Kenwood or Alpine?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 17, 2005 | 11:37 AM
  #1  
termigator's Avatar
Thread Starter
BOSOX FAN IN SUNNY FL
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 79
Likes: 0
From: Orlando
Kenwood or Alpine?

I want to get a new head unit for my TL-S. I've narrowed it down to either the Kenwood KDC-MP828 or Alpine CDA-9853. Any opinions? Would like to hear the pros and cons of each. I know the Kenwood can play AAC files, but I don't even know what that is, so I don't know if that's something I might want down the road. The most important thing to me they play MP3's. I'll entertain all opinions!
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2005 | 11:39 AM
  #2  
elduderino's Avatar
VP Electricity
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 4,617
Likes: 8
From: Portland OR US
Of those two I'd go Alpine.
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2005 | 11:44 AM
  #3  
Jputt's Avatar
Audio Enthusiast
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 329
Likes: 0
From: SoCal
I would get the Alpine but beware of the "Glide Touch" some people love it and some hate it. Either way it will take a little getting used to.
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2005 | 11:58 AM
  #4  
dark inspire's Avatar
El Presidente
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 7,392
Likes: 1
From: SacTown n CowTown
Originally Posted by Jputt
I would get the Alpine but beware of the "Glide Touch" some people love it and some hate it. Either way it will take a little getting used to.

i have the 9855, i love it, but the glidetouch can get a lil frustrating at first
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2005 | 12:41 PM
  #5  
baboya96's Avatar
Cruising in ATL!!
20 Year Member
Liked
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 762
Likes: 12
From: Atlanta, GA
I went with Alpine 9830.. it was only 250 from crutchfield including metra kit and wiring harness. Can't beat that price not even on ebay... Haven't had a chance to install it yet, but I haven't heard any cons about alpine HU. From what I heard, 9830 is supposed to better than 9851 b/c it has more Voltage output or something. I dont' knwo if that's true for 9853. If it is, I would suggest 9830 or 9831 depending on your taste. Hope that helps
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2005 | 01:32 PM
  #6  
NICKTL's Avatar
Instructor
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 170
Likes: 0
Alpine.
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2005 | 03:56 PM
  #7  
D. Jeckle's Avatar
Mazda=redneckricer
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 297
Likes: 0
/////Alpine
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2005 | 04:45 PM
  #8  
dark inspire's Avatar
El Presidente
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 7,392
Likes: 1
From: SacTown n CowTown
Originally Posted by D. Jeckle
/////Alpine

Reply
Old Jun 17, 2005 | 05:53 PM
  #9  
ou sig's Avatar
Boomer SOONER
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 3,729
Likes: 14
From: McKinney, TX
Alpine for sure - I dont like the new Kenwood units at all - the display sucks and I dont like how the controls slide out - and Alpine decks really are some of the best in every category
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2005 | 07:12 PM
  #10  
termigator's Avatar
Thread Starter
BOSOX FAN IN SUNNY FL
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 79
Likes: 0
From: Orlando
Alpine seems the way to go, according the EVERYBODY. Are Kenwood units that bad or something?
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2005 | 07:13 PM
  #11  
dark inspire's Avatar
El Presidente
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 7,392
Likes: 1
From: SacTown n CowTown
Originally Posted by termigator
Alpine seems the way to go, according the EVERYBODY. Are Kenwood units that bad or something?

no, but given the option of gettin' an alpine its just about no contest
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2005 | 07:41 PM
  #12  
termigator's Avatar
Thread Starter
BOSOX FAN IN SUNNY FL
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 79
Likes: 0
From: Orlando
It's just as well. I already have a couple of Alpine amps sitting around waiting to be matched up with a head unit.
Reply
Old Jun 19, 2005 | 02:46 AM
  #13  
ed99's Avatar
9.5+10.5 22m=Hella Flush
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 3,106
Likes: 11
From: Canuck Town
This is a no brainer.....ALPINE all the way!!!!
Reply
Old Jun 19, 2005 | 12:06 PM
  #14  
termigator's Avatar
Thread Starter
BOSOX FAN IN SUNNY FL
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 79
Likes: 0
From: Orlando
So, exactly what is Alpine's "Bass Engine" feature? What does it do?
Reply
Old Jun 19, 2005 | 07:05 PM
  #15  
D. Jeckle's Avatar
Mazda=redneckricer
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 297
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by termigator
So, exactly what is Alpine's "Bass Engine" feature? What does it do?

!!!
Reply
Old Jun 19, 2005 | 07:07 PM
  #16  
dark inspire's Avatar
El Presidente
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 7,392
Likes: 1
From: SacTown n CowTown
Originally Posted by D. Jeckle
!!!

yeah somethin to that effect
Reply
Old Jun 20, 2005 | 02:16 PM
  #17  
Redemption's Avatar
I.L.W.U. Local 13
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
From: los angeles
Alpine
Reply
Old Jun 24, 2005 | 08:24 AM
  #18  
wilson8100's Avatar
8th Gear
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Alpine

AAC are the type of files that Itunes and Ipod can use.
Reply
Old Jun 24, 2005 | 09:13 AM
  #19  
dragon084's Avatar
1999 CL3.0
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 5,548
Likes: 4
From: Pasadena, CA
alpizz ine
Reply
Old Jun 24, 2005 | 09:37 AM
  #20  
elduderino's Avatar
VP Electricity
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 4,617
Likes: 8
From: Portland OR US
Kenwood has a rich tradition of being difficult to use and counter-intuitive to figure out.

