Lamborghini: Gallardo News **LP 570-4 Squadra Corse Revealed (page 10)**

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-26-2003, 04:08 PM
  #1  
Race Director
Thread Starter
 
zeroday's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 17,921
Received 15 Likes on 4 Posts
Lamborghini: Gallardo News **LP 570-4 Squadra Corse Revealed (page 10)**

If I had 160k for a car I think i'd keep saving up for the big daddy lambo, but cool anyway I guess:

http://www.autoweek.com/cat_content...._code=05935169




Old 03-26-2003, 04:31 PM
  #2  
Banned
 
Red Nj-s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: central jerzey
Age: 38
Posts: 5,547
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
better than the murcielago as far as looks goes
Old 03-26-2003, 08:07 PM
  #3  
Suzuka Master
 
danny25's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: TX
Age: 43
Posts: 8,869
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
how can you tell? it looks like a tank in those pics.
Old 03-26-2003, 09:19 PM
  #4  
__
 
Zoot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Pa
Posts: 1,743
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
why are we looking at these spy pics when the car was already introduced?
Old 03-26-2003, 09:52 PM
  #5  
Fuct in the hed!
 
Nicky Pass's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Chicagoland-ish
Age: 45
Posts: 14,057
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
I'd drive it!
Old 03-26-2003, 11:04 PM
  #6  
Race Director
Thread Starter
 
zeroday's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 17,921
Received 15 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally posted by Zoot
why are we looking at these spy pics when the car was already introduced?
Wow, that looks nice. I searched this site before I posted and didn't find anything. This is why I usually don't bother posting stuff like this, somebody always throws up one of those "welcome to last week" pics...fuck it, next time I won't bother.
Old 03-28-2003, 08:32 AM
  #7  
Suzuka Master
 
danny25's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: TX
Age: 43
Posts: 8,869
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally posted by Zoot
why are we looking at these spy pics when the car was already introduced?
WOW, now that does look better than the Murcielago. :phatyo:
Old 04-05-2003, 10:40 PM
  #8  
Banned
 
Red Nj-s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: central jerzey
Age: 38
Posts: 5,547
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by danny25
WOW, now that does look better than the Murcielago. :phatyo:
Told ya so.
Old 04-06-2003, 12:07 AM
  #9  
 
1SICKLEX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Everywhere
Age: 46
Posts: 12,038
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
wOW, has some CIEN in it with the New Edge styling. Nice. Those Headlights though, WHOA they are long.
Old 10-03-2003, 08:51 AM
  #10  
Moderator Alumnus
 
gavriil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Washington DC (NOVA)
Age: 52
Posts: 16,399
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Lambo Gallardo preproduction model tested and it's SLOW!

Again MotorTrend testing a preproduction exotic.

Numbers:

0-60 in 4.7 seconds
1/4 mile = 13.08 @ 109.89 mph

That's barely quicker than a base C5.

MotorTrend says the conditions were "less than ideal". Did not describe what that meant though. It did not look like rain on the photos. They promised another test later this year.

Braking was at 114 feet (from 60mph)

Engine is 5 liter V10
Power: 495HP @ 7800 rpm
Torque: 376 pounds at 4500 rpm

That's 99.8 HP per liter

Base Price: $166K
Price as tested: $172K
Old 10-03-2003, 08:53 AM
  #11  
Moderator Alumnus
 
gavriil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Washington DC (NOVA)
Age: 52
Posts: 16,399
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
It's interesting to see that USAmerican exotics show better quality control than exotic Italians on a pre-production basis (Ford GT performance better than expected - Gallardo performance worse than expected). The world has changed...
Old 10-03-2003, 09:09 AM
  #12  
Suzuka Master
 
danny25's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: TX
Age: 43
Posts: 8,869
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
either way, the new Lambo is one of the best looking exotics in a long time, imho.
Old 10-03-2003, 09:28 AM
  #13  
Moderator Alumnus
 
gavriil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Washington DC (NOVA)
Age: 52
Posts: 16,399
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Originally posted by danny25
either way, the new Lambo is one of the best looking exotics in a long time, imho.
Possibly, but my point is its performance. As a pre-prodcution car.
Old 10-03-2003, 12:45 PM
  #14  
Banned
 
