Ford Under-rates Again: 2003 Mustang Mach 1

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-11-2003, 11:23 AM
  #1  
Moderator Alumnus
Thread Starter
 
gavriil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Washington DC (NOVA)
Age: 52
Posts: 16,399
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Ford Under-rates Again: 2003 Mustang Mach 1

by, Dean Hantzis

Not only has Ford under-rated the 2003 Mustang Cobra, but also the 2003 Mustang Mach 1. Ford claims the Mach 1 engine produces 305hp and 320ft/lb of torque at the flywheel. From our dyno results, we have found the Mach 1 produces as much as 15 horsepower and 20ft/lb of torque above what is advertised.

When the 4.6 DOHC motor was first released by Ford (the 1996 Mustang Cobra), stock dyno results ranged anywhere from 250 to 260 horsepower and torque to the wheels. This engine is advertised to make 305hp and 300ft/lb of torque at the flywheel. Now in 2003, with a few engine enhancements, the Mach1 is producing between 265-270 horsepower and 280+ ft/lb of torque to the wheels. However, Ford still claims the engine makes the same horsepower and only 20 ft/lb more torque compared to the 1996 4.6 DOHC motor. Assuming a 16 percent drivetrain loss, the new Mach 1 motor is producing between 315-320 horsepower and 333-340 ft/lb of torque.

Quarter mile drag times also support that the Mach 1 is under-rated. The 96-98 Cobras (stock) run the quarter mile in the high 13 second range, while the Mach 1 times are reportedly in the low 13 second range.



Engine Specs: 4.6Liter dohc (8Cyl)
Mileage: 1300 miles
Aspiration: normally aspirated[0 psi]
Transmission: 5M
Max RWHP: 270.2 @ 5260 rpms
Max RWTQ: 286.8 @ 4330 rpms
Estimated Fly Wheel Horsepower: 322 @ 5260 rpms [assuming 16 % drivetrain loss]
Estimated Fly Wheel Torque: 341 @ 4330 rpms [assuming 16 % drivetrain loss]
Room temp / Inlet Temp (F): 0.0 / 94.6
Pressure (kPa): 30.1
Humidity (%): 0.0
Condition Details: Gear Ratio : 49.37 RPM/MPH Correction Factor : 0.99 SAE



Engine Specs: 4.6Liter dohc (8Cyl)
Mileage: 3100 miles
Aspiration: normally aspirated[0 psi]
Transmission: 5M
Max RWHP: 265.7 @ 5130 rpms
Max RWTQ: 280.1 @ 4320 rpms
Estimated Fly Wheel Horsepower: 316 @ 5130 rpms [assuming 16 % drivetrain loss]
Estimated Fly Wheel Torque: 333 @ 4320 rpms [assuming 16 % drivetrain loss]
Room temp / Inlet Temp (F): 0.0 / 64.2
Pressure (kPa): 30.0
Humidity (%): 0.0
Condition Details: Gear Ratio : 48.99 RPM/MPH Correction Factor : 0.96 SAE

Why has Ford under-rated these two Mustangs? One might assume that Ford does not want to experience a similar problem as when they over-rated the horsepower and torque output of the 1999 Cobra. This problem forced Ford to create a performance package to increase the power of the 99 Cobra, costing them time and money. So much time was wasted that the 2000 Cobra never went into production. It would be no surprise if all future Ford performance vehicles will be at least slightly under-rated in power. It is the safe route for Ford to take and keeps performance enthusiasts more than satisfied.
Old 09-11-2003, 11:26 AM
  #2  
Moderator Alumnus
Thread Starter
 
gavriil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Washington DC (NOVA)
Age: 52
Posts: 16,399
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
I think, even 320HP is underated for that engine. I would guess as high as 340HP. That thing is fast. It consistently does the 0-60 in 5.2 secs. Or better depending on factors. Good for Ford. Better underate than overate.
Old 09-11-2003, 11:31 AM
  #3  
Moderator Alumnus
Thread Starter
 
gavriil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Washington DC (NOVA)
Age: 52
Posts: 16,399
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
The 2003 Mustang Cobra - Under-rated by Ford
by, Dean Hantzis

The 2003 Cobra exploded on the automotive scene with a super-charged 4.6 Liter DOHC V8 engine. Compared to recent SVT Cobras, the 2003 has been labeled "King of the Hill" by auto enthusiasts. Ford claims that the Cobra's engine produces 390 horsepower and 390 ft./lb. of torque.

Now that this new Cobra is finally out on the streets, owners have been taking them in for dynamometer testing. The results--encouraging. Assuming a 16% drivetrain loss with the 6 speed manual transmission, this Cobra should theoretically produce between 325-335 horsepower and torque to the wheels. However, after multiple dynamometer results have been obtained from many different owners, the 2003 Cobra is producing well above Ford's advertised horsepower. Typically these cars are producing between 350-365 horsepower and torque to the wheels. With a 16% drivetrain loss, this equates to 406-423 to the flywheel (engine output).

