Thunderbird dead already
#1
Cost Drivers!!!!
Thread Starter
Thunderbird dead already
lol is it really a suprise? Ford plans to kill the t-bird in the 05 or 06 production year. Overpriced and underpowered.
#5
Moderator Alumnus
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Washington DC (NOVA)
Age: 52
Posts: 16,399
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes
on
8 Posts
Originally posted by Collective27
Where did you get this info from, i know that it has had slow sales, but what is your source for this info.
Where did you get this info from, i know that it has had slow sales, but what is your source for this info.
Production will end with '05 or '06 models, but it might resume
By Amy Wilson
Automotive News / April 20, 2003
NEW YORK -- Ford Motor Co. will stop producing the Ford Thunderbird after the 2005 or 2006 model year.
Ford Division President Steve Lyons says the current Thunderbird, which Ford introduced as a low-volume glamour car in 2001, won't be renewed after an initial product run of four or maybe five years. He wouldn't give an exact ending date, but the plan would have Ford shutting down production in mid-2005 or 2006.
"We're going to take a pause, but we don't know what the long-term plan is," Lyons says.
The decision isn't related to sales, he says. But Ford planned to sell about 25,000 Thunderbirds annually. In 2002, it sold 19,085 units in the United States and 1,136 in Canada. This year's U.S. sales are off 22.1 percent.
Stocks of the car piled up through the winter to as high as a 183-day supply on March 1. Lyons attributed the large inventory to an oversupply of 2002 models, which Ford produced into November. Ford resorted to incentives such as $2,000 dealer cash and discounts for employees, suppliers and others.
On April 1, the company had a 129-day supply of the $37,320 two-seater.
Moving a car in and out of production would be unusual.
"While it may go away for a short period of time, it may reappear from time to time," Lyons says.
"When you really stand back and think about the volumes we're trying to sell that vehicle in, it is meant to be a collectors' item. And it doesn't have to have a production run every year."
#6
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: central jerzey
Age: 38
Posts: 5,547
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I think it is underpowered for a 40k roadster. I would just take out a bigger loan, and pick up a vette.
They tried to make it appeal to the classy people who don't care about sport, but classy people don't buy Fords.
They tried to make it appeal to the classy people who don't care about sport, but classy people don't buy Fords.
Trending Topics
#8
Masshole
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Massachusetts
Age: 45
Posts: 3,390
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
LOL..
Ford was convinced that T-Bird nostalgia was going to move 25,000 units per year @ $40k.
It's funny too, because Ford already markets another ragtop for around the same price.
It's called the SVT Cobra, and it's fast.
Ford was convinced that T-Bird nostalgia was going to move 25,000 units per year @ $40k.
It's funny too, because Ford already markets another ragtop for around the same price.
It's called the SVT Cobra, and it's fast.
#9
1 Dog, 2 Cats and a G-Pig
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Crap Arbor
Age: 44
Posts: 938
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Too pricey... almost had one for an overnighter once... wasn't approved for the drive list though... that sucks!
Hmmm... we should guess what model Ford is gonna discontinue next... I'm betting on the Escape... too pricey... and I'm sure the price will sky rocket when they come out with the HEV version...
Hmmm... we should guess what model Ford is gonna discontinue next... I'm betting on the Escape... too pricey... and I'm sure the price will sky rocket when they come out with the HEV version...
#12
Cost Drivers!!!!
Thread Starter
Originally posted by gavriil
Underpowered? This latest iteration of the 3.9 engine gives it a 6.7 sec for the 0-60 which makes this car as fast as an auto CLS. That's not slow for this category.
Underpowered? This latest iteration of the 3.9 engine gives it a 6.7 sec for the 0-60 which makes this car as fast as an auto CLS. That's not slow for this category.
for 40k it's slow
#13
Originally posted by charliemike
I think the price-gouging at the initial release of the car really hurt it ... But it's true that no one wants to spend $40k on a Ford. Hell, $35k for a Cobra makes me cringe.
I think the price-gouging at the initial release of the car really hurt it ... But it's true that no one wants to spend $40k on a Ford. Hell, $35k for a Cobra makes me cringe.
#14
Moderator Alumnus
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Communist, NY
Posts: 9,574
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by charliemike
But it's true that no one wants to spend $40k on a Ford
But it's true that no one wants to spend $40k on a Ford
#16
It just wasn't a looker. It ain't about performance. But did it outperform the Thunderbird S/C (a fav car of mine)? I don't think so and that car was really liked by the auto press.
TIMES HAVE CHANGED. The same people that bought a THunderbird back in the day are not the same people today. ANd their sons and daughters don't care about the car.
TIMES HAVE CHANGED. The same people that bought a THunderbird back in the day are not the same people today. ANd their sons and daughters don't care about the car.
#17
Originally posted by zeroday
..........I'm thinking they need to axe lincoln and the volvo name and create an all new luxury division with more of a sporty high end european image and design focus (no pun inteneded). Volvo and Lincoln both have stodgey images which turns off buyers.
..........I'm thinking they need to axe lincoln and the volvo name and create an all new luxury division with more of a sporty high end european image and design focus (no pun inteneded). Volvo and Lincoln both have stodgey images which turns off buyers.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
SidhuSaaB
3G TL Problems & Fixes
18
05-30-2020 12:40 AM
DerrickW
3G TL Performance Parts & Modifications
9
11-15-2015 05:52 PM
kb1rl
2G RL Audio, Bluetooth, Electronics & Navigation
5
09-30-2015 10:17 AM