Red Nj-s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: central jerzey
Age: 38
Posts: 5,547
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by gavriil
It's interesting to see that USAmerican exotics show better quality control than exotic Italians on a pre-production basis (Ford GT performance better than expected - Gallardo performance worse than expected). The world has changed...
Well GM + Ford have alot more money than Lambo and Ferrari.
Old 10-03-2003, 12:47 PM
  #15  
Moderator Alumnus
 
gavriil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Washington DC (NOVA)
Age: 52
Posts: 16,399
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Originally posted by Red Nj-s
Well GM + Ford have alot more money than Lambo and Ferrari.
Exactly.
Old 10-03-2003, 11:43 PM
  #16  
-S namyaC-
 
proaudio22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: TN
Age: 39
Posts: 4,099
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Who gives a shit if it is slow...if someone is giving me a lambo I'm not gonna complain. How many of us here could actually buy one?
Old 10-04-2003, 11:59 AM
  #17  
THE SILVER BULLET
 
pimpscls's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: socal
Age: 36
Posts: 3,659
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
its faster trust me we're looking at a true o-60 of 3.9 to 4.2 i believe
Old 10-04-2003, 03:27 PM
  #18  
Moderator Alumnus
 
gavriil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Washington DC (NOVA)
Age: 52
Posts: 16,399
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Originally posted by pimpscls
its faster trust me we're looking at a true o-60 of 3.9 to 4.2 i believe
4.2 is what Lambo officially claims for the Gallardo. I am sure there was something wrong with that car or something else was wrong...
Old 10-07-2003, 05:51 AM
  #19  
Racer
 
bsprinker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: just outside of Pittsburgh, PA
Age: 48
Posts: 285
Received 9 Likes on 7 Posts
Originally posted by Red Nj-s
Well GM + Ford have alot more money than Lambo and Ferrari.
Sorry, but IMO, I just cannot agree with that statement about GM and Ford having more money than Ferrari. Lambo...maybe, but Ferrari, I don't think so. Any of you ever heard of a little motor sport called Formula1...That's the one that Ferrari has dominated the last five years or so.

GM and Ford may have the biggest balls in the US, but internationally, Ferrari is one to be contended with. Do you know how much money Ferrari pays M. Schumacher to race in Formula1?....roughly $60 million a year. And that is just to pay one race car driver. I understand that it costs them over $300 million to run two cars for the F1 season. Ford is currently running a Jaguar team, but I insist that they are not throwing around the kind of money that Ferrari is.

Nothing personal, but I just could not let that statement go uncontested.
Old 10-07-2003, 06:07 AM
  #20  
The Creator
 
soopa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Albany, NY
Age: 42
Posts: 37,950
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 3 Posts
prinker... that doesn't mean that Ferrari has more money than Ford.

Ferrari allocates a fuckload of their money towards Formula 1... its not like their throwing their excess cash at it.

As for Lamborghini... they are owned by Volkswagen Group.... another insanely wealthy auto company.


Its sorta like... you own a CLS right, maybe your neighbor owns a Focus. Does that mean you have more money than him? No.
Old 10-07-2003, 07:50 AM
  #21  
Moderator Alumnus
 
gavriil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Washington DC (NOVA)
Age: 52
Posts: 16,399
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Originally posted by bsprinker
Sorry, but IMO, I just cannot agree with that statement about GM and Ford having more money than Ferrari. Lambo...maybe, but Ferrari, I don't think so. Any of you ever heard of a little motor sport called Formula1...That's the one that Ferrari has dominated the last five years or so.

GM and Ford may have the biggest balls in the US, but internationally, Ferrari is one to be contended with. Do you know how much money Ferrari pays M. Schumacher to race in Formula1?....roughly $60 million a year. And that is just to pay one race car driver. I understand that it costs them over $300 million to run two cars for the F1 season. Ford is currently running a Jaguar team, but I insist that they are not throwing around the kind of money that Ferrari is.

Nothing personal, but I just could not let that statement go uncontested.

bsprinker I am sorry but there is simply no comparison between Ferrari and Ford financially. Although it would be no surprise that from a FINANCIAL HEALTH perspective Ferrari is currently on top as compared to Ford (Ford has been in financial trouble for a few years now and there is the remote possibility of Chapter 11 for them).

But if we are talking on a revenue basis, there is just no comparison.

Just a reference. Ferrari is owned by Fiat. Fiat is 20% owned by GM. GM has a put option to completely acquire Fiat in the next 2 years. GM and Ford are comparable on a financial basis.