Now, why did Ford under-rate the power of the 2003 Cobra in their advertisements? Some speculate that Ford did not want to experience the same backlash from the false advertising of the 99 Cobra, which produced well under the advertised horsepower and torque. Others say Ford did this to keep insurance costs down for their customers, which in turn would increase sales. Regardless of the reason, the new Cobras are making owners very happy. With over 400 horsepower for $34,000 the 2003 Cobra holds one of the best horsepower to dollar ratios in the automotive industry today.



2003 ford mustang cobra
Engine Specs: 4.6Liter dohc (8Cyl)
Mileage: 2700 miles
Aspiration: super-charged[8 psi]
Transmission: 6M
Max RWHP: 355.7 @ 6530 rpms
Max RWTQ: 352.4 @ 4110 rpms
Estimated Fly Wheel Horsepower: 423 @ 6530 rpms [assuming 16 % drivetrain loss]
Estimated Fly Wheel Torque: 420 @ 4110 rpms [assuming 16 % drivetrain loss]
Room temp / Inlet Temp (F): 0.0 / 67.8
Pressure (kPa): 30.0
Humidity (%): 0.0
Condition Details: Gear Ratio : 49.42 RPM/MPH Correction Factor : 0.96 SAE
Old 09-11-2003, 11:31 AM
  #4  
Moderator Alumnus
Thread Starter
 
gavriil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Washington DC (NOVA)
Age: 52
Posts: 16,399
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Now that's one smooth torque curve on that Cobra. THat engine must be a joy to use for everyday driving.
Old 09-11-2003, 11:38 AM
  #5  
Banned
 
jimcol711's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Age: 44
Posts: 6,227
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
ugly or not, domestic or not, outdated interior or not, the mustang mach 1 and especially the cobra are fucking bad ass cars for the money, one couldnt ask for anything more for the price these vehicles are offered at. just spectacular preformers. hopefully the new mustang will carry the torch!!!
Old 09-11-2003, 11:43 AM
  #6  
Moderator Alumnus
Thread Starter
 
gavriil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Washington DC (NOVA)
Age: 52
Posts: 16,399
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Originally posted by jimcol711
ugly or not, domestic or not, outdated interior or not, the mustang mach 1 and especially the cobra are fucking bad ass cars for the money, one couldnt ask for anything more for the price these vehicles are offered at. just spectacular preformers. hopefully the new mustang will carry the torch!!!
Indeed. The next Mustang will for sure carry the torch. They are dropping the dynasaur 3.8 liter OHV for a 3 liter DOHC for the base model. That's a good sign in my opinion. Yes a little less torque, but I am sure it will be more benefits in the end than not.

The 4.6 liter DOHC is carried too both in its NA, as well as, its boosted versions. And we know how easy it will be for Ford to generate another 30-50 HP off of that force fed engine. Change the pulley, reprogram ECU, bam! More power!
Old 09-11-2003, 12:59 PM
  #7  
Fuct in the hed!
 
Nicky Pass's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Chicagoland-ish
Age: 45
Posts: 14,057
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
Thats awesome....a car that actually puts out the amount of HP ithe manufacturer says it does!!!!
Old 09-11-2003, 02:05 PM
  #8  
Suzuka Master
 
cusdaddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Age: 46
Posts: 7,083
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Mazda should start taking some notes.. Especially since they are basically the same company!
Old 09-11-2003, 02:46 PM
  #9  
Senior Moderator
 
GreenMonster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Swansea, MA
Age: 58
Posts: 35,218
Received 15 Likes on 7 Posts
I love to see dynos of cars that have more TQ then HP

I guess that 'cause I got used to driving v8's (my last car had the 4.6L in my Tbird).
Old 09-11-2003, 07:45 PM
  #10  
Mazda3 and Honda Civic in
 
gdubb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Houston
Age: 48
Posts: 5,635
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Awsome, def love to hear this. I like the Mach 1's and Cobra's alot. Who doesnt like more power than adverstised
Old 09-12-2003, 06:56 AM
  #11  
Floyd Mayweather Jr.
 
Black CL-S 4-Life's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: The City of Syrup Screwston, Texas
Posts: 14,078
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally posted by gdubb
Awsome, def love to hear this. I like the Mach 1's and Cobra's alot. Who doesnt like more power than adverstised
Now all Ford needs to do is get rid of the V6 Mustang.
Old 09-12-2003, 07:30 AM
  #12  
Silver Surfer CLS
 
mblock66's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: New Jersey
Age: 46
Posts: 429
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
are you kidding the v6 outsells the V8 they would never get rid of that. That is the "college girl daddy buy me a convertable" car. And girls don't car that it is a v6 ahhah they just want a mustang convet
Old 09-12-2003, 07:55 AM
  #13  
Floyd Mayweather Jr.
 
