Drag Race: TLX Type-S vs. Honda Accord
#1
Racer
Thread Starter
Drag Race: TLX Type-S vs. Honda Accord
The following users liked this post:
StealthTL-S (11-12-2021)
#2
Stay Out Of the Left Lane
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: SE Mass --- > Central VA --- > SE Mass
Age: 57
Posts: 8,955
Received 1,236 Likes
on
1,023 Posts
Interesting but no real surprises, right?
The following 6 users liked this post by NBP04TL4ME:
BEAR-AvHistory (11-11-2021),
KrylonBlue (11-11-2021),
MarcoTLX (11-11-2021),
RENARELLO (11-11-2021),
robnalex (11-11-2021),
and 1 others liked this post.
#4
What's the design language for those Accord mods? "Alibaba parts bin"?
#5
Suzuka Master
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Raleigh, NC - USA
Age: 82
Posts: 7,674
Received 2,599 Likes
on
1,581 Posts
2022 BMW M340i xDrive (Ordered)
2019 RDX - SH-AWD - Technology Package - White Diamond Pearl/Parchment
1997 Integra GS-R, 1999 TL
Another one to the very dark side?
#6
Burning Brakes
This is what should have happened but why does that Accord have a Toyota TRD wing? Embarrassing.
#7
Stay Out Of the Left Lane
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: SE Mass --- > Central VA --- > SE Mass
Age: 57
Posts: 8,955
Received 1,236 Likes
on
1,023 Posts
The following users liked this post:
loki (11-15-2021)
Trending Topics
#9
08 TL type-S
This shows just how fast that Type S is. it's pretty fast to beat the very quick Accord Sport like that. I really like my 21 TLX SH-AWD tech. I might trade my TLX for the type S next year if I can do it.....Why did you get rid of your TLX?
#10
The following users liked this post:
BEAR-AvHistory (11-12-2021)
#11
Family Hauler
Did anyone see there’s upcoming videos with the same TLX-S but against other vehicles? I believe one of them being the Infiniti Q50S; curious to see the outcome.
#12
AZ Community Team
Also, there’s a lot of haters and many Type S owners pulled out of the race so that group figured they were worried it would get whooped by an Accord. The thing is I keep seeing these same people say “a tuned Accord would beat the Type S”. The problem with that logic is that why would we race stock versus tuned to prove something? One would have to tune the Type S too, right?
#13
Suzuka Master
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Raleigh, NC - USA
Age: 82
Posts: 7,674
Received 2,599 Likes
on
1,581 Posts
The thought process was that the Accord was winning races most thought not possible and since the Type S was losing races to basically everything they ran with the Accord being faster too. I guess they thought the weight difference would make up for the performance gap.
Also, there’s a lot of haters and many Type S owners pulled out of the race so that group figured they were worried it would get whooped by an Accord. The thing is I keep seeing these same people say “a tuned Accord would beat the Type S”. The problem with that logic is that why would we race stock versus tuned to prove something? One would have to tune the Type S too, right?
Also, there’s a lot of haters and many Type S owners pulled out of the race so that group figured they were worried it would get whooped by an Accord. The thing is I keep seeing these same people say “a tuned Accord would beat the Type S”. The problem with that logic is that why would we race stock versus tuned to prove something? One would have to tune the Type S too, right?
Because the losers fans always say that which is as stupid as it sounds. Kind of like the guy that just got his butt royally kicked yelling Brandon as he runs away.
The following users liked this post:
KrylonBlue (11-12-2021)
#14
AZ Community Team
That does not work because the Honda was not beating the cars that the Acura was losing too. Most of us classified as haters, mostly car guys, understood that the Honda did not have the power or torque to win. Its best shot was the TLX.
Because the losers fans always say that which is as stupid as it sounds. Kind of like the guy that just got his butt royally kicked yelling Brandon as he runs away.
Because the losers fans always say that which is as stupid as it sounds. Kind of like the guy that just got his butt royally kicked yelling Brandon as he runs away.
But that’s not how some of those talking down on the Type S thought about it. I’ve read so many comment sections on his channel and it always turned into a “Type S is garbage” and how the competition was better in every way. I feel like these folks think the Type S is meant to be raw speed but it’s more of a well priced all around package. These same people saw the Accord winning so many races and then assumed Acura, due to it’s only victory coming against an ASPEC TLX at the time, that the Accord would make up it’s power differential with the loss of weight. Of course there were more logical people that said the Type S would win easily off the line but thought it would be closer on a roll but as we know the Type S did and should have won that too.
