Cameras & Photography Because there aren't already enough ways to share photos...

Canon: News, Rumors and Discussion Thread

Thread Tools
 
Old 03-02-2012 | 03:23 PM
  #401  
srika's Avatar
Senior Moderator
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 59,003
Likes: 10,996
From: Chicago
Originally Posted by Sarlacc
dpreview's review states the 5D2 is "ALMOST" as good as the D700/D3

Almost
After reading some comparisons, I see what you are saying. BUT, you can get similar results with the 5D2, if you know what you are doing.
Old 03-02-2012 | 03:25 PM
  #402  
srika's Avatar
Senior Moderator
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 59,003
Likes: 10,996
From: Chicago
Originally Posted by Sarlacc
The huge "mark" huh huh huh of the 5D2 was the inclusion of 1080p video.

But...that said the sensor they switched in that body did have a big overall improvement in resolution and low light vs. 5D.
for once, I agree with teh Sarlacc!!

ok, maybe it's happened a few times over the past 10 yrs.
Old 03-02-2012 | 03:57 PM
  #403  
is300eater's Avatar
I shoot people
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 22,501
Likes: 3,061
From: Vancouver BC
Silent Shutter mode, wedding shooters will like that
Old 03-02-2012 | 04:25 PM
  #404  
Mizouse's Avatar
Thread Starter
Moderator
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 63,316
Likes: 2,812
From: Not Las Vegas (SF Bay Area)
Yea it's quite a difference too in the videos...


My 40D had a very silent shutter, but it only worked in live view
Old 03-02-2012 | 06:33 PM
  #405  
synth19's Avatar
Senior Moderator
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 16,424
Likes: 719
From: Chicago, IL
Originally Posted by is300eater
Silent Shutter mode, wedding shooters will like that
will also make creeping easier.
Old 03-02-2012 | 06:39 PM
  #406  
synth19's Avatar
Senior Moderator
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 16,424
Likes: 719
From: Chicago, IL
Wasn't the MkII around 3k when it was first released? This is my take as a 7D user who has been patiently waiting for the MKIII- Once you are used to the awesome AF system on the 7D, it would almost be a downgrade using something not as robust. I am 99% positive I'll be picking up a 5D MKIII. The MKIII is like what the 5D MKII should have been and then some. Is it worth the price? Maybe not, but as my first FF, I won't have a problem with putting my pre-order in.
Old 03-02-2012 | 06:41 PM
  #407  
srika's Avatar
Senior Moderator
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 59,003
Likes: 10,996
From: Chicago
It'll be a phenomenal camera.
Old 03-02-2012 | 06:47 PM
  #408  
synth19's Avatar
Senior Moderator
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 16,424
Likes: 719
From: Chicago, IL
Glad I didn't get that 5D classic last month. haha
Old 03-02-2012 | 06:52 PM
  #409  
JS + XES's Avatar
I drive a Subata.
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 20,301
Likes: 2,603
From: Socal
Hopefully the price of 5D MK2 will come down quite a bit! I want oneeeee
Old 03-02-2012 | 07:09 PM
  #410  
synth19's Avatar
Senior Moderator
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 16,424
Likes: 719
From: Chicago, IL
Originally Posted by JS + MS3
Hopefully the price of 5D MK2 will come down quite a bit! I want oneeeee
More then the current price? There has to be some sort of control that it doesn't drop THAT much more.
Old 03-02-2012 | 07:27 PM
  #411  
jupitersolo's Avatar
nnInn
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 37,670
Likes: 1,084
Originally Posted by synth19
wasn't the mkii around 3k when it was first released? This is my take as a 7d user who has been patiently waiting for the mkiii- once you are used to the awesome af system on the 7d, it would almost be a downgrade using something not as robust. I am 99% positive i'll be picking up a 5d mkiii. The mkiii is like what the 5d mkii should have been and then some. Is it worth the price? Maybe not, but as my first ff, i won't have a problem with putting my pre-order in.
$2800
Old 03-02-2012 | 07:32 PM
  #412  
Sarlacc's Avatar
The Third Ball
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 49,450
Likes: 5,116
From: Los Angeles, Ca
Originally Posted by synth19
Wasn't the MkII around 3k when it was first released?
Yes.

