Ferrari Modena Biturbo...
discussions are always fun..... i'll post later....need to get some work done 
10-19-2003, 09:26 PM
#44
Burning Brakes
Join Date: May 2003
Location: D.C Suburbs
Posts: 858
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
gav i think you need to stop man its making you look ridiculous this modena is far more superior than the gt40 hands down there really is no arguement whatsoever and Zap its a MT
11-30-2003, 06:15 PM
#47
Suzuka Master
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Age: 45
Posts: 7,083
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by ApocalypseCL
gav i think you need to stop man its making you look ridiculous this modena is far more superior than the gt40 hands down there really is no arguement whatsoever and Zap its a MT
gav i think you need to stop man its making you look ridiculous this modena is far more superior than the gt40 hands down there really is no arguement whatsoever and Zap its a MT
Quote from C&D:
"First Place: Ford GT
It wasn't even a contest. The Ford GT so completely dusted off its two highly recognized competitors (Porche GT3, Ferrari Challenge Stradale (360)) that if we wanted to make this a real challenge, we would have had to go all the way up the "supercar" price ladder. The $401,000 Saleen S7 is about as quick as the Ford GT, and we know of only one car that would surely outrun the Ford - The $659,000 Ferrari Enzo.
Rocketing the GT to 60mph in 3.3 seconds and to 150 in 16.9 (that's an incredible seven seconds quicker than the Porche and Ferrari) was a cinch....."
I hope after seeing this, some of you give more props to the GT.. It's an awesome car and literally blows away it's competition (in performance) in it's price range.
11-30-2003, 07:05 PM
#48
is Pretty Much a Moron
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Rochester, NY
Age: 38
Posts: 8,140
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
1 Post
The GT40 may be faster, A LOT faster, but yummy....that Ferrari is sooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo sexy. Regardless of speed, Ferrari > GT40. I can respect the engineering that went into making a car get to 60 in 3.3 sec, albeit with little understanding. But I mean come on, in the overall looks, presence, classiness categories.....THAT Ferrari wins 10x over.
11-30-2003, 07:29 PM
#49
Suzuka Master
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Age: 45
Posts: 7,083
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by TypeSAddict
The GT40 may be faster, A LOT faster, but yummy....that Ferrari is sooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo sexy. Regardless of speed, Ferrari > GT40. I can respect the engineering that went into making a car get to 60 in 3.3 sec, albeit with little understanding. But I mean come on, in the overall looks, presence, classiness categories.....THAT Ferrari wins 10x over.
The GT40 may be faster, A LOT faster, but yummy....that Ferrari is sooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo sexy. Regardless of speed, Ferrari > GT40. I can respect the engineering that went into making a car get to 60 in 3.3 sec, albeit with little understanding. But I mean come on, in the overall looks, presence, classiness categories.....THAT Ferrari wins 10x over.
Your comments above are 100% your opinion. You are entitled to your opinion and I won't challenge you on that, but on paper, the GT beats the Ferrari in every category that can have #'s attached (price, 0-60, 1/4, top speed, braking, skidpad, etc.)
In regards to looks, prestige, etc. many of those are held in the eye of the beholder. Personally, I also think the Ferrari is sexy, but to me, the GT looks every bit as good in a different way. The Ferrari is due for a redesign IMO. In regards to prestige, the GT's heritage means a lot to me.
Again, I'm entitled to my opinion just like you are to yours, but looking at the stats, the GT > Ferrari 360. No contest. In regards to the rest, each of us has our own opinion.
11-30-2003, 10:07 PM
#50
6 Forward 1 Back
Hot! Hot! Hot!! Look at that damn contact patch on the rear:
275/40ZR18
275/40ZR18
12-01-2003, 06:12 PM
#52
is Pretty Much a Moron
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Rochester, NY
Age: 38
Posts: 8,140
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
1 Post
Originally posted by cusdaddy
Everyone keeps calling it the GT40.. It's not the GT40. The GT40 was the racing car from the 60's... It's the Ford GT. Sorry, but it's just a little pet peeve of mine.
Your comments above are 100% your opinion. You are entitled to your opinion and I won't challenge you on that, but on paper, the GT beats the Ferrari in every category that can have #'s attached (price, 0-60, 1/4, top speed, braking, skidpad, etc.)
In regards to looks, prestige, etc. many of those are held in the eye of the beholder. Personally, I also think the Ferrari is sexy, but to me, the GT looks every bit as good in a different way. The Ferrari is due for a redesign IMO. In regards to prestige, the GT's heritage means a lot to me.
Again, I'm entitled to my opinion just like you are to yours, but looking at the stats, the GT > Ferrari 360. No contest. In regards to the rest, each of us has our own opinion.
Everyone keeps calling it the GT40.. It's not the GT40. The GT40 was the racing car from the 60's... It's the Ford GT. Sorry, but it's just a little pet peeve of mine.
Your comments above are 100% your opinion. You are entitled to your opinion and I won't challenge you on that, but on paper, the GT beats the Ferrari in every category that can have #'s attached (price, 0-60, 1/4, top speed, braking, skidpad, etc.)
In regards to looks, prestige, etc. many of those are held in the eye of the beholder. Personally, I also think the Ferrari is sexy, but to me, the GT looks every bit as good in a different way. The Ferrari is due for a redesign IMO. In regards to prestige, the GT's heritage means a lot to me.
Again, I'm entitled to my opinion just like you are to yours, but looking at the stats, the GT > Ferrari 360. No contest. In regards to the rest, each of us has our own opinion.
, of course.
01-20-2004, 06:55 PM
#57
-S namyaC-
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: TN
Age: 38
Posts: 4,099
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Ok, how do you figure this thing can keep up with a Mclaren? 
The F1 does 0-60 in 1/2sec less than this car, and has a top speed 40+mph faster. This is a kick ass car, but it's nothing like a car 10x it's price.
The F1 does 0-60 in 1/2sec less than this car, and has a top speed 40+mph faster. This is a kick ass car, but it's nothing like a car 10x it's price.
:crying:
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