Everyone has a right to their preferences in what a car should be. For me Acura is a sport luxury brand that provides me good performance with comfort on its normal models. The Type S pumps the performance up to levels that provide way to have spirited drives but not so much track worthy. I’m not racing others so I don’t need 0-60 in 2 seconds as it seems others do. But if that’s their preference in a cars performance that’s okay too. Neither is wrong right?
Edit: To be clear I’m not referencing you when I mention these negative posters. Your points are 100% valid.
Last edited by KrylonBlue; 11-12-2021 at 09:24 PM.
#15
I agree with you.
But that’s not how some of those talking down on the Type S thought about it. I’ve read so many comment sections on his channel and it always turned into a “Type S is garbage” and how the competition was better in every way. I feel like these folks think the Type S is meant to be raw speed but it’s more of a well priced all around package. These same people saw the Accord winning so many races and then assumed Acura, due to it’s only victory coming against an ASPEC TLX at the time, that the Accord would make up it’s power differential with the loss of weight. Of course there were more logical people that said the Type S would win easily off the line but thought it would be closer on a roll but as we know the Type S did and should have won that too.
Everyone has a right to their preferences in what a car should be. For me Acura is a sport luxury brand that provides me good performance with comfort on its normal models. The Type S pumps the performance up to levels that provide way to have spirited drives but not so much track worthy. I’m not racing others so I don’t need 0-60 in 2 seconds as it seems others do. But if that’s their preference in a cars performance that’s okay too. Neither is wrong right?
Edit: To be clear I’m not referencing you when I mention these negative posters. Your points are 100% valid.
But that’s not how some of those talking down on the Type S thought about it. I’ve read so many comment sections on his channel and it always turned into a “Type S is garbage” and how the competition was better in every way. I feel like these folks think the Type S is meant to be raw speed but it’s more of a well priced all around package. These same people saw the Accord winning so many races and then assumed Acura, due to it’s only victory coming against an ASPEC TLX at the time, that the Accord would make up it’s power differential with the loss of weight. Of course there were more logical people that said the Type S would win easily off the line but thought it would be closer on a roll but as we know the Type S did and should have won that too.
Everyone has a right to their preferences in what a car should be. For me Acura is a sport luxury brand that provides me good performance with comfort on its normal models. The Type S pumps the performance up to levels that provide way to have spirited drives but not so much track worthy. I’m not racing others so I don’t need 0-60 in 2 seconds as it seems others do. But if that’s their preference in a cars performance that’s okay too. Neither is wrong right?
Edit: To be clear I’m not referencing you when I mention these negative posters. Your points are 100% valid.
The following 4 users liked this post by fiatlux:
#17
Suzuka Master
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Raleigh, NC - USA
Age: 82
Posts: 7,674
Received 2,599 Likes
on
1,581 Posts
I agree with you.
But that’s not how some of those talking down on the Type S thought about it. I’ve read so many comment sections on his channel and it always turned into a “Type S is garbage” and how the competition was better in every way. I feel like these folks think the Type S is meant to be raw speed but it’s more of a well priced all around package. These same people saw the Accord winning so many races and then assumed Acura, due to it’s only victory coming against an ASPEC TLX at the time, that the Accord would make up it’s power differential with the loss of weight. Of course there were more logical people that said the Type S would win easily off the line but thought it would be closer on a roll but as we know the Type S did and should have won that too.
Everyone has a right to their preferences in what a car should be. For me Acura is a sport luxury brand that provides me good performance with comfort on its normal models. The Type S pumps the performance up to levels that provide way to have spirited drives but not so much track worthy. I’m not racing others so I don’t need 0-60 in 2 seconds as it seems others do. But if that’s their preference in a cars performance that’s okay too. Neither is wrong right?
Edit: To be clear I’m not referencing you when I mention these negative posters. Your points are 100% valid.
But that’s not how some of those talking down on the Type S thought about it. I’ve read so many comment sections on his channel and it always turned into a “Type S is garbage” and how the competition was better in every way. I feel like these folks think the Type S is meant to be raw speed but it’s more of a well priced all around package. These same people saw the Accord winning so many races and then assumed Acura, due to it’s only victory coming against an ASPEC TLX at the time, that the Accord would make up it’s power differential with the loss of weight. Of course there were more logical people that said the Type S would win easily off the line but thought it would be closer on a roll but as we know the Type S did and should have won that too.
