Fuji X-T2 Review

Thread Tools
 
Old Sep 15, 2016 | 12:15 AM
  #1  
Sarlacc's Avatar
Thread Starter
The Third Ball
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 50,498
Likes: 5,874
From: Los Angeles, Ca
Fuji X-T2 Review

Twist my arm why don't you Vital! ;-)

Rating: 9.5/10
When purchased:
September 2016
Pros: Lightweight, Fast FPS (w/vertical booster grip), Best EVF out there, DSLR rivaling AF, Great low light, Awesome JPEG SOOC, Color science
Cons: Battery life is OK, Vertical Grip makes is heavier/bulkier, Still figuring out quirky in camera profile settings
Would you recommend a friend this item: Yes
Extra Comments: What's not to like about this system. The Fuji lens line up is stellar. The performance of this camera has already made me forget my larger/heavier Nikon gear. It's just fun to use, and takes me back to shooting film. The more I use and learn about this camera the more I grow to love it. I am still trying to figure out why my profile settings dont always stick...and it boned me on this last shoot. So my in camera NR and Sharpness settings weren't where I wanted them, and for that I deducted .5 points or I would have given this a 10/10. Still happy with the results:

X-T2, 16-55 2.8








X-T2, 50-140 2.8






















Last edited by Sarlacc; Sep 15, 2016 at 12:17 AM.
Reply
Old Sep 15, 2016 | 11:14 AM
  #2  
mdkxtreme's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 3,578
Likes: 322
From: Orange County, CA
Could you fix the rest of the broken links? Reason being....the pics that do show up looks SHARP. I want to see more.
Reply
Old Sep 15, 2016 | 02:36 PM
  #3  
asianspec's Avatar
Senior Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 25,348
Likes: 1,100
From: Photography Forum.
Dave.

Reply
Old Sep 15, 2016 | 04:22 PM
  #4  
Sarlacc's Avatar
Thread Starter
The Third Ball
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 50,498
Likes: 5,874
From: Los Angeles, Ca
Originally Posted by mdkxtreme
Could you fix the rest of the broken links? Reason being....the pics that do show up looks SHARP. I want to see more.
I have to look into this, I wonder why they are broken, other than photobucket sucks balls.
Reply
Old Sep 15, 2016 | 04:25 PM
  #5  
Sarlacc's Avatar
Thread Starter
The Third Ball
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 50,498
Likes: 5,874
From: Los Angeles, Ca
test

Reply
Old Sep 15, 2016 | 04:26 PM
  #6  
Sarlacc's Avatar
Thread Starter
The Third Ball
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 50,498
Likes: 5,874
From: Los Angeles, Ca










Reply
Old Oct 3, 2016 | 06:35 PM
  #7  
Mizouse's Avatar
Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 64,144
Likes: 3,391
From: Not Las Vegas (SF Bay Area)
Reply
Old Jun 16, 2017 | 10:29 AM
  #8  
Sarlacc's Avatar
Thread Starter
The Third Ball
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 50,498
Likes: 5,874
From: Los Angeles, Ca
So, while I still love this camera and have no regrets about switching I will admit that last night was the first time I missed having a FF sensor...and I'll tell you why.

Light transmission.

I went to night time event downtown, and I'm so thankful I decided to bring my tripod. Even at 12800 ISO with +3 compensation I was way too underexposed. But my friend, who still has his D800, shooting handheld, was seeing in the dark between 3200-6400 ISO.

All my shots had to be timed exposures of at least 1.5 seconds at 800 ISO. Get a sharp, usable, and well exposed shot. With that I get the uncontrollable motion blur of the people...but I think in this case it lended toward a cool look.

But yeah, FF still have their advantages.




Reply
Old Jun 16, 2017 | 10:52 AM
  #9  
mdkxtreme's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 3,578
Likes: 322
From: Orange County, CA
Off topic but do you happen to know if they'll still have this lighted up? I'm willing to head there tonight if it's still there.
Reply
Old Jun 16, 2017 | 10:54 AM
  #10  
Sarlacc's Avatar
Thread Starter
The Third Ball
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 50,498
Likes: 5,874
From: Los Angeles, Ca
Originally Posted by mdkxtreme
Off topic but do you happen to know if they'll still have this lighted up? I'm willing to head there tonight if it's still there.
I believe it was just last night, but not sure.
Reply
Old Sep 12, 2018 | 10:35 PM
  #11  
Sarlacc's Avatar
Thread Starter
The Third Ball
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 50,498
Likes: 5,874
From: Los Angeles, Ca
OK...2 year review:

I just finished selling all my Fuji gear and I’m going back to Nikon

It was a nice system. There was things I liked...lots I didnt like. When I first got it someone told me the magic in the system was their primes, and well, I never got or used a single prime. I debated about selling one or two zooms and getting a 23/2...but then I fell into the other issue I had with the system. resolution. With my D800 I was used to being able to shoot wide knowing I could crop in and reframe in post thereby negating the need to change lenses in the field unless moving to a telephoto. And the Fuji just doesnt have the crystal clear resolution to accomplish this feat. And I’m too used to be able to shoot like that. I want to be able to take the camera with me more often...and with the zooms and the vertical grip it was a still a “larger” set up.

So, I’ve pre-ordered a Nikon Z7 with the 35 1.8 and hopefully that can satiate my needs. The pre-pro stills Ive seen on dpreview and zoomed in on have blown me away.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Sarlacc
Cameras & Photography
439
Oct 23, 2025 12:45 AM
asianspec
Camera equipment reviews
14
Oct 6, 2016 11:58 PM
trev0006
2G RDX (2013-2018)
7
Sep 16, 2016 06:21 PM
MrRodgers96
2G TL (1999-2003)
0
Aug 30, 2016 10:11 PM
WDPinit
3G TL Audio, Bluetooth, Electronics & Navigation
2
Aug 2, 2016 03:17 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:40 PM.