Mercedes-Benz: CLK-Class news **2009 Spied (page 6)**

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-13-2006, 11:27 PM
  #121  
Instructor
 
majesty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: .
Age: 39
Posts: 124
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
that sucks, no coupe in the usa
Old 05-14-2006, 09:45 PM
  #122  
Moderator Alumnus
Thread Starter
 
gavriil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Washington DC (NOVA)
Age: 52
Posts: 16,399
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
^ I know! I was surpirsed at that too and wondering why...
Old 05-14-2006, 10:23 PM
  #123  
Silky Smooth
 
Lokius's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: San Diego, CA
Age: 38
Posts: 1,272
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
they need a new m3 killer bad, and that sure isnt it.
Old 05-14-2006, 10:40 PM
  #124  
styling on you
 
SeCsTaC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Los Angeles, California
Age: 34
Posts: 5,274
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post







Old 05-15-2006, 12:08 AM
  #125  
101 years of heartache...
 
gocubsgo55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Chicago's North Side/Champaign, IL
Age: 36
Posts: 3,076
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
BMW > shit > MB

perhaps i just have an absolute hate for MB?
Old 05-15-2006, 12:21 AM
  #126  
styling on you
 
SeCsTaC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Los Angeles, California
Age: 34
Posts: 5,274
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Originally Posted by gocubsgo55
BMW > shit > MB

perhaps i just have an absolute hate for MB?
only one way to find out... what do you think of the CLS?
Old 05-15-2006, 09:07 AM
  #127  
Senior Moderator
 
fsttyms1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Appleton WI
Age: 49
Posts: 81,383
Received 3,063 Likes on 2,119 Posts
Originally Posted by gocubsgo55
BMW > shit > MB

perhaps i just have an absolute hate for MB?
With what Bangle has done to the recent cars MB> shit> BMW
Old 05-15-2006, 09:44 AM
  #128  
Senior Moderator
 
derrick's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Windsor, ON, Canada
Age: 49
Posts: 5,122
Received 30 Likes on 17 Posts




Based upon this side shot, doesn't it resemble the Volvo C70? [edit - added comparo pic]... then again, maybe not.[/edit] The grill/front is definite MB but I think there's a merging of design (ie common evolution) among the car manufacturers. Does no one (outside of Bangle) want to push the envelope?

As for this auto, I haven't been impressed with the long term durability of AMG products ever since my bro's C32. Hopefully the "6.3" will change this opinion.
Old 05-15-2006, 11:28 AM
  #129  
Burning Brakes
 
chiawei's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2000
Age: 54
Posts: 775
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts
Originally Posted by derrick




Based upon this side shot, doesn't it resemble the Volvo C70? [edit - added comparo pic]... then again, maybe not.[/edit] The grill/front is definite MB but I think there's a merging of design (ie common evolution) among the car manufacturers. Does no one (outside of Bangle) want to push the envelope?

As for this auto, I haven't been impressed with the long term durability of AMG products ever since my bro's C32. Hopefully the "6.3" will change this opinion.

CLK cabrio has been out since late 2003. If there are similarities, it would be the C70 copying the CLK.
Old 06-12-2006, 10:52 AM
  #130  
Senior Moderator
 
Yumcha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 167,232
Received 22,652 Likes on 13,891 Posts
Official images from Daimler...

Mercedes-Benz has released official images of the 2007 CLK DTM AMG Cabriolet, which it first previewed in September 2005. The car accelerates to 62 mph from a standstill in just 4.0 seconds. It uses a 582 hp powerful AMG 5.4-litre V8 compressor engine and has significant weight savings throughout. Its top speed is limited to 187 mph, but its speedometer suggests 225 mph could be possible with the right computer modifications. Production is limited to 100 cars, the price is 277,820 euros, and the first units were delivered just weeks ago. One of the first owners is F1-turned-DTM race driver Mika Häkkinen. “The CLK DTM AMG Cabriolet is exactly the right car for quick trips around my home town Monte Carlo [Monaco], or along the winding roads in the surrounding Maritime Alps,” he said.








More images here: http://images.leftlanenews.com/conte...-cabriolet.jpg
Old 06-12-2006, 12:03 PM
  #131  
Fahrvergnügen'd
 
charliemike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Maryland
Age: 52
Posts: 13,494
Received 1,568 Likes on 985 Posts
The front looks great ... The back looks great (despite the wing) ... And then there's the sides ... GAH!