Everyone has a right to their preferences in what a car should be. For me Acura is a sport luxury brand that provides me good performance with comfort on its normal models. The Type S pumps the performance up to levels that provide way to have spirited drives but not so much track worthy. I’m not racing others so I don’t need 0-60 in 2 seconds as it seems others do. But if that’s their preference in a cars performance that’s okay too. Neither is wrong right?
Edit: To be clear I’m not referencing you when I mention these negative posters. Your points are 100% valid.
The following 4 users liked this post by BEAR-AvHistory:
#18
AZ Community Team
No problem. Personally never thought the TLX or the TLX-S is garbage or anything remotely resembling garbage. Have always tried to make the case it is a very good car poorly positioned by Acura's marketing department. My bitch is the Acura marketing department & the guys that take their words a gospel, if that makes me a hater so be it.
The following users liked this post:
MarcoTLX (11-13-2021)
#20
It also doesn't help when Sam (who used to comment here) called the previous Type S owners on his videos "pathetic" on his Youtube community page (he later deleted the comments), and then called them "scared" and "losers" on this most recent video.
The following 2 users liked this post by bilirubin:
KrylonBlue (11-13-2021),
WTF.Acura (11-15-2021)
The following users liked this post:
MarcoTLX (11-13-2021)
#22
Burning Brakes
Read the Youtube comments section on any of SamCarlegion's TLX videos, it's a viper pit of Type S haters. Some of the most popular comments claimed the Accord would beat the Type S on a roll (and a few even said from a dig).
It also doesn't help when Sam (who used to comment here) called the previous Type S owners on his videos "pathetic" on his Youtube community page (he later deleted the comments), and then called them "scared" and "losers" on this most recent video.
It also doesn't help when Sam (who used to comment here) called the previous Type S owners on his videos "pathetic" on his Youtube community page (he later deleted the comments), and then called them "scared" and "losers" on this most recent video.
The following 2 users liked this post by Kense:
BEAR-AvHistory (11-13-2021),
MarcoTLX (11-13-2021)
The following users liked this post:
KrylonBlue (11-13-2021)
#25
I think the truth is that there were more than a few members here hoping the Accord would be faster and used the possibilty as a bludgeon to trash the Type S. Yes, there was quite a bit of that here.
The following users liked this post:
WTF.Acura (11-15-2021)
#26
Suzuka Master
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Raleigh, NC - USA
Age: 82
Posts: 7,674
Received 2,599 Likes
on
1,581 Posts
Read the Youtube comments section on any of SamCarlegion's TLX videos, it's a viper pit of Type S haters. Some of the most popular comments claimed the Accord would beat the Type S on a roll (and a few even said from a dig).
It also doesn't help when Sam (who used to comment here) called the previous Type S owners on his videos "pathetic" on his Youtube community page (he later deleted the comments), and then called them "scared" and "losers" on this most recent video.
It also doesn't help when Sam (who used to comment here) called the previous Type S owners on his videos "pathetic" on his Youtube community page (he later deleted the comments), and then called them "scared" and "losers" on this most recent video.
BTW the people who expected the Honda to win do not understand much about performance cars or own a Honda looking for an underdog status lift. Best they could hope for was a close run, was not close.
The following 4 users liked this post by BEAR-AvHistory:
#27
Read the Youtube comments section on any of SamCarlegion's TLX videos, it's a viper pit of Type S haters. Some of the most popular comments claimed the Accord would beat the Type S on a roll (and a few even said from a dig).
It also doesn't help when Sam (who used to comment here) called the previous Type S owners on his videos "pathetic" on his Youtube community page (he later deleted the comments), and then called them "scared" and "losers" on this most recent video.
It also doesn't help when Sam (who used to comment here) called the previous Type S owners on his videos "pathetic" on his Youtube community page (he later deleted the comments), and then called them "scared" and "losers" on this most recent video.
The following users liked this post:
norsairius (11-14-2021)
#28
Sam just was very, very, unprofessional with those comments. Sort of pounds his credibility into the dirt. Like seeing the cars compete against each other but Slow Sam's comments are a good reason to cross him off my list.