The early MASK Excelon units rocked, though.

I think Alpine has slipped in the sub-$500 MSRP range or so, but still...
Reply
Old Jun 24, 2005 | 09:53 AM
  #21  
I'm Batman's Avatar
Boom goes the Dynamite
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,670
Likes: 0
From: Moore, SC
How about Eclipse?
Reply
Old Jun 24, 2005 | 10:23 AM
  #22  
quantmonkey's Avatar
Instructor
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 172
Likes: 0
From: 5280'
Originally Posted by I'm Batman
How about Eclipse?


fwiw Alpine's no longer as good a brand as it used to be.

Kenwood Excelon or Clarion ProAudio are about as good as (if not better ) Alpine.
Reply
Old Jun 24, 2005 | 01:03 PM
  #23  
D. Jeckle's Avatar
Mazda=redneckricer
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 297
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by quantmonkey
fwiw Alpine's no longer as good a brand as it used to be.
Kenwood Excelon or Clarion ProAudio are about as good as (if not better ) Alpine.
That's bullshit

No car stereo is as good as it used to be.
Alpine and Nak are the closest thing to old scool build quality that u can get.

Clarion....lol thats a fucking joke!
Don't pull that shit here!


It is tru that Alpine is hard to get used to but at least it all makes sense. Now if u have no idea what hertz are then u got a problem.
So read the manual!

Alpine > Nakamichi > Eclipse > kenwood > Pioneer > Clarion > Panasonic > Blaupunkt > Sony. Late!
Reply
Old Jun 24, 2005 | 02:43 PM
  #24  
elduderino's Avatar
VP Electricity
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 4,617
Likes: 8
From: Portland OR US
Originally Posted by D. Jeckle
That's bullshit

No car stereo is as good as it used to be.
Alpine and Nak are the closest thing to old scool build quality that u can get.

Clarion....lol thats a fucking joke!
Don't pull that shit here!


It is tru that Alpine is hard to get used to but at least it all makes sense. Now if u have no idea what hertz are then u got a problem.
So read the manual!

Alpine > Nakamichi > Eclipse > kenwood > Pioneer > Clarion > Panasonic > Blaupunkt > Sony. Late!
I would take a Clarion 9255 over any non-F#1 Status HU Alpine makes, personally.

I sell Nakamichi, and I think they sound great... but I also have a Sony 7715X with a 24-biut Burr Brown in it that sounds good.
Reply
Old Jun 24, 2005 | 03:05 PM
  #25  
dark inspire's Avatar
El Presidente
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 7,392
Likes: 1
From: SacTown n CowTown
Originally Posted by elduderino
I would take a Clarion 9255 over any non-F#1 Status HU Alpine makes, personally.

I sell Nakamichi, and I think they sound great... but I also have a Sony 7715X with a 24-biut Burr Brown in it that sounds good.

I thought the Sony ES line w/the Burr-Brown DAC was always really good. I've got one in the benz
Reply
Old Jun 24, 2005 | 04:46 PM
  #26  
D. Jeckle's Avatar
Mazda=redneckricer
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 297
Likes: 0
the Sony C-90 was the shit but back then a great hU was a dime a dozen.
And remember great sound is only part of what makes a deck great.
Reply
Old Jun 24, 2005 | 04:48 PM
  #27  
elduderino's Avatar
VP Electricity
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 4,617
Likes: 8
From: Portland OR US
Originally Posted by D. Jeckle
the Sony C-90 was the shit but back then a great hU was a dime a dozen.
And remember great sound is only part of what makes a deck great.
Thanks for the tip, Tom Brokaw : )

I liked the 7902. Double Oversampling was SO cool.
Reply
Old Jun 24, 2005 | 05:17 PM
  #28  
D. Jeckle's Avatar
Mazda=redneckricer
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 297
Likes: 0
There are some other decks out there that interest me but non of them supports bi-amping straight off the head. Not to mention have a second gen ipod input, 6ch time correction, 24db/oct xover, and a 5bnd perametric EQ all built in.
and were not even talking F1 yet.
Reply
Old Jun 28, 2005 | 02:34 PM
  #29  
quantmonkey's Avatar
Instructor
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 172
Likes: 0
From: 5280'
Originally Posted by D. Jeckle
There are some other decks out there that interest me but non of them supports bi-amping straight off the head...
I thought most high end decks will support this. I have a six year old Clarion ProAudio that will run three amps of the head unit.
Reply
Old Jun 30, 2005 | 02:07 AM
  #30  
UnBr0k3nH3r0's Avatar
Acura Cl N00B
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
From: O~Town
Apline because kenwood sucks
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
rp_guy
Member Cars for Sale
9
Jul 16, 2017 07:33 AM
jmaxima03
Member Cars for Sale
1
Sep 27, 2015 10:22 AM
Pegon95
3G TL Audio, Bluetooth, Electronics & Navigation
4
Sep 15, 2015 01:54 PM
yahelou
3G TL Audio, Bluetooth, Electronics & Navigation
1
Sep 6, 2015 09:12 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:43 PM.