Black CL-S 4-Life's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: The City of Syrup Screwston, Texas
Posts: 14,078
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally posted by mblock66
are you kidding the v6 outsells the V8 they would never get rid of that. That is the "college girl daddy buy me a convertable" car. And girls don't car that it is a v6 ahhah they just want a mustang convet
I know they wouldn't but the V6 is a disgrace to the Mustang Badge, its not a real Mustang.
Old 09-12-2003, 08:24 AM
  #14  
Moderator Alumnus
Thread Starter
 
gavriil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Washington DC (NOVA)
Age: 52
Posts: 16,399
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Originally posted by cusdaddy
Mazda should start taking some notes.. Especially since they are basically the same company!
Not exactly right, though they work very closely together. Ford owns about 1/3rd of Mazda.
Old 09-12-2003, 08:26 AM
  #15  
Moderator Alumnus
Thread Starter
 
gavriil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Washington DC (NOVA)
Age: 52
Posts: 16,399
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Originally posted by Black CL-S 4-Life
Now all Ford needs to do is get rid of the V6 Mustang.
That will never happen The Mustang is supposed to be an affordable USAmerican sports car.
Old 09-12-2003, 08:29 AM
  #16  
Moderator Alumnus
Thread Starter
 
gavriil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Washington DC (NOVA)
Age: 52
Posts: 16,399
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Originally posted by gavriil
Indeed. The next Mustang will for sure carry the torch. They are dropping the dynasaur 3.8 liter OHV for a 3 liter DOHC for the base model. That's a good sign in my opinion. Yes a little less torque, but I am sure it will be more benefits in the end than not.

The 4.6 liter DOHC is carried too both in its NA, as well as, its boosted versions. And we know how easy it will be for Ford to generate another 30-50 HP off of that force fed engine. Change the pulley, reprogram ECU, bam! More power!
Actually a correction to the above: The rumor is for the top engine to be the return of the 5 liter V8 only in boosted form. Hello 450-500 HP
Old 09-12-2003, 08:45 AM
  #17  
Floyd Mayweather Jr.
 
Black CL-S 4-Life's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: The City of Syrup Screwston, Texas
Posts: 14,078
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally posted by gavriil
That will never happen The Mustang is supposed to be an affordable USAmerican sports car.
Yeah but the V6 isn't a sports car.
Old 09-12-2003, 11:24 AM
  #18  
RIP Red-CL
 
thealliance15's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Age: 38
Posts: 889
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i love mach1s and would take it over a cobra, if i had the money for a supercharger.
Old 09-12-2003, 11:24 AM
  #19  
Safety Car
 
heyitsme's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: philly
Posts: 4,426
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i'll be more interested when they drop this power in the next gen body, hopefully the handling/suspension will be more towards a gt sportscar rather than a musclecar.
Old 09-12-2003, 12:30 PM
  #20  
Moderator Alumnus
Thread Starter
 
gavriil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Washington DC (NOVA)
Age: 52
Posts: 16,399
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Originally posted by Black CL-S 4-Life
Yeah but the V6 isn't a sports car.


Let me rephrase:

That will never happen. The Mustang is supposed to be an affordable USAmerican sports car...from the outside.
Old 09-12-2003, 01:04 PM
  #21  
 
1SICKLEX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Everywhere
Age: 46
Posts: 12,038
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I am glad SOMEBODY underated instead of all these fucking companies quoting HP and 1/4 mile times going down Mt. Everest filled with fat bitches eating chicken and gummy bears with Hurricane Isabel providing wind.
Old 09-13-2003, 07:10 AM
  #22  
TQ > MPG
 
Joe5.0's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Metro Detroit
Age: 42
Posts: 3,624
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
They also underrated the Bullit by a little. The intake is worth 10hp alone, and I believe it had underdrive pulleys also. It was only rated 5hp higher than the GT.

And watch out guys, word is that the new 3.5L Duratec could make it's way into the V6 Mustang as an optional engine, and Ford has said the engine can make up to 275hp, which it probably will when put into the Ford 500.

This isn't really anything new though. My 94 GT was rated at 215hp, but they consistenly put down 190-195hp to the wheels. The 93 Cobra was rated at 235hp, but they would dyno at just about 230hp to the wheels.
Old 09-14-2003, 09:18 AM
  #23  
Banned
 
Red Nj-s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: central jerzey
Age: 38
Posts: 5,547
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It is a deffinitly a fast car, and it is a great seller for Ford, but I just don't like it.

It looks like it's going to fall apart to me, for some reason, and EVERYONE has one.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
tonio
Car Talk
252
02-05-2019 05:43 PM
rp_guy
Member Cars for Sale
9
07-16-2017 07:33 AM
Pham Alvan
2G TL (1999-2003)
38
03-16-2016 09:17 AM
95oRANGEcRUSH
Car Talk
35
09-25-2015 12:50 PM



Quick Reply: Ford Under-rates Again: 2003 Mustang Mach 1



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:04 PM.