Posts
wait, what?
Old 08-26-2010, 04:39 PM
  #73  
Senior Moderator
 
srika's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 58,065
Received 9,994 Likes on 5,143 Posts
Originally Posted by jupitersolo
Not that it isn't cared for, not a priority. They are not freaking out that Hollywood isn't using their bodies. Nikon is a camera company, Canon is a consumer electronics company, two different mindsets.
I could continue, but I won't.
Old 08-26-2010, 04:50 PM
  #74  
nnInn
 
jupitersolo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 37,670
Received 1,084 Likes on 646 Posts
Old 08-26-2010, 05:18 PM
  #75  
all work and no play
 
MWalsh9152's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Wakefield, Ma
Age: 49
Posts: 13,916
Received 134 Likes on 97 Posts
Originally Posted by Mizouse
its not a replacement, they made it a lower model.
so much for my ingenious plan of snatching up a good 50D for a bargain after the 60D came out


Originally Posted by synth19
finally some drama in this section! How I've wanted to ban ppl and lock threads in photography! lol !
Old 08-26-2010, 05:32 PM
  #76  
nnInn
 
jupitersolo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 37,670
Received 1,084 Likes on 646 Posts
Originally Posted by synth19
finally some drama in this section! How I've wanted to ban ppl and lock threads in photography! lol !


Not going to happen here, we know it's about the person behind the viewfinder.
Old 08-26-2010, 06:44 PM
  #77  
Moderator
Thread Starter
 
Mizouse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Not Las Vegas (SF Bay Area)
Age: 39
Posts: 63,180
Received 2,774 Likes on 1,977 Posts
Old 08-26-2010, 06:44 PM
  #78  
Moderator Alumnus
 
ChodTheWacko's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Ronkonkoma, NY
Age: 51
Posts: 4,295
Received 121 Likes on 86 Posts
Originally Posted by einsatz
So let me get this straight... The 60D has the same sensor and LCD as the Rebel, plastic body, no AF improvement, and less FPS than the 50D. DPR says "It's a model that sits half-way between the two, without coming too close to either.", but to me it comes way too close to the Rebel.
I've taken a closer look at it.
It's still definitely closer to the 50D than the Rebel.

Rebelish: Sensor, Body
no high speed shutter sync (??!?)
Video (is this improved? not sure)
halfway: fps (5.3 vs 3.7 (rebel)/6.3 (50d)
Lost a couple of the dual functions on the buttons, but it's still
closer ergonomically to the 50D. (top LCD, two dials, etc etc)
50dish: AF grid.
Still has the joystick, but it's a dialpad within the back wheel.

improvements over 50D
Articulated LCD (it's higher res than either 50d/t2i)
wireless flash built in
1 directional level
Viewfinder (a bit)

So it's halfway between the rebel and the 7d. It's kind of worse than the 50D i guess, but it's a give some, get some.

I think the most annoying for me would be the drop to 5.3 fps,
and losing the dual function drive/AF button.

You know, my D60 back in the day had a plastic body, and I didn't mind it at all. I suppose back then I wasn't constantly walking around with the 200 2.8 hanging off my neck, but I would think that if the mount/front plate are metal, that should be sufficient.

- Frank
Old 08-26-2010, 08:48 PM
  #79  
I miss my 03 CL-S :(
 
einsatz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 7,140
Received 445 Likes on 214 Posts
I dunno - everything you list under "rebelish" is everything that matters. The improvements over the 50D don't really have an impact over the quality of photos it would take over the 50D. IMO, that makes it definitely more of a Super-rebel like someone else said than anything.
Old 08-26-2010, 10:09 PM
  #80  
Cause stock sux.
 
JLai's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: FL
Age: 42
Posts: 3,968
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'll be sticking to my 7D.

60D is big time fail IMO (no magnesium alloy body, articulating screen, SD card, loss of independent joystick (instead, integrated into the wheel), etc.)

The 70-300L IS is interesting. I would be more interested had it been constant f/4.0. I've come to despise variable aperture. Pretty sure the 70-200L IS f/4.0 will be the next lens to replace my 70-300 IS.


Quick Reply: Canon: News, Rumors and Discussion Thread



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:17 AM.