GM and Ford are in the top 10 largest companies in the world from a revenue basis, regardless of sector! They are collosal.
Old 10-08-2003, 08:20 AM
  #22  
Racer
 
bsprinker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: just outside of Pittsburgh, PA
Age: 48
Posts: 285
Received 9 Likes on 7 Posts
Originally posted by soopa
prinker... that doesn't mean that Ferrari has more money than Ford.

Ferrari allocates a fuckload of their money towards Formula 1... its not like their throwing their excess cash at it.

As for Lamborghini... they are owned by Volkswagen Group.... another insanely wealthy auto company.


Its sorta like... you own a CLS right, maybe your neighbor owns a Focus. Does that mean you have more money than him? No.
soopa, I agree with you regarding your statement about Lambo and Volkswagon, and your analogy about me owning a CLS and my neighbor owning a Focus. Your right, it doesn't necessarily mean that I have more money than my neighbor...it means that I have better taste in cars. (That's for sure!!)
Old 01-23-2004, 09:22 PM
  #23  
Moderator Alumnus
 
gavriil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Washington DC (NOVA)
Age: 52
Posts: 16,399
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Zero to 60 mph = 4.1 --- 1/4-mile= 12.4 sec @ 118 mph --- 70–0 mph= 158 ft --- 300-ft-dia skidpad 1.00 g --- Price as tested: $177,200
Old 01-23-2004, 09:27 PM
  #24  
Moderator Alumnus
 
gavriil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Washington DC (NOVA)
Age: 52
Posts: 16,399
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
ENGINE
Type V-10, aluminum block and heads
Bore x stroke 3.25 x 3.65 in, 82.5 x 92.8mm
Displacement 303 cu in, 4961cc
Compression ratio 11.0:1
Fuel-delivery system port injection
Valve gear chain-driven double overhead cams, 4 valves per cylinder, hydraulic lifters, variable intake- and exhaust-valve timing
Power (SAE net) 493 bhp @ 7800 rpm
Torque (SAE net) 376 lb-ft @ 4500 rpm
Redline 8100 rpm


DRIVETRAIN
Transmission 6-speed manual with automated shifting and clutch
Final-drive ratio 3.08:1, limited slip
Transfer-gear ratio 1.12:1
4-wheel-drive system full time with limited-slip center differential, open front differential, and limited-slip rear differential with brake-based traction-control
Gear Ratio Mph/1000 rpm Max test speed
I 2.56 8.4 68 mph (8100 rpm)
II 1.85 11.7 94 mph (8100 rpm)
III 1.42 15.2 123 mph (8100 rpm)
IV 1.14 19.0 154 mph (8100 rpm)
V 0.94 23.0 186 mph (8100 rpm)
VI 0.81 26.8 191 mph (7150 rpm)
Old 01-23-2004, 10:00 PM
  #25  
I Feel Too Old Here
 
ItalianStallion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Age: 44
Posts: 5,100
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
shit. i dunno the numbers on the Modena but i would imagine that this lambo is serious shit.
Old 01-23-2004, 11:21 PM
  #26  
Moderator Alumnus
 
Beltfed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Communist, NY
Posts: 9,574
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There is a guy on Ferrarichat who has a 360 spider and decided to test drive the Gallardo, thought about trading the 360.

End result, he absolutely hated the car....wasn't comfortable in it (lot of people have this complaint), thought it felt disconnected from the road, some other issues as well.

For $170k, I wouldn't buy a Gallardo.
Old 01-23-2004, 11:21 PM
  #27  
337
 
CLUofI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Iowa City/Des Moines
Posts: 3,141
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
what the hell are they talking about the v-10 in the vw and porsche is a diesel.
Old 07-20-2004, 09:47 PM
  #28  
Moderator Alumnus
 
gavriil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Washington DC (NOVA)
Age: 52
Posts: 16,399
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Old 07-20-2004, 09:48 PM
  #29  
Moderator Alumnus
 
gavriil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Washington DC (NOVA)
Age: 52
Posts: 16,399
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Gallardo Drop-top Ups Ante - - Source: Autoexpress


A more extreme version of the yet-to-be-launched Lamborghini Gallardo drop-top is in development, Auto Express has learned.

Inspired by the Murciélago Roadster the project has yet to get the go-ahead from company bosses. However, insiders tell us it's been proposed in response to the race-bred F360 Stradale from Ferrari.