BTW the people who expected the Honda to win do not understand much about performance cars or own a Honda looking for an underdog status lift. Best they could hope for was a close run, was not close.
BTW the people who expected the Honda to win do not understand much about performance cars or own a Honda looking for an underdog status lift. Best they could hope for was a close run, was not close.
The Type S will likely lose to the Redsport from a dig and roll (400hp and lighter curbweight), while it should be able to take the Tuned Civic and Kia K5 from a dig. A roll race with the two is a toss up though. The Kia has a greater HP-to-weight ratio, not sure about the Civic.
#29
Sam has some of the worst commentary and “catch phrases” in the business.
A typical Sam video:
Blows the launch in a faster car
“COME ON!!! WHAT??? Nooo… He is taking me! He is just GOING! You are kidding me! Are you ACTUALLY kidding me? No… He is GETTING me, he is GETTING me. Whatttt? He WENT! And he is just GONE. Wow.”
Other is one car length in front
A typical Sam video:
Blows the launch in a faster car
“COME ON!!! WHAT??? Nooo… He is taking me! He is just GOING! You are kidding me! Are you ACTUALLY kidding me? No… He is GETTING me, he is GETTING me. Whatttt? He WENT! And he is just GONE. Wow.”
Other is one car length in front
The following 7 users liked this post by fiatlux:
BEAR-AvHistory (11-14-2021),
bilirubin (11-14-2021),
KrylonBlue (11-14-2021),
MarcoTLX (11-14-2021),
pyrodan007 (11-14-2021),
and 2 others liked this post.
#30
Burning Brakes
Sam gets killed by nearly every car brand owner. I remember when he drove a brand new G80 M3 and wasn’t impressed with the power lol. He got killed by BMW owners. The car wasn’t even broken in yet.
The following 4 users liked this post by Kense:
BEAR-AvHistory (11-14-2021),
KrylonBlue (11-14-2021),
norsairius (11-14-2021),
WTF.Acura (11-15-2021)
#31
AZ Community Team
Sam has some of the worst commentary and “catch phrases” in the business.
A typical Sam video:
Blows the launch in a faster car
“COME ON!!! WHAT??? Nooo… He is taking me! He is just GOING! You are kidding me! Are you ACTUALLY kidding me? No… He is GETTING me, he is GETTING me. Whatttt? He WENT! And he is just GONE. Wow.”
Other is one car length in front
A typical Sam video:
Blows the launch in a faster car
“COME ON!!! WHAT??? Nooo… He is taking me! He is just GOING! You are kidding me! Are you ACTUALLY kidding me? No… He is GETTING me, he is GETTING me. Whatttt? He WENT! And he is just GONE. Wow.”
Other is one car length in front
The following 4 users liked this post by KrylonBlue:
#32
Suzuka Master
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Raleigh, NC - USA
Age: 82
Posts: 7,674
Received 2,599 Likes
on
1,581 Posts
Looks like Sam will be releasing videos of the TLX Type S vs the Q50 Redsport, Tuned Civic 1.5T CVT, and a Kia K5 GT. Keep in mind the Tuned Civic CVT is no joke, it already beat a stock Civic Type R in a previous video.
The Type S will likely lose to the Redsport from a dig and roll (400hp and lighter curbweight), while it should be able to take the Tuned Civic and Kia K5 from a dig. A roll race with the two is a toss up though. The Kia has a greater HP-to-weight ratio, not sure about the Civic.
Have had no issues with his TLX TLX-S tests do far as they are factory stock vs factory stock. One test, having a brain fart, looked a bit off to me as the car seemed to run quite a bit better than stock against Sam, or maybe it was just Slow Sam screwing up his launches. Would not be shocked if some ringers get in the mix. That's why they should run clocks or at minimum a Dragy in both cars.
Kia could be a good race depending on what version shows up. K5-GT 290/311 should be the one to run. Biggest issue can the FWD launch without breaking traction.
The following users liked this post:
bilirubin (11-14-2021)
#33
Sam has some of the worst commentary and “catch phrases” in the business.
A typical Sam video:
Blows the launch in a faster car
“COME ON!!! WHAT??? Nooo… He is taking me! He is just GOING! You are kidding me! Are you ACTUALLY kidding me? No… He is GETTING me, he is GETTING me. Whatttt? He WENT! And he is just GONE. Wow.”
