Cameras & Photography Because there aren't already enough ways to share photos...

"burning in"

Thread Tools
 
Old Aug 11, 2006 | 08:12 PM
  #1  
wndrlst's Avatar
Thread Starter
Earth-bound misfit
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 31,704
Likes: 608
"burning in"

Is there any way to burn in, or darken the whites using ArcSoft? I've played around a little, but I'm not finding anything? If not on ArcSoft, is there any software that has the capability?

For example:
Reply
Old Aug 11, 2006 | 09:28 PM
  #2  
svtmike's Avatar
Team Owner
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 37,706
Likes: 3,904
From: Chicago
The white areas of that picture are so blown out there's almost no detail to extract - so if you try to darken it you'll just end up with featureless grey.
Reply
Old Aug 12, 2006 | 12:24 AM
  #3  
badboy's Avatar
Safety Car
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 4,197
Likes: 16
From: NJ
from the looks of it, the white area in the picture is too over exposed to have much detail that you would want to see, this is obviously coming from a photo noob who is buzzed.
Reply
Old Aug 12, 2006 | 06:41 AM
  #4  
JJ4Short's Avatar
LOLZ McCain Sux
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 13,764
Likes: 0
If you can, start shooting Raw format and use photoshop. Jpegs are hard to salvage


Reply
Old Aug 12, 2006 | 07:06 AM
  #5  
wndrlst's Avatar
Thread Starter
Earth-bound misfit
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 31,704
Likes: 608
Originally Posted by badboy
from the looks of it, the white area in the picture is too over exposed to have much detail that you would want to see, this is obviously coming from a photo noob who is buzzed.

Ha ha. Well, you're kind of right. I'm a newbie to this camera, but I don't think my old non-digital rebel would have blown the highlights like that. Yes, I am totally buzzed to have my new camera. Kinda takes the edge off turning 30.


Originally Posted by JJ4Short
If you can, start shooting Raw format and use photoshop. Jpegs are hard to salvage

Thanks JJ, I'll try raw.
Reply
Old Aug 12, 2006 | 12:25 PM
  #6  
waTSX's Avatar
Have camera, will travel
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 7,783
Likes: 0
From: Federal Way, WA
Originally Posted by JJ4Short
If you can, start shooting Raw format and use photoshop. Jpegs are hard to salvage




Yeppers, those highlights are blown out. Probably not much detail there to salvage. RAW would give you more exposure latitude, but blown highlights are blown highlights.
Reply
Old Aug 16, 2006 | 09:13 AM
  #7  
wndrlst's Avatar
Thread Starter
Earth-bound misfit
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 31,704
Likes: 608
So, I'm happier with this exposure, taken the same day.



I changed the white balance on the camera to "daylight" rather than auto. Obviously, it's quite a different composition, though,with the sunlight coming from a different angle.

Any suggestions for capturing a shot more like the first one without overdoing the highlights? I'd really appreciate it.
Reply
Old Aug 16, 2006 | 09:44 AM
  #8  
EuRTSX's Avatar
Team Owner
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 23,588
Likes: 106
From: District of Corruption
Looks good Wndrlst. Keep up the good work.
Reply
Old Aug 16, 2006 | 01:09 PM
  #9  
waTSX's Avatar
Have camera, will travel
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 7,783
Likes: 0
From: Federal Way, WA
Originally Posted by wndrlst
So, I'm happier with this exposure, taken the same day.



I changed the white balance on the camera to "daylight" rather than auto. Obviously, it's quite a different composition, though,with the sunlight coming from a different angle.

Any suggestions for capturing a shot more like the first one without overdoing the highlights? I'd really appreciate it.
Yeah, get the dog out of that harsh sunlight. That's a pretty contrasty scene, so it's going to be hard to capture detail in both shadows and highlights. Just too much dynamic range there. You can use the cameras exposure compensation to adjust the exposure and save the highlights, but then you'll lose shadow detail. It's be easier just to shoot him in better light, or at least in an area where there's not so much bright light and so much shadow in the same scene.

Try later in the evening when the light is softer.
Reply
Old Aug 16, 2006 | 01:12 PM
  #10  
waTSX's Avatar
Have camera, will travel
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 7,783
Likes: 0
From: Federal Way, WA
Looking again at the first pic, it looks like the cams meter got fooled, exposing for the background and blowing out the highlights on your dog.

Another technique is to let the camera expose for the BG, then use a little fill flash to light your subject.

The second pic is a lot better, but you can still see how the window light is too bright for the camera to expose properly. At least your subject is pretty well exposed.
Reply
Old Aug 16, 2006 | 08:43 PM
  #11  
wndrlst's Avatar
Thread Starter
Earth-bound misfit
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 31,704
Likes: 608
Originally Posted by waTSX
Looking again at the first pic, it looks like the cams meter got fooled, exposing for the background and blowing out the highlights on your dog.

Another technique is to let the camera expose for the BG, then use a little fill flash to light your subject.

The second pic is a lot better, but you can still see how the window light is too bright for the camera to expose properly. At least your subject is pretty well exposed.
Thanks for taking the time to give some constructive comments and suggestions.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
calrow
Car Parts for Sale
11
May 3, 2017 10:21 PM
knight rider
Car Talk
9
Mar 4, 2016 08:59 AM
Thuneau
4G TL (2009-2014)
4
Oct 3, 2015 04:19 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:28 PM.