There's also news on the standard Gallardo convertible, pictures of which were first seen in issue 758. It's expected to cost £120,000 and, as with the coupé, will sport a 500bhp, V10 engine and six-speed, semi-automatic gearbox.

Lamborghini has also revealed plans to build a limited run of road-going versions of the Murciélago R-GT competition car unveiled at last autumn's Frankfurt Motor Show. Collectors will get the chance to buy the supercar, which will vary little from the carbon-bodied racer. Ferrari's Enzo had better watch out!


Old 07-20-2004, 11:20 PM
  #30  
Pit Stop?
 
Minch00's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Orlando FL
Age: 38
Posts: 13,526
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I really don't like the Gallardo......I'd get an SL65 over it......
Old 07-21-2004, 12:00 AM
  #31  
hail to the victors
 
chungkopi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: chicago
Age: 44
Posts: 3,498
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
beautiful. i'll take this over 2 sl65
Old 10-06-2004, 10:27 PM
  #32  
Moderator Alumnus
 
gavriil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Washington DC (NOVA)
Age: 52
Posts: 16,399
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Lamborghini Gallardo News **Gets Track Pack**

Gallardo gets track pack - - Source: Autocar


Lamborghini has reacted to the threat posed by Ferrari’s new F430 by developing a ‘track pack’ for its Gallardo. Aimed at reducing the car’s tendency to understeer, the pack consists of ultra-sticky Pirelli P-Zero Corsa tyres, a new sports suspension option and a new steering pump oil cooler, recognising the fact that the pump oil can boil during heavy use.

Although the development doesn’t include any performance upgrades, insiders have revealed that the company is also working on upping the V10’s power from its current 492bhp.

Old 05-02-2005, 11:53 AM
  #33  
Moderator Alumnus
 
gavriil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Washington DC (NOVA)
Age: 52
Posts: 16,399
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Next Gen. Lamborghini Gallardo News

Spy Shots: ’07 Lamborghini Gallardo - - No bull—well, maybe a restyled one - - By Hans Lehmann/Hidden Image - - Source: The Car Connection

The Lamborghini Gallardo has been on the market since March 2003.


Now parent company Audi is apparently preparing a restyling of the high performance mid-engine all-wheel-drive sports car.

As can be seen on the photos, taken at the Nürburgring, the test car has different air intakes on its flanks. Rumors from the track say the current 5.0-liter 40-valve V-10 (500 hp) is going to be upgraded to some degree.


Old 05-02-2005, 11:55 AM
  #34  
Moderator Alumnus
 
gavriil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Washington DC (NOVA)
Age: 52
Posts: 16,399
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Due to AWD and its weight, this car needs a lot more power than now. Also the gear ratios, especially first, need to be significantly shortened. I've heard 1st goes to almost 70mph.
Old 05-02-2005, 12:22 PM
  #35  
Cost Drivers!!!!
 
Zapata's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: burbs of philly
Age: 46
Posts: 19,392
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
i likey
Old 05-02-2005, 12:32 PM
  #36  
Outnumbered at home
 
95gt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: MD
Age: 46
Posts: 5,334
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
That car is just the hawtness

saw one down at miami beach last weekend. So pretty
Old 05-02-2005, 01:39 PM
  #37  
Pit Stop?
 
Minch00's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Orlando FL
Age: 38
Posts: 13,526
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I hate that car. I really really do.
Old 05-02-2005, 01:46 PM
  #38  
dom
Senior Moderator
 
dom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Toronto, Canada
Age: 47
Posts: 47,710
Received 801 Likes on 662 Posts
Originally Posted by gavriil
Due to AWD and its weight, this car needs a lot more power than now.

I know, 0-60 in 4 sec and a 12.5 1/4 mile is damn slow
Old 05-02-2005, 01:49 PM
  #39  
Outnumbered at home
 
95gt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: MD
Age: 46
Posts: 5,334
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Minch00
I hate that car. I really really do.

Old 05-02-2005, 01:58 PM
  #40  
Pit Stop?
 
Minch00's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Orlando FL
Age: 38
Posts: 13,526
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by 95gt

They tried to make Lamborghini civilized...........giving it civilian doors and a platform-sharing engine. It's a raging bull, not a fucking grazing cow!


Quick Reply: Lamborghini: Gallardo News **LP 570-4 Squadra Corse Revealed (page 10)**



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:47 PM.