So was the D700..and now the D800

I believe the 5D was also 3k, as was the 5D2
Old 03-02-2012 | 07:34 PM
  #413  
jupitersolo's Avatar
nnInn
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 37,670
Likes: 1,084
5D was $3299
Old 03-02-2012 | 07:35 PM
  #414  
Sarlacc's Avatar
The Third Ball
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 49,450
Likes: 5,116
From: Los Angeles, Ca


My friend just posted on Facebook:

"Thank you Canon, you just bought me a D800"
The following 2 users liked this post by Sarlacc:
is300eater (03-02-2012), jupitersolo (03-02-2012)
Old 03-02-2012 | 07:35 PM
  #415  
Sarlacc's Avatar
The Third Ball
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 49,450
Likes: 5,116
From: Los Angeles, Ca
Originally Posted by jupitersolo
5D was $3299
And people bitch that Nikon is more expensive???

Old 03-02-2012 | 07:47 PM
  #416  
Mizouse's Avatar
Thread Starter
Moderator
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 63,316
Likes: 2,812
From: Not Las Vegas (SF Bay Area)
Wasn't the 5D the first prosumer full frame camera?

I mean the only other body was the 1DS series right?
Old 03-02-2012 | 07:53 PM
  #417  
Mizouse's Avatar
Thread Starter
Moderator
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 63,316
Likes: 2,812
From: Not Las Vegas (SF Bay Area)
Originally Posted by synth19
More then the current price? There has to be some sort of control that it doesn't drop THAT much more.
The 5D2 IIRC supposed to drop in price by $300(?) on march 4th.
Old 03-02-2012 | 08:06 PM
  #418  
jupitersolo's Avatar
nnInn
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 37,670
Likes: 1,084
Originally Posted by Sarlacc
And people bitch that Nikon is more expensive???

They still whine and say it, but every item Canon has introduced in the last 18 months has been more expensive. Just look at their new 24 and 28 2.8 IS's, $850 for a consumer prime.
Old 03-02-2012 | 08:07 PM
  #419  
jupitersolo's Avatar
nnInn
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 37,670
Likes: 1,084
Originally Posted by Mizouse
Wasn't the 5D the first prosumer full frame camera?

I mean the only other body was the 1DS series right?
No it was the Nikon F from 1959,
Old 03-02-2012 | 09:07 PM
  #420  
Mizouse's Avatar
Thread Starter
Moderator
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 63,316
Likes: 2,812
From: Not Las Vegas (SF Bay Area)
you know what i mean
Old 03-02-2012 | 09:35 PM
  #421  
is300eater's Avatar
I shoot people
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 22,501
Likes: 3,061
From: Vancouver BC
Hmmmm, doesn't sync @ 1/250th, that's kinda weak
Old 03-02-2012 | 10:35 PM
  #422  
einsatz's Avatar
I miss my 03 CL-S :(
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 7,140
Likes: 445
From: Washington, DC
Quite a few 5DII bodies are showing up on the local CL boards... going price seems to be $1900 - people are apparently looking to upgrade.
Old 03-03-2012 | 01:16 AM
  #423  
Mizouse's Avatar
Thread Starter
Moderator
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 63,316
Likes: 2,812
From: Not Las Vegas (SF Bay Area)
Originally Posted by is300eater
Hmmmm, doesn't sync @ 1/250th, that's kinda weak
its the same as the 5D2 and classic.

whats interesting is that the 20-60D/7D does, but the rebel is 1/200th..

of course the 1D4 goes up to 1/300th with a EX series speedlight..



Last edited by Mizouse; 03-03-2012 at 01:18 AM.
Old 03-03-2012 | 01:19 AM
  #424  
Mizouse's Avatar
Thread Starter
Moderator
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 63,316
Likes: 2,812
From: Not Las Vegas (SF Bay Area)
and the 1D classic went up to 1/500th, but thats due to the CCD sensor.
Old 03-03-2012 | 01:26 AM
  #425  
srika's Avatar
Senior Moderator
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 59,003
Likes: 10,996
From: Chicago
D70 does 1/500th also.

