RL A-SPEC & Comptech TSX

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-09-2004, 10:51 AM
  #41  
Race Director
 
RMATIC09's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: NY
Age: 38
Posts: 12,434
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wats the Diff btween HP, and WHP, and 40 Hp dosent seem worth 5.5 grand
Old 11-09-2004, 08:38 PM
  #42  
I am Ahab!
 
tony4311's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: wisconsin
Age: 43
Posts: 2,077
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
There's more then a 40hp gain. Check the sticky thread to see some dynos to compare to the 240, plus we don't know the torque it's putting out.
Old 11-11-2004, 09:40 AM
  #43  
Race Director
 
RMATIC09's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: NY
Age: 38
Posts: 12,434
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hmm...over 40 is appealing.
Old 11-11-2004, 10:46 AM
  #44  
Troutslap Mod-DUH-rator
 
dzuy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 8,018
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by RMATIC09
Wats the Diff btween HP, and WHP, and 40 Hp dosent seem worth 5.5 grand
hp is usually given as horsepower to the flywheel so before the loss of the tranny

whp is wheel horse power, which is what your car will put down to the ground after the loss of the tranny.

so 240 whp > 240 hp.
Old 11-11-2004, 11:12 AM
  #45  
Bye TSX, hello domestic?
 
xizor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: NOVA
Age: 42
Posts: 8,552
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by dzuy
hp is usually given as horsepower to the flywheel so before the loss of the tranny

whp is wheel horse power, which is what your car will put down to the ground after the loss of the tranny.

so 240 whp > 240 hp.
240WHP is about 283HP at the crank, actually not that bad
Old 11-12-2004, 08:09 AM
  #46  
Engineer
 
savage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Boston
Age: 41
Posts: 4,525
Received 76 Likes on 53 Posts
Originally Posted by xizor
240WHP is about 283HP at the crank, actually not that bad

so thats about a 83hp increase at the crank or if you want to consider whp, it will be about 70hp increase since the tsx dynos around 170 i believe, correct me if i am wrong...

sorry for my ranting...BUT where the hell is hondata...those guys are killin us...
Old 11-12-2004, 08:18 AM
  #47  
04 remembrance
 
iamhomin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: NJ
Posts: 5,681
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by taewlee
damn you pessimistic ingrate iamhomin, I'm sure we'll be able to upgrade the supercharger with a larger blower to create more power. I'm just glad that a supercharger is finally a reality, it gives us something to work with and maybe other companies will want to be competetive and bring out more superchargers
So, exactly what was I ingrateful about?

Anyways, the supercharger for the TSX was inevitable, just because Comtech first introduced it doesn't mean it'll elicit fierceful competition.

And I still believe, the gains are pathetic relative to the $$$.
Old 11-12-2004, 08:19 AM
  #48  
Moderator Alumnus
 
sauceman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Windsor-Quebec corridor
Age: 47
Posts: 7,709
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 4 Posts
If you read between the lines of that Hondata seminar resume thread, Hondata isn't anywhere near from coming up with a K-Pro for the TSX. Actually, they don't even hint there will be one.
Old 11-12-2004, 08:49 AM
  #49  
Photography Nerd
 
Dan Martin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Toronto
Age: 44
Posts: 21,489
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 7 Posts
Originally Posted by xizor
about 283HP at the crank, actually not that bad


I wouldn't feel comfortable running the stock driveline with any more power than that. A 40% horsepower increase is pretty good. I'd be worried about the clutch and drive shafts with more power.

People should ask the question, how over engineered are the OEM parts to begin with? If you were designing a car from scratch why would you design a car that can accept 50-75% more power than it comes with from the factory? If I were an engineer and I knew my bonus was dependant on how much my design came in under budget, I would save everywhere I could. I wouldn't even think twice about adding redundancy for owners that want to bolt on a 12psi turbo and push 400hp to the wheels. If it gets from point a to point b with the OEM engine that's all I'd be concerned about.

I'm sure in the next couple years, high output kits will be available along with clutches and other driveline components for the all-out tuners. This kit looks like a great blend of performance and civility without having to worry about blowing something up.
Old 11-12-2004, 09:16 AM
  #50  
Safety Car
 
heyitsme's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: philly
Posts: 4,426
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by shockwave1111
Take a look at this picture, I think comptech intended the horsepower to be 240 WHP. I would be embrassed to bring out a I/H/E supercharged TSX =p

http://sohc.vtec.net//article_files/...04sema-276.jpg
Well something in the brochure is typed wrong, cause if they really wanted to show the difference between power of the stock tsx using whp, they would have listed it as ~170 not 200. From the context it sounds like they meant 240 at the crank.
Old 11-12-2004, 10:54 AM
  #51  
Bye TSX, hello domestic?
 
xizor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: NOVA
Age: 42
Posts: 8,552
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Dan Martin


I wouldn't feel comfortable running the stock driveline with any more power than that. A 40% horsepower increase is pretty good. I'd be worried about the clutch and drive shafts with more power.
The clutch will definately go quick. My friend's JRSC Prelude wore out his (fairly old) clutch to the point of slipping at WOT in about 2 monthes of hard driving.
Old 11-12-2004, 10:54 AM
  #52  
Bye TSX, hello domestic?
 
xizor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: NOVA
Age: 42
Posts: 8,552
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by iamhomin
So, exactly what was I ingrateful about?

Anyways, the supercharger for the TSX was inevitable, just because Comtech first introduced it doesn't mean it'll elicit fierceful competition.

And I still believe, the gains are pathetic relative to the $$$.
well 80hp for $3500 is a lot better than 5hp for $800 for an exhaust.
Old 11-12-2004, 11:10 AM
  #53  
Baka Unco
 
corbs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Beaverton, OR
Posts: 705
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by xizor
well 80hp for $3500 is a lot better than 5hp for $800 for an exhaust.
But. . . I do think it's a bit high for a supercharger in general. Hopefully the street/internet prices will be closer $2750-3000. . . I can dream right?
Old 11-12-2004, 11:26 AM
  #54  
Troutslap Mod-DUH-rator
 
dzuy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 8,018
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Dan Martin


I wouldn't feel comfortable running the stock driveline with any more power than that. A 40% horsepower increase is pretty good. I'd be worried about the clutch and drive shafts with more power.

People should ask the question, how over engineered are the OEM parts to begin with? If you were designing a car from scratch why would you design a car that can accept 50-75% more power than it comes with from the factory? If I were an engineer and I knew my bonus was dependant on how much my design came in under budget, I would save everywhere I could. I wouldn't even think twice about adding redundancy for owners that want to bolt on a 12psi turbo and push 400hp to the wheels. If it gets from point a to point b with the OEM engine that's all I'd be concerned about.

I'm sure in the next couple years, high output kits will be available along with clutches and other driveline components for the all-out tuners. This kit looks like a great blend of performance and civility without having to worry about blowing something up.
well, we design to have a 2x safety factor. of course, i don't work in the commercial industry, so cost isn't my concern in design

but that is true, in commercial, every penny saved is value added, esp in mass produced products such as cars.
Old 11-12-2004, 12:15 PM
  #55  
Suzuka Master
 
ClutchPerformer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Age: 43
Posts: 5,449
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by xizor
well 80hp for $3500 is a lot better than 5hp for $800 for an exhaust.
And 40HP for $3500 is STILL better than 5HP for $800.
Old 11-12-2004, 12:21 PM
  #56  
Troutslap Mod-DUH-rator
 
dzuy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 8,018
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by ClutchPerformer
And 40HP for $3500 is STILL better than 5HP for $800.
what about 0HP for $0.

that always sounds good to me.
Old 05-04-2005, 11:22 PM
  #57  
I'm a llama :(
 
Motohip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Washington
Posts: 4,243
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
That's only a 20% increase over stock. JRSC always claims at least a 40% increase over stock even on the little D16's.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
tsx_boy
1G TSX Performance Parts & Modifications
4
12-13-2019 08:33 PM
jsonkimz
Car Parts for Sale
31
03-28-2016 07:49 PM
08_UA7_Gr33k
Member Cars for Sale
13
02-11-2016 02:17 PM
CL-S progression 01
Car Parts for Sale
65
01-26-2016 04:15 PM
4drviper
3G TL Tires, Wheels & Suspension
2
09-23-2015 07:42 PM



Quick Reply: RL A-SPEC & Comptech TSX



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:22 AM.