Should have redone the fenders rather than just add shit to the sides!
Old 06-12-2006, 12:30 PM
  #132  
Photography Nerd
 
Dan Martin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Toronto
Age: 43
Posts: 21,489
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 7 Posts
What a strange car. The CLK-DTM is cool, but this just doesn't make any sense.

Why would you ever haul around 4 people in track car? Why would you want to reduce the chasis stiffness by chopping the roof off? Why would you want the added weight and complexity?

I'm sure they'll sell every one they make, but if I had the money, I'd be driving the hardtop.
Old 06-12-2006, 12:46 PM
  #133  
Fahrvergnügen'd
 
charliemike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Maryland
Age: 52
Posts: 13,494
Received 1,568 Likes on 985 Posts
Originally Posted by Dan Martin
What a strange car. The CLK-DTM is cool, but this just doesn't make any sense.

Why would you ever haul around 4 people in track car? Why would you want to reduce the chasis stiffness by chopping the roof off? Why would you want the added weight and complexity?

I'm sure they'll sell every one they make, but if I had the money, I'd be driving the hardtop.
Dude, it's 277k Euros ... Like $310k ... That's insane.
Old 06-12-2006, 12:55 PM
  #134  
Team Owner
iTrader: (1)
 
CGTSX2004's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Beach Cities, CA
Posts: 24,299
Received 378 Likes on 198 Posts
Originally Posted by Dan Martin
What a strange car. The CLK-DTM is cool, but this just doesn't make any sense.

Why would you ever haul around 4 people in track car? Why would you want to reduce the chasis stiffness by chopping the roof off? Why would you want the added weight and complexity?

I'm sure they'll sell every one they make, but if I had the money, I'd be driving the hardtop.
Cars like the CLK-DTM and the M3 CSL strike me as purely being homologation specials intended to allow the manufacturer to build off a better platform than the standard road car for racing purposes. They don't have to make sense since people will shell out money for it solely because it's rare.
Old 06-12-2006, 01:02 PM
  #135  
Suzuka Master
 
kurt_bradley's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Austin, TX
Age: 44
Posts: 6,897
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Dan Martin
What a strange car. The CLK-DTM is cool, but this just doesn't make any sense.

Why would you ever haul around 4 people in track car? Why would you want to reduce the chasis stiffness by chopping the roof off? Why would you want the added weight and complexity?

I'm sure they'll sell every one they make, but if I had the money, I'd be driving the hardtop.


This is stupid on soooo many levels.
Old 07-17-2006, 04:32 PM
  #136  
Moderator Alumnus
Thread Starter
 
gavriil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Washington DC (NOVA)
Age: 52
Posts: 16,399
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
I am looking for a new car. I have tested up to now:

C6 (both Z51 and base suspension)
Cayman S
Boxster S
M3
SC430
CLK550

and the 550 has won. The new engine is a monster and the 7G Tronic the best blend of best of both worlds (manual vs automatic tranny). The suspension is a great balance between sporty and refined over bumps.
Old 07-17-2006, 05:09 PM
  #137  
Burn some dust here
 
cob3683's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Atlanta
Age: 41
Posts: 5,709
Received 13 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by gavriil
I am looking for a new car. I have tested up to now:

C6 (both Z51 and base suspension)
Cayman S
Boxster S
M3
SC430
CLK550

and the 550 has won. The new engine is a monster and the 7G Tronic the best blend of best of both worlds (manual vs automatic tranny). The suspension is a great balance between sporty and refined over bumps.
Gav, those are some of the models I'm looking at around next May. Care to give your opinions on each? (particularly the CLK550)
Old 07-17-2006, 05:37 PM
  #138  
Moderator Alumnus
Thread Starter
 
gavriil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Washington DC (NOVA)
Age: 52
Posts: 16,399
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Originally Posted by cob3683
Gav, those are some of the models I'm looking at around next May. Care to give your opinions on each? (particularly the CLK550)
I am planning in starting a new thread in Car Talk to discuss the complete research of the thing. With the Vette a close 2nd the CLK550 for me is exactly what I am looking from a driving dynamics standpoint. Only if it looked a little more aggressive from the outside.
Old 07-17-2006, 06:04 PM
  #139  
Suzuka Master
 