Other is one car length in front
A typical Sam video:
Blows the launch in a faster car
“COME ON!!! WHAT??? Nooo… He is taking me! He is just GOING! You are kidding me! Are you ACTUALLY kidding me? No… He is GETTING me, he is GETTING me. Whatttt? He WENT! And he is just GONE. Wow.”
Other is one car length in front
The following users liked this post:
silverTL6 (11-27-2021)
#34
Suzuka Master
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Raleigh, NC - USA
Age: 82
Posts: 7,674
Received 2,599 Likes
on
1,581 Posts
this is exactly why I could never be a YouTuber. People criticizing you for the stupidest things… just makes no senses to me. Who cares… he’s putting out pretty decent content that you’re not seeing everywhere else. Obviously his races aren’t prefect and he doesn’t claim to be.
His content is not unique & other do it correctly. People who can't take criticism should all just stay in their mothers basements where its safe. Mommy will not criticize them thats why they stay there. Maybe they should have been involved in competitive sports, without participation trophy's when the were young. They would have developed a spine & be better persons for it when the coach Kindly Suggests that they might do something this way instead of screwing it up .
Think a big failing has been the elimination of the draft. First week in basic would have been a real eye opener for many individuals. Criticism from a DI is an art form. Maybe not keep then in for two years but just run them the Basic & Advance program. After 16/20 weeks you would have young people in good shape self-sufficient & able to take care of themselves.
Last edited by BEAR-AvHistory; 11-14-2021 at 08:36 PM.
#35
Sam just was very, very, unprofessional with those comments. Sort of pounds his credibility into the dirt. Like seeing the cars compete against each other but Slow Sam's comments are a good reason to cross him off my list.
BTW the people who expected the Honda to win do not understand much about performance cars or own a Honda looking for an underdog status lift. Best they could hope for was a close run, was not close.
BTW the people who expected the Honda to win do not understand much about performance cars or own a Honda looking for an underdog status lift. Best they could hope for was a close run, was not close.
The following 2 users liked this post by loki:
BEAR-AvHistory (11-15-2021),
WTF.Acura (11-15-2021)
#36
Senior Moderator
#37
He refuses to use dragy or show any instrumented times because he knows he'll be exposed. The couple of times he did show the numbers, it revealed ended up being a second slower than the magazine times, which he used as justification for not continuing to show the numbers. Not only is he a clown, but he's wholly incompetant as an automative reviewer. The drag races might be fun to watch, but given the lack of consistency and robust testing procedures that's all they're good for.
The following 2 users liked this post by fiatlux:
BEAR-AvHistory (11-15-2021),
bilirubin (11-15-2021)
#38
He refuses to use dragy or show any instrumented times because he knows he'll be exposed. The couple of times he did show the numbers, it revealed ended up being a second slower than the magazine times, which he used as justification for not continuing to show the numbers. Not only is he a clown, but he's wholly incompetant as an automative reviewer. The drag races might be fun to watch, but given the lack of consistency and robust testing procedures that's all they're good for.
#39
But, aren’t his races a fair representation of what would happen on the street in an impromptu race? There’s one thing being fast if you can engage launch control as opposed to your normal stop light run. Granted running a quarter mile would make up for a slow start yet the opportunity to race someone for a quarter mile while out running your errands or even driving on the interstate can’t be more than 1% of the entire length of ownership. I completely understand the allure of sitting in the knowledge that you have a potentially faster car, but in reality it’s a pissing contest that takes place more in your head than on the road.
#40
Suzuka Master
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Raleigh, NC - USA
Age: 82
Posts: 7,674
Received 2,599 Likes
on
1,581 Posts
But, aren’t his races a fair representation of what would happen on the street in an impromptu race? There’s one thing being fast if you can engage launch control as opposed to your normal stop light run. Granted running a quarter mile would make up for a slow start yet the opportunity to race someone for a quarter mile while out running your errands or even driving on the interstate can’t be more than 1% of the entire length of ownership. I completely understand the allure of sitting in the knowledge that you have a potentially faster car, but in reality it’s a pissing contest that takes place more in your head than on the road.
Also I don't except that a poor start can be made up in a 1/4 mile race. Over the years I have beaten any number of cars that actually turned in a quicker 1/4 time. That why they print the reaction & 60ft times on the time slip.
Last edited by BEAR-AvHistory; 11-15-2021 at 07:44 PM.
The following 4 users liked this post by BEAR-AvHistory: