Cameras & Photography Because there aren't already enough ways to share photos...

B+W Neutral Density Filters

Thread Tools
 
Old Nov 18, 2008 | 05:54 PM
  #1  
LuvMyTSX's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 14,667
Likes: 13
From: NY
B+W Neutral Density Filters

I'm making my Christmas list right now and I'm looking at B&H's site for B+W ND filters. I'm set on getting these:

102 (filter factor 4x)
103 (filter factor 8x)
106 (filter factor 64x) (this one's a maybe)

Question is, B&H's site seems to have several different options for the same filters - some are slim, some extra wide, some coated, and some not. I'm looking for 77mm filters for my 10-22, 17-55, and 70-200 lenses. Do I need slim, wide angle, or what?

Here's the page I'm looking at: http://www.bhphotovideo.com/bnh/cont...t=Submit+Query
Reply
Old Nov 18, 2008 | 07:16 PM
  #2  
Billiam's Avatar
Big Block go VROOOM!
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 8,578
Likes: 1
From: Chicago Burbs
I'm pretty sure you don't need slim mount filters with your gear. If you ever go full frame, however, you may experience vignetting with a "standard" mount filter on anything wider than 24-ish mm.

How brave are you feeling with your X-mas list?
http://www.singh-ray.com/varind.html
Reply
Old Nov 18, 2008 | 07:20 PM
  #3  
LKLD's Avatar
I've been Canonized ;)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1,350
Likes: 31
From: FL
Originally Posted by Billiam
How brave are you feeling with your X-mas list?
http://www.singh-ray.com/varind.html

Reply
Old Nov 18, 2008 | 07:20 PM
  #4  
LuvMyTSX's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 14,667
Likes: 13
From: NY
I've read that B+W and Hoya filters are better than Singh-Ray. Is this true?

Eh, nevermind. I don't want a vari ND anyway.
Reply
Old Nov 18, 2008 | 10:02 PM
  #5  
rimz's Avatar
now with four rings
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1,745
Likes: 0
From: Bixby, OK
i own two B+W 4x ND filters (52mm and 62mm)...didn't see anything about them having a slim, wide angle, etc. option when i bought them...but mine are both coated...

and they come in very handy...
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2008 | 01:07 PM
  #6  
LuvMyTSX's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 14,667
Likes: 13
From: NY
Thanks rimz. I'm still confused on the wide angle vs. slim vs. what I guess is regular, but I'll figure it out I suppose.

Is the coating mostly for protection, or does it serve another purpose?
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2008 | 02:42 PM
  #7  
jupitersolo's Avatar
nnInn
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 37,670
Likes: 1,084
The coating is to help with glare, I wouldn't worry about it though. Not like with UV or CPL's.
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2008 | 02:44 PM
  #8  
waTSX's Avatar
Have camera, will travel
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 7,783
Likes: 0
From: Federal Way, WA
The slim filters are just phyically thinner than the standard filter, so as not to cause vignetting when shooting at wider angles. If the filter sticks out more from the end of the lens, and field of view is wide enough, you could get darkening in the corners of the image.

Apparently it's not much of an issue with crop bodies according to Billiam. FWIW, the Hoya CP I just bought is a slim version. I can't really see any downside to getting a slim versus a regular, other than some slim versions won't allow you to stack filters. I'm not sure if the B+W filters have this issue. Hoya's do not.

And yes, multicoating is preferred. It helps control lens flare.
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2008 | 02:56 PM
  #9  
LuvMyTSX's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 14,667
Likes: 13
From: NY
^ Thanks! Yes, I think I did read in the huge PDF file from B+W that one or more of the slim ND filters are not stackable. I'll have to think about whether or not this will pose a problem.
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2008 | 02:59 PM
  #10  
Dan Martin's Avatar
Photography Nerd
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 21,489
Likes: 11
From: Toronto
I've stacked 2 regular thickness B+W ND's on my 10-22 and it will only slightly vignette at 10mm. By 11 or 12mm it's completely fine. I didn't even know B+W made thin ND's...
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2008 | 03:08 PM
  #11  
LuvMyTSX's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 14,667
Likes: 13
From: NY
Dan - thanks for your comment. I was wondering a bit about the 10-22, if I'd have any vignetting on that lens.

So far I'm leaning towards multicoated regular filters. No need for the extra wide ones, right?
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2008 | 03:18 PM
  #12  
Dan Martin's Avatar
Photography Nerd
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 21,489
Likes: 11
From: Toronto
The regular filters will be fine. For what it's worth, none of my ND's are multicoated either and it hasn't been an issue. I think it's because the filters are reducing the light coming into the lens so stray specular lights are dimmed enough to not bounce around the inside of the lens. Multicoating might make more of a difference on the less dark ND's like a 2x or 4x because they don't filter as much light. That's just a guess though.
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2008 | 10:00 PM
  #13  
Billiam's Avatar
Big Block go VROOOM!
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 8,578
Likes: 1
From: Chicago Burbs
I'd also hazard a guess that some other properties of a filter that can contribute to flare are if the surfaces of the glass aren't polished to a consistent finish or if the front and back surfaces aren't polished to be parallel with each other. It's pretty doubtful you'd have to worry about these things with a premium filter brand like B+W.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
rcs86
Car Parts for Sale
3
Aug 2, 2016 06:52 PM
knight rider
Car Talk
9
Mar 4, 2016 08:59 AM
LeVeL
3G TL (2004-2008)
38
Oct 18, 2015 04:19 PM
steve
2G TL (1999-2003)
5
Sep 30, 2015 09:23 PM
MikeJM310
3G TL Problems & Fixes
0
Sep 24, 2015 07:24 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:44 PM.