Maximized's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Chicago Suburbs
Age: 43
Posts: 5,579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by gavriil
I am planning in starting a new thread in Car Talk to discuss the complete research of the thing. With the Vette a close 2nd the CLK550 for me is exactly what I am looking from a driving dynamics standpoint. Only if it looked a little more aggressive from the outside.
I've heard too many horror stories with Mercedes quality first hand. I personally wouldn't buy a Benz.
Old 07-17-2006, 06:13 PM
  #140  
Moderator Alumnus
 
Beltfed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Communist, NY
Posts: 9,574
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Maximized
I've heard too many horror stories with Mercedes quality first hand. I personally wouldn't buy a Benz.
You bought a Ford though........


Gav, a CLK550 will be a very hot car.

If you don't mind that its being redesigned soon, it would be a fine choice.
Old 07-18-2006, 12:22 AM
  #141  
Moderator Alumnus
Thread Starter
 
gavriil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Washington DC (NOVA)
Age: 52
Posts: 16,399
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Originally Posted by Beltfed
You bought a Ford though........


Gav, a CLK550 will be a very hot car.

If you don't mind that its being redesigned soon, it would be a fine choice.
Well, by soon, I am guessing two years from now. So that's OK with me since I am getting in a car-change spree of 3 years max!
Old 07-18-2006, 05:30 PM
  #142  
Moderator Alumnus
Thread Starter
 
gavriil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Washington DC (NOVA)
Age: 52
Posts: 16,399
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Here is the thread I opened:

https://acurazine.com/forums/car-talk-5/research-new-car-344044/
Old 07-18-2006, 06:30 PM
  #143  
Suzuka Master
 
Maximized's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Chicago Suburbs
Age: 43
Posts: 5,579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Beltfed
You bought a Ford though........


Gav, a CLK550 will be a very hot car.

If you don't mind that its being redesigned soon, it would be a fine choice.
Oddly enough, my Ford has been the most reliable car in my family. My mom's RX330 is had its share of problems and so has my fathers 545i. My dad has owned 5 german cars in the last few cars and ALL have had electrical problems. The newer Benz's aren't made like they used to be. I've got friends and family whom have the same experience recently with their new Mercedes.
Old 07-19-2006, 11:04 AM
  #144  
Senior Moderator
 
Yumcha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 167,232
Received 22,652 Likes on 13,891 Posts
Post CLK500 news...

With the 2007 CLK 63 AMG now pushing 481 horsepower — 119 horsepower more than the CLK 55 it replaced — Mercedes knew it had to do something to bridge the gap between the AMG model and the CLK 500. Today, the automaker unveiled the 2007 CLK 500, with a new V8 engine developing 388 horsepower, compared to 302 horsepower for the 2006 model. What's more, torque is increased to 530Nm — up from 460Nm. The increased output means zero to 62 mph takes just 5.2 seconds, rather than the previous 5.9. Fuel consumption is identical to the 2006 model. Mercedes has also made its 7G-TRONIC seven-speed transmission available on the 2007 CLK 350 and 500. The new AMG styling package includes includes leather multicontour seats, metallic paintwork, an AMG ergonomic sports steering wheel with shift paddles and aluminium sports pedals. Outside, new front and rear aprons, chrome tailpipes, 18-inch wheels, and perforated front brake rotors give the car a sportier appearance.






Old 07-20-2006, 09:37 AM
  #145  
Moderator Alumnus
Thread Starter
 
gavriil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Washington DC (NOVA)
Age: 52
Posts: 16,399
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
The above article applies only for European CLK cars. The 550 designation did not make it there, due to the strong brand recognition of the designation in Europe, while we get the 550 designation. I will post the USA article next.
Old 07-20-2006, 09:38 AM
  #146  
Moderator Alumnus
Thread Starter
 
gavriil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Washington DC (NOVA)
Age: 52
Posts: 16,399
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Mercedes gives the CLK an increase in displacement and a new AMG appearance package - - Source: Autoweek

Mercedes has finally given the CLK the new 5.5-liter V8 found in cars such as the SL550 and S550. As you would expect, the new designation is CLK550. The engine replaces the 5.0-liter V8 found in the old CLK500. It produces the 382 hp at 6000 rpm and 391 lb-ft of torque between 2,800 and 4,800 rpm, the same as it does in the SL and S-Class.