And, do some reading on High Speed Sync (HSS)..
Old 03-03-2012 | 01:27 AM
  #426  
Mizouse's Avatar
Thread Starter
Moderator
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 63,316
Likes: 2,812
From: Not Las Vegas (SF Bay Area)
yes I know about HSS...

you should know this.
Old 03-03-2012 | 01:28 AM
  #427  
srika's Avatar
Senior Moderator
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 59,003
Likes: 10,996
From: Chicago
I only learned about it in the past couple months, when I tried studio lighting.
Old 03-03-2012 | 01:30 AM
  #428  
Mizouse's Avatar
Thread Starter
Moderator
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 63,316
Likes: 2,812
From: Not Las Vegas (SF Bay Area)
why would you even need to shoot that fast in a studio?


almost all the times ive shot in a studio ive been at 1/125th @ F8 @ ISO 100
Old 03-03-2012 | 01:33 AM
  #429  
srika's Avatar
Senior Moderator
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 59,003
Likes: 10,996
From: Chicago
if you're using lighting outside in daylight - HSS lets you light up the subjects and have the background look dark.. it's a different effect but I know a number of people who use it.
Old 03-03-2012 | 01:36 AM
  #430  
Mizouse's Avatar
Thread Starter
Moderator
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 63,316
Likes: 2,812
From: Not Las Vegas (SF Bay Area)
when you said studio lights, i thought you were implying shooting in a studio with like a white BG etc.




Old 03-03-2012 | 01:36 AM
  #431  
srika's Avatar
Senior Moderator
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 59,003
Likes: 10,996
From: Chicago
my bad
Old 03-03-2012 | 01:36 AM
  #432  
Mizouse's Avatar
Thread Starter
Moderator
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 63,316
Likes: 2,812
From: Not Las Vegas (SF Bay Area)
Old 03-03-2012 | 01:37 AM
  #433  
is300eater's Avatar
I shoot people
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 22,501
Likes: 3,061
From: Vancouver BC
Originally Posted by Mizouse
why would you even need to shoot that fast in a studio?


almost all the times ive shot in a studio ive been at 1/125th @ F8 @ ISO 100
just depends on how much of the ambient light you want to "kill".

in this photo, the back wall wasn't THAT dark... but it was shot @1/250 thus making the room look much darker.
http://farm7.staticflickr.com/6098/6...c6266f8f_b.jpg

If it had been @1/200, then it wouldn't be as dark. It's just a matter of what you're going for. But nice to be able to sync at a higher speed when you need it
Old 03-03-2012 | 01:53 AM
  #434  
Mizouse's Avatar
Thread Starter
Moderator
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 63,316
Likes: 2,812
From: Not Las Vegas (SF Bay Area)
Originally Posted by is300eater
just depends on how much of the ambient light you want to "kill".

in this photo, the back wall wasn't THAT dark... but it was shot @1/250 thus making the room look much darker.
http://farm7.staticflickr.com/6098/6...c6266f8f_b.jpg

If it had been @1/200, then it wouldn't be as dark. It's just a matter of what you're going for. But nice to be able to sync at a higher speed when you need it
i know what he means now. and i get it.

but i was assuming he meant a studio situation like this.



where i would control how light or dark the BG is by the lights

Old 03-03-2012 | 02:23 AM
  #435  
Mizouse's Avatar
Thread Starter
Moderator
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 63,316
Likes: 2,812
From: Not Las Vegas (SF Bay Area)



heh
Old 03-03-2012 | 02:28 AM
  #436  
Mizouse's Avatar
Thread Starter
Moderator
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 63,316
Likes: 2,812
From: Not Las Vegas (SF Bay Area)
everytime i see a picture of a canon body like that i think of the terminator
Old 03-03-2012 | 12:52 PM
  #437  
synth19's Avatar
Senior Moderator
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 16,424
Likes: 719
From: Chicago, IL
Originally Posted by srika
I only learned about it in the past couple months, when I tried studio lighting.
Negative. I introduced you to HSS last summer.
Old 03-03-2012 | 12:58 PM
  #438  
srika's Avatar
Senior Moderator
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 59,003
Likes: 10,996
From: Chicago
Originally Posted by srika
I only tried it in the past couple months, when I tried studio lighting.
fixed
Old 03-04-2012 | 11:56 AM
  #439  
synth19's Avatar
Senior Moderator
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 16,424
Likes: 719
From: Chicago, IL
New 5D Mark III officially pre-ordered bitches.
The following users liked this post:
is300eater (03-04-2012)
Old 03-04-2012 | 01:34 PM
  #440  
wndrlst's Avatar
Earth-bound misfit
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 31,704
Likes: 608
I hate you.
The following users liked this post:
Mizouse (03-04-2012)


Quick Reply: Canon: News, Rumors and Discussion Thread



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:38 AM.