The car sprints from 0-62 mph in 5.2 seconds, a 0.7 second drop from last year's figure. Top speed is still limited to 155 mph. The seven-speed automatic transmission helps keep fuel economy the same as last year, despite a 26-percent increase in power. There is no word on pricing yet.

Mercedes has also announced the AMG appearance package. Interior changes include leather sport seats, a sport steering wheel with paddle shifters and aluminum sport pedals. On the exterior, the package adds metallic paint, unique 18" alloy wheels, a body kit with different front and rear bumpers, side skirts and a spoiler and of course a chrome AMG exhaust. Sport suspension and ventilated rotors should boost performance as well as looks. The package should cost about $5500.00.
Old 07-20-2006, 09:40 AM
  #147  
Moderator Alumnus
Thread Starter
 
gavriil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Washington DC (NOVA)
Age: 52
Posts: 16,399
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
The 5.2 is for the 0-100 k/h. I bet the coupe will do 4.8 or better when C&D tests it.
Old 07-20-2006, 11:37 AM
  #148  
Fahrvergnügen'd
 
charliemike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Maryland
Age: 52
Posts: 13,494
Received 1,568 Likes on 985 Posts
WTF that dyno graph is tiny!

*runs*

Why not just call them the CLK55? *blink* if the CLK63 is okay and not CLK630.
Old 07-20-2006, 11:45 AM
  #149  
Suzuka Master
 
kurt_bradley's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Austin, TX
Age: 44
Posts: 6,897
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by charliemike
WTF that dyno graph is tiny!

*runs*

Why not just call them the CLK55? *blink* if the CLK63 is okay and not CLK630.
"Normal" MB models use the 3 number model designations. The 2 number designations are for the AMG cars.
Old 07-20-2006, 12:33 PM
  #150  
Burn some dust here
 
cob3683's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Atlanta
Age: 41
Posts: 5,709
Received 13 Likes on 5 Posts
MSRP is already out....

Coupe - $55,675

Convertible - $63,675
Old 01-16-2007, 01:05 AM
  #151  
Moderator Alumnus
Thread Starter
 
gavriil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Washington DC (NOVA)
Age: 52
Posts: 16,399
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
2007 Mercedes-Benz CLK63 AMG Cabriolet - Short Take Road Tests - - BY DAVE VANDERWERP, PHOTOGRAPHY BY AARON KILEY - - Source: caranddriver.com

The current CLK is four years old, so it’s not surprising that the highlight here is the new, AMG-developed 6.2-liter V-8 beast that is spreading throughout Mercedes’ lineup of cranked-up AMG cars. It puts out 475 horsepower in the CLK63, making last year’s 362-hp CLK55 AMG seem somewhat tame. The new engine comes alive right off idle, heaving the tach toward the 7200-rpm redline and singing a refined yet seductive engine snarl that is nothing short of stupendous.

The urge to keep the throttle pinned is almost irresistible but will bring up extra-legal speeds in a hurry: 60 mph arrives in 4.2 seconds, 100 in 9.5, the quarter-mile in 12.5 at 116 mph. That’s 0.6 second quicker through the quarter than the last CLK55 coupe we tested [C/D, May 2004], despite the 4113-pound CLK63 weighing 373 more pounds. Those numbers are also within a sneeze of some intense performers, including the Ferrari F430 and BMW M5, and sufficient to humiliate the 2006 M3.

Inside, the CLK63 is fitted with seriously supportive front buckets, with lumbar, thigh, and bolster adjustments, and one of the sportiest steering wheels we’ve seen in a Benz. Even better, it doesn’t have that weighty feel we’ve become accustomed to in Mercedes products. Still, neither the steering nor the brakes respond quite as sharply as we’d like.

Turn off the stability control and the CLK63 is still as friendly as can be, happily neutral and content to slide around at hero-sized drift angles. Skidpad grip is a decent 0.86 g. But the extra-stiff AMG suspension sends noticeable tremors through the steering wheel and chassis, which makes us yearn for the more solid, sportier coupe that won’t be sold here.

The biggest negative is probably the heart-stopping $92,575 base price, some $45,600 above an entry-level CLK350. That’s also $5100 more than big-brother E63, which seems backward.

At that price, it seems Mercedes’ fabulous new engine is destined to stay rare. That’s a shame.

VEHICLE TYPE: front-engine, rear-wheel-drive, 4-passenger, 2-door convertible

PRICE AS TESTED: $96,655 (base price: $92,575)

ENGINE TYPE: DOHC 32-valve V-8, aluminum block and heads, port fuel injection
Displacement: 379 cu in, 6208cc
Power (SAE net): 475 bhp @ 6800 rpm
Torque (SAE net): 465 lb-ft @ 5200 rpm

TRANSMISSION: 7-speed automatic with manumatic shifting

DIMENSIONS:
Wheelbase: 106.9 in
Length: 183.1 in
Width: 68.5 in
Height: 54.4 in
Curb weight: 4113 lb

C/D TEST RESULTS:
Zero to 60 mph: 4.2 sec
Zero to 100 mph: 9.5 sec
Zero to 150 mph: 22.2 sec
Street start, 5–60 mph: 4.4 sec
Standing Ľ-mile: 12.5 sec @ 116 mph
Top speed (governor limited): 155 mph
Braking, 70–0 mph: 155 ft
Roadholding, 300-ft-dia skidpad: 0.86 g

FUEL ECONOMY:
EPA city driving: 13 mpg
Spec Sheet:

http://www.caranddriver.com/assets/d..._cabrio_ts.pdf
Old 01-16-2007, 01:12 AM
  #152  
Burning Brakes
 
FutureBagdA4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Irvine, CA
Age: 36
Posts: 755
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
to put it into retrospect, when this is compared to a CLK-DTM, it seems like a steal for less than 1/4 of the price
Old 02-15-2007, 11:57 AM
  #153  
Moderator Alumnus
Thread Starter
 
gavriil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Washington DC (NOVA)
Age: 52
Posts: 16,399
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Next Gen. Mercedes CLK-Class News



Article in German here

It says that it will debut in April 2009 and that it will be defined by the E-class with respect to style. The interior design will be based on the S-Class.
Old 02-15-2007, 11:58 AM
  #154  
Moderator Alumnus
Thread Starter
 
gavriil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Washington DC (NOVA)
Age: 52
Posts: 16,399
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
So if I bought the CLK550 now, I got two years before the new one comes out. Leasing it is out of the question because I now need 25K miles a year from my vehicle. I think the best alternative is to wait for some of the 2007 550s go on sale as lightly used and see what happens to their price.
Old 02-18-2007, 11:21 PM
  #155  
_____ like a rabbit
 
stangg172004's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Edgewater, Chicago, IL
Age: 36
Posts: 8,594
Received 12 Likes on 10 Posts
hmmm, im undecided on the looks...
Old 02-20-2007, 07:40 AM
  #156  
Racer
 
DelawareCLS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Delaware
Posts: 292
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Tough to tell from the pic...at least they put a little bit more macho into the thing (though I think the Pre- and Post'03 models look pretty good).

I wouldn't be surprised if the current CLK550 prices tank in the next 3 years or so, just like the others have. You can pick up a lightly used 2002 CLK55 today for about mid-'20's (coupe, not convertible).
Old 02-20-2007, 08:43 AM
  #157  
Acura Vet
 
alphason'sac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Snellville, GA
Age: 46
Posts: 830
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by stangg172004
hmmm, im undecided on the looks...
I would have to say the same. I don't like the curent CLK because I think that it lost it's masculinity. The previous GEN had an understated elegance that the current one lacks IMHO. I will reserve judgment on the next GEN for when I can get a better look at it. I am sure that we will see a lot more of this car in the coming months.
Old 02-20-2007, 09:50 AM
  #158  
Moderator Alumnus
 
Beltfed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Communist, NY
Posts: 9,574
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If you like the new C, chances are you'll like the new CLK.

Guarantee it will be more aggressive than the current model (W209).
Old 02-20-2007, 01:14 PM
  #159  
Moderator Alumnus
 
Silver™'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: SoCal
Posts: 37,312
Received 337 Likes on 244 Posts
Except for the rectangle headlights I like. Looks like a smaller CL550.

I might hold onto my CLK500 and upgrade to this
Old 04-04-2007, 04:03 PM
  #160  
Senior Moderator
 
Yumcha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 167,232
Received 22,652 Likes on 13,891 Posts
Post 2007 Clk63 Amg

WYHI...?

Cuz, dayum...I so would.





Quick Reply: Mercedes-Benz: CLK-Class news **2009 Spied (page 6)**



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:33 AM.